Iran: Ship Face-Off Video "Fabricated"
Reported Claim Of Denial By Iran's Military Is First Reaction To Straight Of Hormuz Incident
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Video Shows US-Iran Boat Clash
The Pentagon released tapes showing Iranian speedboats making a run at U.S. ships in the Strait of Hormuz. It was a dangerous confrontation that almost led to a battle at sea. Kimberly Dozier reports.
-
Video
Navy Video Of Hormuz Incident
A tense encounter in the Strait of Hormuz between U.S. Navy warships and five Iranian Revolutionary Guard fast boats is shown in this U.S. Navy video shot aboard the USS Hopper on January 6, 2008.
-
Video
Iran Rebuked For Provocation
The Pentagon has issued Iran a stern warning after Iranian Revolutionary Guards threatened to fire on U.S. Navy ships patrolling international waters near the Persian Gulf. Bob Orr reports.
-
Photo
A file photo of the guided missile cruiser USS Port Royal, one of three Navy ships that were harrassed by five Iranian fast boats on Sunday. (U.S. Navy/PM 2nd Class C. Mobley)
-
Timeline
The U.S. And Iran
Key events in once friendly, now contentious relationship between Washington and Tehran.
"The footage released by the U.S. Navy was compiled using file pictures and the audio has been fabricated," the state-run English-language channel Press TV quoted an official in the Revolutionary Guards as saying.
State TV did not give the name of the Revolutionary Guard figure and did not offer more details about how the official knew the footage was "fabricated."
The Pentagon on Tuesday released a four-minute, 20-second video that included audio showing small Iranian boats swarming around U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf. In the recording, a man speaking in heavily accented English threatened, "I am coming to you. ... You will explode after (inaudible) minutes."
The Iranian boats appeared to ignore repeated warnings from the U.S. ships, including horn blasts and radio transmissions, according to the video, which was shot from the bridge of the destroyer USS Hopper.
From the Hopper, after spotting the approaching Iranian boats, a U.S. Navy crew member says over the radio: "This is coalition warship. I am engaged in transit passage in accordance with international law. Intend no harm."
Often uneven and shaky, the video condenses what Navy officials have said was a 20-minute or so clash. It ends with a blank screen, as only the audio of the Navy's final warning can be heard, just after the voice warns that they are coming.
"Inbound small craft: You are approaching a coalition warship operating in international waters. Your identity in unknown; your intentions are unclear," the unidentified crew member says. He then cautions the Iranians that if they do no steer clear they will be "subject to defensive measures."
"Request that you alter course immediately to remain clear," the crew member says.
The Americans couldn't believe what they heard next, CBS News correspondent Kimberly Dozier reports.
After a pause, the man with the accent issues a final threat: "You will explode after (indecipherable) minutes."
Earlier Tuesday, Iran's Revolutionary Guards corps denied that its boats sent threatening messages to the U.S. Navy convoy, and it defended its right to ask American vessels to identify themselves.
The Guards have said their boats approached the convoy early Sunday and asked the U.S. ships to identify themselves, then allowed them to continue into the Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz, a prime Middle East oil-shipping lane.
No threatening messages were exchanged.
Iranian state televisionAmerican officials said the Iranian boats harassed the U.S. vessels and threatened to blow them up, calling the incident a dangerous provocation as President George W. Bush prepared to leave Tuesday on his first major trip to the Middle East.
The White House called the alleged incident "a reckless and provocative act," reports CBS News correspondent Mark Knoller.
A top U.S. Navy commander in the region said Monday that the Iranian boats radioed a message "to the effect that they were closing (on) our ships and that the ships would explode - the U.S. ships would explode," said Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff, the commander of U.S. 5th Fleet, which patrols the Gulf and is based at nearby Bahrain.
The Pentagon said five small Iranian boats repeatedly "charged" three U.S. warships - cruiser USS Port Royal, destroyer USS Hopper and frigate USS Ingraham - on what the U.S. Navy called a routine passage in international waters.
It also said the Iranian vessels dropped boxes in the water and warned the U.S. ships that they would set off "explosions," a U.S. Defense Department official said.
On Monday, Iran's Foreign Ministry called the incident a "normal" encounter between the two countries' ships and said it had been resolved.
U.S. Navy and Iranian officials have said in the past that vessels from the two rival nations frequently come into contact in the waters of the narrow, heavily trafficked Gulf. They often communicate by radio to avoid incidents.
But the latest incident was the first time U.S. officials have spoken of such a direct threat from Iranian boats.
On Tuesday, senior Revolutionary Guards commander Ali Reza Tangsiri was quoted as saying Iran had the right to ask any ships to identify themselves upon entering or leaving the Persian Gulf.
"It is a basic responsibility of patrolling units of the Revolutionary Guards to take necessary interception measures toward any vessels entering into the waters of the Persian Gulf," Tangsiri said, according to the Mehr news agency.
"We are entitled to use our definite right in the Strait of Hormuz to take controlling measures in relation to the entry of any vessel into the Persian Gulf," he was quoted as saying.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 9
- next
See all 444 CommentsIn view of the current record of dishonesty by the US military officers - especially regarding Iran - Ms. Dozier would be more responsible if she did not report what "Americans couldn''t believe".
Beliefs are so hard to confirm!
Maybe better would be to report what "so and so said they thought and believed".
Reporting the sources would be especially good. "Captain Ahaby said that the officers on the bridge reported ....."
The boy that cried wolf.
And every cop car in America has a better video cam than what''s apparently installed on our top of the line Navy ships! You''d think they could have gotten better pictures of this alleged incident than some swabbie with a phone cam. For all you can tell from the video it was some water skiers from Dhahran!
Iran could be a dangerous threat and this incident still have been manufactured by the Darth Bushit regime to drum up the war fever in advance of the coming elections. It''s the only card they have left to play. Any "terror" attacks are now highly suspect as well.
Ya! Ya! But then you believe BUSH! The liar of all liars! What does that say about you?
Hope we can make it out alive.
Very well stated. :)
This is what this administration wants - a dumb america does not question - it does not ask why - it does not want to know the truth. They do exactly what they are told in the true southern Christian fashion.
Republicans - Kill for GOD. And of course are closet homosexuals but that''s another story.
"Most sane Americans know that Iran is a dangerous threat and that Ahmadenijad is a nutcase who''''s trying to hasten the arrival of the "12th Imam" or "Mahdi" of shiite islam."
Ahmadinejad might be a nut job, but then so is GW Bush. And so is Cheney. And so are most of the Republicans who were involved in taking us to war against Iraq.
This video is funny though - clearly whoever it was on the other end of the radio was stirring up those on board the USS Hopper. And it worked.
Regardless, those Iranians in the speedboats wouldn''t have stood a chance against our Navy and they knew it.
And as for the danger, most of the video footage that the Navy has released is shaky - and it''s shaky because it was shot at a great distance and was zoomed in.
This is no different to Soviet and American pilots stirring each other up during the Cold War - each side posturing with no real intent to fire on each other.
Give me a break.
you dont see the SHRUB doing anything similar by himslef, he needs massive backup just to go take a leak!!!!
"I say that to my girlfriend all the time, Im comin and ill explode in a few minutes, no one makes a pentagon tape out of it..."
LOL.
Now, could someone please explain this to Singinrick - he''ll never understand it.
If you look really closely, you can see one of the dangerous Iranian guardsmen drop his pants and moon the USS Hopper.
Yep - our Navy was in real danger.
I hope their feelings weren''t hurt.
Movies, tv, etc., love to portray us that way. We smile at the criticism because we know how biased and ignorant its sources are. Also, keeping that hillbilly image alive keeps "others" from moving here and destroying our gentle way of life, which they LOVE to do. They may deride southerners, but they all seem to want to live here and make it "just like upstate" or "exit 82." And plenty of those folks are as inbred and uneducated as anyone else.
PERSONALLY I THINK THE CREW OF THE HOPPER DONE A GREAT JOB DEFUSING A POSSIBLE MILITARY CONFRONTATION THAT WOULD HAVE RESULTED IN SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES.
IF THE IRANIAN''S THINK THIS VIDEO WAS FABRICATED, THEN THE NEXT TIME IRAN FEELS THE URGE TO PROVOKE OUR SHIPS, THEY SHOULD BLOW THESE IRANIAN BOATS OUT OF THE WATER, AND BE SURE THAT IT IS ON VEDIO. LETS SEE IF IRAN CLAIMS THAT THE VEDIO IS FABRICATED????
Fvcking LIB terrorist sympathizer. The brave sailors and officers on that ship deserve praise for not blowing that boat out of the water. REMEMBER THE COLE! Never forget.
And here is the reason I think this.
Iran has been consistantly avoiding provoking the US for several years now. First, it stopped its nuclear weapon program, if it even had one. ElBaradei has never confirmed that fact.
Second, it stopped its support of Shiite aggression against US troops in Iraq. Petraeus admitted as much last week. Not that it was nearly as high as shrub wanted us to think.
Third, it released the British sailors last spring without harm.
Fourth, it has never provoked any US warships in the Straits of Hormuz before, even though the Iranians consider it Iranian waters.
"Fvcking LIB terrorist sympathizer. The brave sailors and officers on that ship deserve praise for not blowing that boat out of the water. REMEMBER THE COLE! Never forget."
I remember the Cole only too well.
I also remember the Gulf of Tonkin "incident", and I also remember how much GW Bush and his criminals have lied to us time and time again.
Now, go and grow up.
The end result of all this behavior in conjunction with the NIE has been the acceptance of Iran as a political player in the middle east by the other middle east countries. For the first time in decades they are invited to visit Saudi Arabia, twice now. They are meeting with Egypt, a first. They have been invited to sit at the negiotiating table with Saudi Arabia, Jorden, Egypt to discuss middle east problems. They are a rising power player in the middle east and everyone knows it.
This is HUGE! They have everything to lose by inviting military conflict with the US. So do all the other countries. No matter how much one thinks they are madmen, they clearly are not.
No, I just do not see Iran provoking US war ships unnecessarily.
Now, lets look at what the Bush admin has to lose by starting military conflict with Iran.
The short answer is not much. Bush is worried about his legacy and Cheney is telling him that to save it, a war with Iran must be. He was embarressed by the NIE and has fumbled since then, exclaiming how Iran is still the immediate danger he has always claimed. His legacy in the middle east is in a sorry state. His one true success, the removal of the Taliban from Afganistan is in serious danger of being call a failure, as anyone knows who is watching Afganistan. The Taliban has made a serious resurgence and now virually runs the country. Opium trade is at an all-time high. More troops are going to be needed to put a stop to losing it completely.
Iraq is still a dangerous unstable place. No matter how he touts the success of the surge, the true measure of success is with the parliment and that is no where, still deadlocked as it has been for years. In Pakistan, the push by the Bush admin to put Benizer Bhutto back in politics where she would no doubt make Musharriff behave has ended in her death.
No, a war with Iran would put all these problems on the back burner and even if it turned out to be a disaster worse than Iraq, which it would, is beside the point. It would be a huge gamble and Bush has already proved that he is willing to take big risks, if the prize is big enough
THANKS nikosk1.
HEY, I KNEW THIS WAS COMMING THANKS FOR LESSON OF THE DAY.
AND BY THE WAY, "GOOD POST".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by gunnerv1
Brilliant, thank you for your thoughtful contribution
Posted by nikosk1
Soviet "bears" tracking the US battle group from overhead and soviet submarines shadowing it from underneath.
Now, go and grow up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by mcdazz at 10:05 AM : Jan 09, 2008
Let''s see now, you draw a straight line from an incident 40 years ago to today. Brilliant! You haven''t got a clue. Your hatred overshadows any rational thought. In your America, a "lie" is anything you disagree with. YOU are what''s wrong with this country.
By what measure do you judge him evil?
By what measure do you judge him evil?
Posted by clestes
He doesn''t "tithe".
A chance for speculators to jack up oil even further.
We got lied into Iraq and they were trying to lie us into Iran - until the intelligence committee came forward with their report that Iran did not have weapons. I am afraid Bush may be trying to find another way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by parrot2 at 10:24 AM : Jan 09, 2008
Absolutely, moron, the definition of to "lie"
Get a life and learn to get along.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jh6379 at 10:25 AM : Jan 09, 2008
I don''t get along with terrorist sympathizers such as you. JIHAD is your answer. Freedom is mine.
so read my posts and respond with reasons why Iran provoked the incident, cause right now I cannot find a single reason they would.
"Let''s see now, you draw a straight line from an incident 40 years ago to today. Brilliant! You haven''t got a clue. Your hatred overshadows any rational thought. In your America, a "lie" is anything you disagree with. YOU are what''s wrong with this country."
It seems to me that it''s *your* kind that has driven this country into the mess that it''s currently in.
As for my "hatred", I haven''t expressed anything "hateful" in any of my posts in relation to this.
Well, it could be argued that I have expressed my dislike of the lies of GW Bush, but then, I''m not prepared to have my government lie to drag us into another war based on propaganda and lies.
But that''s hardly "hateful".
I do, however, get the impression that you''re a rather hateful person who needs to have someone or something to hate so that you can feel good about yourself.
Regardless, I can see this "provocative" incident for what it is - a bunch of Iranian morons poking fun at the US Navy.
Unfortunately, the liars in the GW Bush admin have tried to turn it into a major incident when it should have been downplayed as a stupid joke that could have backfired on the Iranians.
20 minutes of "provocative" actions edited down to a shaky 4 minutes of video footage?
Get real.
"I don''t get along with terrorist sympathizers such as you. JIHAD is your answer. Freedom is mine."
It seems to me as though you''re your own terrorist.
You should see a shrink about your paranoia.
Get real.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by mcdazz at 10:47 AM : Jan 09, 2008
Spoken like a true LIB terrorist sympathizer. Your 70 virgins will have a serious rash.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by clestes at 10:45 AM : Jan 09, 2008
watch the tape, moron. Geez, another LIB terrorist sympathizer. Is this what moron.org is teaching these lemmings.
"Spoken like a true LIB terrorist sympathizer. Your 70 virgins will have a serious rash."
Eh? You really do need to see a shrink about your paranoia and your delusions.
Does paranoid schizophrenia run in your family?
Hmmm - I suspect so.
And what''s with all your hateful comments? Have you declared jihad on commonsense?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by mcdazz at 10:56 AM : Jan 09, 2008
Nope, just LIB terrorist sympathizers. Those of your ilk want to call our brave fighting men and women in uniform murderers. You can go straight to helll!
The man is pure evil.
Posted by singinrick
Quite true, but the same is true of GWB and any who have ever done business with his.
Posted by neenga
That siad, let''s throw the kids in the truck and go mud boggin dude!!!!
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 9
- next
See all 444 Comments