June 18, 2009 6:27 PM

NYC's Billionaire Mayor Eyes White House

(CBS/AP)  New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other potential independent presidential candidates are joining prominent Republican and Democratic centrists at a meeting that will consider the merits of a third-party bid for the White House.

The Jan. 7 event was organized by former Democratic senators David Boren and Sam Nunn, and about a dozen prominent figures are expected to participate, including Bloomberg, former Republican senator John Danforth of Missouri and Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., each of whom has been mentioned as a possible independent candidate.

Plans for the meeting were first reported by The Washington Post.

Boren said the meeting will serve as a form of "shock therapy" to the major-party candidates to stop bickering and provide Americans with a blueprint for bipartisanship in Washington. The event will be at the Norman campus of the University of Oklahoma, where he is president.

"We used to work together across party lines and we used to cooperate with each other," Boren said of his relationships with current and former senators who plan to attend. "It is a message to the two parties: Please rise to the occasion. If you don't, there is always a possibility out there of an independent."

In an interview with the New York Times, Boren suggested that if the prospective major party nominees failed within two months to formally embrace bipartisanship and address the fundamental challenges facing the nation, "I would be among those who would urge Mr. Bloomberg to very seriously consider running for president as an independent."

Bloomberg's spokesman Stu Loeser told the New York Post that "[Bloomberg] is going [to Oklahoma] because he has seen again and again as mayor how hyper-partisanship in Washington isn't just getting in the way of big reforms, it's getting in the way of any meaningful progress on a whole host of issues."

"He's looking forward to the opportunity to sit down with like-minded leaders to try and find solutions," Loeser added.

The meeting comes one day before the New Hampshire primary.

"We need statesmanship, not politics," Boren said. "The meeting in itself implies there could be other possibilities" than a two-party contest.

A Dec. 18 letter from Boren and Nunn to participants asserts that the political system is "at the least, badly bent and many are concluding that it is broken at a time where America must lead boldly at home and abroad. Partisan polarization is preventing us from uniting to meet the challenges that we must face if we are to prevent further erosion of America's power of leadership and example."

"As the letter says, we've literally become a house divided," Boren said. "We really need a government of national unity."

Bloomberg, once a Democrat, then a Republican and now an independent, has denied any interest in running for the presidency even while keeping speculation alive that he might.

"Despite public statements that he has no plans to run as an Independent candidate for president, his staff has laid out exact plans for the press on many occasions," reports CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. "A billionaire businessman who has in the past indicated his future lies in philanthropy could easily spend that money on a campaign instead." (read more in Horserace)

Like the meeting's organizers, the mayor has criticized the tone of the campaign as one of overbearing partisanship. He said last month the country "needs somebody that says, 'I'm going to get the best from both parties.'"

Boren said some of the presidential candidates want to embrace a bipartisan platform but fear being attacked politically if they do so. "Many of the major issues are just not being addressed," he said.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by itchyb-2009 January 1, 2008 10:36 AM EST
After the ''08 elections, the "gridlock" will be over. No more vetoes from the moron-in-chief. There have been many bipartisan bills which bush has vetoed or had his minions in the senate and house kill. The idea of a third party with Bloomie at the lead is a smoke screen, and a dangerous one at that. Let the democrats roll in the next election, and get things done. Finally
Reply to this comment
by stick130 January 1, 2008 4:02 AM EST
When the Republican Mayor of N.Y.runs as a 3rd party candidate,that will give the Republicons a way to spin the results after they take the biggest "WHOOPIN" in the history of the USA. They thought the last election was bad? I believe it will take the Cons'' 50 years to make a comeback,thanks to the "IdiotBoy" in the White House that has embarrassed all Americans .We are not much better or we would be picketing the Congress and Senate until they grow a spine or resign, untill they learn what the Constitution is.
Reply to this comment
by fairandbal December 31, 2007 11:13 PM EST
Let me see if i get this correct...
- Bush reelected in 2004 by slimmest margin ever for a relected president and GOP (along with the MSM) screams "WE HAVE A SWEEPING MANDATE TO DO WHATEVER WE WANT!!!". Dems are not even allowed in congressional discussions of policy, NO ONE on the GOP side objects.
- Carl Rove declares a permanent Republican majority.
- Dems win in 2006 by basically a landslide and GOP SCREAMS it was really a conservative victory.
- Dems set to win big again in 2008 and the GOP and MSM are screaming for ''bipartisanship''.

Give me a break. The GOP and their friends only want dictatorships when their in power, but we MUST have bipartisanship when they''re not. This is a scam folks, don''t buy it!!!
Reply to this comment
by mediacreedia December 31, 2007 11:08 PM EST
Who is this guy? What does he represent? What are his credential? Mayor of New York? Supported by Giuliani? What the heck is up? Why is he running? There are reasons.
Reply to this comment
by creeper00 December 31, 2007 10:52 PM EST
Oh...so NOW we''re supposed to "embrace bipartisanship", huh? After eight years of Dictator Bush dragging us over the right side of the cliff we''re now supposed to meet them halfway?

Scr@w that.
Reply to this comment
by excoachken December 31, 2007 10:13 PM EST
Isn''t that just like your average billionaire, whenever a "one of a kind" thing is up for sale (like our Presidency) they are the first to get in line to buy it!
Reply to this comment
by jsilver2th December 31, 2007 10:11 PM EST
I''m sure all of his lackeys swoon and lick boots all day telling him whatever he wants to hear... with money like that you live in your own little dream world enabled by syncophants droolling after your mighty dollars:

Earth to Bloomberg: Nobody oustide of Manhattan gives a tinker...
Reply to this comment
by cbs_oliver December 31, 2007 9:54 PM EST
""We need statesmanship, not politics," Boren said."

Boran has got it perfectly wrong.

We need more politics and less "statesmanship".

I am not interested in an elitist candidate or leader seeking to sort things out with other elitists in back room meetings.

We''ve had enough of that.

Straight up public politics is what we need for a change.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 December 31, 2007 9:52 PM EST
Neocons trying to split the vote, folks. Oldest trick int he book.
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 December 31, 2007 9:39 PM EST
Bloomberg is a globalist and a corporate tool. Who needs a billionaire president.
Reply to this comment
See all 52 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook