CIA: We Did Cooperate With 9/11 Commission

Agency Rebukes Suggestion It Was Not Forthcoming With Info About Interrogations

(AP)  The CIA on Saturday rebutted suggestions the spy agency was uncooperative and hid from the Sept. 11 commission the videotaped interrogations of two suspected terrorists, saying it waited until the panel went out of business before destroying the material now in question.

The destruction in late 2005 of the videotapes of two al Qaeda suspects has upset a federal judge and riled the Democratic-controlled Congress, which has promised an investigation. The Justice Department also is trying to find out what happened and whether any laws were broken.

A recent memo by Philip Zelikow, the former executive director of the Sept. 11 commission, suggests the CIA was less than forthcoming when asked for documents and other information from the panel, which investigated the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The CIA disputed that characterization and suggested the panel should have requested interrogation videotapes specifically if it wanted them.

"The notion that the CIA wasn't cooperative or forthcoming with the 9/11 commission is just plain wrong. It is utterly without foundation," spokesman Mark Mansfield said Saturday. "The CIA's cooperation and assistance is what enabled the 9/11 commission to reconstruct the plot in their very comprehensive report."

In a statement e-mailed separately Saturday, Mansfield suggested the commission should have been specific about wanting videotapes.

"Because it was thought the commission could ask about tapes at some point, they were not destroyed while the commission was active," he said. Mansfield, citing similar comments this month by CIA Director Michael Hayden, added that "the tapes were destroyed only when it was determined they were no longer of intelligence value and not relevant to any internal, legislative, or judicial inquiries."

Zelikow's seven-page memo, dated Dec. 13, reviews the commission's requests for information from the CIA.

It cites a Jan. 26, 2004, meeting of commission members and administration officials, including then-CIA Director George Tenet, at which the government offered to present written questions to the detainees and relay their answers back to the commission.

"None of the government officials in any of these 2004 meetings alluded to the existence of recordings of interrogations or any further information in the government's possession that was relevant to the commission's requests," Zelikow wrote.

Near the end of the commission's work, and in response to a request by the commission to all agencies, John McLaughlin, then the deputy CIA director, confirmed on June 29, 2004, that the CIA had "taken and completed all reasonable steps necessary to find the documents in its possession, custody or control responsive" to the commission's formal requests and "has produced or made available for review" all such documents, the memo said.

The existence of Zelikow's memo was first reported by The New York Times.

[rowdytexan2]

Hogwarsh!

They deliberately held them back. What do all the legal eagles employed by the CIA not understand about providing any and all documents relating to 9/11, which should include anything to do with the testimony of the ''supposedly'' captured perpatrators. The Commission needed to know exactly how they got that testimony to even begin to make an assessment as to whether their testimony was valid.

If they weren''t ordered by the White HOuse to hold them back, why did they they? And if they destroyed them after, why even acknowledge that they ever had them? Because they knew that SOMEBODY was going to rat them out?

How can you specifically ask for videotapes when nobody knows they exist? Or is our system so corrupt that they knew about them and deliberately didn''t ask?

It is clearly starting to appear that we have fingers in Washington point every which direction. Where is one honest person that cares enough to try to untangle the web of deceit and lies of ALL those involved and see that justice is served? When does it get to the point where we can no longer just stand back and let them sweet this under the rug and make them accountable for those 3,000 lives lost on 9/11?

[uzzisanta]

So basically what they did was bait you guys. Yer talking about the master baiters of the world. They bait everything. They walk around all day long wearing fishing shirts.

[toolmangler-2009]

How can you specifically ask for videotapes when nobody knows they exist? Or is our system so corrupt that they knew about them and deliberately didn''''t ask?
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 01:56 PM : Dec 22, 2007



There you go!!! asked ans answered

[inventagod]

Yeah, we are SO stupid....

[vastr-wcon]

.
"CIA: We Did Cooperate With 9/11 Commission"

Sure, right. Everyone that believes in Santa Clause will certain believe that one.

It''s like 1963 all over again - when the CIA stonewalled the Warren Commission and prevent it from finding out anything about the CIA''s major role in the JFK assassination.

.

[creeper00]

Did the 911 Commission conveniently forget to ask about videotapes?

Did anyone give a d@mn about the truth being told?

[pepperp1]

Nice try, just like everything else bushcorruptize go with a false literal definition without merit or like this just lie

Document:
an object containing information LAW an object such as a movie, photograph, or audio recording that contains information and can be used as evidence.


NO IMMUNITY NONE CONGRESS

[pepperp1]

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 01:56 PM : Dec 22, 2007


This is where We the People need to get their hooks out of our brains, if they say it it is a lie, they have no public trust left and the public should give none. This reference is like everything else a talking point for Rush to feed the poodles it has no merit, it is a lie, a red herring a faux argument a distraction.....a masterful chaos technique to overcome and hide truth, nothing more there is no honor here%u2026..and not providing the document is a crime%u2026

[dustfullman]

We are seeing the results of 16 years of Republican Rule. Lying and lying by omission are the true lasting legacy of The Bushies. Seig Heil!

[king77shaw]

CIA tapes? why didn''t the 9/11 Commission view this footage ?

here%u2019s an independent photographer who shot close up footage of the Pentagon on 9/11 - watch it and hear what he has to say - then ask yourself %u201Cwhere%u2019s the plane?%u201D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYWIT9TSJPE

more damning Pentagon evidence here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAwtmun_aj8&feature=related

and here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=869bO4jI1po&feature=related

[king77shaw]

why did the 9/11 commission completely ignore this footage ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwSc7NPn8Ok

WTC7 housed the CIA as well as the secret service, fbi and SEC ... hmmm, can anyone say command central?

[king77shaw]

neither the CIA nor the 9/11 commission would like you to see these photos ... was it a collapse or controlled demolition? how did the beams get shot so far horizontally? curious ...

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1nenw.html

[neobrian-2009]

Mr. Kean, a Republican and a former governor of New Jersey, said of the agency%u2019s decision not to disclose the existence of the videotapes, %u201CI don%u2019t know whether that%u2019s illegal or not, but it%u2019s certainly wrong.%u201D Mr. Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana, said that the C.I.A. %u201Cclearly obstructed%u201D the commission%u2019s investigation,...

[Krazcarl]

Anyone that would believe the waterboarding secret prisons guys, I have high ground in Fl. cheap real cheap...You don''t expect them to volenter for prison do you, the great lie they have not made us safer just a name for themselves and embarassed us.

[ubrew12]

Elsewhere, the revelation that Herbert Hoover compiled a list of 12000 American''s he intended to illegally imprison without council as possible ''spies'' in the 1950s is news, but apparently not at CBS. With the Bush administrations waterboarding revelations in plain view, this little tidbit, released by the FBI only yesterday after 50 years, provides some context about where this kind of paranoia can lead.

I wonder, will we have to wait another 50 years before we get a peek at *** Cheney''s list?

[cosmicfluke]

"CIA: We Did Cooperate With 9/11 Commission"

The Ommission Commission was very kind to them, made it very easy to cooperate.
The media blackout, bought out or threatened talking heads like Bill Maher, or incestuous media outlets like Popular Science isn''t stopping the growing trend of those who have seen the evidence.

9/11 was an inside job.

[secundus2]

Why should anybody trust the accuracy of what is said by someone who doesn''t know the difference between the two Hoovers (Herbert and J. Edgar)?

So many of the postings on the CBS site are far worse: just factually incorrect, poorly thought out, the product of obsessions or vicious abuse (check the Tony Blair story). For discussion of the news, visit the ABC or BBC moderated sites. It is not really the fault of those posting the drivel here (they can''t do any better), but rather, of CBS, which has never wanted discussion to follow its "Rules of Engagement." It would be interesting to see what the FCC has to say about the CBS claim "we''re not responsible." Maybe the CBS site does provide a useful function insofar as it prevents a few loonies from spraypainting their "thoughts" on subway walls.

[jrw27]

WWII and the Cold War were waged by using techniques dissimilar from water boarding? Is the CIA a hangman caught between U.S. foreign policy and the American legal system? I wonder whose loved ones, whereupon blown up by the shrapnel duct taped to the body of a glazed eye suicide bomber, intent on his last mission for God, would not seriously consider water boarding an appropriate response. More importantly, at least 3000 American citizens were mass murdered by such terrorists during the world trade center bombings! Strong signals should be sent out to all terrorists that we in America mean business. The CIA has heretofore indicated, despite media distortion, that they have been careful and conservative with the method, and have acted in the best interests of the American people. The Democrats, et al, might just as soon shoot themselves in the foot with the same smoking gun they wish to expose; but isn''t that a rather common mistake in Washington?

[uzzisanta]

If I was god I''d pee on ya.

[jrw27]

But if you were "W" wouldya?

[stevex47]

JRW,
"More importantly, at least 3000 American citizens were mass murdered by such terrorists during the world trade center bombings!"

Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. Had no WMD''s. Our loved ones are there why?

[jrw27]

If I''m not mistaken, Iraq was obviously harboring and acting in association with Al Qaeda. At any rate, this current inquiry into the CIA and interrogation techniques, has to do with suspected terrorists, and not, as far as I have read, Iraqi nationals.

[brianbwb-2009]

"The CIA disputed that characterization and suggested the panel should have requested interrogation videotapes specifically if it wanted them."

The CIA is playing games with semantics, along the line of "you didn''t read the fine print."

"I wonder, will we have to wait another 50 years before we get a peek at *** Cheney''''s list?" posted by ubrew12

Too late, they were burned in Cheney''s office.

"Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. Had no WMD''''s. Our loved ones are there why?" Posted by stevex47

No matter how many times you remind them, the Bushbots will continue to onfer that Bush committed his crimes because of 9/11.

"If I''''m not mistaken, Iraq was obviously harboring and acting in association with Al Qaeda." Posted by JRW27

You are quite mistaken.

"At any rate, this current inquiry into the CIA and interrogation techniques, has to do with suspected terrorists, and not, as far as I have read, Iraqi nationals." Posted by JRW27

Obviously you have confined your reading to their version only, which we all know is blatantly false.

[jrw27]

Their version perhaps: the liberal media has no bias? By what evidence, am I mistaken, that Al Qaeda was/is not in Iraq. Show me the news heading. Al Qaeda has been shown to be anywhere from the Philippines to Great Britain. There was not one Al Qaeda operative in Iraq- not ever? You seem confident. I''d like to know your source of information.

JRW27 wrote:

"If I''m not mistaken, Iraq was obviously harboring and acting in association with Al Qaeda. At any rate, this current inquiry into the CIA and interrogation techniques, has to do with suspected terrorists, and not, as far as I have read, Iraqi nationals."

What proof do you have that Iraq was acting in association with al Qaeda?

What proof do you have of this "association", that the CIA and other intelligence agencies have now refuted?

I see that in another one of your posts you make the claim that "at least 3000 American citizens were mass murdered by such terrorists during the world trade center bombings!".

I''m assuming that you''re talking about 9/11 instead of the World Trade Center bombing in 1993 where 1042 people were killed.

It seems to me as though you''re a little confused.

Oooops!!

Correction:

6 were killed and approx 1042 were injured in the WTC bombing.

[Krazcarl]

secundus2...Your just a scumbag trying to look more enlightened than everyone else you don''t you look as stupid as you are.

[woodjd42]

I wonder whose loved ones, whereupon blown up by the shrapnel duct taped to the body of a glazed eye suicide bomber, intent on his last mission for God, would not seriously consider water boarding an appropriate response.
Posted by JRW27 at 09:43 PM : Dec 22, 2007

If my son was killed on the streets here in the U.S. I would want every single person around tortured in order to find who the guilty party was. However does that make it right? Here is this country we are suppose to believe in the rule of law and rights.

[michellem99-2009]

I am pissed at that lier...Yer don''t bully and start wars. They died. Did the govt kill them... covr it up .

[Krazcarl]

Yes I have high ground in Fl. cheap real cheap if you can believe anything these scoundrels say thier breed to lie and turn on there friends...

crzmeat wrote:

"Yes I have high ground in Fl. cheap real cheap if you can believe anything these scoundrels say thier breed to lie and turn on there friends..."

Indeed - you just can''t trust a Republican.

[motherhen11]

Makes you just want to curl up in a little ball and rock back and forth.