February 11, 2009 3:35 PM

White House Threatens Safe Mines Bill Veto

(AP)  The White House on Tuesday threatened to veto a mine safety bill, saying the new regulations proposed by Democrats would interfere with legislation President Bush signed in 2006.

House Democrats on Wednesday planned to pass the Supplementary Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act, also called S-MINER, which they say is a needed follow-up to the sweeping safety changes in the 2006 MINER Act. That bill was passed after the 2006 Sago Mine disaster in West Virginia that killed 12 people.

Democrats now want to pass a bill that would add safeguards to "retreat" mining, the type of mining that was being done at central Utah's Crandall Canyon, where nine people died in August 2007. They say the bill would improve emergency response to mine sites and reduce long-term health risks facing miners.

The bill also would give the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration subpoena authority, increase penalties for safety violations, and create an ombudsman's office to handle miners' safety complaints.

The Bush administration contends that the Democrats' mine safety legislation would jeopardize achievements and efforts under way because of the MINER Act.

"We are focused on implementing the 2006 MINER Act, which provided MSHA with strong new tools to be able to accomplish this mission," said Richard Stickler, who leads the federal mine safety agency. "S-MINER, on the other hand, would undermine these and other ongoing efforts."

"In particular, several of the regulatory mandates in the S-MINER bill would weaken several existing regulations and overturn regulatory processes that were required by the MINER Act and are ongoing," according to a White House statement that threatened a presidential veto if the bill comes to Bush in its current form.

The National Mining Association, a trade group, shared the White House view that the bill would divert resources unnecessarily.

"Mine safety experts, including prominent deans and heads of leading mining engineering schools, agree that additional legislation is unwarranted until the MINER Act is fully implemented and its effectiveness properly assessed," association president Kraig R. Naasz said.

Democrats planned to push on with the legislation with the support of the United Mine Workers, which has come out in favor of the legislation.

"The administration has weakened or rolled back a number of existing mine safety regulations," said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee.

"And now, the White House is offering a series of completely baseless excuses to explain its decision to threaten a veto of this urgently needed legislation," Miller said. "President Bush should stop playing politics with people's lives and work with Congress to enact mine safety reforms that were left unaddressed by the MINER Act of 2006."

The bill number is H.R. 2768.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 36 Comments
by forthepeopl1 January 16, 2008 8:38 PM EST
A former congressman AND GOOD FREIND OF ROMNEY and delegate to the United Nations was indicted Wednesday as part of a terrorist fundraising ring that allegedly sent more than $130,000 to an al Qaeda and Taliban supporter who has threatened U.S. and international troops in Afghanistan.

The former Republican congressman from Michigan, Mark Deli Siljander, was charged with money laundering, conspiracy and obstructing justice for allegedly lying about lobbying senators on behalf of an Islamic charity that authorities said was secretly sending funds to terrorists.

A 42-count indictment, unsealed in U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Mo., accuses the Islamic American Relief Agency of paying Siljander $50,000 for the lobbying - money that turned out to be stolen from the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 16, 2008 8:22 PM EST
PARROT2...Not very bright are we I''m a VERY liberal democrat and the field is lacking Edwards my personal favorite but not sure he can win down the line. Everyone is caught up in gender and race the party is more like a carnavil not much deapth.
Reply to this comment
by enriquecaliente January 16, 2008 6:46 PM EST
Understand that to the privileged and very rich. We are here to serve them, hand and foot. They are the new royalty. We are serfs at best and fodder for their canons. If you are a republican you will swear on a bible and talk about family values. All the while robbing people blind, and corn-holing anything that bends over. We are here for grins and giggles as far as they''re concerned.
Reply to this comment
by nyckate January 16, 2008 6:27 PM EST
These effers HAVE got to be joking ... Utah mine collasp Aug 2007.

There isn''t a chance in hades that Bush has any respect for those who voted for him - he keeps showing it to ya''ll time and time again.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet January 16, 2008 4:55 PM EST
When does the Working Guy become important again. For the last 7 years they haven''t mattered and seem to even less every day. They''ve been blackmailed into working for nearly nothing, Very long hours and no one in this Administration seems to care.
Reply to this comment
by inventagod January 16, 2008 4:33 PM EST
''Since taking office in 2001, the Bush administration has cut funding and staff at the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), the federal agency in charge of enforcing the nation%u2019s mine safety laws. The Bush administration has eliminated 170 jobs at MSHA and proposed to cut the MSHA budget in fiscal year 2006 by some $4.9 million in real dollar terms...

In 2003, the Bush administration%u2019s report on mining fatalities highlighted that deaths in the nation%u2019s mines fell by 18 percent, but the report downplayed the fact coal mining deaths actually increased by 7 percent. The drop in mine fatalities occurred in metal and nonmetal mines, not in coal mines, where the death rate increased, according to MSHA.''
http://www.aflcio.org/issues/safety/ns01052006.cfm
Reply to this comment
by simonsez40 January 16, 2008 4:18 PM EST
Too much! I think people who voted for Bush should start being taxed extra. They (the ''''people'''' who voted for him) need to be punished. Those who voted for him the second time might need to do a little time behind bars.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by mwhc1

GREAT POST - GAVE ME A GREAT LAUGH AND I SO AGREE!
Reply to this comment
by briannorwood January 16, 2008 3:59 PM EST
Compassionate conservatism at its best.
Reply to this comment
by fornicario January 16, 2008 3:39 PM EST
Another example of how much Bush cares about the people he is exploiting. He does not want safety to cut into the profit margin of his corporate cronies.
Reply to this comment
by itchyb-2009 January 16, 2008 3:01 PM EST
Speaking from one of the coal states, WV, this is yet another example of "compassionate conservatism". Hint to GOP: WV will go democratic, no matter who''s running.
Reply to this comment
See all 36 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook