OSKALOOSA, Iowa, Dec. 31, 2007

Fred Thompson's Death Throes

The New Republic: On The Trail In Iowa, The Republican Is A Dead Candidate Walking

  • Play CBS Video Video Can Thompson Turn It Around?

    "Only On The Web": Fred Thompson was seen as the candidate who'd unite the GOP and make a strong run in '08. With slipping numbers, he's now scrambling to stay in the race. CBS' John Bentley reports.

  • Video Thompson's Snowball Revenge

    "Only On The Web": Defending senior adviser Bob Davis after a reporter hit him with a snowball, Fred Thompson exacts revenge on the offending journalist... CBS News' own John Bentley.

  • Video Fred Thompson's Lighter Side

    "CBS News RAW": While on the trail in Iowa, Fred Thompson does his best John Wayne impersonation and sings a few bars of a childhood favorite, "Sioux City Sue."

  • In this photograph taken with a video camera, GOP presidential candidate, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, walks from his campaign bus before his walking tour of Oskaloosa, Iowa, Friday, Dec. 28, 2007. Wearing a cowboy hat and leather jacket, Thompson trudged through ankle-deep snow as he made his way around Oskaloosa's town square, chatting with people at a coffee shop and the county courthouse. Photo

    In this photograph taken with a video camera, GOP presidential candidate, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, walks from his campaign bus before his walking tour of Oskaloosa, Iowa, Friday, Dec. 28, 2007. Wearing a cowboy hat and leather jacket, Thompson trudged through ankle-deep snow as he made his way around Oskaloosa's town square, chatting with people at a coffee shop and the county courthouse.  (AP)

  • Photo Essay Fred Thompson

    He has played the role of the president in several films. Now he is running to be it for real.

  • Video Library Scenes From The Road

    Watch exclusive video from CBS News reporters traveling with the candidates.

(The New Republic)  This column was written by Michael Crowley.

This is what a disaster looks like: Fred Thompson, the former future "savior" of the Republican Party, looking droopy-eyed and jowly in a black leather jacket and tan ten-gallon hat, wandering like some lonesome lost cowboy through the snows of southeastern Iowa in search of voters - and not finding many.

A few minutes earlier, the former U.S. Senator, "Law and Order" star, and would-be conservative hero had emerged from the Smokey Row coffeehouse, where, in his endless search for the only kind of media he can afford - free - he'd sat down with the local newspaper. Otherwise, Smokey Row held at most two dozen largely disinterested patrons. Thompson famously loathes the grip-and-grin side of politics and smiled wanly through his chit-chats. As he staged a handshake with one woman, the photographer had called out, "Look at each other!" Thompson couldn't resist mocking the artificiality of the forced smiling eye contact. "That's the hardest thing in the world to do," he chuckled.

At least someone cared enough to get her picture taken with him. Many of the folks in the quiet coffeehouse ignored Thompson, more interested in their laptops or newspapers than a presidential candidate. A pair of enthusiastic teenagers did approach him on his way out, however. "It's good to be a young man," the often depleted-looking actor-lobbyist told them wistfully. Yet the moment deflated when one of the teens confessed that he's not an Iowa resident.

Perhaps defensive about the wan crowd at the Smokey Row, Thompson's press secretary took care to note that this visit was an unannounced drop-by; nothing should be read into the head count. And in fairness, Thompson's visits like this one to small-town main streets are as much about local media buzz as they are about converting individual voters. Still, it seemed a poor use of the precious little time Thompson has left to salvage his campaign. Currently embarked on a 50-stop statewide bus tour - with the unwieldy moniker of "The Clear Conservative Choice: Hands Down!" emblazoned across the vehicle - Thompson has staked everything on finishing a strong third here in Iowa. (He's given up on New Hampshire entirely, and won't return there until after Iowa's January 3rd caucuses.) This past week, Thompson had to mount a tragic online fundraising appeal in which he begged supporters to help him scrape up the cash - $248,846, to be precise - that will allow him to buy one measly ad on the Iowa airwaves. A week earlier, by contrast, the flaky libertarian Ron Paul had raised $4 million in one day.

Thompson's (quite defensible) argument that he's the only Republican candidate who has been a consistent social and economic conservative hasn't budged him above 12 percent or so in the Iowa polls. That's good enough for fourth place at the moment. But John McCain is now making a late run here, and Paul is mounting a serious television advertising campaign. Finishing fourth - or possibly even fifth - might push Thompson out of the race (that some people think he's wanted to exit for many weeks now) long before he can reach his relative stronghold of South Carolina.

After leaving the coffeehouse, Thompson trudged his way through a snow-covered city park, as aides pointed out patches of snow and ice to prevent a symbolically catastrophic wipeout. He arrived at his next stop, at the town's county courthouse, on his feet, but couldn't summon much enthusiasm. Escorted by the county supervisor, Willie Van Weelden, Thompson popped into a series of dreary administrative offices staffed by a homogenous and somewhat befuddled-looking crew of middle-aged ladies. In the county tax office Thompson greeted precisely one worker. "This lady takes all the property tax money!" Van Wheelen exclaimed with the enthusiasm only a county worker could muster. "Is that right?" Thompson replied, sounding as impassive as he surely was. In the neighboring registrar's office, Thompson delivered a quick round of hellos and then cast a puzzled glance at a shaggy-haired boy scribbling at a table under a sign: "Drivers' Test In Progress." As if that were the final straw, Fred finally made a break for it back through the winter cold and into the warm comfort of his massive bus.

Jeri Thompson isn't with her husband in Iowa this week, but perhaps she should be; his much-discussed young wife has proven herself to be a more adept campaigner throughout the campaign. In a memorable moment at a fire station last week, Jeri charmingly donned a fire captain's helmet after Fred - perhaps fearing an embarrassing photo, but looking like a stick in the mud - refused to put one on. She also recently toured South Carolina on her own, and has blitzed conservative talk-radio shows, sometimes appearing on several in a day. It's enough to make some people wonder whether Fred Thompson's candidacy won't seem, in hindsight, like a platform for Jeri Thompson's future ambitions. (Although her instincts still aren't perfect: One Iowan recounted the way Jeri appeared wildly overdressed, in a beret and expensive dress, at a recent downscale political gathering.) Indeed, the more Thompson campaigns at low octane, the more plausible the theory that Jeri pushed him into running becomes. But why did he flop so badly once he did run? Where to start? He got in too late, didn't sound prepared, lacked the movie-star presence people expected, and suffered from staff turmoil (widely attributed to Jeri). Above all, Thompson never offered a clear rationale for his candidacy - a curious defect for a star contender, unless you consider what's become increasingly clear of late: On some level, the guy never really seemed to want it.

That much was obvious at a town hall forum later that day in nearby Ottumwa. At a time when other candidates are pulling in several hundred voters per stop, at most 75 voters turned out (albeit on a very snowy day) to hear him. Thompson put in a soporific performance made worse by an over-warm room and a noisy child in the audience. And echoing a moment famously recounted on the front page of the New York Times several weeks ago, Thompson had to coax enthusiasm out of his audience. Speaking of the distinction between legal and illegal immigration Thompson said, "We need to be a nation of high fences and wide gates." A man in the audience called out in agreement. "You like that?" Thompson asked hopefully. "Alright," he continued, looking for some momentum. "Can I get a round of applause?" A few long seconds later, the crowd obliged.

After Thompson spoke, his state chairman, the Iowa Congressman Steve King, bounded to the back of the room to greet voters. "How ya doin?" he eagerly asked one woman in her forties. "We're having a ball out here! Where is your head and where is your heart?"

The woman paused. "Probably Huckabee," she said apologetically. Meanwhile, Thompson shook only a quick batch of hands and disappeared from the room within about three minutes.

Out in the hallway stood three campaign workers holding clipboards. "Would you like to sign up to caucus for Fred?" they called to the departing voters. Few stopped.

"That's it. The room's empty," one worker reported back to the others. I could see the signup sheets from over their shoulders. One had two names recorded on it, another just a single name. The third was entirely empty. And so this is the way the savior's campaign ends - not with a bang, but with an empty signup sheet.

By Michael Crowley
If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion and analysis.



If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion, and criticism.

Video and Galleries from Opinion

Add a Comment See all 46 Comments
by skyk-2009 December 31, 2007 12:36 PM PST
Fred Thompson looks more like the Republican Party of today than anyone else. He''s old, tired and out of date.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug December 31, 2007 12:42 PM PST

Fred who?
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 December 31, 2007 12:53 PM PST
Fred does not look good - he needs to go home - for his own health.
Reply to this comment
by rpsupporter December 31, 2007 12:53 PM PST
Just 40 years ago a cup of coffee cost 10 cents, a gallon of gas cost 30 cents, a new car cost $2,500 and a new house cost $25,000.

Today these things cost 10 times more than that. The dollar has lost 90% of its purchasing power because the Federal Reserve has created too much money and the result has been constant inflation.

The US is on the brink of a financial catastrophe. The $''s value is in freefall. The US is in debt to Foreign Governments a total of over 2.3 Trillion dollars. $700 billion is owed to China and OPEC Countries in the Middle East.

That "flaky" Ron Paul is the ONLY presidential candidate that is discussing this coming financial collapse and understands the incredible economic dangers we face. He has also raised over $19 million this fourth quarter.
Reply to this comment
by yaelleno December 31, 2007 1:09 PM PST
I saw a video of Fred to the Iowa voters yesterday that blew me away. The guy is most definitely ALIVE and more Presidential than any of the other candidates on both sides. It''s long but worth watching the whole thing. This guy could really win. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VblJq4j0_SE
Reply to this comment
by sarag21 December 31, 2007 1:22 PM PST
In case the author of this article read the comments -- I take exception to your calling Ron Paul a "flake". According to your rules of engagement (and I quote):
"There%u2019s legal language nearby. Here''s the plain English: no libel, slander, no lying, no fabricating, . . . " You will set an example by following your own rules. And regarding your assessment of Dr. Paul -- I recommend you study, with an open mind and heart, the wisdom of what he is saying. You will learn about the foundational concepts that built this nation by those who know what was needed for her greatness to endure.
Reply to this comment
by sarag21 December 31, 2007 1:23 PM PST
In case the author of this article read the comments -- I take exception to your calling Ron Paul a "flake". According to your rules of engagement (and I quote):
"There%u2019s legal language nearby. Here''s the plain English: no libel, slander, no lying, no fabricating, . . . " You will set an example by following your own rules. And regarding your assessment of Dr. Paul -- I recommend you study, with an open mind and heart, the wisdom of what he is saying. You will learn about the foundational concepts that built this nation by those who know what was needed for her greatness to endure.
Reply to this comment
by cfischahs December 31, 2007 1:32 PM PST
Fred is alive and well... taking his message to the Iowa voters through his "Hands Down" bus tour... town-by-town... and he is connecting to voters like me!

As reported by Drudge,
Sen. Fred Thompson''s Personal Message to the Iowa Voters makes the case for why he%u2019s the best man to America%u2019s next Commander in Chief.

www.Fred08.com

Look. Listen. Choose.
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 December 31, 2007 1:35 PM PST
Sarag21,.....I''m with you. Good observation!
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 December 31, 2007 1:49 PM PST
Thompson is a joke. He was never a serious candidate and has only provided fodder for last night talk show hosts!
Reply to this comment
by gloria37074 December 31, 2007 2:06 PM PST
I respectfully submit to you that Fred Dalton Thompson is alive and well contrary to some disinformed journalists. Fred Thompson is a conservative who does not whine or throw dirt on other candidates. When asked questions....you know exactly where he stands. He is candidate for the people. We asked him to run for President because of his beliefs and service to our country. He has not flip-flopped or lied. If he has not known the answer, he has so stated it. As for his finances, we who support him will do what is needed. Unlike some who can finance their campaign with no help from others. It is of utmost importance that we select a President who can make GOOD decisions and abide by them. Fred Dalton Thompson is that man.
Reply to this comment
by camd115 December 31, 2007 2:35 PM PST
I''d just like to point out that on Dec. 16 Ron Paul raised 6 million, not 4 million as your article said.

Only Mitt Romney has raised more money in a quarter on the GOP side than Ron Paul did this quarter (over $19 million).

Thank you Fred, for being a perfect example of how NOT to run a campaign. Please come home to Tennessee and quit embarrassing us.
Reply to this comment
by camd115 December 31, 2007 2:37 PM PST
Oh yeah, I also am offended by your labeling Ron Paul a "flake". You don''t accept name-calling in your comments, don''t accept it in articles either.
Reply to this comment
by allan_59 December 31, 2007 2:44 PM PST
Notice that SayBS is now posting articles from other sites to defame Thompson so that they can deny the willful misstatements that fill these articles. As a resident of Iowa who has attended multiple events of Thompson and other candidates, I can assure you that this article totally misrepresents the Thompson campaign. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the left is becoming increasingly worried.
These so-called reporters should know that mendacity is not a basis for a career. Other hate-mongers may applaud what you write, but no one, even them, will ever be foolish enough to believe another word you write.
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 December 31, 2007 2:47 PM PST
" I take exception to your calling Ron Paul a "flake". According to your rules of engagement (and I quote):
"There%u2019s legal language nearby. Here''''s the plain English: no libel, slander, no lying, no fabricating, . . ."


Calling Ron Paul a "flake" is neither libel nor slander (how could it be slander?--slander is spoken)

It is either "evaluative", or true.

Neither of which is libel.
Reply to this comment
by sparks224 December 31, 2007 2:50 PM PST
Wow,
An article about a non-candidate by a right wing noise machine. What a waste of time.
Reply to this comment
by December 31, 2007 3:21 PM PST
After this, I fully expect a Fred Thompson 2nd place showing, if not an outright first.

I can always tell which way the political wind is blowing just by seeing how hard CBS tries to make it seem like it''s not blowing that way at all.
Reply to this comment
by winghunter December 31, 2007 3:34 PM PST
Another hit-job from Mikey Crowley.

You and CBS are digging their own professional grave...I''ld offer you a bigger shovel but, you''re doing just fine with the spatula you''re using.
Reply to this comment
by ioweign December 31, 2007 4:02 PM PST
Who !
Reply to this comment
by lnardozi December 31, 2007 4:17 PM PST
The dollar slid across the board on Friday as data showing a 9 percent decline in sales of new U.S. homes last month heightened concern about the economy, putting the greenback on track for its worst week in more than a year.
The housing report, which was weaker than economists had expected, also bolstered the case for more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2008. Earlier this week, the S&P/Case-Shiller index showed a record decline in U.S. home prices in October.

This is what''s happening to YOUR house. All the ''money'' and ''equity'' you thought you had saved - eliminated! The equity through falling house prices - and the money because we are DEBASING OUR CURRENCY. That low fed rate you''re reading about gets created by printing money and lending it to people. With more money, the money YOU have is worth LESS. So your money is worth less and your property is worth less - where can you turn to keep ahead of inflation? I think you BETTER turn to Dr. Paul. He''s the ONLY one running that has a HOPE of being able to deal with this.
Reply to this comment
by aaabee-2009 December 31, 2007 5:24 PM PST
This is just more of See BS doing their best to tank Thompson, who can beat Hillary, while promoting Ron Paul and Huckabee who can''''t." Posted by vbnvbnvbn at 02:12 PM : Dec 31, 2007

CBS isn''t tanking Thompson, Thompson is tanking Thompson. His heart isn''t in the race. Why blame CBS for Thompson''s lasse-faire attitude about his own presidential campaign? He is squandering what could have been a good run.
Reply to this comment
by txwatersnake December 31, 2007 5:35 PM PST
Ron Paul: The people voted with their wallets.

Fred''s a CFR tool and a RINO. His record on the 2d Amendment is middling, and he had a hand in the odious McCain-Feingold act. No, thank you.
Reply to this comment
by txwatersnake December 31, 2007 5:42 PM PST
"Thompson''s (quite defensible) argument that he''s the only Republican candidate who has been a consistent social and economic conservative"

It''s only defensible if Ron Paul wasn''t in the race. Ron Paul has the best record of upholding and defending the Constitution of any of the candidates.

Brief Overview of Congressman Paul%u2019s Record:

He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.

He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.
Reply to this comment
by angela62-2009 December 31, 2007 5:48 PM PST
Conservatism isn%u2019t soft on immigration. Conservatism does not promote an ever-expanding nanny-statism. Conservatism is not weak on our national defense. Conservatism respects the 10th amendment and state%u2019s rights. Conservatism seeks lower taxes AND lower spending. Conservatism does not believe the expansion of the welfare state is compassionate - to the contrary, the manner in which it creates dependency and disincentivizes productive behavior is a grave disservice to those on the receiving end.

Almost all of the candidates in the Republican primary this year fall short of conservative ideals, in one area or another.

Except for one, and that man is Fred Thompson. (Well, OK, maybe two - but Duncan Hunter just isn%u2019t doing it for me%u2026.)

Whether he can prevail against the media bias and style over substance that rules the campaign trail is yet to be seen. But that does not make his message any less valid, and true conservatives %u201Csettle%u201D for another candidate in the primaries and caucuses at their own peril.

I am putting my faith in the Iowa electorate to see past liberal hit pieces against the best conservative candidate running.
Reply to this comment
by bgbest December 31, 2007 5:50 PM PST
Another hit-job by little Mikey, See BS is a freakin joke. It''s unbelievable the MSM''s hatred towards conservatives, especially the one TRUE CONSERVATIVE FRED THOMPSON. I''ve got a feeling there are going to be a lot people eating their own *** when FRED does very well come Thursday. GO FRED!!!
Reply to this comment
by godofredo29 December 31, 2007 7:18 PM PST
I wonder about the title of this piece: did someone forget that Thompson actually has a potentially fatal health condition?
Reply to this comment
by shockemdores December 31, 2007 7:20 PM PST
Gee, post an article written by a liberal magazine that has been trying to belittle Fred ever since he entered the campaign...and people call Fred lazy...maybe if you returned to the day of when reporters tried to tell the objective story, you might find a different - and correct -- picture of what Fred is all about.
Reply to this comment
by ramos937 December 31, 2007 7:33 PM PST
My guys the Cowboys wanted a win over the Redskins Sunday but they did not want to work for it so they lost. Fred wants to be President but does not want to campaign for it and it shows. Therefore, he will quite the race sometime in the next 90 days.

Let''s try to be charitable. The guy is battling cancer (I know he says he is not cancer free). That takes a lot out of you.

Good luck to you Fred and God Bless.
Reply to this comment
by sussababy December 31, 2007 8:11 PM PST
That is the most ridiculous article! Is the author simply hoping his dreams will come true if he writes them down?

Puh-leeze!
Reply to this comment
by fairandbal December 31, 2007 9:47 PM PST
Fred is still the true conservative in this race. He can''t stand being with ordinary people which is typical GOP, can''t stand ordinary folks, so don''t care to do anything to help them once elected.

Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot December 31, 2007 10:59 PM PST
This is just more of See BS doing their best to tank Thompson, who can beat Hillary, while promoting Ron Paul and Huckabee who can''''t." Posted by vbnvbnvbn at 02:12 PM : Dec 31, 2007

Not sure on what basis you think Thompson could win against ANYONE, let alone Hillary (who isn''t anyone''s choice, yet, BTW, since no votes have been cast). No, Thompson is just another arrogant a$shole who thinks he''s entitled to something. Instead, he''s just a dried up, tired old man. A second-rate actor who started to believe his own bul1_sh1t. Great article, BTW. Laughed my a$s off as I read it.

Reply to this comment
by mediapreachr January 1, 2008 2:13 AM PST
This guy is just mad that he''s retired and has no golden parachute handed to him-see the latest batch of ceo''s who got hundred of millions in severance packages.
I think there''s a guy in his staff that has only one thing to do-constantly remind Fred that he is not on the set of Law and order anymore.This is for real,man...
Reply to this comment
by cs4466 January 1, 2008 2:26 AM PST
Fred who?
Reply to this comment
by mcvet January 1, 2008 8:55 AM PST
I have followed national elections since the early ''''50s. This is the worst mob of candidates, Republican and Democratic, in history. Most sound like a Christian version of The Taliban. If these are the best America has to offer, we are in serious trouble.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jmcgilvray at 12:42 AM : Jan 01, 2008
+ report abuse

Which Democrats sound or act like the Taliban? I''ve followed them closely from the start and I do not see on the Democrat side this pandering to religion I see CONSTANTLY on the fascist side.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet January 1, 2008 8:58 AM PST
Gee, post an article written by a liberal magazine that has been trying to belittle Fred ever since he entered the campaign...and people call Fred lazy...maybe if you returned to the day of when reporters tried to tell the objective story, you might find a different - and correct -- picture of what Fred is all about.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by shockemdores at 07:20 PM : Dec 31, 2007
+ report abuse

LOL Well some things NEVER change... here''s a bootlicker blaming the Media for the failure of this MORON to connect to the voters. I''d suppose the MEDIA is stopping them from coming out to hear him? ROFLMAO Could it be that Neocon''s have failed and failed BADLY? I have a lot of faith in the American People and I think they''ve seen and heard about all they can take from the right and THAT is the reason for the problems you face. Sieg Heil Bush!!
Reply to this comment
by krisd999-2009 January 1, 2008 9:09 AM PST
Let''s see, Fred Thompson at least knows something about federalism and that Congress has no business getting involved in things it has no powers to be involved in such as the Schiavo case. We are also not supposed to be paying any attention to the "flaky" Ron Paul that stands for such flaky things as our Constitution, America itself, and by the way, just had an almost $20 million 4th quarter that might even beat the fundraising of Obama and Hillary and not to mention most media anointed republican "frontrunners" COMBINED! Ron Paul breaks all one day records with $6 million on top of the previous $4 million and have you heard about it? Media blackout. If it was Hillary, they would be talking about it non-stop.
Reply to this comment
by af9115 January 1, 2008 11:57 AM PST
I wouldn''t expect anything better from any reporters at CBS Clinton Broadcast Service. I also wouldn''t expect anything other than the hateful, vitriolic spewing from the Ron Paul morons. They invade the media wherever they are allowed, they take over all of the online voting where you can vote as often as you like. As far as your above preferred Dems., you can''t have my hard earned tax dollars for your medical care or any other entitlement. Get off your butts and go to work like the rest of us that a responsible citizens.
Reply to this comment
by patrick327 January 1, 2008 12:52 PM PST
Amusing and downright pathetic how the liberal media has the power to shape elections by writing tripe and fabricating polls.

By this writer''s interpretation he paints Fred bad because he''s not a lap dog telling us everything we want to hear and doing it with vigor. Amazing how yellow journalism is now not just reserved for the Inquirer and the NY Post.

The liberals are scared of Fred and want to discredit him to the voters at every turn. Exploiting the fact that Fred doesn''t like the pretentiousness of campaigning doesn''t make him a bad candidate. It just means he doesn''t want to bow down and give lip service just to placate. As if all the energetic flip floppers and their promises are going to remember a thing they said to get elected when they get elected.
Reply to this comment
by patrick327 January 1, 2008 12:54 PM PST
Amusing and downright pathetic how the liberal media has the power to shape elections by writing tripe and fabricating polls.

By this writer''s interpretation he paints Fred bad because he''s not a lap dog telling us everything we want to hear and doing it with vigor. Amazing how yellow journalism is now not just reserved for the Inquirer and the NY Post.

The liberals are scared of Fred and want to discredit him to the voters at every turn. Exploiting the fact that Fred doesn''t like the pretentiousness of campaigning doesn''t make him a bad candidate. It just means he doesn''t want to bow down and give lip service just to placate. As if all the energetic flip floppers and their promises are going to remember a thing they said to get elected when they get elected.
Reply to this comment
by patrick327 January 1, 2008 12:59 PM PST
Amusing and downright pathetic how the liberal media has the power to shape elections by writing tripe and fabricating polls.

By this writer''s interpretation he paints Fred bad because he''s not a lap dog telling us everything we want to hear and doing it with vigor. Amazing how yellow journalism is now not just reserved for the Inquirer and the NY Post.

The liberals are scared of Fred and want to discredit him to the voters at every turn. Exploiting the fact that Fred doesn''t like the pretentiousness of campaigning doesn''t make him a bad candidate. It just means he doesn''t want to bow down and give lip service just to placate. As if all the energetic flip floppers and their promises are going to remember a thing they said to get elected when they get elected.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught January 1, 2008 1:09 PM PST
Posted by Steve3030 at 12:59 PM : Jan 01, 2008

um... This is the Opinion section. Since opinions disturb you to the point of making fanciful conspiracy accusations, you probably should avoid this section. And re-re-reposting doesn''t help your IQ either...
Reply to this comment
by sleepdecay January 1, 2008 8:01 PM PST
Go Thompson Go!!
Reply to this comment
by ianlou January 2, 2008 9:54 AM PST
Fred Thompson%u2019s first mistake was to announce his candidacy on the Leno show, I mean, who watches Leno!
Reply to this comment
by tbird354 January 3, 2008 12:12 AM PST
I love the way my wife set the stage on this issue. If you were going to have brain surgery and you had every one of these candidates as an option for which doctor you would select - who would you chose (and were talking about the front runners)? Docter A: Even though Doctor A would have the knowledge and expertise in running a hospital and maybe a few good surgeries under his belt, but was always second guessing himself and "Flip-Flopping" on what choices he was making while you are under sedation and couldn''t be firm on what he believed - is this the one you would pick? Or Doctor B: Maybe you would select the higher ground with Doctor B that has had little experience in this type of surgery and his controversial procedures are becoming a big concern for his Liability Insurance provider, but Hey, he is a local leader in the most popular church in town - would you pray a long prayer and select this doctor? Or Doctor C: This surgeon has been there in the most intense surgeries and has the experience and understanding of what new procedures are a viable option for your particular needs and also has a plan for your recovery through rehab and weekly exams. I don''t think there is any doubt that you would select Doctor C - and that doctor''s name is FRED THOMPSON!!! I don''t know about the rest of the country but my wife has a very good point about all this. Experience, Integrity and Honesty - to me that is why Fred Thompson is hands down the best man for the job. God Bless America!!!
Reply to this comment
by tbird354 January 3, 2008 12:13 AM PST
I love the way my wife set the stage on this issue. If you were going to have brain surgery and you had every one of these candidates as an option for which doctor you would select - who would you chose (and were talking about the front runners)? Docter A: Even though Doctor A would have the knowledge and expertise in running a hospital and maybe a few good surgeries under his belt, but was always second guessing himself and "Flip-Flopping" on what choices he was making while you are under sedation and couldn''t be firm on what he believed - is this the one you would pick? Or Doctor B: Maybe you would select the higher ground with Doctor B that has had little experience in this type of surgery and his controversial procedures are becoming a big concern for his Liability Insurance provider, but Hey, he is a local leader in the most popular church in town - would you pray a long prayer and select this doctor? Or Doctor C: This surgeon has been there in the most intense surgeries and has the experience and understanding of what new procedures are a viable option for your particular needs and also has a plan for your recovery through rehab and weekly exams. I don''t think there is any doubt that you would select Doctor C - and that doctor''s name is FRED THOMPSON!!! I don''t know about the rest of the country but my wife has a very good point about all this. Experience, Integrity and Honesty - to me that is why Fred Thompson is hands down the best man for the job. God Bless America!!!
Reply to this comment
by tbird354 January 3, 2008 12:14 AM PST
I love the way my wife set the stage on this issue. If you were going to have brain surgery and you had every one of these candidates as an option for which doctor you would select - who would you chose (and were talking about the front runners)? Docter A: Even though Doctor A would have the knowledge and expertise in running a hospital and maybe a few good surgeries under his belt, but was always second guessing himself and "Flip-Flopping" on what choices he was making while you are under sedation and couldn''t be firm on what he believed - is this the one you would pick? Or Doctor B: Maybe you would select the higher ground with Doctor B that has had little experience in this type of surgery and his controversial procedures are becoming a big concern for his Liability Insurance provider, but Hey, he is a local leader in the most popular church in town - would you pray a long prayer and select this doctor? Or Doctor C: This surgeon has been there in the most intense surgeries and has the experience and understanding of what new procedures are a viable option for your particular needs and also has a plan for your recovery through rehab and weekly exams. I don''t think there is any doubt that you would select Doctor C - and that doctor''s name is FRED THOMPSON!!! I don''t know about the rest of the country but my wife has a very good point about all this. Experience, Integrity and Honesty - to me that is why Fred Thompson is hands down the best man for the job. God Bless America!!!
Reply to this comment
See all 46 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs