WASHINGTON, Jan. 4, 2008

One Byrd Gets Lion's Share Of Earmarks

Why Are So Many Of Your Tax Dollars Going To Dedicate Buildings To W.Va. Sen. Robert Byrd?

  • Play CBS Video Video King Of Congressional Earmarks

    In 2007 members of the House and Senate slipped more than 11,000 "earmarks" into the federal budget. No one has racked up more than Sen. Robert Byrd, and no one's prouder. Sharyl Attkisson reports.

  • Senator Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., gestures during a 2006 interview.

    Senator Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., gestures during a 2006 interview.  (AP)

  • Interactive 110th Congress

    The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.

(CBS)  At age 90, Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia has been in the Senate longer than anybody else. And he's spent much of that time as head of the most powerful spending committee, with extraordinary control over earmarks - grants of your tax dollars without the normal public review, CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports for Follow the Money.

Byrd was the first senator to rack up a total of $1 billion in earmarks for his home state.

That was in 1999. Today he's past the $3 billion mark.

In his famously colorful Senate speeches, Byrd has repeatedly defended his earmarks.

"Hear me!! Some members have asserted that all, all, all earmarked funding is wasteful spending or an abuse of power," Byrd said. "Hogwash!"

And though tradition frowns on sitting members of Congress funding projects in their own name, they don't seem to have a problem with it in Byrd Country. West Virginia is full of ventures paid for with your tax dollars but named after him.

You can take the Robert C. Byrd Highway to the Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, explore space through the Robert C. Byrd Telescope, and work at the Robert C. Byrd Hilltop Office Complex.

In all, we found more than 40 projects bearing the Byrd name. Many of them sound perfectly reasonable, but the problem is other needy communities never get a crack at the money.

"He's unabashedly unapologetic about his earmarking," said watchdog Leslie Paige, who calls the earmarks "Byrd droppings."

"It's always been 'to the victor goes the spoils' with these earmarks," said Paige, who works for Citizens Against Government Waste. "Which means if you've got a member who sits on a powerful committee, you're gonna get the lion's share of that money."

But it's made Byrd a hero back home.

"Yeah man, you're lookin' at Big Daddy. Big Daddy!"

Read more about Byrd's pet projects at Couric & Co.
That's Byrd at the opening of the Robert C. Byrd Biotech Center, to which he generously gave $35.6 million of your tax dollars.

"Our effort to construct this facility and create a stronger foundation for the biotech industry here in West Virginia began where? With a visit to my office. Yeah. Yeah man," Byrd said. "A visit to my office, yeah."

Byrd wouldn't agree to an interview with CBS News.

His five decades in office have been money in the bank for West Virginians. So much so, they might consider some sort of monument in Byrd's name.

Except there are already so many.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 46 Comments
by dalidog255 January 6, 2008 3:14 PM EST
I ask you rfcnj68, would you rather have bombs & an illegal war or telescopes that map the universe (look at Green Bank Obervatory''s website? Tax dollars are needed for roads, bridges, parks, etc. I do know my Girl Scouts wrote to Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush, Alma Powell, and Katie Couric, Anne Holton (Gov Tim Kaine of VA wife) all former Girl Scouts. They all wrote back except Katie Couric ~ go figure.
Reply to this comment
by drivelphobe January 5, 2008 8:21 PM EST
Robert Byrd is a hero and a master politician. He has taken his obligation to his electorate to heart, and provided the necessary funds through legal and political means. I wish we had had him in California all these years.
Reply to this comment
by micma-2009 January 5, 2008 3:57 PM EST


We need to make earmarks more transparent.


Reply to this comment
by element51 January 5, 2008 3:18 PM EST
I am very opposed to earmarks. I know that people are elected to get all they can for their states but I also think that we the people should have the right to know where our money is being spent. Why can''t a review committee be set up to look at this kind of spending and then report to us, the taxpayers, on where funds are being spent? There are some projects that should be funded but so many of them are totally unnecessary. Maybe some of the waste could be eliminated and the money divided amont the states to offset some of the unfunded federal mandates that just cause our state and local taxes to go up.
Reply to this comment
by element51 January 5, 2008 3:10 PM EST
Pelosistilho....I started to respond to your post and was shocked at the profanity that flew out of my fingers. So I backed up and started again. I will not bring myself down to your level. All I can say is that I feel sorry for you. It must be truly awful to go around with so much hate inside. I hope something good happens to you so you can get a little joy out of your life. Good luck.
Reply to this comment
by crawdadmax January 5, 2008 1:36 PM EST
Let''s not forget that George Bush signs all of these bills.
Reply to this comment
by phoenixandy January 5, 2008 12:52 PM EST
I''d like to know if Sharyl Atkinson plans to do any stories of Republicans collecting earmarks. Her partisan one-sided reports against the Democrats not only makes her a disgrace among responsible journalists worldwide, she is also a hypocrite and a charlatan.
Reply to this comment
by bethatwork January 5, 2008 12:36 PM EST
Highway - infrastructure.
Locks and dams - infrastructure.
Radio telescope - exploration and scientific knowledge.
Hilltop Building - at least it isn''t a bridge to nowhere.
Reply to this comment
by fairandbal January 5, 2008 12:26 PM EST
The pro GOP parade on CBS continues. No mention of Senator Stevens in Alaska''s billion dollar bridge to no-where.

CBS and the other MSM outlets are gearing up for supporting GOP interests in 2008. Way to do independent free media!!!
Reply to this comment
by nor-one January 5, 2008 12:07 PM EST
Wake up idiots! Of course ear marks are legal! When you have thieves making the laws of course stealing is going to be legal. But only for them.
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 January 5, 2008 11:29 AM EST
So much money going to West Virginia yet the vast majority of the population remains poor, the education system remains substandard and the best jobs you can get are working in dirty coal mines.
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 January 5, 2008 11:27 AM EST
If people only truly became aware of how much of their tax dollars were wasted on frivolous things.
Reply to this comment
by alexma50085 January 5, 2008 11:17 AM EST
Earmarks are the biggest load of s h i t the government has ever come up with. It just a way to get money without anybody telling them no, and without the American people even knowing about it. With all this money that we give out in earmarks, you think we could reverse it and bring down our 9 trillion dollar national debt. But no, our government just wants to keep spending and spending, and spending more money that we don''t have. Our national debt is what is going to make our country economy bomb. The balloon is about to burst and we going to be heading into another depression, probably worse than that of the 20''s.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 January 5, 2008 11:06 AM EST
"All paid for by our taxes. Next - the Robert C. KKK Byrd Institute of Racial Superiority, David Duke, Director."
- Posted by Pelosistilho at 01:41 AM : Jan 05, 2008

This is refreshing.

A Neocon racist who has been banned from this forum numerous times, reminding everybody that Byrd used to be in the Klan.

Pelosistilho is also a big fan and follower of some other Neocon, I forget his name, but a guy who used to be a Stalinist but has now "sincerely apologized."

How many people did Stalin murder ?
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo January 5, 2008 11:05 AM EST
Earmarks are not illegal. And the political contributions that are ultimately rewarded with the earmarks are not illegal. And they''ll tell you there is no connection between the two. This whole process, and the government that runs it, is out of control (both Democrats and Republicans), is worsening and the entire country is about to pay for it over the next 10-15 years. Newton''s thrid law (and if you have to look it up then the educational system failed you).
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica January 5, 2008 10:28 AM EST
I hope West Virginia has used Byrd''s earmarks wisely and built some self-sustaining industries with them, or else it sounds like if and when the Byrd goes they''re plucked!
Reply to this comment
by scottyusa January 5, 2008 10:27 AM EST
I suppose you cannot blame Byrd for being good at what he does. He is just really good at playing the game. I am totally against earmarks especially in the defense bill but as long as they are legal and there is no line item veto we are stuck watching WV get all the cash.
Reply to this comment
by olebd January 5, 2008 10:10 AM EST
The old coot does a more honest days work than that pig in Alaska or the nut in Pennsylvania (Murtha) I know, but that doesn''t say much.

The hole system is bloated and needs to be trimmed.
Reply to this comment
by rfcnj68 January 5, 2008 10:06 AM EST
Sorry to tell you dalidog255 but that nice trip was not free it was your tax dollars at work.
Reply to this comment
by melcarnahan January 5, 2008 9:43 AM EST
At least he does not operate in secrecy, unlike the no-bid Bushies ( http://tpj.org/page_view.jsp?pageid=203&pubid=85 ) who have looted the treasury turning Clinton''s historic budget surplus as far as the eye can see into a ten trillion dollar debt for the children while vetoing SCHIP.
Reply to this comment
See all 46 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: