NYC's Billionaire Mayor Eyes White House
Bipartisan Summit On Third-Party Candidates Fuels Michael Bloomberg Buzz
-
-
Photo
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg responds to questions during a news conference last week in New York. (AP)
-
Photo
A poster urging New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg to run for president — and offering free hot dogs on inauguration day — hangs in the window of a Gray's Papaya fast food restaurant in New York's Greenwich Village neighborhood on Dec. 30, 2007. (CBS/Judy Faber)
-
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Bloomberg In Bali
Harry Smith speaks with Michael Bloomberg about his attendance at the U.N. conference on climate change in Bali, Indonesia, and finds out what cities are doing to curb global warming.
-
Video
Obama Joins Bloomberg For Eggs
"CBS News RAW": Barack Obama and Mayor Michael Bloomberg draw a crowd as they meet for breakfast in Manhattan. Their topic of conversation remains unknown. Obama picked up the $17.34 check.
-
Video
Mayor On A Mission
New York City's Mayor Michael Bloomberg sits down with Harry Smith to discuss his proposal for a carbon taxing.
-
News Tools
Campaign Calendar
The latest list of primary and caucus dates as states continue jockeying for position.
-
News Tools
Poll Database
Search for results from the latest CBS News national polls on the president, the campaign and more.
The Jan. 7 event was organized by former Democratic senators David Boren and Sam Nunn, and about a dozen prominent figures are expected to participate, including Bloomberg, former Republican senator John Danforth of Missouri and Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., each of whom has been mentioned as a possible independent candidate.
Plans for the meeting were first reported by The Washington Post.
Boren said the meeting will serve as a form of "shock therapy" to the major-party candidates to stop bickering and provide Americans with a blueprint for bipartisanship in Washington. The event will be at the Norman campus of the University of Oklahoma, where he is president.
"We used to work together across party lines and we used to cooperate with each other," Boren said of his relationships with current and former senators who plan to attend. "It is a message to the two parties: Please rise to the occasion. If you don't, there is always a possibility out there of an independent."
In an interview with the New York Times, Boren suggested that if the prospective major party nominees failed within two months to formally embrace bipartisanship and address the fundamental challenges facing the nation, "I would be among those who would urge Mr. Bloomberg to very seriously consider running for president as an independent."
Bloomberg's spokesman Stu Loeser told the New York Post that "[Bloomberg] is going [to Oklahoma] because he has seen again and again as mayor how hyper-partisanship in Washington isn't just getting in the way of big reforms, it's getting in the way of any meaningful progress on a whole host of issues."
"He's looking forward to the opportunity to sit down with like-minded leaders to try and find solutions," Loeser added.
The meeting comes one day before the New Hampshire primary.
"We need statesmanship, not politics," Boren said. "The meeting in itself implies there could be other possibilities" than a two-party contest.
A Dec. 18 letter from Boren and Nunn to participants asserts that the political system is "at the least, badly bent and many are concluding that it is broken at a time where America must lead boldly at home and abroad. Partisan polarization is preventing us from uniting to meet the challenges that we must face if we are to prevent further erosion of America's power of leadership and example."
"As the letter says, we've literally become a house divided," Boren said. "We really need a government of national unity."
Bloomberg, once a Democrat, then a Republican and now an independent, has denied any interest in running for the presidency even while keeping speculation alive that he might.
"Despite public statements that he has no plans to run as an Independent candidate for president, his staff has laid out exact plans for the press on many occasions," reports CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. "A billionaire businessman who has in the past indicated his future lies in philanthropy could easily spend that money on a campaign instead." (read more in Horserace)
Like the meeting's organizers, the mayor has criticized the tone of the campaign as one of overbearing partisanship. He said last month the country "needs somebody that says, 'I'm going to get the best from both parties.'"
Boren said some of the presidential candidates want to embrace a bipartisan platform but fear being attacked politically if they do so. "Many of the major issues are just not being addressed," he said.
©MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.




- 1
- 2
- next
See all 53 CommentsAnd we''ve seen in the past how third party candidates ensure a victory for an otherwise weak candidate.
Can anyone say President Mike Huckabee?
http://blancadebree.blogspot.com
leafsntrees make pointless posts to this board
leafsntrees make pointless posts to this board
leafsntrees make pointless posts to this board
leafsntrees make pointless posts to this board
leafsntrees make pointless posts to this board
leafsntrees make pointless posts to this board
leafsntrees make pointless posts to this board
Sorry folks.
Pax vobiscum
If he doesn''t, the next best candidates are out there (Huckabee, Paul, Edwards, Obama...)
We should have more than a two party system. That is democracy in action and it is up to each individual candidate to make their best case. If that candidate loses, it''s incredibly wormy to blame everyone else. Period.
For sale to the best prostitute
If Bloomberg runs will we hear them fretting about his Jewish religion, and question his loyalty to the USA vs Israel?
I''ve actually never heard anyone have concerns about dual country loyalties of Mormons as they don''t have a homeland except for the USA.
I concur.
Cough, cough, puke!
Nobody out here in the West gives a rip about this Billionaire- Ross Perot did better that this guy will ever do because at least he had a populist edge-
Sure there''s plenty of consultants and hired-ons ready to predict great things- Boren quit his Senate seat when the going got tough-
I hope they aren''t spending public money from the state University on this- a conference my behind- launching pad for Bloomberg sign sealed and delivered- the timing- oh yeah- People that think they are God''s gift because they are rich- BORRRING
Aristocracy
a government or state ruled by an elite, or privileged upper class.
Oligarchy
a form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique; government by the few.
Plutocracy
a government or state in which the wealthy class rules.
"Whoever has the most money wins."
Remember "Ross Perot" and his 19,741,065 votes? That was the only reason for the Clinton victory. Clinton got 43% of the popular vote, and they knew that going in. Thus the creation of a false ringer candidate in this case "Ross Perot" who would have been a non-entity except for the media types on the Clinton payroll who brought him out there as a serious candidate. They even allowed him in the final presidential debate, the only time in history that has happened.
Once again, the Clinton mafia has a candidate that cannot get more than 43% of the vote, thus they are looking to put another ringer in there. "Bloomberg" I suppose is meant to appeal to the middle Republicans, the money Republicans, enough to swing key states to her satanic majesty the clinton.
But I doubt anyone will vote for him - the "Ross Perot" fake candidate came out with a pseudo-populist agenda designed to fool middle Americans, he said all the things they wanted to say, and therby guarateeing that the arch-evil architect of NAFTA would seize the White House. What fake positions will "Bloomberg" take? Lower taxes for the rich? More wealth for the super-wealthy? A bigger share of our national treasure to be misspent in that Hell-hole New York?
If this is all the Clintons have, they are getting weak.
Sam Nunn (Ga.), He is a board member of the following publicly held corporations: Chevron Corporation, The Coca-Cola Company, Dell Computer Corporation, General Electric Company.
Charles S. Robb (Va.)Married into LBJ Family= he was the only senate Democrat to vote for all items in the GOP''s "Contract with America" when they reached the Senate floor, including a Balanced Budget Amendment and a line item veto.
Former New Jersey governor Christine Todd Whitman. Whitman as Bush EPA executive appeared twice in New York City after the September 11 attacks to inform New Yorkers that the toxins released by the attacks posed no threat to their health.
Gary Hart? ho ho ho he likes the hos.
And this is change?
Posted by marcodele
Unless your name is Ron Paul.
The corporate-owned mass media tries hard to ignore those they can''t control.
I would vote for anyone other than Bloomberg. Americans need to stand up and say we''re not going to let global wealth run our country. Never again. Ron Paul or John Edwards what other choice is there?
But isn''t it nice to have so much money you can run for president just for the fun of it? Just ask George.
Posted by savdavid at 03:43 PM : Dec 31, 2007
No current presidential candidates political record can compete with Bloomberg''s record either.
Posted by FloydZepp at 04:35 PM : Dec 31, 2007
Floyd - Bloomberg is the man!! Please take a look at his record AND his approval rating in NYC.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1302.xml?ReleaseID=1065
NYC residents are tough, and they don''t give their politicians an inch.
This smacks of someone wanting to save from getting caught in a landslide, nothing more!!!
And the way Bush and Cheney are selling off America''s assets, he could buy it for a song.
be the next president???? Duh..... Besides, Bloomberg
is a CFR NEW WORLD ORDER SCUM.....BEWARE!!!!!!
seat twice because he bought up all the voting machines
in Nebraska. What a SCUM BUCKET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boran has got it perfectly wrong.
We need more politics and less "statesmanship".
I am not interested in an elitist candidate or leader seeking to sort things out with other elitists in back room meetings.
We''ve had enough of that.
Straight up public politics is what we need for a change.
Earth to Bloomberg: Nobody oustide of Manhattan gives a tinker...
Scr@w that.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 53 Comments