CRAWFORD, Texas, Dec. 28, 2007

Bush Vetoes Defense Policy Bill

Unexpected Move Centers On Provision That Could Freeze Iraqi Assets In The U.S.

  • President Bush's intention to veto sweeping U.S defense policy bill apparently caught congressional leaders off guard.

    President Bush's intention to veto sweeping U.S defense policy bill apparently caught congressional leaders off guard.  (AP)

  • Blog Enter The Crypt

    Read the latest behind-the-scenes news from Capitol Hill in this blog provided by our partner The Politico.

  • Interactive Bush Presidency

    The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.

(AP)  President Bush on Friday used a "pocket veto" to reject a sweeping defense bill because he dislikes a provision that would expose the Iraqi government to expensive lawsuits seeking damages from the Saddam Hussein era.

In a statement, Bush said the legislation "would imperil billions of dollars of Iraqi assets at a crucial juncture in that nation's reconstruction efforts."

The president's objections were focused on a provision deep within legislation that sets defense policy for the coming year and approves $696 billion in spending, including $189 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Also in the legislation were improved veterans benefits and tighter oversight of contractors and weapons programs.

The pocket veto means that troops will get a 3 percent raise Jan. 1 instead of the 3.5 percent authorized by the bill.

Bush's decision to use a pocket veto, announced while vacationing at his Texas ranch, means the legislation will die at midnight Dec. 31. This tactic for killing a bill can be used only when Congress is not in session.

The House last week adjourned until Jan. 15; the Senate returns a week later but has been holding brief, often seconds-long pro forma sessions every two or three days to prevent Bush from making appointments that otherwise would need Senate approval.

Brendan Daly, spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said, "The House rejects any assertion that the White House has the authority to do a pocket veto."

When adjourning before Christmas, the House instructed the House clerk to accept any communications — such as veto messages from the White House during the monthlong break.

A Democratic congressional aide pointed out that a pocket veto cannot be overridden by Congress and allows Bush to distance himself from the rejection of a major Pentagon bill in a time of war.

In a message to Congress, the president said he was sending the bill and his outline of objections to the House clerk "to avoid unnecessary litigation about the non-enactment of the bill that results from my withholding approval, and to leave no doubt that the bill is being vetoed."

Democratic aides said they have not ruled out any legislative options, including dropping the language on lawsuits against Iraq and sending the rest of the bill back to Bush.

The sponsor of the contested provision, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said the provision would allow "American victims of terror to hold perpetrators accountable — plain and simple."

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky called on lawmakers to "move rapidly to fix this section" when Congress returns in January so that the underlying bill can be signed.

Democratic congressional leaders complained that Bush's move was a last-minute stunt because he had never indicated his intention to veto the bill.

Bush aides said they had signaled concern about the controversial provision for weeks, although there had been no formal veto threat. They said their concern grew urgent recently after a legal review and feedback from U.S. diplomats in Iraq and Iraqi leaders.

The disputed section of the bill would reshape Iraq's immunity to lawsuits, exposing the new government to litigation in U.S. courts stemming from treatment of Americans in Iraq during Saddam's reign. Even cases that had once been rejected could be refiled.

Bush's aides warned of a dire scenario — a rush of litigation that could freeze tens of billions of dollars in Iraqi assets being held in U.S. banks. Money at the heart of the Iraqi rebuilding effort would be tied up in court, potentially halting the very stabilization efforts that could get U.S. troops home faster, the aides said.

Yet Democrats fumed that Bush could have worked out the technical fix sooner if he had wanted, without rejecting an entire bill that contains extra help and money for troops.




© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 146 Comments
by samsel3 December 31, 2007 6:39 PM EST
On September 14,2002 Rep. James McDermott at a Capitol Hill Briefing said that politics and oil, not fear that Iraq will use WMD are driving factors behind the presidents call for regime change. McDermott said there was an organized effort to squelch such discussions. "The political operatives in the white house have been very careful to spin it away from oil. Anytime anybody sees a connection they spin it the other way". These plans were formulated by members of the Council for National Policy and members of the PNAC both secretive private organisations representing some 200 of the wealthiest men in the United States. Global control of business without any worldly government interfering is there agenda. They are in control not the people.
Reply to this comment
by david1737 December 30, 2007 7:54 PM EST
W and the rest of the GOP believes that Govt. doesn''t work.

They (the GOP) are right. As long as they are running the Govt. it won''t work.

This is what happens when you put people in charge of something which they not only believe won''t work, but more importantly make money (for themselves and their cronies) when it doesn''t work.


Wake up people.

Let''s stop paying the GOP to destroy our country!
Reply to this comment
by abbe91 December 30, 2007 12:57 PM EST
"jon2012,,,, Impeachment won''''t happen I''''m afraid.. But, the House still has the power to convict.

Posted by j-whitman at 06:23 PM : Dec 29, 2007"

wouldn''t this make you dream ... ?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/12/29/ap/africa/main3656114.shtml?source=search_story
Reply to this comment
by vincan-2009 December 29, 2007 9:44 PM EST
This just shows how much Bush cares about anyone but the rich. The military are finally getting to understand that Bush doesn''t give a high hoe about them. Sadly he would listen to the Iraqi government more than any Americans.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 December 29, 2007 9:41 PM EST
When you take the oathe of office for the highest position in the land, you swear to uphold the constitution and protect it, not trample on it or try to dismantle it. You don''t use the power for dishonest gain so your backers and buds can make landslide profit''s exporting american jobs and production so that a few can fill there pockets with money at the expense of Americans. Thats not America, it is only greed and the love of money.............

Reply to this comment
by j-whitman December 29, 2007 9:23 PM EST
jon2012,,,, Impeachment won''t happen I''m afraid.. But, the House still has the power to convict.
Reply to this comment
by amazedd December 29, 2007 8:45 PM EST
Balking Vampires, Robin!
Reply to this comment
by jon2012-2009 December 29, 2007 8:38 PM EST
But hey, at least the members of our military, whom our President wants to fully support, will be getting a smaller pay raise thanks to... the President. Where''''s the irony in these statement: We will go to war against Iraq for being complicit in 9/11; we will not hold Iraq accountable by litigation for 9/11. With Bush, it''''s always shoot first, ask questions later.
Posted by IdlePugilist at 02:09 PM : Dec 29, 2007

To find this president in inconsistent positions is not unusual because he lies when he opens his mouth. He lies to obscure his actions and to give his political adversaries as little time to act as possible. This is a president who intends to get what he wants come hell or high water, the truth and the country be damned. With support and connivance from the GOP, with or without the war on terror, he is destroying the economy, our civil liberties, our preeminnece in the world, and the progress we have achieved in safeguarding the environment and promoting civil rights to benefit an economic class of the rich.

Seeing that impeachment as a mechanism of recall is hardly ever successful, I think our political system needs to be reevaluated to make this kind of president more accountable without the need for an election to provide the ultimate check.
Reply to this comment
by firststate December 29, 2007 7:11 PM EST
"in the legislation were improved veterans benefits and tighter oversight of contractors and weapons programs.

Reasons for the pocket veto.
1. Bush has a chinese magnet somewhere, shaped like a yellow ribbon that says support the troops, so no other actual support is required.
2. The outrageous idea of oversight of contractors and weapons, when they have him in their pockets.
3. The big money interests in Iraq need to be protected at the expense of the troops who are already covered by the magnet (see 1. above)

The concern about the Iraq assets provides an excuse for stopping the legislation to prevent more oversight on contractors and weapons programs as well as wasting money on the troops and our vets. The contractors and weapons systems money pits involve hundreds of billions of dollars. Coincidentally, the beneficiaries of the waste they generate were huge contributors to his campaigns and continue to support the republic party. They can always find a few billion dollars for their friends but not to waste on the troops, veterans or health care for kids.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 December 29, 2007 6:32 PM EST
"...the plan calls for the outright elimination of programs for port security, transit security, and local emergency management operations in the next budget year."

Posted by david1737

No doubt Bush and his cronies have a Republican connected "privatized" company that can assume these functions by doing half the work and receiving twice the pay.
Reply to this comment
by david1737 December 29, 2007 6:04 PM EST
Here''s an AP article from Dec. 1, 2007:

The Bush Admin. wants to cut anti-terror funds.

The cut would slash counterterrorism funding for police, firefighters, and rescue depts. across the country by more than half next year, according to budget docs. obtained by the ap.

"...the plan calls for the outright elimination of programs for port security, transit security, and local emergency management operations in the next budget year."
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman December 29, 2007 6:00 PM EST
david1737,, Your right,, That''s the same story I was hearing from Camp Pendelton this morning. Less for the troops
Reply to this comment
by david1737 December 29, 2007 5:48 PM EST
This is what Bush vetoed:



"in the legislation were improved veterans benefits and tighter oversight of contractors and weapons programs.

The pocket veto means that troops will get a 3 percent raise Jan. 1 instead of the 3.5 percent authorized by the bill."

Enough said.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 December 29, 2007 5:37 PM EST
On the other hand, I would believe that the conservative talk radio network is very well funded with sponsorships and advertizing from corporations and individuals who benefit from having the GOP in power.

I believe the following acronym applies when describing the G.O.P. (Government Of the Privileged).

If I do not have a chance beforehand, have a happy new year!

Posted by the74blaster

Blaster, I would agree with what you said and also point out the rise of the corporate funded "think tanks". If you start paying close attention to the so called news stories you will find that these lazy reporters often run to The AEI or Heritage foundation for their two bit opinions. Oh, and a happy new year to you as well.
Reply to this comment
by the74blaster December 29, 2007 5:23 PM EST
Blaster, the fear and greed that drives the markets are the same emotions that drive today''''s Republican party, think about it.

Posted by omega39,

The Republican party provides a great example of not bitting the hand the feeds you. It would be of interest to see how much the defense contractors have given to put these necons in power.

If you look at talk radio, how many liberal programs do we have to choose from?

On the other hand, I would believe that the conservative talk radio network is very well funded with sponsorships and advertizing from corporations and individuals who benefit from having the GOP in power.

I believe the following acronym applies when describing the G.O.P. (Government Of the Privileged).

If I do not have a chance beforehand, have a happy new year!
Reply to this comment
by ddaymichael December 29, 2007 5:20 PM EST
This Bush the Lesser comes from a family that has built its fortune by profiteering on America''s wars (and not always by investing in America''s side)

Doubya''s father, Bush the First (I can''t bring myself to call him Bush the Greater)Looted the country, but for only four years, with the S&L scam, the first Gulf War and most of all, by his activities with the Carlisle Group.

His father, Prescott Bush had assets seized in August 1942 under the Trading With The Enemy Act.

His father, G.W. bush%u2019s great grandfather, Samuel Bush, through his Yale connections (imagine that) became chief of small arms ordinance procurement during WWI. In1922, when an investigation into some questionable deals with cronies named Harriman and Rockefeller was begun, it was discovered that all records %u2018had been destroyed to make room.%u2019

Can anyone be surprised that this chimp-looking cowardly moron is stealing with both hands?
Reply to this comment
by idlepugilist December 29, 2007 5:09 PM EST
But hey, at least the members of our military, whom our President wants to fully support, will be getting a smaller pay raise thanks to... the President. Where''s the irony in these statement: We will go to war against Iraq for being complicit in 9/11; we will not hold Iraq accountable by litigation for 9/11. With Bush, it''s always shoot first, ask questions later.
Reply to this comment
by idlepugilist December 29, 2007 5:05 PM EST
My Republican neighbors and friends, this provision was contrived because our President has maintained consistently that Iraq was involved in 9/11. Why he would feel it''s right to dismantle Iraq by war and then pretend to be a cordial neighbor by eliminating accountability for Iraq''s alleged complicity in 9/11 shows our President is two-faced, certainly a liar, and if you or I acted like this we''d have more medicinal labels attached to our names.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 December 29, 2007 4:49 PM EST
The storm has been brewing for over a year and yet they did not listen to the voice of America in 2006, they said they were beating badly. Yet the still ignored the voice that kept crying out now it is a storm of the century for the Republican party. There are 20 Republican Senators up for re-election and 9 are battle ground states. Yet, KY just replaced a Republican Governor with a Democrat looks like the battle ground states may not be the only loses this bunch will take.

Have a happy holiday to all.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad December 29, 2007 4:39 PM EST
AMERICANS DO SOMETHING OR SHUT UP!

YOU GET WHAT YOU DESERVE...
Reply to this comment
See all 146 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Fort Hood's Fallen Heroes Fort Hood's Fallen Heroes

    A Look at Those Who Lost Their Lives in the Fort Hood Massacre

  • Veterans Day 2009 Veterans Day 2009

    Respects are Paid to Soldiers Around the Country and Abroad

  • BMI Country Awards BMI Country Awards

    Country's Finest Walk the Red Carpet for the 57th BMI Country Music Awards

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    James Woods in Court, Michelle Obama on "Sesame Street"; Plus, Premieres for "The Road" and "A Single Man"

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: