WASHINGTON, Jan. 7, 2008

Pentagon: Iranians Harassed Navy Ships

U.S. Captain Nearly Opened Fire; Iran Calls Incident "Something Normal"

  • Play CBS Video Video Iran Chided Over Provocation

    The Pentagon has warned Iran against taking provocative actions against the U.S. after Iranian Revolutionary Guards swarmed U.S. Navy ships on their way to the Persian Gulf. Drew Levinson reports.

  • Video Iran Rebuked For Provocation

    The Pentagon has issued Iran a stern warning after Iranian Revolutionary Guards threatened to fire on U.S. Navy ships patrolling international waters near the Persian Gulf. Bob Orr reports.

  • A file photo of the guided missile cruiser USS Port Royal, one of three Navy ships that were harrassed by five Iranian fast boats on Sunday.

    A file photo of the guided missile cruiser USS Port Royal, one of three Navy ships that were harrassed by five Iranian fast boats on Sunday.  (U.S. Navy/PM 2nd Class C. Mobley)

  • Timeline The U.S. And Iran

    Key events in once friendly, now contentious relationship between Washington and Tehran.

(CBS/AP)  Iranian boats harassed and provoked three American Navy ships in the strategic Strait of Hormuz, threatening to explode the vessels, U.S. officials said Monday, calling it the most serious such incident in years.

U.S. forces were taking steps toward firing on the Iranians to defend themselves, said the U.S. naval commander in the region. But the boats - believed to be from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's navy - turned and moved away, officials said.

"We take this deadly seriously," Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff told a Pentagon news conference via video from Bahrain.

"It's important to remember we have been attacked by small high-speed boats in the region," said Cosgriff, recalling the USS Cole in which 17 U.S. sailors were killed when an explosives-laden boat rammed the destroyer as it refueled in 2000 in Yemen's port of Aden.

Iran's Foreign Ministry said Monday that the confrontation early Sunday was "something normal" and was resolved, suggesting the Iranian boats had not recognized the U.S. vessels. The Bush administration said that Iranians should "refrain from such provocative actions that could lead to a dangerous incident in the future."

High-seas hostilities have been building for months, with heavily armed speed boats carrying Iran's Revolutionary Guard darting near U.S. ships patrolling the dangerous waters of the Persian Gulf, CBS News correspondent Bob Orr reports.

This is at least the third time in six months that Iranian boats have harassed U.S. ships in international waters, Orr reports. And just last March, 15 British sailors were captured in the Persian Gulf and held for two weeks by the Revolutionary Guard.

The incident raised new tensions between Washington and Tehran as President Bush prepared for his first major trip to the Middle East.

According to CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller, White House spokesperson Tony Fratto said the Bush administration urges the Iranians "to abstain from such provocative acts that could lead to a dangerous incident in the future."

Cosgriff said the incident occurred at about 8 a.m. local time Sunday.

CBS News has learned from Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman that the three ships - the guided missile cruiser USS Port Royal, the guided-missile destroyer USS Hopper and the guided missile frigate USS Ingraham - were transiting the Strait of Hormuz into the Persian Gulf when they were approached by 5 Iranian fast boats, some of which were assessed to be visibly armed.

The five small boats began charging the U.S. ships, dropping box-like objects in the water in front of one of the ships and forcing the U.S. ships to take evasive maneuvers, said Cosgriff, commander of the 5th Fleet and of naval forces in the U.S. Central Command region.

The Iranian boats came to less than 500 yards from the U.S. formation and at one point broke into two groups, one group going to one side and the other to the others side of the Americans. Officials said there were no injuries.

"At one point during this encounter ... the ships received a radio call that was threatening in nature, to the effect that they were closing (in on) our ships and that the ships would explode - the U.S. ships would explode," Cosgriff said.

While meeting the leaders of Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and other regional nations Jan. 9-16, Bush is expected to try to bolster the troubled peace process between Israel and the Palestinians but is also likely to seek backing for U.S. concerns about Iran.

Iran is under two sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions for its refusal to freeze uranium enrichment, a potential pathway to nuclear arms, and Washington is pushing for additional U.N. penalties. But a recent U.S. intelligence assessment that it probably shut down a clandestine weapons program three years ago have led to increased resistance to such a move from permanent Security Council members Russia and China, which have strategic and trade ties with Tehran.

At the State Department Monday, spokesman Sean McCormack said he was not aware of any plans to lodge a formal protest.

"Without specific reference to this incident in the Strait of Hormuz, the United States will confront Iranian behavior where it seeks to do harm either to us or to our friends and allies in the region," McCormack told reporters. "There is wide support for that within the region and certainly that's not going to change."

Quote

Iran's Foreign Ministry said the weekend incident between Iranian boats and U.S. Navy ships in the Strait of Hormuz was "something normal" and was resolved.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the Defense Department will work with State and National Security Council officials to determine "the appropriate way to address this with the Iranian government."

But Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammed Ali Hosseini played down the incident, suggesting it was an issue of misidentification. He did not comment on the U.S. claims of the Iranian boats' actions.

"That is something normal that takes place every now and then for each party, and it (the problem) is settled after identification of the two parties," he told the state news agency IRNA.

The incident was "similar to past ones" that were resolved "once the two sides recognized each other," he said.

An Iranian Revolutionary Guard official also described the incident as nothing unusual.

"No unusual confrontation has taken place between the Guard's patrol vessels and U.S. ships," state-run television quoted the official as saying. The official was speaking on customary condition of anonymity. The Guard official said the Guard's vessels were conducting normal patrols in the Strait of Hormuz when they saw three U.S. ships enter the waters of the region.

"The Guard's navy vessels, as usual, asked the ships to identify themselves and they did so and continued their path," the TV quoted the official as saying.

Whitman said the U.S. vessels were in international waters, making a normal transit into the Gulf. He said the Iranian boats were operating at "distances and speeds that showed reckless and dangerous intent - reckless, dangerous and potentially hostile intent."

Historical tensions between the two nations have increased in recent years over Washington's charge that Tehran has been developing nuclear weapons and supplying and training Iraqi insurgents using roadside bombs - the No. 1 killer of U.S. troops in Iraq.

At about this time last year, Bush announced he was sending a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf region in a show of force against Iran. The U.S. Navy quietly scaled back to one carrier group several months later. But while the two were there, they staged two major exercises off Iran's coast.

As one of the world's most vital chokepoints for oil shipping, the 30-mile-wide Hormuz strait has been the subject of previous armed confrontations between the United States and Iran, most notably during the eight-year Iraq-Iran war of the 1980s.



© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 804 Comments
by samsel3 January 10, 2008 6:52 PM EST
Nothing has changed on Iran. The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are Cheney''s energy policy.Condi Rice is a former board member of Chevron Oil and mouthpiece for the administrations energy policy. Part of that policy is the The Caspian Sea pipeline which will go through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan,Pakistan, to the gulf of Oman and on to India & Nepal.It will be cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran, but regime change is necessary first. The Caspian sea area holds one third of the world''s oil and south asian oil markets are their target market. This pipeline was also the reason for the Afghanistan invasion. Cheney''s energy policy is the root of all these middle east wars, a federal court judge sealed all documents associated with it for the administration, and the national media are not allowed to discuss or comment on it. More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the pipeline. Iran stands in the way of total control of global oil now with sales of oil to China''s Sinopec Oil,deal signed Dec.10,2007. Months ago China said there would be dire consequences if the US interfered with there direct oil contracts with Iran. Both parties in the Congress should be very concerned with China''s growing war machine and need for oil. They are the real threat & the administration doesn''t care they are in control ! All that matters to them is BIG OIL and their corporate stock portfolios
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 January 10, 2008 1:32 PM EST
One million barrels per day capacity for the Eilat Ashkelon pipeline where tankers are filled at the Red Sea port for transport to Asian markets. Currently tankers are unloaded at Ashkelon and pumped through Israel to Eilat a Red Sea terminal. The Turkey Israel pipelines project will save tanker transport costs to Ashkelon and increase market share for Caspian Sea oil. This is the purpose behind the Bush peace talks!
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 January 9, 2008 8:00 PM EST
Bush met with the president of Turkey yesterday and today he''s in Israel. The connection is the Turkey Israeli pipelines. The real purpose of the recent middle east peace summit was covered up. The actual story is the proposed oil pipeline that will be built down the coast from Turkey to Israel. Condi Rice is trying to broker this deal. BP oil, US oil interests and the Saudis all have a stake in that pipeline. Domonique Strauss- Khan managing director of the International Monetary Fund and Robert Zoellick president of the World Bank were in attendance. Big money won''t finance the venture without stability in the region.
In the Daily telegraph, July 22, 2006 Condoleeza Rice stated her main objective in the middle east was not to push a ceasefire in Lebanon, but to cause an isolation of Syria and Iran. The strategic objective is all tied to oil and oil pipelines. In April of 2006 Israel & Turkey made their announcement which included four pipelines which will bypass Syria & Lebanon. The source of the oil is the BTC pipeline from the Caspian Sea Region. Shareholders in the BTC pipeline are: British Petroleum, AzBTC, Chevron, Statoil, TPAO, ENI, Total, Itochu, INPEX, Conoco-Phillips & Amerada Hess. Another very important factor on the war with Lebanon is that Israel will have a strategic role in protecting the pipeline and transportation corridor out of Ceyhan Turkey. The strategy will weaken Russian oil''s role in central asia and also isolate Iran.
Reply to this comment
by bloodfiest-2009 January 9, 2008 6:43 PM EST
rtt
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 January 8, 2008 11:13 PM EST
I am officially sick of the rest of the world. Why can''t the USA find another planet in the solar system like earth & move the country there? Seems simple enough.
Reply to this comment
by gce65 January 8, 2008 10:22 PM EST
Well, the Straights of Hormuz are about 30 miles wide at the narrowest points, so 12 miles from the east and 12 miles from the west only gives you 6 miles to pass through in international waters. And if the US warships are in international waters, the Iranian speedboats can be there too. But the US can''t go into Iranian waters. Dangerous neighborhood. Maybe we shouldn''t be there...
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica January 8, 2008 5:34 PM EST
what if Venezuelas Navy was off the coast in International waters off of Texas? holding War Games with the Cubans?
Wouldnt the Coast Guard be offshore looking at things?
this is a very non issue.
Quetzal666

If Venezuela and Cuba had a Navy to hold war games near US waters, the US could only watch.
This however is much different. The US ships were in international waters. The Iranians radioed their intention to destroy the ships, the Iranians were dropping boxes (possible mines or torpedos) in front of the US ships forcing them to take evasive action.
This is a HUGE issue. How can you hold the this opinion after reading the article? Oh, you didn''t.
Reply to this comment
by damnedrelign January 8, 2008 1:47 PM EST
GENERAL NORMAN SHWARZKOPF should be recognized as a brilliant, enlightened general, having superior insight regarding current situations. Such leadership is needed to (if we borrow from his thinking) arrange for the "holier-than-thou" islamofascist Iranians to ...meet god or allah as ASAP. If permitted, these warped, religious sickos who lead Iran will precipitate world-wide destruction sooner than most are able to believe. The Iranian threat must be eliminated NOW, at a relatively low cost. Otherwise, the entire humanity faces a hell-on-earth which is too horrible to describe. How would we like that?
Reply to this comment
by quetzal666 January 8, 2008 12:21 PM EST
Bush has been Holding War Games off the Coast of Iran..
doent it make sence they are a bit ****.ed off?
what if Venezuelas Navy was off the coast in International waters off of Texas? holding War Games with the Cubans?
Wouldnt the Coast Guard be offshore looking at things?
this is a very non issue.
Reply to this comment
by searingtruth January 8, 2008 11:51 AM EST
Oh my goodness.

This is the silliest thing I''ve heard in weeks from Dictator Bush and his treasonous henchmen. Which now not only include Cheney et al, but also even Feinstein, Rockefeller, and Pelosi herself.

US Warships were attacked by a small group of Iranian gunships who dropped unknown boxes in front of them, sent them a message that they were about to blown up, but weren''t fired upon and then mysteriously disappeared and escaped, despite all of our advanced technology, air power, drones, undersea sonar, and satellites?

And there aren''t even plans to file a protest?

My goodness gracious again. Are we all supposed to be deaf, dumb, and blind now?
ST


"Truth is defined by the weakest of us who must suffer through it."
SearingTruth

A Future of the Brave - www.searingtruth.com
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 January 8, 2008 11:35 AM EST
In the Daily telegraph, July 22, 2006 Condoleeza Rice stated her main objective in the middle east was not to push a ceasefire in Lebanon, but to cause an isolation of Syria and Iran. The strategic objective is all tied to oil and oil pipelines.
The Israel Turkey pipeline has been in the works for some time now. In April of 2006 Israel & Turkey made their announcement which included four pipelines which will bypass Syria & Lebanon. The source of the oil is the BTC pipeline from the Caspian Sea Region. Shareholders in the BTC pipeline are: British Petroleum, AzBTC, Chevron, Statoil, TPAO, ENI, Total, Itochu, INPEX, ConocoPhillips & Amerada Hess. Another very important factor on the war with Lebanon is that Israel will have a strategic role in protecting the pipeline and transportation corridor out of Ceyhan Turkey. The strategy will weaken Russian oil''s role in central asia and also isolate Iran.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 January 8, 2008 11:32 AM EST
Nothing has changed on Iran. The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are Cheney''s energy policy.Condi Rice is a former board member of Chevron Oil and mouthpiece for the administrations energy policy. Part of that policy is the The Caspian Sea pipeline which will go through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan,Pakistan, to the gulf of Oman and on to India & Nepal.It will be cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran, but regime change is necessary first. The Caspian sea area holds one third of the world''s oil and south asian oil markets are their target market. This pipeline was also the reason for the Afghanistan invasion. Cheney''''s energy policy is the root of all these middle east wars, a federal court judge sealed all documents associated with it for the administration, and the national media are not allowed to discuss or comment on it. More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the pipeline. Iran stands in the way of total control of global oil now with sales of oil to China''''s Sinopec Oil,deal signed Dec.10,2007. Months ago China said there would be dire consequences if the US interfered with there direct oil contracts with Iran. Both parties in the Congress should be very concerned with China''s growing war machine and need for oil. They are the real threat & the administration doesn''t care they are in control! All that matters to them is BIG OIL and their corporate stock portfolios .
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 8, 2008 11:27 AM EST
-The Gulf of Tonkin was made up by LBJ and used to send troops to Vietnam. The Gulf of Tonkin NEVER HAPPENED.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Incident

And you can''t see history repeating itself here?

Two U.S. warship attacked by hostile boats off the coast of......

Next came, we must defend by attacking the nation of.....

While I am all for the U.S. defending itself anywhere in the world. I really don''t like it poking another nation in the eye. They will soon get tired of it and fight. In some ways I get a feeling we are doing the bidding of Saudi Arabia.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 January 8, 2008 11:21 AM EST
Loading cookies... Please wait...



Done!
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 January 8, 2008 11:17 AM EST
yes we got plenty FOR THE NEXT 20 YRS! THE MIDDLE EAST IS DROWNING IN OIL! THEY GOT OIL COMING OUT THEIR EARS!Posted by:
underdogus at 07:27 AM : Jan 08, 2008
Southeast asian and Chinese markets represent trillions of dollars in sales. BIG OIL''s needs come first !
Reply to this comment
by closethippy1 January 8, 2008 11:12 AM EST
I''ve been reading some of the Arab press and the word "harrasment" is preceded by "allege" and "supposed". The Iranians are describing what happened as an "incident" or a "situation".
It seems the US Navy ships got close to the waters of Iran, Iran in turn send some ships to check them out.
In other words, the US is looking like a police bully who taser someone for looking at him the wrong way.
Do you guys even care how foolish you look in all of this by screaming "harrasment!" like a 13 year-old princess?
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 January 8, 2008 11:03 AM EST
I don''t get it why do they act like this and are we sure that it is true. What we have seen in the last few years has made me question everything.

Maybe it is what it is supposed to be the world governments are to blame along with religions they have jumped in bed once again with each other and are trying to control with hate and fear.
Reply to this comment
by searingtruth January 8, 2008 10:36 AM EST
I remember a time when The United States of America was the undisputed leader and advocate of human rights.

I remember a time when the United States could be trusted.

I remember a time when we were respected.

I remember a time when we were admired, even by most of our enemies.

But the fascist Bush and his henchmen, including Cheney, Feinstein, Rockefeller, and Pelosi, have erased all of that.

We are now just another simple police state, which Americans, just like the Germans, recognized too late.
ST


"The last days of our once great nation were the most difficult. Arbitrary abduction, forbidden speech, and absolute obedience were extracted from all who lived, even from the Americans who had always been assured of their exclusion."
SearingTruth


A Future of the Brave - www.searingtruth.com
Reply to this comment
by underdogus January 8, 2008 10:27 AM EST
I don''''t even know why we''''re over there. We got plenty oil over here Posted by dougandslug yes we got plenty FOR THE NEXT 20 YRS!! THE MIDDLE EAST IS DROWNING IN OIL!! THEY GOT OIL COMING OUT THEIR EARS!!!
Reply to this comment
by woodjd42 January 8, 2008 10:03 AM EST
The Gulf of Tonkin was made up by LBJ and used to send troops to Vietnam. The Gulf of Tonkin NEVER HAPPENED.
Reply to this comment
See all 804 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

    Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

  • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

    Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

    Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

  • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

    The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

  • Orlando Office Shooting Orlando Office Shooting

    A Gunman Opens Fire at the Offices of an Engineering Firm Where He Once Worked

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: