September 22, 2009 11:13 AM

The "Take It Easy" Candidates

By
CBSNews
(Weekly Standard)  This column was written by Fred Barnes.


The popular notion about Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee is that they're soaring in the 2008 presidential race because they're candidates of change. And indeed that's true. But it's a particular kind of change that is key to their appeal. They might be called the "take it easy" candidates.

There's a certain amount of nostalgia in their message, too. They would like to return America to a more tranquil time when the country seemed less threatened--like the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the 9/11 attacks in 2001--and when our politic culture was less combative.

And this points to an underlying theme in both the Obama and Huckabee campaigns. It's pretty simple: We can get along with the world and with each other. As a nation, we don't have to be tense and angry. We can take it easy.

Since he began his run for the Democratic nomination, Obama has emphasized his goal of ending the bitter fighting between Democrats and Republicans and forging bipartisan compromises. He promises to stop the polarization, the hyped-up political atmosphere, the nasty squabbling, the personal attacks--in short, all the stuff that millions of Americans hate about Washington.

His early opposition to the war in Iraq plays a role here. America, Obama suggests or at least implies, doesn't have to go off on crusades around the world. Nor do we have to be so furiously at odds with adversaries around the world that we insist on an arms-length, no-talking relationship. Obama says as president he would meet with anti-American leaders like President Amadinejad of Iran.

A Republican senator mockingly refers to Obama as "Senator Bring Us Together." But it's a talking point that Obama has been using effectively since his celebrated speech at the 2004 Democratic convention in Boston. Americans, he said then, can "pursue our individual dreams and yet still come together as one American family. E pluribus unum. Out of many, one."

Just this week, Obama is stressing this idea in his Christmas TV ad. Sitting with his wife and young daughters beside a Christmas tree and a fire, he repeats a line from his campaign speeches--and it seems quite appropriate in a Christmas holiday context. "The things that unite us as a people are more powerful and enduring than anything that sets us apart," he says.

Huckabee, the first candidate to air a Christmas message, makes a slightly different point in his ad. Politics isn't the most important thing in life, he indicates--a point campaign-weary residents of Iowa and New Hampshire no doubt agree with. At Christmas, Huckabee says, "what matters is the celebration of the birth of Christ."

From the beginning of his candidacy, Huckabee has promoted the idea that everyone needs to lighten up. He introduced himself in the early television debates among Republican presidential candidates this way: "I'm a conservative, but I'm not mad at anyone about it." Though a Republican, Huckabee has actually echoed Obama, a Democrat. In the Republican debate on December 11 in Des Moines, he said his top priority is to "bring the country back together."

In foreign affairs, Huckabee doesn't appear to be mad at anyone either. His policy for getting along with other nations is the Golden Rule. Be nice to other countries and they'll be nice to America. In other words, we can take it easy not just as a national attitude but also as a foreign policy."

Now, Obama and Huckabee have many detractors. Critics of Obama complain that he talks about bipartisanship but does little to pursue it. In his book, The Audacity of Hope, he praised the bipartisan "gang of 14" senators that got together on judicial nominations. But he declined to join them because they allowed conservative nominees to be confirmed.

With Huckabee, the charge is that he's naïve on national security and as Arkansas governor wasn't very adept at bringing competing sides together. And despite his concern for "what matters" more than politics, Huckabee did a series of TV interviews the day before Christmas and scheduled five campaign events in Iowa the day after.

There's an obvious reason behind the attacks on Obama and Huckabee. They come from political opponents who wouldn't be complaining if the appeals of Obama and Huckabee to tone down the friction in politics and world affairs weren't working.

Fred Barnes is executive editor of THE WEEKLY STANDARD.
By Fred Barnes
© 2007, News Corporations, Weekly Standard, All Rights Reserved

Weekly Standard
Add a Comment See all 13 Comments
by im2pid2 December 28, 2007 6:17 PM EST
A new day is dawning, I vote for Truth. Ron Paul who you new world order clowns won''t even mention. This more than anything else tell me he is the MAN.
Think for yourself (Join the Ron Paul Revolution) I Did.
Reply to this comment
by quatrops December 28, 2007 10:56 AM EST
Those of us born prior to 1940 began their lives or spent their early adulthood in Marie''s "Garden of Eden" and I assure you it was anything BUT the heaven she imagines. A combination of "blue laws" extant prior to WWII and the Great Depression mandated that we had one day (at least!) out of seven to appreciate the social benefits she imagines. We didn''t.

Like most simplistic solutions to social and cultural "problems", hers begins with a core of truth but then expands it by ignoring the realities of human nature. Does she really believe that legislating or mandating a "day off" from work or "production" is going to change the habits of a consumption-oriented society?

As long as our desire for MORE goods and services continues to be the motivating factor in our society, Wall Street and Madison Avenue will continue to control how our culture is shaped.

Yes, we all would benefit from more R&R, but before we can achieve that goal, a massive transformation in our mindset is going to be required. A day off just won''t do it.
Reply to this comment
by jon2012-2009 December 27, 2007 4:33 PM EST
Obama''s "new direction" is no less gimmickry than Hillary''s "experience." I doubt he can deliver because how we got to where we are now is mostly the fault of right-wing expremism in the GOP. The Democrats have resisted while still playing by the rules or we would have been in deeper ***.

Can Obama work a miracle and change the hearts of 10% of America who find Bush the most admired man today and the 30% who still approve of Bush''s presidency? Bush''s judicial appointments, reckless treatment of the environment and the threat of global warming, shredding of our Constitution, the tax cuts that shifted more wealth to the already rich and undermine federal programs like Social Security, and of course the senseless Iraq War--they will remain in the political landscape for decades to fix and whatever happens it will be contentious.
Reply to this comment
by jon2012-2009 December 27, 2007 4:12 PM EST
Huckabee scares me mostly because of his "preacher" background. We''''ve already had one "born-againer" (Bush II) in the Oval Office for 7 years and we can see the mess Junior has made of everything he touches. When someone tells me that they talk to God in the Rose Garden, get answers and advice, and those answers and advice turn out to be a disaster, I get nervous!
Posted by walt1944 at 01:40 PM : Dec 26, 2007

It''s all an act anyway, the God thing. What Bush does is take advice from his cronies and those interests who put money in his pocket. The American people as an abstraction is not even in the picture.
Reply to this comment
by gretagreen December 27, 2007 3:28 PM EST
I like Obama.
Huckabee freaks me out.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 December 27, 2007 4:43 AM EST
"But he declined to join them because they allowed conservative nominees to be confirmed."

Mr Barnes, why should a "Black" man support the nomination of "conservatives", since the vast majority of the people who call themselves such would take us (and also Mr. Obama, regardless of whether he thinks that his "race" matters) back to the days of Jim Crow?

Why indeed should any sane person support those who call themselves "conservative" but support the corruption of trillions of dollars for illegal wars, and other antisocial measures that are detrimental to America''s progress as a country?

Your answer should be interesting, if you are brave enough to post it...
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 December 27, 2007 4:33 AM EST
CBS needs stop their preference for publishing right wing opinions.
Posted by CBS_Oliver

Of a truth, I believe they have no choice, since they are owned and operated by the super rich, they wouldn''t dare publish opinion which anathematizes their vision of "how the world should be", it is why the Bush klan has so far gotten away with their crimes.

Journalism, along with education, died after Watergate showed them that when the public knows the truth, they won''t accept such corruption.

Notice how many people on these topics, myself included, are calling for the Bush klan, and the Democrat enablers like Pelosi and Reid to be held responsible for their actions, which are recognized the world over as crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Then see how many "professional" op ed writers posit such, the difference is staggeringly obvious.

Even the politician Kucinich understands the gravity of the Bush klan''s crimes, but apparently no "journalists" do...
Reply to this comment
by cbs_oliver December 27, 2007 2:06 AM EST
CBS needs stop their preference for publishing right wing opinions.
Reply to this comment
by chrisbieber December 27, 2007 1:10 AM EST
and NeoCon lackey/mouthpiece warmonger Huckabee is a Take It Easy candidate?...NOT...just read his(ghostwritten)tome in the ESTABLISHMENT Foreign Affairs...he wants to be the NEW Woodrow Wilson..make things Fair and equitable...right... just like NONnationabuilder getalong awshucks and Voice of God-hearing W....

Barack wants to outdo the rest in GLOBAL NewDeal socialism....spreading OUR PRODUCED WEALTH(that isnt yet stolen by IRS and FedReserve inflation) to good economies like COMMUNIST China...and Zimbabwe....with its $750,000 bill....

and WHICH one of these nice guys wants to lessen the LET IT BE and UNCONSTITUTIONAL War on Drugs/Terror????

Neocon MOUTHPIECE Fred Barnes will follow Das Party Line and NOT MENTION Ron Paul and HIS Consistent and CONSTITUTIONAL noninterventionism and his freedom agenda....

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!! bellows Fred Barnes...
Reply to this comment
by cs4466 December 26, 2007 9:00 PM EST
This might be interesting if Obama or Huckabee actually had a snowball''s chance in heck of being in the White House at the end of 2008. Of course, they do not.

Go Hillary!!! Woot!
Reply to this comment
See all 13 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook