Dec. 28, 2007

Romney Fights His Own Past Words

Politico: On Many Topics, Past Statements Contradict Or Dilute Present Day Attacks

  • Play CBS Video Video Does Faith Help Or Hurt Mitt?

    Republican Mitt Romney is campaigning amid more questions about whether his faith is helping or hurting his chances. There's even a split within the Mormon Church. Bill Whitaker reports.

  • Video Mitt Romney's Campaign 'Flap'

    Mitt Romney has added a new campaign stump story to his arsenal in which he mimics a baby bird by flapping his arms.

  • Video Infidelity: Romney

    In a CBS Evening News special series, "Primary Questions," Katie Couric asks Mitt Romney if he understands why infidelity might matter to voters.

  • Photo Essay Mitt Romney

    He turned around companies, and the Olympics and ran for president pledging to turn around the country.

  • Video Library Scenes From The Road

    Watch exclusive video from CBS News reporters traveling with the candidates.

(The Politico)  This story was written by Jonathan Martin.


Hoping to stymie John McCain’s New Hampshire surge, Mitt Romney has turned to two issues almost certain to move GOP primary voters: tax cuts and immigration.

On both counts, Romney noted in recent Granite State campaign appearances, McCain has been crosswise with the majority of his own party.

But, in responding to the charges, McCain’s campaign turned to off-the-shelf material sure to take some of the sting out of Romney’s attacks - Romney’s own words.

On these two hot topics and many others, past statements or positions by the former Massachusetts governor can be found that either completely contradict or at least dilute Romney’s present day attacks.

That Romney has changed or at least modified his stance on a variety of issues is, of course, not new.

But as the primary campaign ramps up into its frantic final days before the first contests, and as Romney is forced to fend off a challenge from former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee in Iowa and Arizona Sen. John McCain in New Hampshire, the problem is presenting itself anew.

Lacking a pure conservative record of his own, Romney is unable to get off any clean shots at his rivals without them - or the media - pointing to a past quote or stance that calls into question his own consistency.

Take last weekend in New Hampshire, when Romney took after McCain for opposing President Bush’s tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.

The Associated Press account of the day included Romney’s attack, McCain’s counter and then additional evidence muddying the original charge.

In 2003, the story noted, Romney told the Massachusetts congressional delegation that when it came to the Bush tax cuts, he wouldn’t “be a cheerleader” for proposals he didn’t support.

“But I have to keep a solid relationship with the White House,” Romney noted to his state’s representatives in Washington.

Similarly, when Romney raised McCain’s unpopular immigration views in a campaign appearance Wednesday, the Arizonan’s campaign was ready.

“Last Year, Romney Supported ‘Path Toward Citizenship’ for Illegal Immigrants, Said Republicans Breaking With President Bush on Immigration ‘Made a Big Mistake,'" McCain’s aides reminded in a press release over 2006 stories in the Lowell Sun and Associated Press.

Also included was the November 2005 story from the Boston Globe where Romney deemed McCain’s immigration approach “quite different” from amnesty and “reasonable.”

Romney and his campaign have at-the-ready answers to counter the counters.

But his challenge is that there are seemingly few issues where he has not been previously more moderate than he is now or where a rival can’t at least find a discrepancy sufficient to blur an attack.

Abortion is the one issue that he fesses up to having flat changed his mind on, but that the list only begins there.

On gay rights, campaign finance reform, gun control and even his own political identity, Romney has tonally, if not substantively, moved to the right.

The consistency question is one that Romney and his staff are sensitive about but also one that has effectively become baked into the campaign’s narrative.

"I know that there are some - particularly in opposing campaigns - who will try to look at old quotes, and perhaps take them out of context and perhaps not, and go back 14 years or 15 years and say, 'You said this here, you said that there,'" Romney said in New Hampshire Wednesday.

"But ... if you want to know what I'd do as president, you can see what I did as governor."

Asked about this, Romney spokesman Matt Rhoades pointed to his candidate’s statehouse record of “balancing budgets, creating jobs, enforcing immigration laws and reforming health care.”

Rhoades didn’t directly respond when aked how the campaign could take on rivals without its own impurities being brought up.

“On issues like immigration, Gov. Romney agrees with the majority of grass-roots Republicans,” Rhoades said.

“The enforcement of immigration laws is an important issue, and Governor Romney’s pro-enforcement policies are the right way to stop illegal immigration, while Senator McCain’s advocacy of blanket legal status and benefits for those who break our immigration laws are exactly the wrong policies."

Politically, though, the changed positions pose a serious threat, especially in New Hampshire.

Huckabee lacks the resources or campaign structure to effectively strike back at Romney on his past stances.

And thanks to Romney’s ads, mailers and automated calls - as well as Huckabee’s current role as the front-runner - the focus of the race there has become more about the Arkansan’s views.

But in New Hampshire, Romney’s conversions are bound to matter more.

First, it’s a matter of simple geography. Granite State voters, or at least the media outlets they’re served by, have been following Romney’s career since at least 2002, when he ran for governor, if not since 1994.

Familiarity may or may not breed contempt, but in Romney’s case it has ensured tough coverage and deep skepticism.

First, there are the New Hampshire-penetrating Boston Globe and Boston Herald - from where much of the oppo springs.

Additionally, the local Boston TV affiliates - which also reach into the Granite State - include some aggressive, politics-focused reporters.

And perhaps most threatening of all for Romney, he has emerged as public enemy No. 1 of both the liberal-leaning Concord Monitor editorial page and the stalwart conservative Union Leader.

The Monitor printed a withering editorial Sunday explaining just why Romney should not be president, and, since getting behind McCain earlier this month, the Manchester-based Union Leader has kept up a steady drumbeat of editorials praising their pick and damning his top rival in the state.

The latter paper has become especially helpful to McCain in providing conservative validation and serving as an effective, independent tool with which to beat Romney over the head.

Which is exactly what the McCain campaign did when Romney launched his immigration shot Wednesday.

In addition to sending along a trove of their own research, McCain aides topped their release with a quote and link to a Union Leader editorial from just last week.

“If Republicans are voting for Mitt Romney because they think he would be tougher on illegal immigration than John McCain would be, they need to explain how Romney suddenly switched from supporting McCain's position just two years ago to attacking it (with distortions) this year,” read the Dec. 19 broadside.

In addition to its allies in the press, McCain’s camp retains firepower of its own.

Though considerably smaller than what he had before his summer implosion, McCain’s staff still knows all of Romney’s vulnerabilities and still has at easy reach a trove of oppo on him.

Still, McCain’s task is not an easy one. Huckabee needs to hang on to an Iowa lead that seems increasingly precarious with each new news cycle dominated by his own vulnerabilities.

Though New Hampshire hasn’t traditionally followed the course set by Iowa, a Romney victory there would instantly dispel the notion that he’s slipping and provide an immense boost just four days before Granite Staters vote.

And then there is the Romney advantage that hangs over, not just New Hampshire, but the entire GOP contest: his personal wealth.

McCain and his staff can press the flip-flop narrative and have it underscored by the Union Leader and Monitor every other day.

But, thanks to his self-funding, Romney can attempt to drown out the naysaers by airing negative ads, dropping more tough mail and sending out robo-calls attacking McCain.

And, through these mediums, Romney’s own past views don’t get a mention.


Copyright 2007 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Add a Comment See all 50 Comments
by ixoye_02 December 30, 2007 11:02 AM EST
I have no problem with Romney being a Mormon. It''s Romney''s flip-flopping on political issues....period. I can''t trust a politician whose viewpoints shifts with the political winds. I can understand that political positions might evolve over time, but within a couple of years? Sorry, "I was wrong" just doesn''t cut it with me especially when trying to appeal to voters. This smacks of deceit and lies, which we already have experienced with out current president. I don''t want another politician like GW Bush!!!
And for those still saying the the Mormon church believes in separation of church and state, non-Mormons in Utah would have alot to say about the idea of church and state. It simply does not exist in Utah.
Reply to this comment
by keriama December 30, 2007 7:43 AM EST
vbnvbnvbn:
What has personal, sacred clothing got to do with electing a president? Don''t know how to discuss politics without being an asinine, insulting drongo? Isn''t there is supposed be a separation of Church and State here? Why bring up something that offends millions of LDS? They are good people.

Everyone is FREE to think and believe whatever they CHOOSE to think and believe in, and should be able to do so without fear of condemnation or derogatory remarks from those who think differently. This is not Iraq or Saudi Arabia. Just remember that and quit with the mental persecution. Stick to the politics will you. Thank you.
Reply to this comment
by bud28dy December 30, 2007 4:56 AM EST
Flip flopper Mitt intends to have a news conference this week where he reveals in his heart he has always been a lifelong Presbyterian.
Reply to this comment
by lone-star5 December 29, 2007 7:51 PM EST
I think Huckabee''s honesty and ability to deal with international affairs needs to be questioned.

Posted today in USA Today:
Stem cell, gun control groups paid Huckabee

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee last year accepted $52,000 in speaking fees from a biotech giant that wants to research human embryonic stem cells, a non-profit working to expand access to the morning-after pill and a group pushing to study whether tightening gun control laws will reduce violence.
Huckabee opposes embryonic stem cell research, emergency contraception and stricter gun laws %u2014 all of which rank high on the list of deal-breakers for many of the religious conservatives whose support he''s ridden to the top of the Republican presidential field.

