Jan. 6, 2008
Clemens Vehemently Denies Steroid Use
Tells Mike Wallace Trainer Only Injected Legal Drug
-
Play CBS Video Video Roger Clemens In his first interview since being accused in the Mitchell Report of using performance-enhancing drugs, baseball superstar Roger Clemens talks to Mike Wallace.
-
Roger Clemens (CBS)
-
Interactive The Mitchell Report Investigation exposes "serious drug culture within baseball, from top to bottom."
-
Photo Essay Chasing 300 Follow the career of Yankee's pitcher Roger Clemens leading up to his 300th career win.
MP3 Audio
- 60 Minutes
This episode of 60 Minutes is available as a free audio podcast. Click here to listen or download.
"And even probably more about the Vioxx question," Clemens says.
Clemens may appear as requested at a congressional hearing in ten days. His challenge is getting people to believe him. "I don’t know if I can defend myself, I think people, a lot of people, have already made their decisions," he says.
"Well, a lot of people have made…," Wallace says.
"And that's our country, isn't it? Guilty before innocent. That that's the way our country works now. And then everybody's talking about sue, sue, sue. Should I sue? Well, let me exhaust. Let me just spend. How about, let's keep spending," Clemens says. "But I’m gonna explore what I can do and then I want to see if it’s gonna be worth it, worth all the headache."
Brian McNamee's attorney said McNamee will decide after watching this interview whether he'll sue Clemens for defamation. McNamee declined to talk with 60 Minutes. The problem both he and Clemens have is proving they're telling the truth.
How about a lie detector test?
"Some say they're good. Some say they're not. Do whatever," Clemens says.
"So as far as you're concerned, you would conceivably?" Wallace asks.
"Yeah. I don't know if they're good or bad," Clemens replies.
"Were you to pass a lie detector test, would that help prove that you’re telling the truth and help restore?" Wallace asks.
"Would it?" Clemens says.
"I don't know," Wallace replies.
"I don't either," Clemens says.
And he doesn't know if he'll ever pitch again. "But I understand that as a public person, you're gonna take some shots. The higher you get up on the flagpole, the more your butt shows? And I understand all that," Clemens says. "But I’m tired of answering to ‘em. That's why I will not ever play again. I don't want to answer to it. I want to slide off and be just a citizen.
"You're retiring. Period," Wallace says.
"Probably," Clemens says. "I would say, yeah. If I sit here and tell you right now, I would say yes."
Clemens says he'll never pitch again.
But he has retired three times before and could "un-retire" again.
"After listening to you in this interview, do you think people are gonna believe you? Believe that you, Roger Clemens never took steroids?" Wallace asks.
"I think the people that know me believe me and understand what I’m about. The people that are out there that have been saying the things that they’ve been sayin’, I don’t know if I’ll ever swing their opinion," Clemens says. "These accusations are not gonna change me as a person. I'll do everything I can to prove 'em wrong. And I still don't know if that's good enough."
Produced By Robert Anderson and Casey Morgan
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right


- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 13
- next
See all 252 CommentsRecently there was a person who finally admitted using steroids and she lost her medals but when it was first brought up by someone way back when.......didnt that remind you a bit like this episode and i can still remember ben johnson... fastest man in the world ..yup ran like a stallion in heat.. say "who me..not me i never took any enhancing drugs".........
so please when names are brought forward and the public hears em.. we are usually the last to hear the talk.. itd be interesting to hear honest athletes be asked what they have heard.. but then the union wouldnt want that ..is this making any sense?
McNamee has nothing to lose and everything to gain with this illusion. He has had great satisfaction toying with Clemens, the other players and the public at large. He is living the narcissist dream.
I don''t know anything about Brian McNamee at all. But I do know that the ONLY way he could blow his immunity was to lie, in which case he goes directly to jail. My guess is that Clemens treated him like garbage the same way he treats everybody else and that he didn''t hestitate to rat him out.
Karen Petersen
Former Manager, Honolulu Office
Western Temporary Services
As for the other overly inteligent statement of cheating because he used painkillers to play through injuries all athletes do this for instance Big Papi and his shoulder all season so please get a clue!!!
Mike has been a lot more aggressive interviewing people when he wants to get at the truth. Mike didn%u2019t do the follow up questions that mike usually does to get at the truth.
Why didn%u2019t Mike Wallace ask Roger if McNamee is a liar?????????? , Yes or No
Roger never answered the question why McNamee did not lie about Andy Pettitte but according to Roger lied about Roger????
Mike has been a lot more aggressive interviewing people when he wants to get at the truth. Mike didn%u2019t do the follow up questions that mike usually does to get at the truth.
Why didn%u2019t Mike Wallace ask Roger if McNamee is a liar?????????? , Yes or No
Roger never answered the question why McNamee did not lie about Andy Pettitte but according to Roger lied about Roger????
"Toward the end of the road trip which included the Marlins series, or shortly after the Blue Jays returned home to Toronto, Clemens approached McNamee and, for the first time, brought up the subject of using steroids. Clemens said he was not able to inject himself, and he asked for McNamee''s help."
Clemens approached McNamee. He did so after coming back from Florida, the same trip that he visited Jose Canseco and had a discussion with him about "stacking and cycling" steroids. You can read more about it in the report or in Canseco''s book.
McNammee is the real guilty party, the FBI even said he was guilty. But they let him go if he confessed up the names of the BIG stars, so the LAWYERS could seek out some BIG BUCKS. How much money could they get from McNammee? lol, he''s a trainer... not much money there.
We live in a fuhcked up country.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by job1966
Now that is something I just didn''t think about. However I could not agree more with your comment.
I am not disputing the truthfulness of Clinton. He was a very good liar. However I still say the masters of lying are bush/chaney.
I disagree about the Clintons lying.
However, they are masters of making truthful statements which mislead the listener.
It''s best illustrated with an example.
During the 1992 campaign, the Clintons were interviewed on 60 Minutes.
Steve Croft asked, "Isn''t it true that you had a 12-year affair with Gennifer Flowers?". Bill Clinton responded, "No, it''s not true".
It was common knowledge that Bill Clinton had a multi-year affair with Ms Flowers, but he wouldn''t have been lying if:
(a) the affair lasted 11 years and 10 months
or
(b) the affair ended more than 12 years after it began, but there was a 2-year period in the middle when they never saw each other
or
(c) ..........
That is why questions to the Clintons have to be very precise so they don''t leave an opening for them to mislead. However, the questions are always too vague.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 13
- next
See all 252 Comments