Bush Signs $555 Billion Spending Bill
Measure Keeps Government Running Through September, Includes $70B For Iraq, Afghanistan Wars
-
President Bush and his wife, first lady Laura Bush wave, as they walk with Mrs. Bush's mother Jenna Welch, second from left, past Brig. Gen. Margaret H. Woodward, obscured, right, on their way to board Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland, Wednesday Dec. 26, 2007, enroute to Crawford, Texas. (AP)
-
Interactive Bush Presidency The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
-
Interactive 110th Congress The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.
Mr. Bush also signed 15 other bills, including the patch to the alternative minimum tax, reports CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller.
Mr. Bush's signature on the massive spending bill capped a long-running battle with the Democratic-run Congress as he left boarded Air Force One to fly from his Maryland mountaintop retreat and flew to his Texas ranch here to see in the new year.
Mr. Bush had deep reservations about special "earmark" spending in the bill, but signed it into law nevertheless.
"The omnibus (bill) funds the government at responsible levels that the president proposed without raising taxes," White House spokesman Scott Stanzel told reporters traveling to Texas with Bush.
Stanzel said that although he signed the bill, Mr. Bush continues to be "disappointed with Congress' addiction to earmarks."
"And soon the president will outline his fiscal year 2009 budget proposal," the spokesman added, "which will hold the line on spending, keep taxes low and continue us on the path to a balanced budget."
Mr. Bush, who had used his veto power to remain relevant in the debate with Democrats on national spending priorities, had agreed to sign the measure, which includes $70 billion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, after winning concessions on Iraq and other budget items. The bill bankrolls 14 Cabinet departments and federal agencies and funds foreign aid for the budget year that began on Oct. 1.
Mr. Bush and his Senate GOP allies forced the Iraq money upon anti-war Democrats as the price for permitting the year-end budget deal to pass and be signed.
Democrats tried to use war spending legislation to force a change in Mr. Bush's Iraq policy, chiefly by setting a withdrawal goal with dates such as Dec. 15, 2009. But Mr. Bush and Republicans held a powerful hand. They knew Democrats would not let money lapse for troops overseas. That allowed a Bush veto in May and GOP stalling tactics to determine the outcome.
On the domestic budget, Mr. Bush's GOP allies were divided over whether the overall spending bill was a victory for their party in the long fight with Democrats over agency budgets.
Conservatives and outside watchdog groups criticized the bill for having about $28 billion in domestic spending that topped Bush's budget and was paid for by a combination of "emergency" spending, transfers from the defense budget and other maneuvers.
©MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 7
- next
See all 140 CommentsPosted by JetRanger7 at 08:32 AM : Dec 27, 2007
So,,,thats the way of the world (U.S) nowa days. Huh?
WE all gonna turn into a bunch theives. Well I guess that''s the only way I can get my money back. the pri(ks
Posted by hillaryin08 at 08:03 AM : Dec 27
DUH!!!! But the thief in the White House signed it!! All the time complaining because he really wanted it all for himself!!
Can''t wait for 08--get them all out of Washington--BUSH and our elected officials in Washington have sold America to China Saudi Arabia and God knows who else--its going to take us generations to bring this country back to where we should be!
Although stating his displeasure at all the unnecessary spending in the bill, he signed it anyway, which raises the question: If he disapproved of this bill but signed it anyway, why did he veto such bills as SCHIP?
The only answer seems to be that the bill recently signed and loaded with "earmarks" (including the infamous Alaskan ferry to nowhere pushed for by Alaskan GOP congressmen!), was really a "thank you" from the Emperor to Congress for being so subservent to his will over the past year.
I wish I could get a "thank you" like that!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
Borrow and Spend! That''''s what''''s become of the "fiscally conservative" party. They borrow and borrow and spend and spend, and then they keep on doing it... on and on and on.
We will be paying for Bush''''s stu.pidity for several generations!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by MyIDonCBS at 09:07 PM : Dec 26, 2007
Your Socialist Controlled Congress funded the war again not Bush. Pinhead
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by JetRanger7 at 12:34 AM : Dec 27, 2007
Your Socialist Controlled Congress funded the war again not Bush. Pinhead
Then he left the lying about "on the road to a balanced budget" to his "spokesman", and quickly left town.
Hey president Texan, I hear you types take being called a liar and a coward rather seriously, then take this one, you are a liar, a traitor, a thief, and a "yellow" coward, and I challenge you personally to a public televised debate on why you and your co conspirators should be facing a firing squad.
I''''m calling you out, coward.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by brianbwb at 12:40 AM : Dec 27, 2007
Your Socialist Controlled Congress funded the war again not Bush. Pinhead
AMERICA YOU GET WHAT YOU DESERVE..
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT OR SHUT UP!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by bluestardad at 03:35 AM : Dec 27, 2007
Your Socialist Controlled Congress funded the war not Bush. Pinhead
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by spires01 at 05:14 AM : Dec 27, 2007
Your Socialist Controlled Congress funded the war not Bush. Pinhead
It is all a Farce - if you think about it even our votes don''''t count - the electoral college has the final say in electing our president. Americans are like lamb being led to the butcher and our elected officials don''''t care because they are part of the problem and will Never be part of the solution.
*** all you want - it falls on deaf ears!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by watcher269 at 07:20 AM : Dec 27, 2007
Ya Know What
Your Socialist Controlled Congress funded the war not Bush. Pinhead
It is all a Farce - if you think about it even our votes don''t count - the electoral college has the final say in electing our president. Americans are like lamb being led to the butcher and our elected officials don''t care because they are part of the problem and will Never be part of the solution.
*** all you want - it falls on deaf ears!
Come on back dude, it was just getting interesting...
AMERICA YOU GET WHAT YOU DESERVE..
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT OR SHUT UP!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by bluestardad
BLUESTARDAD -- We are doing something about it. It''s called "Creating Strategic Launching Points in Iraq and Afghanistan". Now, go away, dummy......
AMERICA YOU GET WHAT YOU DESERVE..
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT OR SHUT UP!
Only an neocon with a suspicious agenda would call education a "wasteful" program, but not see the illegal wars we are now spending trillions on as such...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 7
- next
See all 140 Comments