Payments came from drug-maker Novo Nordisk, which engages in stem cell research; the Public Health Institute, which works to expand access to "morning after" contraception; and Grant Makers in Health, which is seeking to steer funding to studies of gun violence. The fees highlight the delicate line Huckabee has walked on the profitable speaking circuit.

"It raises questions as to his philosophical positions if he is accepting very lucrative speaking fees from special interest groups who have a markedly different perspective on certain social issues from what he is projecting as a candidate," Lauderback said.



Reply to this comment
by im4honesty December 29, 2007 5:19 PM EST
For those of you not really familiar with the LDS faith, let me explain one thing, he will do the churches bidding if elected president. His LDS faith will come first and the American people second. I%u2019ve lived in Utah and seen the LDS control state politics and their endorsement of Mitt isn%u2019t a good omen. His statement that he%u2019ll represent ALL American%u2019s is very unlikely. He%u2019s a Mormon first and would be American president second. Posted by david_45 at 06:11 PM : Dec 28, 2007

Correct!! I was brought into the LDS chruch at the age of 21 and escaped at the age of 25. If Romney gets elected the leader of the free world will be Gordon Hinkley, their ''prophet''.
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 December 29, 2007 3:01 PM EST
this is what you will get with missery hillary as PRESIDENT. she were the same traiter coat as bush/cheney

at all has to do with saudi''''s and the king with the help of bush/cheneny.9-11 was all bush/cheney/and the oil countrys


The U.S. military has returned 10 Saudi detainees from the Guantanamo Bay prison to their home country, a Pentagon spokesman said Friday.

The transfer cuts the number of men now held at the isolated U.S. Naval station in southeast Cuba to about 275, a decline of nearly a third in the last year.

About 136 of the 759 people detained at Guantanamo since 2002 have been Saudi, the second-largest group after Afghans. The vast majority have been repatriated - despite the fact that more than 90 percent are still considered a terrorist threat.

The U.S. agreed to return the men with the understanding that Saudi Arabia will mitigate that risk, partly through a state program to reintegrate former detainees into civilian life, said Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, a Defense Department spokesman.

Their detention has been a source of strain with Riyadh, a close U.S. ally.



Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 December 29, 2007 1:36 AM EST
Mitt...
Flip..flop..flip..flop..flip.......
Reply to this comment
by merlgrey December 28, 2007 10:35 PM EST
here is a guy who claims to have pulled his car off the road to openly weep when he heard the news that the mormon church had a revalation and could now allow blacks as priests (way back in the dark ages of 1978). now, of course it is a feel good story... i had to stop and weep... this is not to imply he is a rascist by any means. however, if somebody is so moved to pull off the road and weep over news about progressive social change in thier own church, if it affected them that much personally, wouldnt they have been at least petitioning and questioning the church for change before that point? wouldnt we expect someone who considers themselves presidential, to have the kind of nature where they have fought for equality and rights amongst americans long before needing to do so for political reasons?
Reply to this comment
by david_45 December 28, 2007 10:16 PM EST
Hosers22, are you saying that Mitt Romney will go after himself for employing illegal aliens? You%u2019re bashing McCain and other candidates while ole Mitt%u2019s been caught twice now with illegal aliens working for him.

Ole Mitt flip flops constantly concerning the issues. I don%u2019t know that we have a good choice for president but it sure isn%u2019t Mitt Romney. He%u2019s a liar and hypocrite and he%u2019ll say anything as long as he thinks it will get him elected.
Reply to this comment
by david_45 December 28, 2007 9:11 PM EST
Mitt Romney is a proven liar. Or when he gets caught it becomes an embellishment. He%u2019s had to restate two statements now.

For those of you not really familiar with the LDS faith, let me explain one thing, he will do the churches bidding if elected president. His LDS faith will come first and the American people second. I%u2019ve lived in Utah and seen the LDS control state politics and their endorsement of Mitt isn%u2019t a good omen. His statement that he%u2019ll represent ALL American%u2019s is very unlikely. He%u2019s a Mormon first and would be American president second.
Reply to this comment
by quetzal666 December 28, 2007 8:39 PM EST
Element51...Antimony.. good name.....
i like it.....
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds December 28, 2007 8:33 PM EST
Mitt Romney.....Pander Bear.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 December 28, 2007 7:46 PM EST
Posted by Element51 at 03:04 PM : Dec 28, 2007

Exactly! These folks have no concept of what a family does to survive. They never have, nor ever will have to decide of a jar of Peter Pan Peanutbutter over a generic brand just to save a few pennies to be able to buy some corn flakes.

Nor have they had to take their children to the ER because that is the only place they can get medical care without insurance. And then the bill is horrendus and more than they can pay, even with their little bit of savings, if they are lucky to have ANY.

Their companies want to pay people minimum wage, and then raise a hue and cry because people have to go on welfare.

They are privileged IDIOTS! Who will swear up and down to take care of all your problems for you if you just elect them to the presidency so they can give more tax breaks and loopholes for the rich and get libraries donated to their name for the greatness of their achievements. The donations and upkeep for which could feed 500,000 families for years.

They''ve already lived royally off our government for 4 or 8 years! And will have been on the take for fortunes that will keep them in luxury all their natural born lives. Isn''t that reward enough?

These men will neither get a vote from me because they support the Neocon regime''s lies and corruption. I could care less what religion they are or whether they wear pink drawers!
Reply to this comment
by wendy731 December 28, 2007 7:44 PM EST
Elements, Let me redirect your thinking a bit. First of all, George Romney, Mitt Romney''s father lived a very meager life as a child. His parents did not have much of this world''s good. George worked hard and was able to do better than his father. The Romney''s appreciate more than you know what the "real world" is really like. Mitt is not a wasteful person. As far as seeking power, I would suggest that falls into Mike Huckabee''s camp much more than Romney''s. Mike Huckabee is a "pleaser". He will do and say anything to reach the populus. He has worked hard to overcome his upbringing and his children will be considered "priviledged children" to the next generation. Romney''s desire to serve this nation is that he really cares about America. Mitt could rest comfortablly the rest of his life and be happy, instead, he has put his family and himself in the spotlight for the sheer sense of duty. His parents where outstanding examples of volunteering to help others. Mitt was raised with this value. Money is not the root of all evil, the love of money is. I don''t think Mitt loves his money. He does use the resources he has been blessed with to make a difference for others. I have seen more ethic and underhandedness in Huckabee''s record. He is playing the "poor" card.
Reply to this comment
by hosers22 December 28, 2007 6:43 PM EST
To Element51 -
Most of us have gone through exactly what you are describing, the normal American Family. Trying to make ends meet, usually succeeding, sometimes not.

The premise that we are going to find a Lech Walesa (Poland) that can rise up from the middle class here in America probably won''t happen in our lifetime. The next best thing is to get someone who has our standards, and can actually get something accomplished with the system we have.
I like Romney, for one, because his standards reflect my standards. Yes, I do think family values are important. I also believe that our next president is going to have some horrendous national fiscal problems. Giuliani, Huckabee, Thompson, and McCain do not have the background to handle that scenario. Mitt Romney does.
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 December 28, 2007 6:34 PM EST
"Wonderful...the anti-Mormons have arrived. You still have failed to show how this has caused Mitt to have a problem serving in government though. But thanks for the deep insights. "--Posted by IAmAnAmerica


There may be some resentment out there from folks who have lived in and around Mormons. The Mormons have a name for them: "gentiles".

Read that famous novel "Riders of the Purple Sage" by Zane Grey if you fail to understand.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by gkc99 at 01:56 PM : Dec 28, 2007
#######################
I think the word was genitalia because they was allways waving it around at their 40 or so wives!
Reply to this comment
by hosers22 December 28, 2007 6:31 PM EST
Isn''t is about time the bigots of the world are seen for what they are - nothing but bigots.
For those of you who have managed to graduate the third grade, the words "magic" and "sacred" have two entirely different meanings.
Anyone with an ounce of religious background and identity hold certain things sacred to them. To these people, making light of a persons beliefs would be unthinkable.
To the rest, continue on with your bigot crusades. You''ve been around for centuries and will still be snarling and wailing long after these elections are over with. Then you can work your wonders on the next set of decent people.
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 December 28, 2007 6:19 PM EST
CORRECTION!
except if they are a raining monarch !
SHOULD READ!
except if they are a reining monarch!
Reply to this comment
by prairiefox1 December 28, 2007 6:14 PM EST
Ask not what I will do for this country!
Ask what I have done for this country!
and elect me on these grounds!

I may not be a good speaker!
i may not look good! My personality may be lacking!
I will not make unfounded promises like the others which cannot be kept except if they are a raining monarch !
I will do as I have proven in the past and will represent all and not just a group!
I have no party affiliation !
I am an American!
Reply to this comment
by quetzal666 December 28, 2007 6:09 PM EST
He who votes decides nothing; he who counts the votes decides everything." - Joseph Stalin
Reply to this comment
See all 50 Comments

60 Minutes

The secrets of tennis legend Andre Agassi; the growing threat of cyber wars; and more.
Read More

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

    Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

  • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

    Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

    Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

  • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

    The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

  • Orlando Office Shooting Orlando Office Shooting

    A Gunman Opens Fire at the Offices of an Engineering Firm Where He Once Worked

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: