Jan. 23, 2008

24 Governors Make Their Presidential Picks

Clinton Leads With 10 Endorsements; Some Say Support Of State Leaders No Longer Crucial

  • Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius delivers her State of the State address Monday, Jan. 14, 2008 at the Kansas Statehouse in Topeka, Kan. The Democrat has yet to endorse any presidential candidate, and her support as a party powerhouse will be coveted.

    Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius delivers her State of the State address Monday, Jan. 14, 2008 at the Kansas Statehouse in Topeka, Kan. The Democrat has yet to endorse any presidential candidate, and her support as a party powerhouse will be coveted.  (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

  • Play CBS Video Video Slugfest At S.C. Dem Debate

    Dean Reynolds reports on the tough talk and accusations among Sens. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards in the Democratic presidential debate. Bob Schieffer says it didn't help anybody.

  • Video Democratic Debate Losers

    Bob Schieffer speaks with Harry Smith on the effects of the testy South Carolina Democratic debate. Jeff Greenfield says the sharp exchanges don't bode well for Sen. Barack Obama.

  • Quiz Candidates Quiz

    Test your knowledge of the presidential contenders.

  • Interactive Candidates On Display

    The life stories, positions, and personalities of the people who would be president

(AP)  Twenty-four of the country's governors have endorsed a presidential candidate at a time when their support matters most, lending their names, fundraising and organizing machinery to campaigns desperate for an edge in the primaries.

Among Democrats, Hillary Rodham Clinton leads with 10 endorsements, including Wednesday's nod from Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania. She also has support from New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and Gov. Ted Strickland of Ohio, the state that sealed President Bush's victory in 2004.

A governor's endorsement can be campaign gold since governors have a built-in bully pulpit they can use to promote a candidate and their own grass-roots organizing and fundraising networks to share.

Come the general election, it's natural for governors to support their party's nominee, and voters take it for granted. That makes governors' backing particularly important now, in the primary and caucus stage of the campaign.

"Voters in the primaries and caucuses are trying to make decisions among candidates that they generally prefer, so those choices tend to be harder," said Paul Beck, an Ohio State University political scientist. "There, a governor's endorsement can be useful."

The endorsement game started early. A year ago, seven governors already had announced their support for candidates, including Indiana's Mitch Daniels for John McCain, Missouri's Matt Blunt for Mitt Romney and Illinois' Rod Blagojevich for Barack Obama.

Despite the jockeying for endorsements, governors' backing has probably declined in importance over the years, said David Webber, a political scientist at the University of Missouri-Columbia. That's due in part to a weakening of state political organizations and in part to today's information overload, from blogs to 24-hour news channels.

"People are waiting for (broadcaster) Lou Dobbs to endorse someone," Webber said. "I'm not sure governors have as much clout as they did 25 or 40 years ago."

Obama has five endorsements, including the support of Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, the nation's only black governor and a one-time top official at the Justice Department during the Clinton administration.

On the GOP side, McCain has four endorsements to Romney's three. Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, has support so far from only one governor, Mike Rounds of South Dakota. Gov. Rick Perry of Texas is the only governor to endorse former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

Some prominent endorsements are missing from governors whose states are among the two dozen that hold primary or caucus contests on Feb. 5, when 1,678 of the 2,025 delegates needed to win the Democratic nomination and 1,038 of the 1,191 delegates need to win the Republican nomination are at stake.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of California, the biggest prize on Feb. 5, has yet to back a candidate, though he's met personally with McCain, Giuliani and Romney and talked to Huckabee by phone.

He recently said he will endorse eventually, but for now is focusing on the state's influence in the primary.

"Now we have power, now they have to come our way," Schwarzenegger said recently. "California is a very powerful state, and for the first time in decades we can now be part of the decision-making process."

One of the most coveted endorsements will come from Kansas' Democratic Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, a party star whose name surfaced four years ago as a possible running mate for John Kerry. She has been contacted multiple times by the top Democratic candidates.

Until recently, Sebelius was holding off until she appoints a new Kansas attorney general. Last week she was tapped to give the Democratic response to Bush's State of the Union address, further delaying her announcement.

Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican, has also not backed anyone though he is not ruling out an announcement. Florida's primary is Jan. 29.

"Just because a governor says this is who I'm supporting, I don't know that that really means that people are going to follow that guidance," Crist said.

Republican governors held the majority of states in 2000 and 2004, helping propel Bush to the White House. Democrats held the majority when Bill Clinton won election in 1992.

Such party control doesn't always translate to presidential success. Clinton won re-election over Republican Bob Dole in 1996 when GOP governors held a 33-17 edge.

Democratic governors have a 28-22 advantage this year, having regained the majority last year after 12 years of GOP dominance.


Presidential candidates and the governors who have endorsed them:

Republicans:

Rudy Giuliani:

  • Rick Perry of Texas

    Mike Huckabee:

  • Mike Rounds of South Dakota

    John McCain:

  • Mitch Daniels of Indiana

  • Jon Huntsman of Utah

  • Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota

  • Jim Douglas of Vermont

    Mitt Romney:

  • Matt Blunt of Missouri

  • Don Carcieri of Rhode Island

  • Dave Heineman of Nebraska


    Democrats:

    Hillary Rodham Clinton:

  • Ruth Ann Minner of Delaware

  • Jon Corzine of New Jersey

  • Eliot Spitzer of New York

  • Martin O'Malley of Maryland

  • John Baldacci of Maine

  • Mike Beebe of Arkansas

  • Jennifer Granholm of Michigan

  • Ted Strickland of Ohio

  • Ted Kulongoski of Oregon

  • Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania

    Barack Obama:

  • Deval Patrick of Massachusetts

  • Rod Blagojevich of Illinois

  • Tim Kaine of Virginia

  • Jim Doyle of Wisconsin

  • Janet Napolitano of Arizona

    © MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
    Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


    Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
    by robert_orme January 24, 2008 11:33 PM EST
    Well here we go idiots running states that want a woman who has made the statement that she would make oil companies for thier high prices.........wake up america and look and the prices of fuel in New York another Clinton liar in the White House 4 more years of lies.This country needs a real leader willing to make this country what we claim it is...........
    Reply to this comment
    by hwy71so January 24, 2008 11:32 AM EST
    Rick Perry''s pick doesn''t surprise me one bit. Two peas in a pod right there.
    Reply to this comment
    by joeshields56 January 24, 2008 12:32 AM EST
    Disappointed in Rendell. But then maybe he''s playing for 2012. Knows Hillary will lose to McCain... McCain will self-destruct with the Iraq war still out of control four years later... and Rendell can ride in on his white horse.

    OR... we, the people can see for ourselves that this time we are in a big enough mess that needs to be solved NOW and that it will take an extraordinary person to lead us out of it. We are fortunate enough to have such a leader in Barack Obama. If only America can be smart enough to not let him get away.
    Reply to this comment
    by rowdytexan2 January 23, 2008 9:02 PM EST
    Yeah, how come he hasn''t been invited back on the Oprah show so they can wave at the audience together!!!

    Or did Oprah too just get notice of his connection with the slumlord in south Chicago?
    Reply to this comment
    by prayerman3 January 23, 2008 8:05 PM EST
    From Newsmax.com
    Obama is referring to a debunked chain e-mail circulating widely on the Internet that suggests he is hiding his Islamic roots and may be a terrorist in disguise. It says he was sworn into the Senate on the Quran and turns his back on the flag during the pledge.

    There are some truths in the e-mail''''''''s details. Obama''''''''s middle name is Hussein. His father and stepfather were Muslim. And he spent part of his childhood in Indonesia, a largely Muslim country. But he attended secular and Catholic schools, not a radical madrassa.

    From Prayman3

    Why didn''''''''t Obama tell everyone that he lived in Indonesia where Muslims live. He has something to hide not telling everyone about this. For him to say trust him , this is where I hope everyone who supports him better think twice for him to hide this. What else does he have to hide??????

    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 January 23, 2008 8:01 PM EST
    FORMER Queensland Premier Peter Beattie will spend the next six months at the University of South Carolina lecturing students on politics and investment etc.

    I am just wondering how can you guys trust the governors or any one who has anything to do with politics when they take a man from Australia (Mr Beatie) who has run his own state in Australia, (Queensland)down the drain. Queensland schools, hospitals, mental health, roads, police, education are in one hell of a mess even though Australia has been running through a massive boom time for 12 years, and Queensland has had a boom in its minerals. Even though more money than ever before has been pouring into the state for 12 years from the housing boom but now it is in the process of loosing its rating just because of the way he ran his state when he was premier. How can an American university ask a man like this who is a failure to lecture on politics and economic, it is just a laugh. No matter how good or bad a person is, we all know what the media can do when it is so bias, thus he only got into government because the media wrote the alternative up as stupid, and because of the vote rigging .. When the GST tax system came into Australia the states were supposed to get rid of the Stamp duty which worked out to be about $10.000 per house bought, but they didn''t get rid of it thus giving themselves a river of money, and he still couldn''t make a success of the state it is in a hell of a mess.
    Reply to this comment
    by gunownerdan January 23, 2008 6:06 PM EST
    If the Clintons do somehow lie and cheat their way back into the whitehouse, how many more interns will Bill rape and molest?
    Now that he will be first laddy , old "Slick Willie" is going to have a lot more free time on his hands...
    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 January 23, 2008 5:42 PM EST
    I can see the wing nut crowd is getting nervous more and more each day.

    Let me see the c.rap is hitting the fan with the Republicans and all they can worry about is a B.J. Bill got.
    Reply to this comment
    by angelina005 January 23, 2008 5:31 PM EST
    Do people in this country love Dynastys/Monarchy?

    Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton (Hill and Bill) then... later Clinton (Chelsea)

    as an independent voter,a woman, a legal immigrant and a citizen for many many years, a professionaland just a simple individual this negativity makes me sick. The attacks, rumors, personal remarks by Bill and Hill on Senator Obama and at times on other i ndividuals, show who they are. the negative campaign brought about by the Billary people _ gives my vote to the Republicans if Senator Obama or other candidate is not nominated. She and her husband had their time and what did they accomplished besides him having *** with an intern, and she learning to be a bitter and agressive woman?
    We deserve better.
    35 years have passed and nothing was accomplished, now for the next 35 we would like change and opportunity for others.

    we do not want: Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton (BILLARY) Clinton (CHelsea)
    monarchies have been gone for a long time...
    Reply to this comment
    by madashell4lo January 23, 2008 4:03 PM EST
    I''ll never understand why Hillary did not kick Bill to the curb when good o''l Monica and Bill gave us a new definition for the word "is is". Even if this had been the first is-is, and it was not, my wife would be my X wife and I would be at the curb minus a few body parts. I am sorry that this comment sounds like sleze and bringing up the past, yet it does come into play when Hillary rants about her experience. I guess it is what it is. Bill did take his side of the case to the public forum when he swore to us that " I never had sexual relations with that woman". Now we are asked to accept and/or forget what happened the last time these two were in the W.H.. I can not. Some one somewhere has brought up the phrase "fairy tale". I can see why Bill wants back in. I do not think Hillary wants him in the House of is is.
    Reply to this comment
    by pepperp1 January 23, 2008 2:56 PM EST
    Posted by CHERYLEH911 at 11:10 AM : Jan 23, 2008


    Wha Whah Bill got a blower....nah nah nah, seems like non black pols may have their own trust issues going with your community going forward as you suggest.


    Reply to this comment
    by pepperp1 January 23, 2008 2:12 PM EST

    dont buy the lie that Repugs want to run against Senator Clinton they absolutely do not they want an unknown swift boater victim to run against in 08 one without a defense other that boo hoo they are being mean and trampling on HOPE, America knows Senator Clinton she had a seventy million dollar background check conducted by a rabid foaming partisan prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is more talented

    For weeks now, the Republican National Committee has been circulating Rezko clips about Obama relationship to the indicted political operative


    they had to knew Rezko trial was coming up right after super Tuesday where Dems could have made a fatal error with out all the date, and I just don%u2019t accept they didn%u2019t know that Obama was the unnamed pol mentioned in the indictment according to the Chic Sun Times lets recall the political corruption of the DOJ for political indictments the firing of the 8 USA who did not play along in the 2006 election%u2026%u2026%u2026.Rove will be very disappointed if Senator Clinton is the nominee don%u2019t let them con you


    Reply to this comment
    by cheryleh911 January 23, 2008 2:10 PM EST
    For all of the bickering going on from the Clinton''s toward Barack Obama, I think that as an African American woman, we only voted for Bill Clinton because we felt he was the lesser of two evils when he ran against Bush. We had no better then, so we could not do better. Now that we have Mr. Obama, we should as African Americans do better by voting for him. Has everyone forgotten that Mr. Clinton who is vehemently attacking Mr. Obama was impeached for having *** in the Oval office, the highest office in the land. How can one excuse all of the scandals caused by the Clinton''s; one would think that the American people are not thinking with a stable mentality to forget such embarrassment to us from the rest of the world because because of his lustful actions. Look at the history of the Clinton''s underhanded land deals, i.e. Rose law firm activities. It is time for the political arena to give a new and fresh face the opportunity to see if it is politics as usual, or real concern for we the people. I think the best choice we have is Obama, who has had the honor of both seeing America through the Caucasian as well as African American spectrum. Impeachment; Vince Foster; Ms. Flowers; Ms. Jones, how much more do we need? Our opportunity is now, not 4 or 8 more years of of greed and monarchy.

    VOTE OBAMA 08''
    Reply to this comment
    by nolalou January 23, 2008 1:34 PM EST
    I think endorsements by governors might help with fund raising, but I can''t believe it effects many votes. I don''t care who my governor supports, I vote based on my own opinion of the candidates, and where they stand on the issues important to me.
    Reply to this comment
    by demslie January 23, 2008 1:34 PM EST
    When Hillary Clinton worked for the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas, she invested one thousand dollars in a real estate scheme and got back one hundred thousand in less than six months. Like all the "big" investors, she made tons of money just weeks before the real estate company went bankrupt and most small investors lost everything. If this had been a republican, Congress would still be investigating. But Hillary gets a pass from democraps.
    Reply to this comment
    by fettkonserv January 23, 2008 1:22 PM EST
    These Unclean Governors will see the light and insist that we should Make President George Bush permanent as well as the tax cuts that have helped so many of the unworthy wicked poor mixed race people.
    Reply to this comment
    by merge98fm January 23, 2008 1:10 PM EST
    Well I''m torn between Ron Paul and Steve Kubby, maybe Barack Obama, but so far I''m not impressed with what CBS is giving us. Remember Hilary Clinton = Iran War
    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 January 23, 2008 12:15 PM EST
    The Republicans swept so much *** under the carpet and now they are beginning to feel the wait.

    The Republicans should have stopped the administration when the 2006 vote came in. Now with all the *** that is oozing out the first journalist to grab the best story will go down as a great but soon it will be a feeding frenzy for the GOP.

    This should be a lesson to all you can not hide it forever.

    Furthermore, the politicians must realize that they are slaves and nothing more. They must do our will not theirs or their parties.
    Reply to this comment
    by perception5 January 23, 2008 11:58 AM EST
    America is the largest enterprise in the world. Who do you want running that "enterprise"?

    For me it''s easy...................Mitt Romney is clearly the most qualified candidate running from either party in 2008.

    Do we really what another "lawyer" running our economy?

    Washington DC is broken and Mitt Romney has the vast cross-funtional experience in the private, non-profit, and public sector to "FIX" these lingering problems and issues.

    It'' time for Mitt Romney.....................................GO MITT !
    Reply to this comment
    by neobrian-2009 January 23, 2008 11:23 AM EST
    I couldn''''t vote for her even if she ran unopposed. Sorry, there''''s way too much sleze factor that''''s well hid out of sight.

    Posted by gunnerv1 at 07:52 AM : Jan 23, 2008
    ===========================
    SUCH an OPEN-MINDLESS SHRUBBIE !
    The World IS Crumbling & Listen to this IDIOT!
    Reply to this comment
    See all 24 Comments
  • Exclusive Webshow

    Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

    Latest News
    News in Pictures
    Scroll Left Scroll Right
    Connect with CBS News

    Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications:

    What do you think of President-elect Obama picking Hillary Clinton for his Cabinet?
     Brilliant
     Risky
     Awful