BOSTON, Dec. 21, 2007
Romney's Hometown Papers Endorse McCain
Conservative Boston Herald Joins The Globe, Backing Ariz. Senator Over Former Mass. Governor
-
Republican presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, right, pose at historic Faneuil Hall in Boston, Dec. 19, 2007. Kissinger endorsed McCain at the event. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)
-
Photo Essay John McCain Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?
The Boston Herald, the state's conservative tabloid, endorsed Arizona Sen. McCain for president in an editorial posted online Thursday.
"There are times in this nation's history so perilous that they cry out for a steady, experienced leader, a person so trusted that we would put the fate of this country in his hands. This is one of those times, and Sen. John McCain is that person," the newspaper said.
It did not mention Romney, who led Massachusetts from 2003 to January of this year.
The newspaper also did not endorse anyone in the Democratic presidential race, breaking its tradition of choosing candidates in both parties.
Both the Herald and The Boston Globe, which announced its backing of McCain earlier this week, circulate in vote-rich southern New Hampshire, which holds the nation's first presidential primary on Jan. 8. Romney maintains a sizable lead there, but McCain is hoping to repeat his primary victory in 2000.
McCain also has been endorsed by the Union Leader, New Hampshire's largest newspaper.
Romney has brushed off the endorsements, citing his own, including from Republican Sen. Judd Gregg, the senior Republican in New Hampshire.
The Boston newspaper endorsements could provide fodder for former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who has pulled into first place and ahead of Romney in Iowa, which holds caucuses Jan. 3. Since losing the lead, Romney's campaign aides have taken to e-mailing daily missives about Huckabee written by people familiar with his record. They are headlined, "Those who know him best."
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The secrets of tennis legend 
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 29 CommentsPosted by omega39 at 12:17 PM : Dec 21, 2007
LOL! It just tears right wingers apart to think of how popular Clinton was and still is. If he could run again he''d win in a walk.
Zogby''s Director of Communications Fritz Wenzel said on November 20 that Paul is the strongest of the GOP candidates to run against Clinton. "Among the larger universe of voters," which includes all parties, "yes, Paul would be a much stronger candidate than any of the other three [Romney, Giuliani, Thompson]," Wenzel said. Zogby recently announced that Paul was their winner in a nationwide blind-bio poll which included voters from all parties. "He is anti-war and the majority of Democrats are anti-war, he has some other ideas and policies and stances on issues more attractive to Democrats, particularly conservative Democrats," said Wenzel. "Even among Independents, he is far and away a more attractive candidate," he added. Paul is the only GOP candidate who is not threatening war with Iran, whereas Clinton vowed to keep that option "on the table." Paul also voted against the war in Iraq, which Clinton has supported. Because Democrats outnumber Republicans, none of the other GOP candidates can win against Clinton, because they simply won''t be able to reach across party lines and attract enough Democratic and Independent voters to beat Clinton. Only Paul can do that. "He''s right on schedule," Wenzel said. "He''s making all the right moves, going in the right direction...at a time when other candidates are not moving." Wenzel based his analysis on recent polls that show Paul could win in New Hampshire and that his support nationwide is intensifying.
The Senate Armed Services Committee practically assured military personnel a 3.5 percent pay raise next January by including that figure in the fiscal 2008 defense authorization bill it approved in late May.
The House of Representatives already had voted to give the military a 3.5 pay raise next year, which is a half percentage point higher than proposed the Bush administration.
After the House vote, the White House%u2019s Office of Management and Budget said the bigger pay raise was %u201Cunnecessary%u201D and urged congressional leaders to instead back a 3 percent increase which would match recent wage growth in the private sector.
Senate Republicans ignored the White House pleading and joined with Democrats in supporting the bigger raise. It now appears likely that 2008 will be the ninth consecutive year of military raises set at least .5 percent above private sector wage growth as measured by the government%u2019s Employment Cost Index (ECI).
Yeah, we need another Democrat in office...
Posted by Hwy71So
And yet, he left office with a 66% approval rating, he must have been doing something right.
Posted by Hwy71So
Why, too much peace and prosperity? You know, I have read many of your posts on different topics and we are really not that much different in our positions.
Yeah, we need another Democrat in office...
Unfortunately, McCain doesn''''t qualify, either. Ask anyone who''''s sat down to talk with him. He''''s looney as a fruitcake.
Posted by GladImNotOJ at 07:27 AM : Dec 21, 2007
+
There is not one republican running for President that is qualified to be President, I have searched, and searched, for one word I could stand up and say," YES" nope, forget it.
Mitt is, by far, the most qualified candidate running from either party in 2008.
America is the largest enterprise in the world and Mitt is the only candidate qualified to run that enterprise.
Domestically Americans face a lot of issues that need addressed/fixed. We someone with a business background not a political background to address these issues.
Mitt Romney won in the bluest state in the Union and proved that he can work with the other party to get real things done.
Now everyone in Massachusetts had "health insurance" without raising taxes.
Who else out there has done that?.............besides just "talking" about it.
For me the choice is clear...........................Presiden
t Romney!
Posted by perception5 at 08:58 AM : Dec 21, 20
Well now you just messed up, everyone I talk to hates that insurance for everyone and it has made the most liberal state as mad at one person that I have ever seen in my lifetime
Posted by Hwy71So
Why not just make it from the milk you get from the goats tied up behind your mobile home? Seriously, what is it with Republicans and cheese? Reagan gave away so much free cheese to the poor some of them are still constipated, and Bush is clearly the cheesiest president ever.
If your own town doesn''''t support you why should the nation?
Posted by tbweb at 06:06 AM : Dec 21, 2007
I told you awhile back that Romney was hated in the state of Massachusetts and this is proof when the papers of Boston say No Romney. That insurance for everyone done him in costing everyone too much to insure the ones that can not afford it so they can be insured
Posted by neoconism at 09:09 AM : Dec 21, 2007
+ r
AWESOME!!!!!!!!!
Mitt and Hillary will both pay a high price for their perception that gaming the system is more important than having things you strongly believe in...
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 29 Comments