CONCORD, N.H., Jan. 1, 2008

New Year, New Same-Sex Unions

Dozens Of Gay, Lesbian Couples Legalize Partnerships Under New N.H. Law

  • Couples Gretchen Grappone, left, and Rose Wiant, second from left, both of Concord, N.H., and Wendy Waterstrat, center right, and Holly Henshaw, right, both of Brookline, N.H., hold hands during ceremonies leading to their legal civil unions, in front of the Statehouse, in Concord, N.H., early Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2008. Civil unions for same sex couples became legal in New Hampshire after the stroke of midnight Tuesday. Photo

    Couples Gretchen Grappone, left, and Rose Wiant, second from left, both of Concord, N.H., and Wendy Waterstrat, center right, and Holly Henshaw, right, both of Brookline, N.H., hold hands during ceremonies leading to their legal civil unions, in front of the Statehouse, in Concord, N.H., early Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2008. Civil unions for same sex couples became legal in New Hampshire after the stroke of midnight Tuesday.  (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

  • Photo Essay Same-Sex Wedding Days

    Same-sex couples marry in San Francisco and rally across the nation, while those opposed speak their piece.

  • Photo Essay Gay Pride Worldwide

    All over the world, parades celebrate gay pride.

(CBS)  Dozens of gay and lesbian couples entered into civil unions in New Hampshire in the early moments of New Year's Day as a new state law legalized the partnerships after midnight.

Organizers said they checked in 37 couples for an outdoor ceremony on the plaza of the New Hampshire Statehouse - the building where the law was adopted and signed in 2007. Participants bundled up against below-freezing temperatures.

"We've been together 20 years; we've been waiting for this moment for 20 years; finally the state will recognize us as we are," said Julie Bernier, who posed for photos on the Statehouse steps with partner Joan Andresen before the ceremony. Bernier and Andresen, who both work at Plymouth State University, never sought a commitment ceremony or other symbolic recognition of their relationship before Tuesday.

"I didn't believe in doing it until it meant something," Bernier said.

As ceremonies go, the outdoors event that began at 11 p.m. Monday was equal parts political rally, party and personal triumph.

"We really didn't believe that we'd be able to see this accomplished within one year but it has happened," state Rep. Jim Splaine, a sponsor of the civil unions bill, told the cheering crowd of about 200. "One thing we have to keep in mind is that there is much more to do. We have to continue the journey to make sure that we have marriage equality, full marriage equality - with the word marriage - soon."

New Hampshire's civil unions law - enacted by the Democrat-dominated Legislature early last year and signed by Democratic Gov. John Lynch in May, gives same sex couples the same rights, responsibilities and obligations of marriage without calling the union a marriage. New Hampshire is the fourth state in the nation to allow civil unions.

"We are a citizen legislature and we legislated this into being," said state Rep. Gail Morrison, a Democrat and co-organizer of the event who entered into a civil union with her longtime partner.

John Davey and Mark Brodeur brought gold wedding bands to exchange during their ceremony. Together 10 years since meeting online, Davey, 34, and Brodeur, 48, held a commitment ceremony with friends several years ago, but became the first couple to seek a civil union license in their hometown of Stratham when they became available last month.

"That was just for to say that we loved each other, that we're committed," Davey said of the commitment ceremony. "This is to show the world this is who we are, this is finally recognized in New Hampshire."

There were no protesters at the Statehouse, though one man, Michael Hein, said he drove 180 miles from Augusta, Maine, so he could "report to the people of Maine that this is going on next door." Hein also passed out statements from his group, The Christian Civil League of Maine, which denounces homosexuality.

"Without our vigilance in Maine, (civil unions are) something that could occur as soon as next year," Hein said.

After making brief group vows together, couples walked through an archway decorated with rainbow ribbons and a "just married" banner to meet officiants for individual ceremonies. As they walked through, fireworks from the city's New Year's celebration lit up the sky.

New Hampshire follows Vermont, Connecticut and New Jersey in allowing civil unions. Massachusetts is the only state that allows marriage. New Hampshire estimates that as many as 3,500 to 4,000 civil unions will be performed this first year.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 921 Comments
by sgtrds January 1, 2008 10:48 AM PST
Fantastic news and way way way overdue. One more step toward the goal of legalized same se*x marriage. Congrats to all of the couples!
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 1, 2008 10:58 AM PST
I''m a coutry boy where this behavior was for perverts. I''m so sick of U.S.A.''s facination by making queer cool it''s not it''s sick. I could care less what you no in a back room with a willing partner but that doesn''t make it right or cool.
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 1, 2008 10:59 AM PST
SgtRDS...Never thought you were a little light in the loafers but you never know.
Reply to this comment
by blancadebree January 1, 2008 11:03 AM PST
I couldn''t agree more with the first poster. That is something I have always admired about country people. They seem to be able to cut through the treacle and find the truly important matters. Sure, this rube is probably without a job, health insurance, and probably has his home in foreclosure, but he knows it''s the *** who are the real problem. I think it was Jesus who said "why do you notice the speck in my eye, when you do not...man look at those gay guys over there!"

http://blancadebree.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 1, 2008 11:03 AM PST
crzmeat

My oldest son is g*ay and a wonderful person. So is one of my step-sons and also a wonderful person.

You, on the other hand, are an as*s.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 1, 2008 11:06 AM PST
I think it was Jesus who said "why do you notice the speck in my eye, when you do not...man look at those gay guys over there!"

Posted by blancadebree at 11:03 AM : Jan 01, 2008

ROTFLMFAO!!!!! That was great! Oh and don''t judge all country folk by crzmeat. I''m a country boy too and most of us have much much much more tolerance, understanding and commonsense then that redneck.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 1, 2008 11:14 AM PST
Good for them!! Congratulations on a very happy day of your life!! I wish you many happy years together with your loved ones!!
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 1, 2008 11:16 AM PST
I''''m a coutry boy where this behavior was for perverts. I''''m so sick of U.S.A.''''s facination by making queer cool it''''s not it''''s sick. I could care less what you no in a back room with a willing partner but that doesn''''t make it right or cool.

Posted by crzmeat at 10:58 AM : Jan 01, 2008



If you don''t care about it, then why do you bother posting here?

Is minding your own f''in business, too difficult of a task for you?
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 1, 2008 11:32 AM PST
SgtRDS... My brother went up the down staircase I don''t hate queers I just don''t want nothing to do with them it''s unatrural like frog mating with a turtle like the old song goes if you don''t stand up for something you''ll fall for anything.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 1, 2008 11:44 AM PST
crzmeat

There is not a single thing about my son or step-son that is unnatural. They''re completely normal people. Have jobs, work hard, pay their bills, pay their taxes, etc. Actually both of them lead quite boring lives. They''re as normal as anyone else, except I think my son should move out of his mothers house and that my stepson could find a better boyfriend then the one he has, but since when do parents always approve of who the kids choose? Again, that''s normal.
Reply to this comment
by underdogus January 1, 2008 11:44 AM PST
SODOM & GAMORRAH way to go folks...
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 1, 2008 11:50 AM PST
SgtRDS,,,Appeciate your honesty......
Reply to this comment
by runningralph January 1, 2008 11:54 AM PST
This is a non-issue. Move on.
Reply to this comment
by jimbo554 January 1, 2008 12:20 PM PST
"This is a non-issue. Move on.

Posted by runningralph"

It''s a non-issue for those who are not affected by it. For those who have waited for this, it is a great day. Best wishes to all the happy couples!

Reply to this comment
by smtchcose January 1, 2008 12:23 PM PST
Happy New Year from www.interracialloving.com ... you know it is a site where diversely ethnic singles meet new friends, make great dates, and build lasting interracial relationships.
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 12:24 PM PST
I have read the posts. I really have a hard time understanding why this is such an impossible subject. So two people love each other. Does love have rules? Does it state you can only love a different type of person?
I think we are all better off with love, rather than hate. If all of you who hate this, stop and start working on your own personal problems. You will find your life a much happier place.
Reply to this comment
by newz4i January 1, 2008 12:26 PM PST
Anti-*** continually clamor that a lifestyle is somehow pushed in their face. However they peer through the door of another''s privacy and feverishly take it all in.
Reply to this comment
by secundus2 January 1, 2008 12:40 PM PST
Homosexual uniions will equal heterosexual unions in their social effect when homosexual conduct results in procreation. Governments that want new generations of taxpayers and soldiers and Social Security payers and schoolchildren will put incentives for heterosexual unions into the their laws. Governments that want to decrease their populations will write favors for homosexual unions into their laws. Religion has nothing to do with any of this, except that religions that want to expand demographically will favor heterosexual unions.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 1, 2008 12:45 PM PST
I got a feeling that you''''re just itching to experience the Ted Haggard life-style. Just do the world a favor, when you do, make sure he''''s eighteen.

Regards,

Posted by Nancy_Naive at 12:39 PM : Jan 01, 2008

I have little doubt that most of the more virulent anti-ga*y people are closeted ga*ys and are either in denial or terrified of the truth.
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl January 1, 2008 12:46 PM PST
Singen Rick there are 50 states and terriotories.
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 12:52 PM PST
secundus2 I really don''t understand how allowing same *** couples, will decrease the population. These folks are the way they are regardless being allowed or not. Just because you allow it, doesn''t mean everyone is going to do it.

singinrick

Allot of the founding fathers were agnostic if not out right atheist. Who really can decided what is morally right or wrong. Your bible was written by a bunch of old men who had "visions". Today we have medications for that. I think we really need to ask, about allot of things. How does this harm us as a nation? I think by allowing this, it makes us a much stronger nation.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 1, 2008 12:53 PM PST
I would like to point out that at one point in our history nearly half of America thought slavery was alright and that Black people were sub-human. However many of us have evolved beyond that stupidity. I''m afraid it''s going to take awhile longer for some people to evolve past their fear of ga*y people. Though some may never have the intelligence to do so. 100 years from now when ga*y marriage is as common as intr-racial marriage most people will wonder what all of the bigots were worried about.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 January 1, 2008 12:55 PM PST
crzmeat yes sah. If God wanted one gender He would have done so but that is not the case. I they are out there. That life style ain''t normal and never was. We were taught as young kids right from wrong. I knew a woman who had children. She lived with a woman like a man and woman..Them children and the boy he told me hold he felt. That is not right as there are kids that know it is wrong.. He couldn''t have his school mates over as his Mum''s love interesrt. They never think of the children that this hurt.He could not handle it.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 1, 2008 12:55 PM PST
Singin'''' Rick is one of those guys who just thinks about homosexuality all the time. I have no doubt he''''s latent...

Posted by Nancy_Naive at 12:51 PM : Jan 01, 2008

I certainly second that. In his case it''s as obvious as Larry Craig.
Reply to this comment
by chrisross2008 January 1, 2008 1:00 PM PST
Singinrick
Whatever happened to live and let live. I am glad to see that somewhere in the US finally gives the same rights and privileges to same *** couples. It''s not called a Marriage, they''re not going to be doing it in a Church. What possible harm can it do to you personally for these people to be happy? It''s not like you''re being forced to watch. All that is necessary is tolerance, from BOTH sides!
Reply to this comment
by jimbo554 January 1, 2008 1:00 PM PST
Gee singingrick, funny how you never fail to show up for this topic.

As much as you hate it, religion is dying and g ay acceptance is growing. The young generation couldn''t care less about it. You must have a pretty small concept of God if you think he thinks genitalia is more important than love.
Reply to this comment
by chrisross2008 January 1, 2008 1:10 PM PST
Wow NameVerified.
That is such a powerful argument. Your use of inspiring ideas and observations of social trends and civil liberties is truly amazing! So much for 2008 being a year for intellectual debate.
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 1:13 PM PST
There are no moral absolutes associated with atheism. Only moral relativism. Atheism does not have a basis for it''''s beliefs, it doesn''''t have a foundation. They don''''t have an absolute set of rules and standards to live by, only what they "deem" moral is relative to them, not what a higher authority (IE: GOD) has laid out for mankind.

You cannot base a society off of moral relativism otherwise you are asking for down-right chaos and lack of order.


Morals? So why do allot of Christians lack them? They seem to pick and choose. If your a reading man at all, try Scientific American. The did an interesting piece on morals, and how it is part of our brains makeup. We are born with or without. Nothing to do with superstitions. I am much happier being an atheist, than I even was being a Christian. As for lack of order. Atheist have the lowest crime rate of any group. Christians have the highest. And before you say that there are more Christians than atheist, the studies were based on percent of populations. And for what atheist base there ,morals on? It is not on some outdated opinion of someone who lived when the world was flat.

Also look up Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson. That will lead you to many more founding fathers.
Reply to this comment
by middleman8 January 1, 2008 1:36 PM PST
Its ok to level a country, and kill thousands of its citizens but for God''s sake don''t allow two people of the same *** too marry.
.
Reply to this comment
by sentry4jc January 1, 2008 1:37 PM PST
Gotta love the pro-gay lifestyle folks. All they can do is criticize and bash those of us who KNOW it''s a sinful lifestyle. Now don''t get me wrong, I have nothing against those who engage in it, it''s there CHOICE and that choice will mean eternal suffering, unless they repent. The majority of Americans who disagree with that lifestyle shouldn''t have it shoved down our throats and be made to accept it as normal and proper, when it isn''t. They shouldn''t have special laws made for them (marriage, employment, etc) when they are in the vast minority. They just need to deal with the circumstances of their choice.

Leviticus 18, 22-30 (NIV)
" ''Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.
" ''Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion.
" ''Do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants. But you must keep my decrees and my laws. The native-born and the aliens living among you must not do any of these detestable things, for all these things were done by the people who lived in the land before you, and the land became defiled. And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 1, 2008 1:48 PM PST
The decline of our Judeo-Christian roots that our country was founded upon is rapidly increasing and this article only indicates as such.

Posted by singinrick at 12:58 PM : Jan 01, 2008



How many atheists have been presidents, senators, or congressmen in this country? Virtually none - because the evangelicals would ENSURE that they were not voted into office.

On the flip side, how many politicians consider themselves "VERY" religious? Answer: most of them.

According to wikipedia: "Most U.S. citizens adhere to Christianity (78.5%)"

It seems to me that since atheists are such a tiny, tiny minority compared to the "very religious", and ALL of the major politicians are "very religious", don''t you find that it''s kind of a stretch to blame ALL of America''s problems in our society on atheists, when we have virtually no voice in our government, and all of our wishes fall on deaf ears?

By contrast, shouldn''t the 78.5% of Americans that consider themselves to be the "moral majority" shoulder 78.5% of the blame for the decline of our civilization?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 1, 2008 1:51 PM PST
Libs dont have as much misery to celebrate in Iraq, so they have more time to devote to the gay marriage issue in 2008.

Posted by NameVerified at 01:04 PM : Jan 01, 2008



There is plenty of misery to go around in Iraq. I see that thousands of Iraqi refugees are returning home now, and have no where to go because their houses are either leveled, or taken over by squatters that lost their own houses.

I guess as long as they''re homeless refugees in their own country, they''re not miserable according to you?
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 January 1, 2008 1:56 PM PST
I was not raised in the church and my parents taught there are 2 genders male and female. Not male and male . Not female and female.
This nation is not and never have been Christian. Some have a problem with that but it is true. Yet for an unholy nation thay got some explaining why the killed people for health issues when they yelled whitch..They surely pushed their church on others for a nation that was/is sep of church and state..the 1692 killing of people. Today it still goes on.
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 1:58 PM PST
singinrick

Is this the same author?


Leviticus 20:13: Gay people should be stoned to death
Exodus 21:7: It''s ok to sell your daughter into slavery
Exodus 35:2: If you work on the Sabbath, you should be put to death.
Corinthians 11:14: "If a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him"(*cough, Jesus, *cough)
19:24: A Man should not go near a woman when she is on her period
Leviticus 18:20: adultery carries the same punishment as homosexuality: DEATH

This guy kinda scares me.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 1, 2008 2:05 PM PST
Posted by Sentry4JC at 01:37 PM : Jan 01, 2008


"I have nothing against those who engage in it, it''s there CHOICE and that choice will mean eternal suffering, unless they repent."

Which section of Sharia Law does that come from?


"The majority of Americans who disagree with that lifestyle shouldn''t have it shoved down our throats and be made to accept it as normal and proper, when it isn''t."

How is it being shoved down your throat? Are you being forced to marry someone of the same s`e`x? Or is your stinking your nose into everybody else''s private lives considered more morally acceptable than minding your own friggin'' business?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 1, 2008 2:07 PM PST
Posted by Sentry4JC at 01:37 PM : Jan 01, 2008



Are you sure you want to start living your life according to Leviticus?
What about section 1:9 requiring a burnt offering on the altar?

What about 25:23 prohibiting land ownership? LOTS of sinners on that one, huh?

Leviticus 25:44-46 which condones and ENCOURAGES slavery:
"Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly."

How about Leviticus 11:6-8 that prohibits people from eating rabbits or pork? Had a ham sandwich or a BLT lately - SINNER?

How about Leviticus 11:10 that prohibits you from eating clams, oysters, lobster, crab, or anything else from the sea that doesn''t have scales or fins? I guess I''m a vicious sinner - I had clams AND crab legs yesterday!!

And don''t even get me started on Exodus!!
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 1, 2008 2:09 PM PST
BUMP

Posted by singinrick at 01:52 PM : Jan 01, 2008



Too stupid to post your own ignorant comments that don''t make any sense, so you''re forced to "BUMP" someone else''s stupid comments that don''t make any sense?
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 January 1, 2008 2:35 PM PST
Not every one owned black persons as slaves..We did not..I am a Mainer. but what we are talking about gender..Yes gender same love..I may not be the sharpeish pencil in the box but I know the difference in the genders. If they be born that way then medical means can''t THEY fix this. The bible it sits in my book case with my computer books..It is not read as I can''t read the bloody book. I don''t hate them same genger persons but they make no sense as well use yer head and think it out.
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 2:47 PM PST
MichelleM99

To me it does not make sense. But it doesn''t have to. Just because I don''t understand it, doesn''t make it wrong or right. All that really matters is that people be allowed to do what makes sense to them. I sure if you ask a ga*y person "Does hetros make sense to you?" you would get the same answer we get when we are asked about ga*ys. All that really matters is that we treat everyone as humans, we show everyone love and compassion, no matter how different they are. Truth be told, I''m sure you are friends with a few people who are ga*y. There is a good chance you are friends with an atheist or two. You just don''t know it.
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 2:50 PM PST
This article shoud read:

"New Year, New acts of Sodomy"

-The decline of morals in America continues

You have said it before.

Maybe it should read.

"New Year, New acts of Understanding"

-The decline of closed minds in America continues
Reply to this comment
by January 1, 2008 2:51 PM PST
The good news is that same-*** marriage is supported by nearly half of 18-25 year olds, while only supported by 11% of those 65+. Once California and New York have civil unions and same-*** marriage (which will happen within a decade) it will be mainstream. In 50 years opposition to same-*** marriage will be as odd as opposition to interracial marriage.
Reply to this comment
by January 1, 2008 2:53 PM PST
singinrick, there is nothing morally relativistic about supporting same-*** marriage. The absolute moral right is to support the rights of gay couples.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds January 1, 2008 2:53 PM PST
Leviticus 20:13: Gay people should be stoned to death
Exodus 21:7: It''''s ok to sell your daughter into slavery
Exodus 35:2: If you work on the Sabbath, you should be put to death.
Corinthians 11:14: "If a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him"(*cough, Jesus, *cough)
19:24: A Man should not go near a woman when she is on her period
Leviticus 18:20: adultery carries the same punishment as homosexuality: DEATH

This guy kinda scares me.

Posted by jeff-fla at 01:58 PM : Jan 01, 2008

RAmen!
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 2:55 PM PST
singinrick

Very simple. Us Atheist understand law and order based mostly on. Do no harm to others. Plus your not judging people base on man judging man, your basing it on man judging man based on what man wrote in the days the earth was flat.
Reply to this comment
by January 1, 2008 3:04 PM PST
singinrick, morality is not about popularity. Is it moral to whip rape victims in Saudi Arabia if the majority there supports it? Of course not. It is moral to treat people as equals, which is why same-*** marriage should be legal. Gay couples should not be treated as second-class citizens. As the Declaration stated, we are all created equal.
Reply to this comment
by cs4466 January 1, 2008 3:07 PM PST
In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, thus negating its previous definition of homosexuality as a clinical mental disorder.

In 2008, the American Psychiatric Association is considering adding bigotry to that list. But look on the bright side Singinrick, you might be able to collect disability benefits.

Happy 2008!
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 3:12 PM PST
Rick

Do no harm is just plain human nature. If it is just biblical, than the most of the world is would be killing and raping one another. As for the world being flat. In the days the bible was written, they believed the world was flat, and you could be put to death stating other wise. Read a but of history other than the made up one you seem to read about.

Back in the day, we had the crusades, inquisition, witch burnings, and depending on who was king or queen, you was put to death for being the wrong kind of Christian. Sure some have done good, even mother Teresa had done great works. Oppss. I forgot she wrote that she had lost her faith many years before she died.
Reply to this comment
by January 1, 2008 3:14 PM PST
Well, then the Creator supports same-se*x marriage, I suppose.
Reply to this comment
by revbates January 1, 2008 3:15 PM PST
I think it makes the world a better place each time we recognize that the mystery of Love, can be expressed more freely. Best wishes to all the New Hampshire couples who have made this life commitment to each other!
Happy New Year!
Reply to this comment
by jeff-fla January 1, 2008 3:19 PM PST
Rick

Homosexual might have the word se*x in it, but it is not about ***. It is about love. The same way heterosexual is not about se*x it is about love. I ask you? What harm does it do, and what is wrong with love?

Also degrading somone over the sexual preference does do great harm. Read about Alan Turing. To name just one. With his death the whole world was harmed.
Reply to this comment
See all 921 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs