February 11, 2009 3:33 PM

Study: "False Pretenses" Led U.S. To War

(AP)  A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study concluded that the statements "were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses."

The study was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism.

White House spokesman Scott Stanzel did not comment on the merits of the study Tuesday night but reiterated the administration's position that the world community viewed Iraq's leader, Saddam Hussein, as a threat.

"The actions taken in 2003 were based on the collective judgment of intelligence agencies around the world," Stanzel said.

The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Mr. Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to al Qaeda or both.

"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al Qaeda," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members, writing an overview of the study. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."

Named in the study along with Mr. Bush were top officials of the administration during the period studied: Vice President Dick Cheney, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan.

Mr. Bush led with 259 false statements, 231 about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 28 about Iraq's links to al Qaeda, the study found. That was second only to Powell's 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al Qaeda.

The center said the study was based on a database created with public statements over the two years beginning on Sept. 11, 2001, and information from more than 25 government reports, books, articles, speeches and interviews.

"The cumulative effect of these false statements - amplified by thousands of news stories and broadcasts - was massive, with the media coverage creating an almost impenetrable din for several critical months in the run-up to war," the study concluded.

"Some journalists - indeed, even some entire news organizations - have since acknowledged that their coverage during those prewar months was far too deferential and uncritical. These mea culpas notwithstanding, much of the wall-to-wall media coverage provided additional, 'independent' validation of the Bush administration's false statements about Iraq," it said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 1046 Comments
by ioweign January 26, 2008 3:21 AM EST
It is always the best policy to tell the truth, unless, of course, you are an exceptionally good liar.
Jerome K. Jerome


They still don''t get it...
Reply to this comment
by speakinup January 25, 2008 5:49 PM EST
MCVet - you didn''t answer the question, did you ?

Nope!

Why ?

I''ll tell you why - because you don''t have a reasonable answer.


So, you are saying Bush lied to get us there, but yor silence on why he won''t CYA by planting WDMs contradicts yor first statement.

You big lie theory - as well as Hillary''s reference to how the Republicans have created a "vast conspiricy" are nothing more than lies themselves - propped up by Soros''s money.

Now, you are probably ignorant and well meaning, but never-the-less a tool of Soros''s.





BTW, I got a kick out of how you called me a ''cultist'' and in the same breath say, "Sieg Heil Bush". It shows just what the far left is like - hypocritical, ignorant, and want to stay that way.
Reply to this comment
by slpdisk January 25, 2008 2:16 PM EST
You can not correct a wrong with a wrong!
Reply to this comment
by slpdisk January 25, 2008 2:15 PM EST
You people like good little sheep tend to stray from the subject, which is these criminals lead us into an illegal war based on lies to get the American peoples cooperation. Here let me give you an example. From the sanctions placed on Iraq after gulf war,our government led the oil for food scandal which as of today has caused starvation and sickness killing over 1.5 million Iraqi civilians mostly children. Does that give another country the right to attack us and illegally occupy america?
Reply to this comment
by mcvet January 25, 2008 11:39 AM EST
Let un not forget the he Mass murdered the Northeren Kurds with Poison Gas ( I do belive that that would be considered a WMD!)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by gunnerv1 at 03:53 PM : Jan 24, 2008
+ report abuse

Where did Saddam get that gas? Hummm?? PLEASE go to the site that has the 935 LIES posted and tell us WHICH of those are actually TRUTH. If you, as everyone else can''t find one, then have a LITTLE honor about you for goodness sake! Bush LIED us into a war that had NOTHING to do with the attacks on us... The "Front for the War on Terror"? It was a LIE man... you don''t have to be a rocket scientist to figure this out... it''s all laid out for you in BLACK and WHITE... it''s right there with dates, places, names... it''s all right there! Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by mcvet January 25, 2008 11:36 AM EST
Hey ANYONE - IF YOU CLAIM BUSH LIED TO GET US INTO IRAQ LIKE THIS "non-profit" report advocates,

WHY DIDN''''T BUSH PLANT WDMs IN IRAQ TO VINDICATE HIMSELF ?

That would seem to be the obvious next step.

Did I just hear the far left (Soros) house of cards fall ?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by speakinup at 06:05 PM : Jan 24, 2008
+ report abuse

Now look we have to give you some space here because you are a cultist but come on!! I have pulled up EVERY one of the LIES told, they are VERY specific with dates, times and Names, as to why they are, without a doubt LIES! NO one in the Reich has come forward to contradict even ONE of the lies so what is YOUR problem. Because you aren''t intelligent enough to admit you were lied to we should just ignore the reality? Because some folks YOU may not agree with contributed to the group doing the data search we should just ignore the reality? That''s crazy!! Sieg Heil Bush!
Reply to this comment
by robert_orme January 24, 2008 11:42 PM EST
This what is wrong with this country is we want to focus on one man and leave out the masses that had to vote for this and it was a mixture of both political parties and this is a shame that we have no good choices for president and one who has proven that she is only after money and we need a special group in government who will do the job that these clown collect a hand out for that we call senators and house of representives......One we will wake up and wonder where freedom and our rights have went at that point we will not be able to fight back without alot lf losses wake up America.
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 24, 2008 11:10 PM EST
speakinup...you cant be that stupid thet would notice it was a USA bomb and they would undermine our whole nuclear program it''s not like a bullet where one fita all they can tell by constuction where it came from even shrub isn''t that stupid tgough he nay have thought of it,
Reply to this comment
by speakinup January 24, 2008 9:05 PM EST
Hey ANYONE - IF YOU CLAIM BUSH LIED TO GET US INTO IRAQ LIKE THIS "non-profit" report advocates,

WHY DIDN''T BUSH PLANT WDMs IN IRAQ TO VINDICATE HIMSELF ?

That would seem to be the obvious next step.

Did I just hear the far left (Soros) house of cards fall ?
Reply to this comment
by gunnerv1 January 24, 2008 6:53 PM EST
Let un not forget the he Mass murdered the Northeren Kurds with Poison Gas ( I do belive that that would be considered a WMD!)
Reply to this comment
See all 1046 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook