Man Mistakenly Declared Dead; Family Sues
Family Of N.C. Man Hit By Car And Wrongly Declared Dead Sues Medical Officials
-
Photo
(AP / CBS)
-
Interactive
Dying Wishes
Learn about living wills and other steps to protect your end-of-life decisions.
-
Interactive
Motor Away
Things to know before hitting the road.
-
In The Spotlight
The Odd Truth
Strange but factual tales from around the world compiled by CBSNews.com.
- Stories
- Back From The Dead
Larry Green was walking across a highway in 2005 when he was hit by a car. He was put into a body bag and sent to the morgue, and the medical examiner did not notice Green was still alive until roughly 2½ hours after the accident.
Green, who now lives in a nursing home, was hospitalized for two months with a severe head injury, broken leg and other injuries. He began some limited speaking five months after the accident.
In the lawsuit filed this month, the familiy claims medical officials inadequately checked his vital signs after the accident. It also alleges the medical examiner disregarded signs that Green was alive.
The examiner, J.B. Perdue, said it was not his job to determine whether Green was dead or alive.
"The medical examiner is called after death," Perdue said. "Someone else pronounced his death, and the medical examiner is called to investigate the cause and manner of that death. He does not pronounce people dead."
William Hill, an attorney representing Franklin County, did not return calls seeking comment.
©MMV, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Uh, shouldn''t they be thankful he''s alive, and be not trying to squeeze cash out of this incident?
it really should be everyone''s responsibility to know when they''re dead ... thereby leaving nothing to chance.
Posted by mike71067 at 04:26 PM : Dec 28, 2007
They are suing because if he had been treated from the first as though he were alive, He might not be brain damaged now.
And what about the poor person who hit him, surely he would feel like suing this man for walking out in from of him and causing a life time of mental horror. Imagine hitting someone, it would cause you nightmares for life, let alone being told that you had killed him and the relief later to find out that you hadn''t but that now he had caused brain damage.
THIS WAS A HORRIBLE MISTAKE, BUT THE MAN IS ALIVE, ISN''T THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING. HAVE WE LOST ALL OF OUR COMPASSION AND SINCE OF HUMANITY... NEXT THING YOU KNOW BURGLARS WILL SUING THE VICTIMS THEY ROB! OH YEAH, THEY ALREADY HAVE...
http://blancadebree.blogspot.com
it really should be everyone''''s responsibility to know when they''''re dead ... thereby leaving nothing to chance.
Do any of us know how medical examiners work. Suppose normal procedure is to bring a body to the morgue and someone then schedules an autopsy for later in the day or for the next day. It seems logical that a body could be "on ice" for hours or even days before the medical examiner actually sees a body. Suppose there were five other autopsies scheduled before this one. It would be helful to understand what happens before condemning the medical examiner for not discovering that this person was still alive.
Just another ''its not my fault'' person.
Just another ''''its not my fault'''' person.
Posted by mdell27
The first part of your statement is correct. The medical examiner determines the cause of death. Other people determine if a person is dead. This has nothing to do with "Just another ''its not my fault'' person." It has everything to do with different people doing their jobs. If on the other hand, it was the medical examiner''s responsibilty to check for death as soon as a body is brought in, I would be in full asgreement with you. We don''t live in a perfect world.
If the people that pronounced a live man dead get sued, the victim is a dirtbag for demanding they take responsibility.
Now it all makes sense!!
Have you bone heads ever considered that shooting the guy who''s dog bit your kid is illegal so you take the scumbag to court to get JUSTICE? We have a whole system designed so we don''t have to handle it ourselves but you think the people that use it are wrong.
without the system we would have annarchy and lots of "family feuds".
----------------------------------------------------
sorry some one has to pay for damages and pain &
suffering to the family this looks to me like a winning case with loads of money being awarded to the plantiffs thank GOD for the legal system that protects the poor & middle class
My BP is so low I''ve gone into the ER talking and they could barely find a pulse. You''d think they''d check these things out at every stop.
Yep, what an opportunity for some ambulance chaser! Not to politicize this, but John Edwards would leap on this like a chicken on a june bug.
suffering to the family this looks to me like a winning case with loads of money being awarded to the plantiffs thank GOD for the legal system that protects the poor & middle class
-----
Posted by aznyron
I might agree, except that the lawyers end up with as much, or more, or their compensation...shouldn''t they be looking out for the poor and middle class, like all the others who have empathy in our society? Everyone chomps down on those with insurance or money, and the more money one goes after, the higher the prices for the lawyer. Seems at odds with the bleeding heart philosophy for the poor and middle class. All the family really needs is to have bills paid to take care of the guy. Where is it written they have to make millions because they were stunned by a false declaration. Worse things happen everyday to people in all kinds of tragedies and accidents and nothing is done to help all the them. No. A lawyer saw $$$$ signs and suddenly it''s pain and suffering and punitive damages...punitive? Please. This isn''t about correcting a system...it''s about $$$$$$ for the lawyers.
Posted by tmn123 at 12:37 PM : Dec 29, 2007
*** straight he does! May he/they get all of the money,,and little to the lawyers.Of coures they will need to get paid.
I thought that they at the very least took them to a hospital and that is where they pronouce a person dead. They seem to put this poor man in a body bag rather quickly.
I don''t know who I would sue first but I would sue not so much for the money because no amount of money would bring back my loved one but just to make sure that never happens again.
What worries me there were some many people who saw this man and none of them took a double take to make sure that he had gone to other side of the curtain or not that is what worries me.
MAY GOD BLESS THE ENTIRE FAMILY THROUGH THIS VERY HARD TIME NOW AND FOREVER AS I AM SURE HE WILL!!!
someone declared him dead when he was alive. that person is in a position of authority and is supposed to be qualified to determine death. they are very much to blame. this could have led to a man''s death--essentially their negligence almost killed him and may have led to long term injuries.
even more you have to wonder if this is an isolated incident--this will cause emotional pain and suffering for many families who had someone declared dead in similar circumstances. Now they will have lingering doubts.
They are all entitled to compensation, seeing the people responsible punished. The lawsuit(s) also perform a service if they make people more diligent in the future.
Didn''t you read what I have written, I wont lower myself to making a nasty comment back to you like, can''t you read...
I said that...IF this family is genuine, then it will cost them money to keep him going, money that they might not have had to spend if he hadn''t been hit and he might not have had this brain damage if he had of been attended to properly straight off, but questions have to be asked first...and my heart goes out to the man who hit him..
Of course he would need money to keep him going, and as far as that is concerned I would sue also to help me, but if he was drunk or whatever then he has no right to sue others for his stupidity..
JP48481, it is no good being alive if you are badly mentally effected..and yes you are right, here in Australia crims have sued for being hurt while doing their dirty deed, and what is more incredible is that the Judges allow it and give them the money they have asked for instead of putting them away.
There is no need for people to put nasty comments on here. Whether it be right or wrong everyone is just voicing their opinion, and if misunderstood it is always wise to ask what the other person means before making a fool of themselves, this way we can all learn from each other, I love to hear the opinions of others.. Nasty words get us no where.
And Michelle from what I see you write, you can also be very proud of yourself, not only for your compassion for others but for your common sense in so many things..
No one does not. It not relevant. The answer would not help to explain the mistake or excuse the wrong that was done. The lawsuit would be just the same no matter what the answer might be.
must be talking about the person who was supposed to decide if this guy was alive or not. Didn''t do the job, almost killed a guy, but hey why should anyone get upset. Just collecting a pycheck like everyone else. Heck, probably happens every day.
I do agree with the above statement. No matter if he was drunk when the accident took place, if the injuries are a result of negligent care after the accident, his family has every right to ask the court for relief.
-
by keiler1
December 31, 2007 8:06 AM PST
- If he is an elder and can''t walk that fast and then someone says hes dead when he isn''t, don''t you think that would cause trama to the family. I think the family has all rights to sue because some doctors are getting away with stuff everyday. This should give them a wake up call to pay more attention even when they are busy.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 47 Comments