ST. PAUL, Minn., Jan. 8, 2008

Sen. Craig: Hand Signals Protected Speech

Seeking To Nix Guilty Plea, Lawyers Say Act Wasn't Criminal Since It Didn't Involve Multiple Victims

  • Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, takes part in a Senate Environment and Public Works hearing in Washington Thursday, Sept. 20, 2007. Photo

    Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, takes part in a Senate Environment and Public Works hearing in Washington Thursday, Sept. 20, 2007.  (AP)

  • Timeline The Larry Craig Case

    Follow events in the arrest of, and subsequent guilty plea by the Idaho senator.

  • Photo Essay Larry Craig

    Idaho senator embroiled in scandal after arrest at Minneapolis airport comes to light.

(AP)  Seeking to have his guilty plea in a bathroom sex sting erased, the attorneys for Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho argue in a new court filing that the underlying act wasn't criminal because it didn't involve multiple victims.

An appeals brief filed Tuesday contends that Minnesota's disorderly conduct law "requires that the conduct at issue have a tendency to alarm or anger 'others"' - underscoring the plural nature of the term.

Craig's brief goes on to cite other convictions that were overturned because the multiple-victim test wasn't met. His lawyers apply the same logic to his case.

The Republican senator pleaded guilty in August after his arrest two months earlier at the Minneapolis airport. It was part of a broader undercover push targeting men soliciting sex in public restrooms.

Craig was arrested June 11 by an undercover officer, Sgt. Dave Karsnia, who said Craig tapped his feet and swiped his hand under a stall divider in a way that signaled he wanted sex. Craig has denied that, saying his actions were misconstrued.

"Appellant's alleged conduct in this case affected only a single individual - Sergeant Karsnia," the Craig brief says. "It did not - and could not affect 'others' as the disorderly conduct statute requires, and therefore, does not satisfy that element of the statute."

The brief also argues that Karsnia himself could not have been offended by the alleged conduct because "he invited it." The alleged conduct, Craig's lawyers added, doesn't rise to the level of being "offensive, obscene, abusive, boisterous or noisy."

Craig's earlier attempt to withdraw his plea was turned down by a district court judge, and the case is now before the Minnesota Court of Appeals.

Besides attacking the law he was prosecuted under, Craig's legal team argues that the hand signal allegedly used to communicate a desire to engage in sexual conduct would be constitutionally protected speech. They also say the plea is technically flawed because it lacked a judicial signature.

Patrick Hogan, a spokesman for the Metropolitan Airports Commission, which oversees the Minneapolis airport and which brought the charges, said he was confident the guilty plea will stand.

"Facts are resilient, and Sen. Craig's continued, transparent efforts to escape them don't change the truth of his behavior in an airport restroom or the fact that he admitted guilt last August," Hogan said.

Prosecutors have 45 days to respond, and then the case will be scheduled for oral arguments. Once heard, a ruling is required within 90 days.

Craig has said he will finish his term, which ends in January 2009.




© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 70 Comments
by denn034 January 8, 2008 9:02 PM PST
Is my middle finger protected speech?
Reply to this comment
by denn034 January 8, 2008 9:43 PM PST
Emphasize gay abstinence not promoting AIDS infections or banning is the better approach.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 January 8, 2008 9:50 PM PST
If only other men didn''t vacuum it up in the airport restroom and proving what pride and culture they have, then Craig would never have been, uh, outed...

Don''t blame me, George Michael called (doing it) in public bathrooms part of the culture. He''s gay so it counts. Anyone not gay saying the same thing would be called "homophobe". Weird.

Meanwhile, Ricky Menudo Martin, who used to go around saying it''s nobody''s business what people do, officially came out some time ago too. Needed 15 more minutes of fame, or wanted to flip flop as well? If it''s nobody''s business, why did he open his yap for reasons other than the obvious?

Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 January 8, 2008 9:52 PM PST
I think this whole thing is nonsense in the first place. If the airport was having problems with this particular restroom, why didn''t they just have uniformed security or police officers up their presence or post a sign that there had been complaints and that the restroom would be monitored. Why spend the time and money with these stupid sting operations that only server to embarrass people.
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 January 8, 2008 10:21 PM PST
How does republican "leadership" allow this nutjob pervert criminal to stay in the headlines?

Ya, vote republican. Good idea.

Reply to this comment
by brianp55 January 8, 2008 10:36 PM PST
I see. So if I solicit services from a hooker who turns out to be an undercover cop, I can claim that I am simply engaged in an expression of my Fifth Amendment rights.
Reply to this comment
by ms38654ob January 8, 2008 11:20 PM PST
I got a hand signal for this creep! Can anyone guess what it is? - ps. it''s protected speech...
Reply to this comment
by fairandbal January 8, 2008 11:46 PM PST
The Gay Senator Craig should be allowed to wed the man of his dreams just like any other couple in America.
Reply to this comment
by ringading3 January 8, 2008 11:54 PM PST
This would be hilarious, if it was not so sad. Seems the Lawmakers are exempt from the Laws. Craig you are a creep!
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs January 9, 2008 1:09 AM PST
Posted by brianbwb at 12:14 AM : Jan 09, 2008
+ report abuse

*********

i think i can trash talk a liberal till the day I die..do i not have the freedom to do so??? craig pleaded guilty trying to commit an act that is HOMOSEXUAL..homosexuality is an issue that liberals are trying to protect..am i correct?? then why are most liberals oppose to him doing a homosexual act??

its like religion..liberals are big athiest fan..but majority of liberals that linger around here are big avid muslim fan as well...you know why??
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs January 9, 2008 1:10 AM PST
Posted by brianbwb at 12:14 AM : Jan 09, 2008
+ report abuse

*****************

choose your issues and stick with it..dont flip flop just because you dont like the person involved..
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 January 9, 2008 1:36 AM PST
My new stepMum told me the line *think before ye open yer mouth.* I called her cause I needed to talk and needed her advice. I perfer to not use public rest rooms if I don''t have to. They are dirty.
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 January 9, 2008 1:55 AM PST
libsluvsuvs: P.S. I''d debate you anytime, anywhere, with no sleep, low-blood sugar and a headache and I would still have you crying and begging for mercy.
Reply to this comment
by Con Mohrat January 9, 2008 1:56 AM PST
Larry Craig said those gestures were protected "speech".

Promising to resign if found guilty was protected speech.

Reneging on the promise was protected speech as well.
Reply to this comment
by mick7744 January 9, 2008 3:49 AM PST
It was really just a sting operation by a courageous Senator Craig to expose the vice, sin & perversity at Minneapolis Airport.

Isn''t that what Republicans do best...point out sin in others?

They''re all just a bunch of bible-thumping thieving hypocrites...pathetic yes men to the deserter-in-chief!

ALL MEMBERS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY SHOULD BE VIGOROUSLY PROSECUTED AS MEMBERS OF AN ONGOING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE!
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 January 9, 2008 5:53 AM PST
Just come out of the closet already.
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 January 9, 2008 5:56 AM PST
Real simple, Republicans. Don''t shove the bible down our throats. Don''t act like your the sole guardians of morality & decency.
Reply to this comment
by jsilver2th January 9, 2008 5:57 AM PST
If he didn''t do it, how could it be protected speech?

What difference does it make if he gets the plea withdrawn or not?

Mitt Romney already threw him under the bus and he''s not getting reelected in Idaho or San Francisco...
Reply to this comment
by jowand January 9, 2008 6:03 AM PST
Posted by dakotaclark at 02:00 AM : Jan 09, 2008

King James wasn''t "the famous bible editor" go crawl back under your rock.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet January 9, 2008 7:20 AM PST
Wouldn''t it be great to be having a debate, in a VERY healthy economy while our troops were housed in US Base''s IN America, about a stain on a dress? Yet again America has seen what happens when you attempt to use the Government to inforce YOUR Moral''s. Snake Oil Salesmen like Craig are all around us and they will sell you the snake oil IF you are willing to buy it. Sieg Heil and Amen
Reply to this comment
by honestabe8 January 9, 2008 7:39 AM PST
sure is fun to see him squirm.
Reply to this comment
by quetzal666 January 9, 2008 9:23 AM PST
hahahahahahhahaahahha................
hes a baptist correct?
Heres my middle finger as protected speech mister gay
republicon!!!!
Reply to this comment
by cyberus-2009 January 9, 2008 9:30 AM PST
Sad .. got caught now trying to get out of it on technicalities. So much for the *values* party.
Reply to this comment
by ioweign January 9, 2008 9:41 AM PST
The brief also argues that Karsnia himself could not have been offended by the alleged conduct because "he invited it."


The police officer "invited it" and Craig responded.

Hmmm...

Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 January 9, 2008 9:42 AM PST
Like all good slime they split hairs and think we don''t know.
Reply to this comment
by barbaraf4 January 9, 2008 9:45 AM PST
Has his wife left him yet?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 9, 2008 10:00 AM PST
Sad .. got caught now trying to get out of it on technicalities. So much for the *values* party.

Posted by cyberus at 09:30 AM : Jan 09, 2008



The GOP hasn''t had any legitimate values since Eisenhower left office in 1961.

This president is thoroughly incompetent - to say the least.

Bush 41 and Reagan provided weapons, ammo, and training to Iraq, Iran, and the Taliban in addition to ruining our economy.

Ford pardoned Nixon, which sent a clear message - "Presidents will NOT be held accountable for their actions - whether the break the law or not."

Nixon was the most corrupt and colluded politician ever (up to that point in time).
Reply to this comment
by talkingham January 9, 2008 10:02 AM PST
I have a hand signal I''d like to show him.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 January 9, 2008 10:05 AM PST
Sen. Craig: Hand Signals Protected Speech

I believe Thomas Jefferson devoted an entire article of the US constitution to the rights of toe tappers and said rights shall not to be tapped....er I mean infringed on.

Reply to this comment
by cepe10-2009 January 9, 2008 10:06 AM PST
The prosecutors office here does not know what a real crime is or how to prepare legal documents. Hogan is incompetent and should be sweeping the streets.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 January 9, 2008 10:19 AM PST
"Sen. Craig: Hand Signals Protected Speech"


The judge should give him the finger.
Reply to this comment
by kissamaarse January 9, 2008 10:47 AM PST
GOP: Gay Odd People
Reply to this comment
by kattyclayz January 9, 2008 11:33 AM PST
Every time I read a sentence containing the words "Craig & brief" All I could think about was underwear. I don''t know if he''s a closet "person" or not, but it sure doesn''t look too good for him saying that, "Yeah, I gave hand signals that would indicate that, but it was only to one person and not PEOPLE as the law states." I guess if it''ll get him off then he''ll try anything to get an overturn, even not deny it, just find another way around it, but it kinda shows me more guilt feelings than innocence.
Reply to this comment
by Con Mohrat January 9, 2008 11:40 AM PST
The GOP hasn''''t had any legitimate values since Eisenhower left office in 1961.

This president is thoroughly incompetent - to say the least.

Bush 41 and Reagan provided weapons, ammo, and training to Iraq, Iran, and the Taliban in addition to ruining our economy.

Ford pardoned Nixon, which sent a clear message - "Presidents will NOT be held accountable for their actions - whether the break the law or not."

Nixon was the most corrupt and colluded politician ever (up to that point in time).
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:00 AM : Jan 09, 2008

~~~~~~~~~~~

True, Eisenhower did his part along with the Soviet Union and overran the Nazis. He saw the German autobahnen and began the U.S. intersate system too.

BUT, when the General Secretary Nikita Khrushchev was about to end the cold war in 1960 at a scheduled meeting with Eisenhower, Eisenhower allowed a CIA spy, Gary Frances Powers to fly, (with his poison pill if caught), from Peshawar, in Northern Pakistan to Bodo, Norway to spy with his U-2. He was shot down at Sverdslovsk, Russia, captured alive with his fancy cameras, and didn''t swallow his pill.

Khrushchev asked Eisenhower about the plane, and Eisenhower repeatedly lied about a weather plane lost. The meeting was cancelled, and the cold war continued for another 31 years, at huge expense.

EISENHOWER WAS INFINITELY WORSE THAN OUR LAME DUCK.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 9, 2008 11:48 AM PST
EISENHOWER WAS INFINITELY WORSE THAN OUR LAME DUCK.

Posted by Vet1971 at 11:40 AM : Jan 09, 2008



There is absolutely NO ONE WORSE than Bush in American presidential history.

And he''s quickly climbing the list of all-time world''s worst leader.
Reply to this comment
by knyghtwolf January 9, 2008 11:53 AM PST
Amazing how CBS views RICHARD/Lil'' DI@K Cheney''s nickname obscene. What''s even more amazing is the fact that the TWO worst names for new borns this generation are RICHARD (Dikk) & GEORGE!!!!! But my pet Trantula seems good with his name "Allah Mohammad" and loves the flies and crickets he gets when he responds to his name, LOLOL.
Reply to this comment
by wdrussell1 January 9, 2008 11:58 AM PST
The GOP preaches ''family values''.
They don''t practice them.
Reply to this comment
by Con Mohrat January 9, 2008 12:20 PM PST
There is absolutely NO ONE WORSE than Bush in American presidential history.
And he''''s quickly climbing the list of all-time world''''s worst leader.
Posted by hungry1968 at 11:48 AM : Jan 09, 2008

!!!!!!!!

Bush spent about a trillion of deflated, devalued dollars on invasions and occupations and lost. Gold is pushing $900 an ounce now.

Eisenhower spent trillions for 31 years with his stupidity, since the days when gold was valued at $25 an ounce.

The Lame Duck does not have brains to be that stupid.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 9, 2008 12:39 PM PST
HUNGRY -- There is no other idiot, worse than you. You will go down in history as the biggest idiot to ever post on the CBSNEWS boards.

Posted by poopusbuttus at 12:31 PM : Jan 09, 2008



Flattering....

It means absolutely nothing coming from though. You can''t even rationalize you''re own twisted thoughts, you contradict your own posts after 5 minutes, you admit that Bush invaded Iraq based on lies yet you try to justify the invasion, and you consider Baghdad Bob to be an ally on these boards.

That just about says it all....
Reply to this comment
by poopusbuttus January 9, 2008 12:43 PM PST
Flattering....

It means absolutely nothing coming from though. You can''''t even rationalize you''''re own twisted thoughts, you contradict your own posts after 5 minutes, you admit that Bush invaded Iraq based on lies yet you try to justify the invasion, and you consider Baghdad Bob to be an ally on these boards.

That just about says it all....


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hungry1968


Again HUNGRY, you do not pay attention. Do you even know who Baghdad Bob is? If so, enlighten me......
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 9, 2008 12:48 PM PST
Again HUNGRY, you do not pay attention. Do you even know who Baghdad Bob is? If so, enlighten me......

Posted by poopusbuttus at 12:43 PM : Jan 09, 2008



Yeah - that was Saddam Hussein''s minister of information:

http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/


He now posts here under the guise of Baghdadshere.


Typical, and not surprising, that you''re so uninformed that you don''t even know who Baghdad Bob is.....
Reply to this comment
by poopusbuttus January 9, 2008 12:51 PM PST
Typical, and not surprising, that you''''re so uninformed that you don''''t even know who Baghdad Bob is.....


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hungry1968


HUNGRY -- I dont need your link to know who Baghdad Bob is. I already knew who he was.

What''s funny is that you just provided me a link to who he is which tells me that you had to look up who he was. HAHAHAHAHA

At any rate, it''s not important. So, having said that, let me ask you this question. How in the world do you take what I said about Baghdad Bob yesterday and turn it around to say that I support Baghdad Bob?
Reply to this comment
by micma-2009 January 9, 2008 1:02 PM PST



Family Values Republican and bathroom enthusiast, Larry Craig loves Mitt Romney. In his own words, "I support Mitt Romney because of his very strong family values."




Reply to this comment
by briannorwood January 9, 2008 1:07 PM PST
As much as I hate to admit it, I''m feeling a little sorry for this pathetic little man. I mean, it must be so terrible to have to live a life like that--engaging in anonomous ***, yet still believing that somehow your not a homosexual has got t be a terrible burdon.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 9, 2008 1:10 PM PST
HUNGRY -- I dont need your link to know who Baghdad Bob is. I already knew who he was.

Posted by poopusbuttus at 12:51 PM : Jan 09, 2008




If you already knew who he was, why did you ask to be enlightened?





Do you even know who Baghdad Bob is? If so, enlighten me......

Posted by poopusbuttus at 12:43 PM : Jan 09, 2008
Reply to this comment
by cozzicon January 9, 2008 1:13 PM PST
Protected free speech (Just a hand signal):
/"
|./|
| |
| |
| ~ |
| |
/''| |/''..
/~| | | |
| =[@]= | |
| | | | |
| ~ ~ ~ ~ |` )
| /
/
/
_____ /
|--//''''`--|
| (( +==)) |
|--_|_//--|
Reply to this comment
by jncc1701 January 9, 2008 1:14 PM PST
Where are the Republicans??? What no comment on Craig??? what a bunch of double standard wimps - if this was any Democrat this board would be lit up with family values.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 9, 2008 1:19 PM PST
Hey poopsontheUS - did you tuck tail and run away AGAIN?
Reply to this comment
by candide777 January 9, 2008 1:21 PM PST
One thing is for sure, even if Craig''s conviction is overturned and there''s a trial, he will NEVER testify. Why? Because he knows that he''ll be torn to pieces on cross-examination, and his attorneys would have to work around the clock to convince the court that his witnesses to his past bathroom activities should not be permitted to testify.
Reply to this comment
by Con Mohrat January 9, 2008 1:24 PM PST
Family Values Republican and bathroom enthusiast, Larry Craig loves Mitt Romney. In his own words, "I support Mitt Romney because of his very strong family values."
Posted by micma at 01:02 PM : Jan 09, 2008

~~~~~~~~

That was "protected speech" too.

When he told the Republican Congress "I will resign if found guilty" that was protected speech.

To expound, any lie is "protected speech", isn''t it?
Reply to this comment
See all 70 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs