February 11, 2009 3:34 PM

Va. Panel Rejects Closing Gun Law Loophole

(AP)  Emotional pleas by relatives and friends of Virginia Tech shooting victims failed Friday to persuade a legislative committee to close a loophole that allows criminals and the mentally ill to buy firearms at Virginia gun shows.

The House Militia, Police and Public Safety Committee voted 13-9 to kill legislation that would require unlicensed sellers at gun shows to conduct criminal background checks on buyers.

Such checks now are required only on transactions by federally licensed gun dealers.

Only a few relatives of those killed and wounded during the April 16 shootings at Virginia Tech were able to attend the meeting because they had less than 24 hours notice. The committee refused to delay a vote until more family members could be there.

Thirty-two people were killed at the Virginia Tech by a mentally disturbed student who committed suicide as police closed in.

"Please don't say these innocent lives were lost," said Lori Haas of Richmond, whose daughter Emily was shot twice in the head but survived. "They weren't lost - they were killed by a sick person who should not have had that gun."

Gun-rights advocates who opposed the bill noted that the gunman, Seung-Hui Cho, did not buy his weapon at a gun show.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 34 Comments
by keithle1 January 20, 2008 11:06 AM EST
carolrhill:

"MAY GOD BLESS ALL THE PEOPLE THAT WERE EFFECTED BY THIS HORRIBLE THING THAT HAPPENED AT THAT SCHOOL NOW AND FOREVER AS I AM SURE HE WILL!!!"

You said the same thing in your comment about the two police officers who were shot.


skyk:

"In the G-7 this is the ONLY nation that does NOT have gun control laws, restricting hand guns dramatically. This Country has MORE killings EVERY year that the entire G-6 group combined. COMBINED!!!"

I''m glad the USA is # 1 in something.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan January 20, 2008 1:06 AM EST
Front Page Headline of "The New York Times" on November 11, 1938 -
"NAZIS SMASH, LOOT AND BURN JEWISH SHOPS AND TEMPLES..."

Nazi Weapons Law passed on November 11, 1938 -
"Jews are prohibited from acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons.
Those now possessing weapons and ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority.
Firearms and ammunition found in a Jew''s possession will be forfeited to the government without compensation.
Whoever willfully or negligently violates the provisions...will be punished with imprisonment and a fine.
Berlin, 11 November 1938
Minister of the Interior
Frick"
http://www.jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/NaziLawEnglish.htm

Coincidence?
I THINK NOT
Reply to this comment
by harp1963 January 19, 2008 11:36 PM EST
Va Tech was a horrible horrible thing, but gun laws, like illegal drug laws, only will create a black market of unregistered guns. This countries borders are so broad the entire U.S. Military couldn''t keep drugs out. Are we going to create gun cratels in South America like the drug cartels by outlawing gun ownership? I don''t know what the solution is, but maybe we need to promote going to church the way we do sporting events in this country. That might be a start.
Reply to this comment
by carolrhill January 19, 2008 8:03 PM EST
This entire thing is INSANE. Maybe when one of their family members get killed by some insane person they will change their minds. That is if they have a mind of which I doubt.
MAY GOD BLESS ALL THE PEOPLE THAT WERE EFFECTED BY THIS HORRIBLE THING THAT HAPPENED AT THAT SCHOOL NOW AND FOREVER AS I AM SURE HE WILL!!!
Reply to this comment
by kindrox January 19, 2008 7:59 PM EST
* You seem to be the one with paranoid delusions. "Oh my Gawd, there''''s a gun nut on every corner...run away!" *

And at the same time I always hear from School that crime is so rare there is no need for law abiding citizens to be armed.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 January 19, 2008 4:35 PM EST
That will only be true if you are a criminal or mentally ill!~ Sometimes you sound like mentally ill though!~ "LOL"
Posted by schoollord at 03:38 PM : Jan 18, 2008
You seem to be the one with paranoid delusions. "Oh my Gawd, there''s a gun nut on every corner...run away!"
Reply to this comment
by sharednotion January 19, 2008 2:39 PM EST
If what worries some lawmakers is whether a gun dealer, or someone else, could, out of idle curiosity, type in any person''s name & address onto a Web site that would reveal something personal about their mental state, then the law could require a system designed so that only gun dealers & police would have authorized access to the site, AND, even THEY would need to type in your driver''s license number (or alternative state photo ID number) to see if you are ineligible to buy a gun for any legal reason, and, the specific site would not even diclose the reason, mental or otherwise. This could protect the privacy of ineligible mental patients: As long as you do NOT show your ID to a gun dealer seeking to buy a firearm or ammunition, then the dealer will NOT be able to access anything about you.
Reply to this comment
by fredcs25 January 19, 2008 12:56 PM EST
They did the correct thing.Government has no business interfering with a private transaction between citizens.When you live in a free and open society you cannot continue to be free if all risk are removed from that society.If you value living free then risk will happen.The only way to reduce the risk is to close society to a socialistic state in which the government controls everything about life.

Know why the State of Utah doesn''t have a problem with school shootings?They allow trained people that have a concealed handgun licence to carry at school.This includes both teachers and students at colleges.The results....no school shootings.
Reply to this comment
by bhxob January 19, 2008 9:20 AM EST
Nervous Nancy: That was a quote, not a question. It''s called reading comprehension. It''s good to see someone admit that the UK is crazy though.
Reply to this comment
by bhxob January 19, 2008 9:05 AM EST
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/2656875.stm

"You are now six times more likely to be mugged in London than New York. Why? Because as common law appreciated, not only does an armed individual have the ability to protect himself or herself but criminals are less likely to attack them. They help keep the peace. A study found American burglars fear armed home-owners more than the police. As a result burglaries are much rarer and only 13% occur when people are at home, in contrast to 53% in England."
Reply to this comment
See all 34 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook