Fewer U.S. Soldiers Have H.S. Diplomas
Report: Demand Creates Concern Over Declining Number Of "High-Quality" Recruits
-
The Army has not met its goal of 90 percent high school graduates since 2004, according to a report released Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2008. (AP / file)
-
Interactive Military 101 Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.
National Priorities Project, a research group that analyzes federal data, found that nearly 71 percent of Army recruits graduated from high school in the 2007 budget year. It based its findings on data it obtained from the Defense Department through a Freedom of Information Act request.
All troops must have a high school diploma or an equivalent degree. The military prefers that they have a high school diploma because its studies have shown they are more likely to finish an enlistment term. Still, the Army has paid for some recruits to take GED preparation classes and take the test.
The Army's goal is 90 percent high school graduates, which it hasn't met since 2004. Each year since, the number of recruits with at least a high school diploma has steadily declined.
Douglas Smith, spokesman for the Army Recruiting Command at Fort Knox, Ky., acknowledged it has been a difficult recruiting environment. He said overall high school graduation rates are declining, which could be a factor.
Strained, in part, by military operations in Afghanistan following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the military has had to increase the number of waivers and raise enlistment bonuses to fill its ranks.
"Every soldier that we put in the Army is qualified," Smith said. "We don't put unqualified people in the Army, but it's something we're watching."
The National Priorities Project said the percent of "high-quality" recruits - those with a high school diploma who scored in the top half on the military's qualification test - declined from budget years 2004 to 2007. In that period, the number of high-quality recruits fell from about 61 percent to nearly 45 percent, the group said.
It also found that in the 2007 budget year, upper middle- and high-income neighborhoods were underrepresented by an even larger margin than three years earlier.
The Army has been under growing pressure to strengthen recruiting as part of an ongoing effort to increase its size.
Every soldier that we put in the Army is qualified. We don't put unqualified people in the Army, but it's something we're watching.
Douglas SmithU.S. Army spokesman
In September, Defense Secretary Robert Gates told reporters he'd like the see the percent of recruits with a high school diploma increase. He said he was reluctant to accelerate an expansion of the force that would lead to a lowering of recruitment standards.
Paul Boyce, an Army spokesman, said recruitment has been strong in the first four months of this budget year.
© MVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- Keithle,
My experience is that parents can''t make teenagers do anything, or stop them from doing anything. Parents can talk ''til they drop, threaten, ground, whatever. And if you strike a teenage boy he will strike back. Girls will sneak out and lie. I''m not talking about welfare moms. I''ve seen it with hardworking taxpayers'' kids. A fairly high percentage are uncontrollable.
gunnerv1,
Public schools are free to the student. If you are involved is some type of taxpayer revolt, don''t make public schools the target. Public schools are the only way to educate the majority of kids. - Reply to this comment
- Klingon69 Where do you get that it was free. We''er paying out the wazoo taxes for your "free" education. The tax wars are a coming.
- Reply to this comment
- Why do parents let their son/daughter drop out of high school? Makes no sense. That shouldn''t even be an option. Without a high school diploma, you might as well move to the park & live with the homeless people. If you''re a girl, you might as well find a street corner downtown & start twirling your "Hello Kitty" purse.
- Reply to this comment
- Many young men that entered the military during WWII and other conflicts didn''t have high school educations either. But the military made them better men and eventually better citizens. The military has nothing to be ashamed of. The military is a great place to learn responsibility and maturity. If these young men feel this is an opportunity for them, give them a chance.
- Reply to this comment
- SgtRDS,
You sound like a good ole boy. But I still contend a teenager is better off staying in school. The average high school senior is 17 to 18 years old. At that age you couldn''t have been in the Air Force more than 2 years. Probably E-4. Low rank, low pay. The only way to get an apartment would be with some other good ole boys. But that doesn''t mean it wasn''t fun. I''m sure it was. While you were starting the 3rd year in the Air Force your old high school buddies were starting the 1st year at college. They had fun, too. When they finished college they went in the Air Force officer corps. Higher rank, higher pay. It''s all about what you want out of life. I''m sure you have some great war stories. - Reply to this comment
- Some will be those kicked out because keeping them would reflect poorly on the "no child left behind" system, and would mean a loss of revenue for the school.
Posted by Klingon69 at 01:45 PM : Jan 23, 2008
I dropped out after 10th grade because I was bored out of my mind. The Air Force was much more of a challenge. While my high school friends were wondering if they could borrow their dad''s car to go to the Junior Prom I was working with computers at a SAC nuclear weapons base and had my own apartment. Loved it. - Reply to this comment
- I have never why any American teenager would not want to at least finish high school. The classes are not that difficult. The books are free, the bus rides are free, even free lunch if the situation calls for it. Everything is free. Why not go for it? Maybe some kids feel a high school diploma is bad for some reason?
Posted by runningralph at 10:54 AM : Jan 22, 2008
Some will be those kicked out because keeping them would reflect poorly on the "no child left behind" system, and would mean a loss of revenue for the school. - Reply to this comment
- If you had anything better going on, you would be doing it. You wouldn''t join the Armed Services. Unless you want to make it a career & not just get money for college.
- Reply to this comment
- High School Diplomas ? what a useless paper,the army is better off ,with street smart personal,.Everyone can get a education depends on the desire.Most in the army are trying to better there life.
Posted by beehive21 at 08:32 AM : Jan 22, 2008
Another Bush reject posting? Allow me to help you in furthering your better life:
CORRECTIONS:
High School Diplomas ? What a useless paper,the army is better off ,with street smart PERSONNEL,. ANYONE can get a education---IT depends on the desire. Most in the army are trying to better THEIR life.
GOT LEFT BEHIND ALSO? LOL. Bush has room for you in the friendly firing squads. lol
Posted by beehive21 at 08:32 AM : Jan 22, 2008 - Reply to this comment
- "The percent of Army recruits with a high school diploma dropped last year, continuing a trend that has worsened since the start of the Iraq war, according to a report released Tuesday."
So Kerry was right after all, the stupid, the gullible , the desperate and those who fail to achieve in school get to be cannon fodder for Bush''s wars. LOL - Reply to this comment
- Sgt...spent some time in L.A in 1990 on a trip down for 2 weeks to get an induction logging tool for oil well data calibrated. I enjoyed the glitz and glimmer and the night life but I found the air a little hard to breath. We were the laughing-stock because we were wearing t-shirts in January.(55 degrees F is warm to us) We tanned regardless and returned to Alberta wanting to go back soon. The best time was a bar in Oakland (all black with metal detectors at the door-all new and intriguing to us) The bouncer was an ebony giant but was friendly and sang Karaoke like an angel. I''ll never forget that. In February one of their people cam up to Edmonton and stayed at our house. He wouldn''t leave the front of the fireplace to go out into the cold and snow.
Funny.
I haven''t been back since though I intend to go eventually. - Reply to this comment
- The troops are fully sighted..They can''t be sightless to be in the military. Sgt I am the daughter of a vet. I love my Dad. He is 72. As a girl I was taught to thank our vets. My room mate is a vet. They serve this nation and they don''t get what they earnt. For starters medical care. There are lots of homeless vets. The VAMCs need money to care for our vets..whine baby Bush will not step up to the plate and fund them..Support the vets if he still wants to send them in harm''s way..
- Reply to this comment
- sgtrds...
Vancover Washington just a smite north of Portland,Oregon, or Vancouver B.C.?
Where are you?
Posted by logicanada at 08:46 PM : Jan 22, 2008
I''m in Los Angeles, but I was refering to BC. - Reply to this comment
- sgtrds...
Vancover Washington just a smite north of Portland,Oregon, or Vancouver B.C.?
Where are you? - Reply to this comment
- sgtrds...hello again from the ''''great white north''''. How are you? Well, I hope"
Posted by logicanada at 08:09 PM : Jan 22, 2008
I''m fine, but it''s muggy, wet, chilly and rainy here. I might as well be in Vancouver.
;-) - Reply to this comment
- sgtrds...hello again from the ''great white north''. How are you? Well, I hope"
- Reply to this comment
- Only the intelligent, brave youths with an abundance of character feels the need to serve their country and do it well. Again, I am proud of our soldiers. All you do is repeat the liberal talking points. You swallowed all their propaganda. That wasn''''t smart.
Posted by ediewrites at 07:27 PM : Jan 22, 2008
Well that explains why Bush did such a cowardly and cra*ppy job of serving. Still the idea that liberals somehow hate the military or don''t support the troops is a huge steaming pile of sh*it. There is a monstrously huge difference between thinking Bush is an as*s who is getting our troops killed in vain and not supporting the fighting men and women. As a Vietnam vet I have nothing but the greatest respect for those who serve. I do not, however, have any repeat at all for that moronic idiot in the White House or his war. - Reply to this comment
- ediewrites...I don''t feel as though anyone has put down our fighting men were ALL proud there tere for us and respect them were just looking at the decisions that get them there for the good of us all.
- Reply to this comment
- ediewrites...brave soldiers are sometimes blind and/or brainwashed when they are feeling so redundant as to have to join such an unfulfillable career as acting as sandbags for corporate America.
I feel your angst but think about it.
These young men, brave and true, are being sent under false pretenses of glory and righteousness to die for the likes of Halliburton and the Carlyle Group.
If they are willing to risk their lives in such a venture, they should be paid in salary and benefits , what Blackwater employees earn. - Reply to this comment
- I am not addressing any of you anymore. All you care about is running down Bush. You don''t care about this issue. I am glad you are not over there. Only the intelligent, brave youths with an abundance of character feels the need to serve their country and do it well. Again, I am proud of our soldiers. All you do is repeat the liberal talking points. You swallowed all their propaganda. That wasn''t smart.
- Reply to this comment
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."




