NASHUA, N.H., Jan 9, 2008

Numbers Expose Candidates' Weaknesses

Politico: N.H. Women And Liberal Republicans Interrupt Iowa Momentum Of Obama And Huckabee

  • Video A Night Of Surprises

    The New Hampshire primary turned out to be a night of comebacks. Hillary Clinton edged out Barack Obama and John McCain won over the Republicans. Karen Brown reports.

  • Video McCain: Straight Talk Win

    Sen. John McCain easily tops GOP rivals in the N.H. primary. Harry Smith talks to McCain about his victory.

  •  (AP)

  • Photo Essay John McCain

    Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?

  • Photo Essay Hillary Clinton

    A look at a life and career full of firsts.

(The Politico)  This story was written by David Paul Kuhn.

The country’s first presidential primary held two surprises, according to exit polls.

Democratic women surged behind Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and revived the candidacy of the country’s first viable female presidential candidate.

Sen. John McCain owes his victory as much to the Republican faithful as to independents.

Thus New Hampshire women and Republicans interrupted the Iowa momentum of Sen. Barack Obama and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

Neither winner of the Hawkeye State’s caucuses was able to repeat in New Hampshire.

A historic half million voters came out to the polls in New Hampshire on Tuesday.

Iowa also had a record number of voters turn out. Both states saw unseasonably good weather on Election Day. But the diversity of this race, with no incumbent running and a strong black candidate and a strong female candidate, also played a role.

Women were 57 percent of Democratic voters Tuesday night, and Clinton beat Obama by 12 points among them.

The New York senator won single women with no children - about four in 10 Democratic voters - by a stunning 18 points. Clinton also won married women by 13 points and a fifth of voters; mothers, by 20 points.

Obama had defeated Clinton among women in Iowa last week, dampening her electoral hopes.

But in New Hampshire they propelled her comeback.

Clinton spent the week here answering far more questions with voters than she did in Iowa, and she opened up emotionally in the days before the primary. But the win also testified to the Clinton campaign’s long, strategic focus on women in New Hampshire, which accomplished its aim of serving as a firewall following the Iowa loss.

Polls prior to Tuesday’s vote indicated Obama would win New Hampshire by double-digits.

Clinton’s win testifies to the success of her get-out-the-vote operation, which focused on women. For example, on Monday night, Clinton adviser Ann Lewis made a dramatic plea to the campaign’s immense e-mail list of women.

Titled a “personal note,” Lewis’ e-mail urged women to come out for Clinton because her record of “standing up and fighting for women” was “better” than all other candidates in the race.

And equal numbers of women turned out in Iowa and New Hampshire this year.

But as a percentage of the vote, female turnout in New Hampshire was less than the proportion of women who voted in the 2000 primary.

Iowa and Mississippi remain the only states never to have elected a woman to Congress or as governor. That stands in stark contrast with New Hampshire, where women hold prominent elected offices.

Obama won men by 11 points, echoing his Iowa results.

The Illinois senator also won independent voters about 8 points. But Clinton won registered Democrats by about the same margin.

More Democrats than independents voted, 54 percent to 44 percent.

One key segment of Obama’s victory margin in Iowa, youth, did not turn out in New Hampshire as they did in Iowa.

Seventeen percent of 18- to 29-year-olds voted in the Democratic contest in New Hampshire, a proportion similar to the 2000 and 2004 general elections and about 5 percent fewer than in the Iowa caucuses.

McCain won Republican men and women. He overcame the unpopularity of his position on immigration by emphasizing his character, experience and capacity to handle national security issues.

McCain swept every income and age bracket. Moderates and liberal Republicans rallied to the Arizona senator.

The less partisan GOP voters make up 45 percent of the Republican electorate and they backed McCain by about a 2-to-1 ratio over former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

Romney placed second despite winning conservative voters, more than half of the Republican electorate, by 8 points.

Despite McCain’s victory, almost unimaginable last summer when his campaign was nearly out of funds, the exit pll results portend both good and bad for his campaign’s future.

McCain did substantively worse with independents compared with 2000. Yet he showed he could win Republican votes.

In 2000, McCain lost New Hampshire Republicans to George W. Bush, but won independents by a 3-to-1 ratio. Unlike New Hampshire, most primary contests do not allow independents to vote.

That McCain narrowly won Republicans Tuesday night should confirm his go-ahead strategy.

Yet the Arizona senator won only 40 percent of independents Tuesday night, defeating Romney by only 13 points among that group.

In 2000, McCain won nearly twice that proportion of independent voters and by a far larger margin. The one-time maverick now seems better-placed to attract the party faithful.

In a disappointment for Huckabee, McCain won weekly churchgoers by an 8-point margin over the former Arkansas governor.

Huckabee won the Iowa caucuses last week based on support from social conservatives.

While New Hampshire is a significantly less religious state than Iowa, weekly church attendance remains the most accurate measure of a candidate’s support among religious voters.

More than six in 10 Republican voters said they cared most about candidates’ experience and that their choice “says what he believes.”

Those voters supported McCain.

Romney dominated among GOP voters who thought illegal immigration was the most important issue. But that bloc only made up 23 percent of Republicans.

By double-digit margins, McCain won those who voted on the economy, on the war in Iraq and on terrorism.

The exit poll, conducted by a consortium of five television networks and The Associated Press, found that 55 percent of Democrats said the capacity to bring about “needed change” was the “deciding” factor behind their votes. Obama won those voters by about 30 percentage points.

Half of Democratic voters felt Obama could unite the country.

Only 28 percent said the same about Clinton.

He won Democrats who thought the war in Iraq and health care were the most important issues, while Clinton won those who cared most about the economy.

She also did better than Obama among seniors. Clinton won working-class voters, those making less than $50,000 in household income.

Obama largely won middle class and rich Democrats (although Clinton narrowly won those with $150,000 to $199,000 in family income).

With Obama remaining strong on the issues that won Iowa for him, Clinton’s margin among female voters decided New Hampshire in her favor.

Copyright 2008 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
by writerchick4 January 10, 2008 6:06 PM EST
Even though I wanted to, I just can''t get behind Huckabee. He crossed a picket line last week and thinks people should just forget about it.

Here''s an article about it:
http://www.helium.com/tm/775713/admit-political-fanatic-stretch
Reply to this comment
by clovisbuford January 10, 2008 3:14 PM EST
Based on the numbers, turnout is historic , and by large margins voters are choosing to vote democratic.This is a sad sight to see.We need a continuation of Republican policies. We could invade Iran, whats another war ,another front.We too can join the ranks of third world countries on how we treat the elderly ,the sick . Why should just 3rd world countries be denied universal health care like all the other industrialized nations have.We can do more that double the deficit in 8 yrs as Bush has done. We aren''t bankrupt yet as a country ,lets finish the job. We still have a middle class to get rid of.We need more torure, fewer civil liberties,all in the name of "security " just like the founding fathers imagined.We can show "we" are all in this together like our Katrina response.We need more corporations running things in Washington.Leave No Special Interest Behind. We can insitutionalize corruption as part of our government service,and get Abramoff to advise us how.We can take the Civil Service ,The Justice Dept and make them dependent on what ever party gets elected ,rather than non-partisan.Do not lose this opportunity to continue successful republican ideals.
Reply to this comment
by hwy71so January 10, 2008 11:10 AM EST
"You dems are obsessed with religion whether you want to admit it or not. It is YOU who keeps bringing it up.

Posted by katg21 at 07:19 PM : Jan 09, 2008"

Ain''t that the truth!!
Reply to this comment
by obama1289 January 10, 2008 12:17 AM EST
Obama supporters check this video out:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jPev5sEdTjg
Reply to this comment
by katg21 January 9, 2008 10:19 PM EST
How does a baptist minister represent america? Last I heard those types have tunnel vision.
Posted by degress12

Not supporting Huckabee but why the hell does it matter that he was a Baptist minister? You dems are obsessed with religion whether you want to admit it or not. It is YOU who keeps bringing it up.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 9, 2008 5:28 PM EST
holy *** - sorry for the multi-post :o
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 9, 2008 5:22 PM EST
Another site is doing an analysis of the polls to see whether ppl telling pollsters that they intend to vote for a black candidate and then don''t was the problem. What they''ve found already:

"Some folks are suggesting that "late deciders" made the difference - a common explanation for poor estimates. But the exit poll doesn''t support the notion. Remove voters who decided on Tuesday and the New Hampshire exit poll result is Clinton +2 %u2013 exactly her actual margin. (Among those who decided "just today" it was Clinton 3.) Next theory."

* * * * *

I guess that means she really didn''t bring out a lot more women.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 9, 2008 5:22 PM EST
Another site is doing an analysis of the polls to see whether ppl telling pollsters that they intend to vote for a black candidate and then don''t was the problem. What they''ve found already:

"Some folks are suggesting that "late deciders" made the difference - a common explanation for poor estimates. But the exit poll doesn''t support the notion. Remove voters who decided on Tuesday and the New Hampshire exit poll result is Clinton +2 %u2013 exactly her actual margin. (Among those who decided "just today" it was Clinton 3.) Next theory."

* * * * *

I guess that means she really didn''t bring out a lot more women.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 9, 2008 5:21 PM EST
Another site is doing an analysis of the polls to see whether ppl telling pollsters that they intend to vote for a black candidate and then don''t was the problem. What they''ve found already:

"Some folks are suggesting that "late deciders" made the difference - a common explanation for poor estimates. But the exit poll doesn''t support the notion. Remove voters who decided on Tuesday and the New Hampshire exit poll result is Clinton +2 %u2013 exactly her actual margin. (Among those who decided "just today" it was Clinton 3.) Next theory."

* * * * *

I guess that means she really didn''t bring out a lot more women.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 9, 2008 5:21 PM EST
Another site is doing an analysis of the polls to see whether ppl telling pollsters that they intend to vote for a black candidate and then don''t was the problem. What they''ve found already:

"Some folks are suggesting that "late deciders" made the difference - a common explanation for poor estimates. But the exit poll doesn''t support the notion. Remove voters who decided on Tuesday and the New Hampshire exit poll result is Clinton +2 %u2013 exactly her actual margin. (Among those who decided "just today" it was Clinton 3.) Next theory."

* * * * *

I guess that means she really didn''t bring out a lot more women.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 January 9, 2008 4:29 PM EST
Mike Huckabee is to the GOP what Barack Obama is to the Democrats: a vision of the future, a vision of change, a vision of nonpartisan politics, and hope for restoring America to the control of the people.

The difference is that Mike Huckabee''''s positions on specific issues are more akin to those of the average voter on both sides of the ticket.

I support Mike Huckabee, and I support a new vision for America.

Posted by newideas1 at 10:39 AM : Jan 09, 2007

Spoken like a true scared neo con that knows the end is in site. You should have listened to the voice of America after the 2006 elections.

Huck is another neo cons a Bush war monger and that will spell his and the Republican defeat in November.


Anything but Republican at this point.........

Posted by simonsez40 at 11:37 AM : Jan 09, 2008

Agreed
Reply to this comment
by simonsez40 January 9, 2008 2:37 PM EST
I think women voting will be the defining moment for this country and getting change.

Huck isn''t qualified to lead Arkansas much less our nation.

Anything but Republican at this point.........
Reply to this comment
by DaveGress January 9, 2008 2:01 PM EST
How does a baptist minister represent america? Last I heard those types have tunnel vision.
Reply to this comment
by newideas1 January 9, 2008 1:39 PM EST
Mike Huckabee is to the GOP what Barack Obama is to the Democrats: a vision of the future, a vision of change, a vision of nonpartisan politics, and hope for restoring America to the control of the people.

The difference is that Mike Huckabee''s positions on specific issues are more akin to those of the average voter on both sides of the ticket.

I support Mike Huckabee, and I support a new vision for America.

www.abuckforhuck.com
Reply to this comment
See all 14 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: