June 18, 2009 6:22 PM

Obama's Age Gap: Is It Race?

By
Dick Meyer
(CBS)  This analysis was written by CBSNews.com Editorial Director Dick Meyer.

Now that Democrats have voted or caucused in three states in three different parts of the country, it appears there is one crucial voting bloc that will not support Barack Obama: older Americans.

Obama was able to overcome a consistent age gap in Iowa because of an unusually high turnout by young voters who supported him overwhelmingly. And he may be able to carry South Carolina, where roughly half the Democratic primary voters are expected to be African-American.

But Obama's weak performance so far among older voters substantially increases the odds against him scoring big victories in the slew of states voting on February 5th, "Super Duper Tuesday."

Hillary Clinton has dominated among voters of a "certain age."

In Iowa, Clinton grabbed 45 percent of the 65 and up while Obama took just 18 percent. In New Hampshire, she won 48 percent to 32 percent. Among voters 60 and older in Nevada, Clinton mopped up with a stunning 60 percent to Obama's 31 percent.

Nationally, Clinton led Obama 44 percent to 18 percent among voters over 65 in a CBS New/The New York Times poll taken January 9-12.

This could be Hillary Clinton's secret recipe for success. That's because older Americans turn out to vote.

Voters over 65 were a solid 22 percent of the Democratic primary electorate in Iowa.

But in Nevada, a dazzling 36 percent of the primary voters were over 60. Turnout for the caucuses was huge. Nearly a third of the state's registered Democrats participated. All Democrats, even the over-65 crowd, are unusually motivated this year - not just the young voters Obama has energized.

Clinton has solid support among other populations, especially women and voters down the income ladder. But Obama has had at least some success with those groups. In Iowa, he carried women 35 percent to 30. And voters earning less than $50,000 a year preferred Obama 34 percent to 32 percent.

Before real voters began casting real votes, it was natural to wonder if older Americans were more ready to consider a woman president or a black president. It appears that the answer is in and it is to Hillary Clinton's advantage.

In the CBS News/New York Times national poll, 94 percent of respondents said they were ready to vote for a black candidate for president. But when asked if "most people" they knew were ready to make the same choice, only 71 percent said yes.

When asked if the whole country was ready to elect a black president, just 54 percent said yes. By contrast, 65 percent said the country was ready to elect a woman president.

There is no reliable way to tell exactly what role race has played in the voting decision of older Americans. Older voters might also be expected to place a higher premium on experience. Whatever the reasons, the pattern of voting behavior so far is clear.

It is a pattern that could be a key to making Hillary Clinton the first female presidential nominee in American history.
By Dick Meyer

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 213 Comments
by kaliveotin January 22, 2008 8:57 PM EST
Young people dont have a clue. 28% of them cant find the Pacific Ocean on a map. They grew up on MTV (whwn it wasnt a music station anymore, and shows like real world and the bachelor) These shows only pick people apart for thier flaws and define masses of losers. They are NOT politically active as the older generation was and is. Watch the votes this year, since you obviously havent in the past. Young people on thier best day, vote against the status quo for the sake of opposition, but they dont really vote for anything. Only a very few young people, mostly in Washington and Oregon are standing up FPR anything.
They changes in my generation were a relection of younger people. That definately isnt true today.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 January 22, 2008 8:51 AM EST
Kaliveton,

I''m 57 and I think your condescending attitude about young people is ***.

The truth is that young people aren''t fighting about and living in the past like our generation.

What gives our generation the right to lecture to the younger generation when it''s been us who has screwed everything up?

Young people didn''t elect Bush, we did. Young people didn''t ignore the energy crisis for 30 years while driving their SUVs, we did. Young people aren''t talking about what America can''t do, we are.

It''s time for our generation to realize that rather than "changing the world'' we''ve become part of what''s wrong with the world. The next generation is smarter, more open-minded and not stuck in the past.

Just because we screwed up doesn''t mean they will.
Reply to this comment
by kaliveotin January 22, 2008 7:16 AM EST
Young people think it''s race, because they don''t know any better. People under 30 still believe that we can bring about change quickly. Obama wont be elected, even though he''s shown he has the support of one third of the democrats and independants who have voted so far. Hillary has a shot at being able to change things because she''s been working at it for 35 years. Osama''s having to act like a Republican just to be competative. Actually its failures from the past, like Kerry and Hart and ambitious democratic conservatives,knowing they would not be insiders in a Clinton administration, such as Nepolitano and that
ex-prosequtor who barely won in Missouri or Arkansas (whats her name) thanks to the 2006 Democratic landslide, also both conservatives. Real Democratic Moderates and liberals are supporting Hillary in Spite of The Bill is a drag factor. We love Hillary. She will be our best President since FDR, unlike Bill.
Reply to this comment
by tibu987 January 22, 2008 12:30 AM EST
Unfortunately, there are many air-heads out there that have or will vote for Hillary simply because she is a woman. How simple-minded.
Eight years as First Lady, planning menus and serving tea simply does not equate into all the experience Hillary would like us to believe.
Nor does having traveled to 82 countries equate into presidential experience. Hillary did not sit in on any national or international meetings.
Just more b^llsh^t that Hillary would like us to believe.
Don''''t fall for it.
I am an old guy (71, white) and I would like to see more young, idealistic people get into politcal office and get the old, more than two term pols out of office. Just look where all that experience has gotten us in the last 40 years, not a very impressive record. Two terms max. Vote for term limits when possible.
Only Obama fits that model, young, intelligent, idealistic, someone who can mediate with our enemies and better understands the position of the average American.

Reply to this comment
by wync January 22, 2008 12:01 AM EST
Posted by realpatriot1 at 09:00 AM : Jan 21, 2008

Understood. It is my sincere hope the younger generations do stand up and be counted. It is time that we take responsibility for the future course of America. OBAMA ''08
Reply to this comment
by wync January 21, 2008 11:58 PM EST
Posted by realpatriot1 at 09:00 AM : Jan 21, 2008
Reply to this comment
by l00ker January 21, 2008 10:58 PM EST
It''s not race; it''s the Clintons.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 January 21, 2008 10:45 PM EST
I am 61 and I love Obama and would vote him in a heart beat. I don''t think it is race, because he doesn''t do as well with older blacks either. I think it is the comfort level older Democrats feel for Hillary. Things were good when Bill was in the Whitehouse, they know her, they view her with more experience, and Obama is young, so older people may trust someone their own age. Younger people are more accepting of change.

By continually asking the "race" question, I think that is harmful to the whole process. There are too many white people who are crazy about Obama for it to be a race issue.
Reply to this comment
by l00ker January 21, 2008 10:25 PM EST
If Hillary Clinton is elected, there may be an attempt to create a third party in earnest.
Reply to this comment
by l00ker January 21, 2008 10:13 PM EST
I don''t think so, she''s poll and media driven, and the media was war central.
Reply to this comment
See all 213 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook