Pakistan: You Can’t Hunt Al Qaeda Here
Foreign Ministry Says, Despite Report, U.S. Forces Cannot Engage Militants On Pakistani Soil
-
Photo
A paramilitary soldier patrols a road in Pakistan in this file photo. The Foreign Ministry rebuffed a report that the Bush administration was considering expanding U.S. operations inside Pakistan, saying it would not tolerate any such operations within its territory. (AP Photo/Arshad Butt)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Bhutto Was Ready To Bare Plot
On the day she was murdered, Benazir Bhutto was to deliver a report that alleged poll rigging and diversion of U.S. aid by the Pakistani government. Sheila MacVicar reports.
-
Video
Bhutto Alleged Election Fraud
An aide of Benazir Bhutto said that on the day she was killed, the opposition leader planned to give U.S. officials a dossier accusing the government of rigging the elections. Lara Logan reports.
-
Video
Bhutto's Chosen Successor
Benazir Bhutto's son, 19, and husband have been chosen to co-lead the Pakistan People's Party. Sheila MacVicar reports.
-
Fast Facts
Pakistan
Learn about the people, economy and history.
The Foreign Ministry dismissed as "speculative" a story in The New York Times saying President Bush's top security officials discussed a proposal Friday to deploy U.S. troops to pursue militants along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.
"We are very clear. Nobody is going to be allowed to do anything here," said Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad, the top spokesman for Pakistan's army.
"The government has said it so many times," Arshad said. "No foreign forces will be allowed to operate inside Pakistan."
The Pakistan-Afghanistan border area has long been considered a likely hiding place for al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and his top deputy Ayman al-Zawahri, as well as an operating ground for tribal Taliban sympathizers.
In Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai's spokesman did not immediately return a call seeking comment on the report.
Bush's top security advisers - including Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice - had debated whether to expand the authority of the CIA and the military to "conduct far more aggressive covert operations in the tribal areas of Pakistan," the Times reported.
Recent reports indicate al Qaeda and the Taliban are "intensifying efforts" to destabilize Pakistan's government, the newspaper said.
It said Bush's security advisers' discussion on the proposal was part of an assessment of Washington's strategy following the Dec. 27 assassination of populist opposition leader Benazir Bhutto, a moderate pro-U.S. politician who had vowed to fight Islamic extremists if she was elected in an upcoming parliamentary vote.
Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf, a close U.S. ally in the war against terror, has blamed Baitullah Mehsud, a tribal militant leader allegedly tied to al Qaeda, for Bhutto's death.
Mehsud has reportedly denied involvement.
By Sadaqat Jan
© MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 86 CommentsNot that I think we should be in Pakistan, but it looks to me like if it was my country and was being over taken by rats, and my own resources could not get rid of them, I''d certainly be on the phone with a rat killer for help!
...just sayin!
Americans just cant keep their fingers off the trigger.
The U.S.A. will hunt terrorists any place it wants.
~~~~~~~~~
Firstly, they forgot to consult anyone in Pakistan.
Does this mean all other nations including China are permitted to send troops to the US because there were once terrorists on 9/11 ?
Secondly, when they say they can "deploy U.S. troops", since when did the U.S. have enough troops to deploy anywhere? The Bomb-RunAway-Hide US military is only capable of bombing and killing little children, not fighting on the ground. When they do fight on the ground, they leave the job unfinished as in Korea, or surrender as in Viet Nam.
Our Draft Dodger Administration does not know war, and they have proved it by losing two wars in the Near East.
Oh really? Why? Because they say so in a report provided to CBSNEWS?
Do the research VET, there have already been joint strikes (with Pakistans approval) conducted within the country.
when you begin to question the 9/11 myth it doesn''t take long to realize the official "story" is just that, a story - mired in cover-up, deception and lies - look at the actual collapses of the 3 WTC buildings (especially WTC 7) and you realize these are no ordinary collapses - these are demolitions - the science does not support the myth..
check out 9/11 Mysteries, a well done documentary on the 9/11 myth:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003
wake up and do your own research - stop buying the mainstream propaganda!
Witness the miseries unilateralism has brought and learn some lessons from that. I dont see any great American achievements in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy''s most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the Mossad and CIA and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/december2007/120407_common_knowledge.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYWIT9TSJPE
more damning Pentagon evidence here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAwtmun_aj8&feature=related
and here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=869bO4jI1po&feature=related
it''''s rare European news footage of the Pentagon close-up on 9/11 ... and you realize that a) the wingspan of a 757 would not fit in that hole - there is no damage to the sides .. and b) there is NO PLANE ... where is the 757 ? no luggage, no skid marks, no bodies, no tail section, no wings ? ... what hit the Pentagon ? ...
Posted by sandy777 at 12:12 PM : Jan 06, 2008"
Didn''t it occur to you that it''s not those countries which changed but the US policy ? In 1983 (did you see the famous handshake with Rumsfeld ?), Hussein was an ally, just like Musharraf now. Ask yourself: what changed between 1983 and 2003 ? Iraq policy didn''t change by a iota. Hussein was already a dictator in 1983 and was still a dictator. Unlike Pakistan, Iraq was not a heaven for Al Quaeda. So what ? 911 was a unique chance for Bush and Cheney to invade Iraq and they didn''t miss it.
Leave this board, we have no place for traitors like you on this board who have lost all sense of reality. Go to DailyKos or some other looney left site where they will appreciate your lunacy and treasonous lies. Get lost!!
The latest photographs from the Pentagon cameras parking lots show a very clear discription of someone lighting a very long fuse. This information comes from sources close to real smart inteligence sources that are from very intelligent people.
Ron T
Founder
www.ipranked.com
why did WTC7 fall at free fall speeds so neatly into it''s own footprint?
why has the NIST refused to put out it''s final report on WTC7?
here''s why -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwSc7NPn8Ok
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by king77shaw at 12:32 PM : Jan 06, 2008
After much research I found out that planes are made of lead and not aluminum. This has been covered up by Pentagon sources for 7 years.
It has also been found by more intelligent sources in Europe that steel does not melt or is made by fire but is created at a secret manufacturing plant in Pongo-Bongo on the Gringo Islands in the Pacific. It is so secret that its not on any maps but European sources state that its made out to be a Gay-Lesbian- Freemason resort area to hide the real intent.
Other sources claim that luggae should not burn with fuel that burns since evryone knows that the Samsonite Co. came out with non-retardent line of luggage in 1976 as was seen by many while watching television. This can also be seen on YouTube if one does not believe it.
Tuesday Aug 21, 2007
James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST%u2019s investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.
Dr. Quintiere made his plea during his presentation, %u201CQuestions on the WTC Investigations%u201D at the 2007 World Fire Safety Conference. %u201CI wish that there would be a peer review of this,%u201D he said, referring to the NIST investigation. %u201CI think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they%u2019ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view.%u201D
%u201CI think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable,%u201D explained Dr. Quintiere. %u201CLet''''s look at real alternatives that might have been the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Towers and how that relates to the official cause and what''''s the significance of one cause versus another.%u201D
Dr. Quintiere, one of the world%u2019s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, also encouraged his audience of fellow researchers and engineers to scientifically re-examine the WTC collapses. %u201CI hope to convince you to perhaps become ''Conspiracy Theorists'', but in a proper way,%u201D he said.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/e
vidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by king77shaw at 01:06 PM : Jan 06, 2008
Sources in Europe have found out that Newtons Law of Gravity was really a Mossad invention and that Benjamin Franklin created this myth.
Ron T
Founder
www.ipranked.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by ipranked at 01:02 PM : Jan 06, 2008
+ report abuse
How many MORE thousands do you propose die because WE can''t elect a competent Leader? How many have died already and look at the Hatred you have generated from those who have NEEDLESSLY died. Going after a criminal is one thing but when YOUR leader screws up and allows him to escape... Then rebuild using YOUR stupidy to do so? You can''t honestly think that would help do you?? You can''t kill EVERYONE Sparky.... That was tried by Hitler...doesn''t work.
why did WTC7 fall at free fall speeds so neatly into it''''s own footprint?
why has the NIST refused to put out it''''s final report on WTC7?
here''''s why -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwSc7N
Pn8Ok
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by king77shaw at 01:05 PM : Jan 06, 2008
You have a point there !
After watching a recent Flintstones episode on the Cartoon Channel I notice that when Fred demolishesa buiding it goes..."sploof" and takes up 10 times the original footprint. Why this was not bought up in the last Congressional report is a real coverup !
people in glass houses should not throw stones.
Paul Craig Roberts, PhD
"Over the past six years, the ranks of distinguished skeptics of the 9-11 storyline have grown enormously. The ranks include distinguished scientists, engineers and architects, intelligence officers, air traffic controllers, military officers and generals, including the former commanding general of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, former presidential appointees and members of the White House staff in Republican administrations, Top Gun fighter pilots and career airline pilots who say that the flying attributed to the 9-11 hijackers is beyond the skills of America''s best pilots, and foreign dignitaries."
Your so right !
The foreign Hindus in India
The foreign ****** and Sunnis in Iraq
The foreign Indonesians in Indonesia
There were suicide bombers many many years before this so called "occupation". Get a history book if you can with a timeline in it instead of a back of a cereal box.
Well then put your military where your mouth is and expel the ones already operating inside Pakistan.
If the Pakistan government can''t even operate a police station in these remote areas, who is going to tell if an errant bomb fell accidentally on a foreign militants training camp? Oh, that''s right, the majority of Pakistan''s military support the Taliban and their al Qaeda guests.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by actornaught at 01:24 PM : Jan 06, 2008
Even though I am a conspiracy I appreciate your Thanks
What is happening in the enslaved Muslim countries is a natural reaction to occupation, bombings, killing and terrorizing of innocent civilians (children, old men and women), rapes, in addition to looting of resources, national antiques and artifacts, above all destruction of property by the occupiers. - qazi63
Who are the enslavers in Saudia Arabia? This is the land where al Qaeda was formed. This is the country that funnels money into this terrorist organization.
Enslaved muslim nations? What an Oxymoron because as the Iranian form of government so blatantly depicts, everyone in Iran is repressed and enslaved by their supreme leader. Make him mad and its off with your head. Wear the wrong clothes and its off to prison, if you are lucky.
The Taliban hung a young boy in the middle of a village: his crime was having a dollar bill in his pocket. Who is the slave master in that picture?
The world has heard how peaceful Muslims are supposed to be but where is the proof? Where has a Muslim stood up for peace? Where has a Muslim stood up and denounced the Islamic extremists and their actions of terror?
To answer your first question, considering all the decades of international terror caused by Muslims, why not blame the Muslims?
Who ignores the very basic human right and today owns the largest population of slaves? The Muslims do.
Every one of your so-called "mysteries" has been debunked time and time again. Here is the most comprehensive debunking, by Popular Science magazine:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
Posted by WillCAD at 01:56 PM : Jan 06, 2008"
Don''t cherry pick what you agree with in science ...
What about this one ...
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0609105
The point is an American attack will help militants more than it will hinder them.
Posted by fredgrad2000
It is our obligation as citizens and patriots to question the government and what it tells us. Especially when they start saying "it''s none of your business" or "because I said so" Study founder Thom J. a little bit, he was distrusting of the powerfull as well.
That said I do not agree with King77Shaw''s suppositions but I fully support his right to present them. That is what a constitional patriot does.
PS. name calling is childish, what are you ten and on the school yard?
Posted by earth561
Would that be Alah Crispies?
We don''t need to be deterred in our decision-making by their nukes because Prof. Khan has already given all of our enemies whatever they''ve needed to start their own programs.
We don''t take orders from Pakastan and if they choose to allow those who attacked us to have safe haven in their country we have the right to respond and we aren''t going to wait for another attack to do so.
It''s time to immediately susupend all aid to this state sponser of terror.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 86 Comments