December 21, 2007

Ed Rollins: Huckabee Will Win Iowa

Political Players: Campaign Chairman Says His Candidate Is Most Like Reagan

  • Ed Rollins with Mike Huckabee

    Ed Rollins with Mike Huckabee  (AP)

(CBS)  Political Players is a weekly conversation with the leaders, consultants, and activists who shape American politics. This week, CBS News' Brian Goldsmith talked with Ed Rollins, the former Reagan political director, who signed on last week as national chairman of the surging Mike Huckabee presidential campaign.

CBSNews.com: Let’s start with the attacks on Governor Huckabee from a lot of Republican establishment figures lately. Rush Limbaugh has called him “the Huckster.” Rich Lowry, the editor of the National Review, has said it would be suicide to nominate him. Why do you think he's provoking all of this criticism?

Ed Rollins: Well, I think first of all he is not an establishment candidate. I don't think anybody anticipated early on when he started to run that he would do as well as he's doing. Some of these guys have picked other candidates.

And I think, to a certain extent, the alleged wise men have sat around in either the studios, or the newsrooms, basically writing magazine articles. They didn't see it coming and I think they underestimated him.

CBSNews.com: Does he threaten them?

Ed Rollins: Well, I think he's not their candidate. You know some of them obviously are with McCain. Some of them are obviously with Romney. And I think at the end of the day Mike is a guy who basically was a very effective governor.

You can look at his record. It's a record of accomplishment. He didn't use the governor's office to just purely run for president. He wanted to fix mistakes and do things that are meaningful. And I think the thing they challenge him on is not really about his record.

CBSNews.com: But, as you know, Romney is running a number of attack ads in Iowa about your candidate’s record. The latest is focused on crime-and Huckabee’s pardons and commutations. And Huckabee's trying to turn that around by saying, the only reason Romney didn’t issue any is that he’s so political. Do you think the voters are going to buy that?

Ed Rollins: Well, I think to a certain extent the governor has had to explain what it is that he did. I mean, I think most people don't realize that everybody who's in prison in Arkansas has the option of appealing to the governor to get their sentence commuted or pardoned. It's an automatic state law, which it isn't in other places.

Most places the initiative comes from the governor or the president or what have you. But in Arkansas it's a state law that prisoners actually get to have that right. More than 8,000 applied to have their sentences commuted.

Mike read every single one. He made decisions on people that he thought had basically been rehabilitated. It wasn't like he opened up the prisons and sent everybody home. And I don't think anybody's ever said that.

No, it's about statistics. And there's a lot of statistics on Romney that we could fire back on, but we've chosen at this point in time not to do that. We certainly reserve that right.

CBSNews.com: What's your view of Romney’s record?

Ed Rollins: The irony to me is that if Romney thought he was such a great governor, why he is not talking about being a governor? Why didn’t he run for a second term? He was losing badly [in the polls] to a couple of Democrats.

He spent most of his last year out of state campaigning. He made it very clear in the New York Times, even before he'd ever been elected to an office, he wanted to run for president. And after having been defeated for Senate in 1994, I think he just basically was out looking for an office to get a hold of.

And the day he got inaugurated he started running for president. He's not the first man to ever do that, but I think Mike Huckabee tried to be a good governor and fix the problems of Arkansas.

CBSNews.com: And so what's your opinion of Romney not issuing any pardons or commutations?

Ed Rollins: My view is it was a political decision. I think Romney basically has changed his position on many, many things because he sees it as more politically doable. It's like you take a pollster and you sit down and say, "Tell me what the primary voters want." Not what I've done in the past. "Tell me what the primary voters want and that's what I'll do."

You know he shifts his positions on so many things. And to a certain extent, he's somewhat misleading. He said on Meet the Press last weekend he got the NRA endorsement when he ran [for governor]. It turns out he didn't. So there's just all kinds of little things that he spins.

And he's got a good campaign team. And obviously they thought they had this thing in the bag months ago. And they've spent an exorbitant sum of his own money, not money that he's raised. And I think he sees Mike as a very serious threat.

CBSNews.com: What's your reaction to the photo that came out this week of Mitt Romney at the Planned Parenthood fundraiser in 1994?

Ed Rollins: I mean all these guys have said, "Well, that's where I was then and that's why I'm in a different place today. And I made mistakes. I did this. I did that."

You know, at the end of the day, usually people develop their ideology before they get to be 60 years old. It's just all so political at this point in time.

CBSNews.com: But the Romney people would argue that Ronald Reagan, whom you served as political director and campaign manager, changed his positions.

Ed Rollins: Let me tell you the Ronald Reagan story. The Ronald Reagan story which they have used over and over again is totally untrue. First of all, Roe vs. Wade had not occurred yet [during his early years as governor]. Ronald Reagan was never pro-choice.

Ronald Reagan signed a law that allowed women who had had psychiatric damage and were suicidal to have an abortion. He thought it was about maybe 300 a year, which is what he was told. You know, it turned out to be a very significant abortion bill because a lot of women just went and got a sign off from a psychiatrist.

Ronald Reagan was opposed to that from day one. He was very upset about that. So I mean I find real fault with Romney basically saying, "Ronald Reagan did this. Ronald Reagan did that." I mean I remember him basically saying he wasn't for Ronald Reagan. He belittled Ronald Reagan in '94 when he ran against Kennedy.

Continued



By Brian Goldsmith
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 77 Comments
by ih2005 December 23, 2007 7:43 AM EST
Increasingly, Mike Huckabee is what Leadership looks like ( http://snipr.com/leaderlook ). He''s an adroit public speaker; he''s all about calling his listeners to "do something," to awaken them to their own empowerment, and summon them to action in order that "Main Street," and not "Wall Street," will prevail in guarding the values and beliefs upon which the Republic was founded.

Most importantly, Huckabee is ONE with the FairTax grassroots movement ( http://snipr.com/fthuckabeeonirs ). Romney''s recent WEAK response to FairTax questioning on %u201CThis Week with Geo. Stephanopoulos ( http://snipurl.com/stephanopoulosdebate )%u201D drew a sharp contrast between Huckabee and all other presidential front-runners who will not embrace it. Huckabee understands that what''''s wrong with the income tax can''''t be fixed with "a tap of the hammer, nor a twist of the screwdriver." That his opponents cling to the destructive Tax Code, the IRS, preserving political power of granting tax favors at continued cost to - and misery of - American families, invigorates his campaign''''s raison d''''etre. %u201CMain Street%u201D will have to demand ( http://snipr.com/scrapthecode ) that their legislators deliver the bill to Huckabee, if elected.
Reply to this comment
by quo_vadis-2009 December 23, 2007 3:39 AM EST
"Huckabee, if you''''re going to foreground religion, then you need to act with integrity. Denying the cross that you "used" for your ad demonstrates that given the option, you''''d rather be funny than honest and devious rather than devout."

I watched that ad 3 times & never saw anything other than a window pane (I thought it was a window - till the "cross" furor, then I looked at it closer & realized that what I thought were lights on the window are baubles on a shelf). This man has been open & honest about his faith despite the ridicule & abuse that is being heaped on him for it - why on earth would he start making subliminal messages now? What would be the point?

This whole thing is so incredibly absurd! What is so threatening about the cross anyway? And on what basis have you determined that the man is lying?

If Huckabee loses Iowa, it will be because our country has given over its heart to money & cynicism...
Reply to this comment
by milton07722 December 23, 2007 2:27 AM EST
Huckabee''s record stands for itself. Look at his own constitutency. They are NOT happy with him and his stands. Ron Paul''s record speaks for itself too. He is the only candidtate who will do what he says and will begin the process to restore the republic to what it should be. Vote Ron Paul!
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch December 23, 2007 12:37 AM EST
Fundies should stay in church and out of public life.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by fibonacci_ at 08:02 PM : Dec 22, 2007

Interesting who else will you prevent from having their constitutional rights. maybe anyone who is a muslim Or simply anyone you don''t like.
Reply to this comment
by ptden December 22, 2007 11:15 PM EST
I think we should call him....Suckabee
Reply to this comment
by fibonacci_ December 22, 2007 11:02 PM EST
Fundies should stay in church and out of public life.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb December 22, 2007 8:34 PM EST
I predicted Mike Huckabee''s rise to the top of the GOP Ticket when he was sitting at rock bottom, Huckabee''s problem was always a lack of money. The other scary candidate is Ron Paul whose followers are fanatical!
Reply to this comment
by edf12 December 22, 2007 3:34 PM EST
What did Rollins really say?

First, Rollins says, "I think the bottom line is that we think we''''re going to win Iowa." (Notice the word ''''think'''').

Second, the headline of this story reads, "Ed Rollins: Huckabee Will Win Iowa." (Notice the word ''''will'''').

Last, and of course the most egregious, DrudgeReport says, "Huckabee''''s National Chairman Guarantees IA Victory..." (Now the word ''''think'''' has become a ''''guarantee'''')

Let the spin continue.....
Reply to this comment
by edf12 December 22, 2007 3:32 PM EST
No question, it is terrible what Huckabee''s son did to that poor dog back when he was 17 years old. But Presidential candidate Romney has his own dog tale which reflects on his judgement.

At this rate, we''ll need Bindi Irwin to pay our nominees a visit.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1638065,00.html
Reply to this comment
by jjrogers1 December 22, 2007 3:05 PM EST
Ummm isn''t it better to spend millions of your own money, than millions of other people''s money?
Reply to this comment
by notsure2008 December 22, 2007 2:14 PM EST
Why the Cross Matters

Consider the number of things we would need to believe in order to trust that Huckabee and the professionals who filmed his Christmas ad were unaware that the book shelves looked like a cross:

1) The photographer never noticed that the lighting made the book shelf look like a cross.
2) They filmed the ad in one take and no one previewed it.
3) The slow pan from the book shelves/floating cross to the Christmas tree was a happy accident.
4) Thousands - perhaps millions - of people saw an image that looked very much like a cross, but Huckabee and his crew of professionals didn''t notice this at all.

I''m unable to believe any of the above possibilities, and I doubt anyone else could, either. Given that, we''re left with one conclusion: Huckabee and crew either planned the cross or noticed it after the ad was completed and thought it was a wonderful touch. Fine.

However, here is where things get dicey. Rather than acknowledging that the way his ad was filmed did indeed create the image of a cross, he denied the whole thing. His answers in response to the "floating cross" question were both funny and glib. Unfortunately, THEY WERE NOT HONEST.

Huckabee, if you''re going to foreground religion, then you need to act with integrity. Denying the cross that you "used" for your ad demonstrates that given the option, you''d rather be funny than honest and devious rather than devout.

Reply to this comment
by edw987 December 22, 2007 1:06 PM EST
Huckabee represents more of the same - maintaining the status quo. Right now we have $1 trillion in US tax money and debt going to militarism around the world that should rather be used in the US for social obligations, to repair the infrastructure like collapsing bridges and power grid, and to pay down the national debt. Our rights and freedoms are being taken away. For example, the FBI is building a new huge database. Our country is being sold to the Chinese. The politicos are peddling their influence to the multinational corporations for campaign contributions. Ron Paul is the only major candidate who does not take graft. Ron Paul says the Federal government''s purpose is to protect individual freedom and liberty. That''s what the US Constitution says. Property rights of the individual count. No eminent domain taking away our property in his administration. He is the only candidate like Washington and Jefferson, the only wise and true candidate. True patriots want Ron Paul for president.
Reply to this comment
by suomi78006 December 22, 2007 12:12 PM EST
Huckabee is not and has never been a conservative. What more needs to be known? Is he really Ron Paul''s huckleberry?
Reply to this comment
by vinnie91 December 22, 2007 11:04 AM EST
MCVet, you are a beauty. You just confirmed the type of people that make up the Democratic Party and why liberal radio never succeeds. You also sound very intelligent and informed. Thanks for making my case.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet December 22, 2007 10:29 AM EST
It is just a shame that some Republican campaigns have stooped to these sewer tactics.


Posted by EdF12 at 07:54 PM : Dec 21, 2007
+ report abuse

After the LIES and dirty tricks of Bush/Rove I hardly see how the Republican''s (Fascist) can go much lower. The Party has set a standard for Incompetence and Gutter Politics unlike any in the History of this nation. Sieg Heil Bush!
Reply to this comment
by vinnie91 December 22, 2007 10:21 AM EST
When Huckabee and his national chairman Rollins, attack both Bush and Rush what are they thinking?? Bush has the guts to defy the liberal NY/Hollywood media and do what''s right in Iraq, while Rush is responsible for the biggest turnaround in political history from a previous completely controlled liberal media (Vietnam days), to a conservative movement that finally turned a 40 year democratic controlled congress over to a conservative controlled Republican congress in the 90''s. Conservatives won''t forget this, then to have Huckabee and Rollins go after these two hero''s? Nuts!!
Reply to this comment
by oldat45 December 22, 2007 8:48 AM EST
Ed Rollins: Well, I think first of all he is not an establishment candidate.

Olden Atwoody: Of course, he''s not establishment. He is a Christian whack-o.

"Dear Lord, please protect me from your followers..."
Reply to this comment
by diggyme December 22, 2007 6:11 AM EST
Mike is a communicator like Ronnie and Mike is a man of honesty, integrity and is an outsider. I love Rush, and Laura Ingraham, and Glenn Beck, but I think all three have Mike Huckabee wrong, very wrong. They think that just because he comes out of nowhere he can''t be elected. I think that he will show the nay sayers wrong again as he has before. He is a nightmare for Hillary because with Huckabee she will have to tell about her horrid experiments with Arkansas schools, which he fixed, and her husband''s abismal record on the infrastructure, which he fixed, and a host of other equally embarrassing situations.
Huckabee is a true man of the people, all the people, and he is like Reagan, an outsider, not a "shadow governement" man like the mayor of NY, or the Gov or Mass, or the Senator from Arizona.
He is my man.
Reply to this comment
by diggyme December 22, 2007 6:09 AM EST
Mike is a communicator like Ronnie and Mike is a man of honesty, integrity and is an outsider. I love Rush, and Laura Ingraham, and Glenn Beck, but I think all three have Mike Huckabee wrong, very wrong. They think that just because he comes out of nowhere he can''t be elected. I think that he will show the nay sayers wrong again as he has before. He is a nightmare for Hillary because with Huckabee she will have to tell about her horrid experiments with Arkansas schools, which he fixed, and her husband''s abismal record on the infrastructure, which he fixed, and a host of other equally embarrassing situations.
Huckabee is a true man of the people, all the people, and he is like Reagan, an outsider, not a "shadow governement" man like the mayor of NY, or the Gov or Mass, or the Senator from Arizona.
He is my man.
Reply to this comment
by oldat45 December 22, 2007 4:19 AM EST
Ed Rollins: Well, I think first of all he is not an establishment candidate.

Olden Atwoody: Of course, he''s not establishmnet. He is a Christian wack-o.

"Dear Lord, please protect me from your followers..."
Reply to this comment
See all 77 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • The Berlin Wall The Berlin Wall

    Photographer Peter Turnley Captures the Fall

  • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

    Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

  • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

    Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

    Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

  • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

    The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: