February 11, 2009 3:35 PM

Bush Trip Deepens U.S.-Iran Propaganda War

(AP)  U.S. President George W. Bush's trip to the Mideast is suddenly dominated not by Iraq or the push for Israeli-Palestinian peace but by a renewed and ferocious U.S. and Iranian propaganda war.

In the last few days, Mr. Bush and other top U.S. officials have highlighted the dangers of last week's Persian Gulf ship confrontation, claimed that Iranian attacks inside Iraq are again spiking, and pointedly labeled Iran the worst state terror sponsor.

The tough words seem aimed at assuring both Arab allies and Israel that the United States remains intent on pressuring Iran, despite last fall's U.S. intelligence estimate that concluded Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program four years ago.

In the report's wake, Mr. Bush faces a genuine challenge trying to keep strong international pressure focused on Iran, amid Russian and Chinese desires to ease up. Iran's promise, announced Sunday, to shortly answer remaining United Nations' questions about its past nuclear activities is likely to give the two more ammunition to forestall a new U.S. push for sanctions.

The danger is that the public U.S. confrontation, if it lacks credible factual back-up, will turn off the very European allies the United States seeks to convince. France, Germany and Britain are likely to stay allied with Mr. Bush on Iran, but only as long as they believe the United States has compelling evidence of Iranian wrongdoing.

The fierce Iranian-U.S. squabbling also poses a danger of spilling over into real conflict, perhaps by accident, as jittery U.S. Navy leaders in the Gulf's narrow Strait of Hormuz try to gauge Iran's intentions in real time.

Coincidentally or not, the last time Iranian-U.S. tensions spiked so high came after Vice President Dick Cheney - speaking aboard an aircraft carrier in the Gulf in May - issued a strong warning to Iran to back off on its nuclear program.

Complicating matters, Iran's motives remain as murky as usual.

Struggling hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may be looking anew for confrontations with the United States as he tries to build political support before March parliamentary elections.

Ahmadinejad often gets a popularity boost from U.S. tensions, as nationalistic feeling temporarily papers over the sharp disputes among Iran's factions. Under attack from many sides, Ahmadinejad badly needs such a boost to retain any real domestic influence during his last year and a half in office before he must seek re-election.

Iran also may be sending a message to Arab neighbors that it will not tolerate total U.S. control in the key Gulf waters, through which much of the world's oil flows.

After the Jan. 6 confrontation, when five small Iranian boats swarmed in a threatening manner toward three U.S. warships, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed there had been two or three similar incidents - "maybe not quite as dramatic" - over the last year.

None had been publicized until Mr. Bush's trip.

Iran and the U.S. each released videotapes vying to show their version of events. In the U.S.-released audio recording, a man threatens in accented English, "I am coming to you. ... You will explode after ... minutes."

On Sunday, however, the commander of one American ship, Cmdr. Jeffery James of the destroyer USS Hopper, said the threatening radio message may have been a coincidence. U.S. Navy officials said they had not yet determined where the message came from.

The Navy Times, a privately-owned newspaper, reported that some Navy sailors thought the threatening broadcast could have come from a heckler, widely known among sailors in the Gulf since the 1980s, who often taunts ships over open radio frequencies.

Also still unclear was the information, made public Saturday by the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, that attacks in Iraq linked to Iranian explosive devices had increased by a factor of two to three in the first 10 days of January. Such Iranian-linked attacks had dropped sharply last fall.

U.S. military officials said Monday they did not yet know if that constituted a sustained trend, but viewed it as significant. U.S. military reports in Iraq have so far shown no spike in deaths in the predominantly Shiite areas where the explosives, called EFPs, have been mostly used.

Despite such uncertainties, there is real fear in the region toward Iran and many hopes pinned on U.S. protection.

Businessman Khaled Mubarak al-Kendi said while some Arabs don't like Mr. Bush: "For us in the Emirates, it's very important to have a good relationship with the U.S., because only the U.S. can keep stability, especially when it comes to Iran."

The danger, said Joseph Cirincione of the liberal Center for American Progress in Washington, is that the administration may have "needlessly hyped a threat for political purposes - and further undermined American credibility in a crucial region."

Analysis by Sally Buzbee, Chief of Middle East News for The Associated Press.


© MVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by samsel3 January 16, 2008 8:44 AM EST
January 9, 2007 Bush met with the president of Turkey on the 10th he was in Israel. The connection is the Turkey Israeli pipelines, the real purpose of the recent middle east peace summit . The actual story are the proposed oil pipelines that will be built down the coast from Turkey to Israel. Condi Rice is trying to broker this deal. BP oil, US oil interests and the Saudis all have a stake in that pipeline. Domonique Strauss- Khan managing director of the International Monetary Fund and Robert Zoellick president of the World Bank were in attendance. Big money won''t finance the venture without stability in the region.
In the Daily telegraph, July 22, 2006 Condoleeza Rice stated her main objective in the middle east was not to push a ceasefire in Lebanon, but to cause an isolation of Syria and Iran. The strategic objective is all tied to oil and oil pipelines. In April of 2006 Israel & Turkey made their announcement which included four pipelines which will bypass Syria & Lebanon. The source of the oil is the BTC pipeline from the Caspian Sea Region. Shareholders in the BTC pipeline are: British Petroleum, AzBTC, Chevron, Statoil, TPAO, ENI, Total, Itochu, INPEX, Conoco-Phillips & Amerada Hess. Another very important factor on the war with Lebanon is that Israel will have a strategic role in protecting the pipeline and transportation corridor out of Ceyhan Turkey. The strategy will weaken Russian oil''s role in central asia and also isolate Iran.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 January 16, 2008 8:42 AM EST
Nothing has changed on Iran. The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are Cheney''s energy policy.Condi Rice is a former board member of Chevron Oil and mouthpiece for the administrations energy policy. Part of that policy is the The Caspian Sea pipeline which will go through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan,Pakistan, to the gulf of Oman and on to India & Nepal.It will be cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran, but regime change is necessary first. The Caspian sea area holds one third of the world''s oil and south asian oil markets are their target market. This pipeline was also the reason for the Afghanistan invasion. Cheney''s energy policy is the root of all these middle east wars, a federal court judge sealed all documents associated with it for the administration, and the national media are not allowed to discuss or comment on it. More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the pipeline. Iran stands in the way of total control of global oil now with sales of oil to China''s Sinopec Oil,deal signed Dec.10,2007. Months ago China said there would be dire consequences if the US interfered with there direct oil contracts with Iran. Both parties in the Congress should be very concerned with China''s growing war machine and need for oil. They are the real threat & the administration doesn''t care they are in control ! All that matters to them is BIG OIL and their corporate stock portfolios
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 January 16, 2008 8:41 AM EST
Reuters uk-business: January 14, 2008 reported that "US/Iran tensions over it''s nuclear programs may cause Iran to retaliate by cutting oil production." This will cause the price of oil to go even higher. More profits for BIG OIL. Part of Cheney''s energy policy is to build multiple pipelines from many areas of the region so that the US & British oil interests can control global markets and weaken Russia''''s and Irans positions.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales January 14, 2008 10:02 PM EST
He holds it like a girly-boy...He''s afraid of horses...a camel would spit in his face and bite him on the arse as he chased him down the street...though he may be used to that from the military prostitute who spent dozens of overnighters at the White House according to White House logs.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 14, 2008 9:15 PM EST
He looks like an idiot in that picture. Of course he is, so that doesn''t help.............
Reply to this comment
by inventagod January 14, 2008 4:20 PM EST
Kinda hard for Bu$h to rattle swords when his Navy looks foolish for their lies about the Iran Swiftboats...
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 January 14, 2008 3:45 PM EST
"The Bush legacy" Cowardice before and after the fact and ''stupidity'' during it.
Reply to this comment
by liberalme January 14, 2008 3:22 PM EST
He looks scared of the sword.
Posted by ToolMangler at 11:49 AM : Jan 14, 2008

He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword--he''s scared to death of it!! lol The coward!
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 14, 2008 3:05 PM EST
"The Navy Times, a privately-owned newspaper, reported that some Navy sailors thought the threatening broadcast could have come from a heckler, widely known among sailors in the Gulf since the 1980s, who often taunts ships over open radio frequencies."

Sounds like Dic*ky Boy Cheney trying to whip up another war.
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat January 14, 2008 2:51 PM EST
Idiotically enough, Our Walking-Liar Bush president is giving more shining armor and potential credibility than it needs, more than it has already. As per above picture, the saber rattling legitimizes the defense Iran is looking forward to acquire, if at all, in the eyes of the International Community and more particularly among fellow Americans who have more than enough with this brainless puppet president...

-In order not to leave the 2006 war criminal Olmert quiet, he''s looking forward to divert the Israelis attention to the fictional enemy that is Iran, instead to really make THE concessions to the Palestinians and sign a peace deal that will release the tensions crippling the Middle-East and preventing Middle-Easterners (including Israelis) from sound and strong development. Forgetting and keeping a blind eye over the region stability that will prevent inequality and Terrorism.
Reply to this comment
See all 11 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook