Edgy New Orleans OKs Razing Public Housing
Amid Protests, Council Approves Public Housing Demolition As City Rebuilds From Katrina
-
Play CBS Video
Video
New Orleans Protesters Sprayed
"CBS News Raw:" Police in New Orleans use a chemical spray on protesters storming the gates of City Hall demonstrating against the demolition of public housing.
-
Video
Protesters Storm New Orleans
New Orleans police used tear gas to dispel civil rights protestors from city hall trying to stop a key vote that could limit the amount of affordable housing. WWL's Mike Hoss reports.
-
-
Photo
Though they were slated for destruction just prior to Hurricane Katrina, the B.W. Cooper public housing units have been occupied by 2,000 families since the storm. As demolition of several buildings in the complex began earlier this month, residents now face eviction at a time when the city's homeless population is twice what it was in 2005. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
-
Photo
New Orleans police officers subdue protesters at the New Orleans City Council meeting where the council is expected to vote for the demolition of housing projects, Dec. 20, 2007. Police used chemical spray and stun guns as dozens of protesters seeking to halt the demolition of 4,500 public housing units tried to force their way through an iron gate at City Hall. (AP Photo/Cheryl Gerber)
-
Photo
A woman gets treated after New Orleans police officers pepper sprayed and tasered protesters who tried to break the gate at City Hall. (AP Photo/Cheryl Gerber)
-
Photo
New Orleans police officers force back dozens of protesters, seeking to halt the demolition of 4,500 public housing units. (AP Photo/Cheryl Gerber)
-
Photo
New Orleans police officers force back dozens of protesters, seeking to halt the demolition of 4,500 public housing units, as they tried to force their way into a City Council meeting. (AP Photo/Cheryl Gerber)
-
-
Special Report
Gulf Coast Disaster
Complete coverage of the effects of Hurricane Katrina on the Gulf Coast, including anniversary coverage.
The unanimous vote to permit the federal government to tear down four public housing developments - a critical moment in a protracted fight between the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and residents, activists and preservationists - followed hours of debate and periodic clashes in the street.
Police used chemical spray and stun guns as dozens of protesters tried to force their way into the packed City Council chamber. One woman was sprayed and dragged from the gates. Emergency workers took her away on a stretcher.
Another woman said she was stunned by officers, and still had what appeared to be a Taser wire hanging from her shirt.
"I was just standing, trying to get into my City Council meeting," said the dazed woman, Kim Ellis, who was taken away in an ambulance.
"Is this what democracy looks like?" Bill Quigley, a Loyola University law professor who opposes demolition, said as he held a strand of Taser wire he said had been shot into another of the protesters.
Quigley said he believed the crackdown violated public meetings laws.
Protesters said they pushed against the iron gates that kept them out of the building because the Housing Authority of New Orleans had disproportionately allowed supporters of the demolition to pack the chambers.
After roughly 30 minutes of on-again-off-again struggle to get into the meeting, protesters fell back, continuously chanting with bullhorns. An afternoon storm thinned the demonstrators, some of whom had been waiting since 7 a.m. to enter, and the crowd disappeared altogether shortly after the afternoon vote.
At the peak of the confusion, some 70 protesters were facing about a dozen mounted police and 40 more law enforcement officers on foot.
Details on arrests were not immediately available.
The meeting itself was mostly peaceful, although an early fight in the chambers between protesters and police caused a brief interruption.
Some public housing residents repeated during the daylong debate that they welcome the plan to replace the decades-old structures with mixed-income housing.
Other residents and their advocates said they fear the plan will result in loss of badly needing housing for the city's low-income black residents.
The vote crossed racial lines, with the three black council members joining four whites.
HUD says about 3,000 families who once lived in New Orleans public housing remain scattered across the country, and social workers say the number of homeless people in the area has doubled to about 12,000.
The housing projects have long been a center for high crime, conditions made worse by damage from Hurricane Katrina, reports Mike Hoss of CBS affiliate WWL-TV. But HUD says the transition from housing projects to mixed income was underway long before the hurricane.
There is no consensus on what's best for New Orleans' poor, even among public housing residents. Redevelopment would diminish the public housing stock and drive many into less stable voucher programs. Repair of brick and barracks-style projects badly damaged by Hurricane Katrina would keep intact poor but close-knit neighborhoods.
Mayor Ray Nagin said the resolution approved by the council includes language that will assure that public housing residents have a voice in the redevelopment plans.
Opponents were not immediately available for comment on the decision.
Thursday's vote was required before demolition work could begin, but several legal challenges to the plan have not been resolved.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 261 CommentsWelcome to BuSHAMErica
Bushit and his crew go over New Orleans every weekend that he flies in that Giant 747 with the entire SS team all his guests to Crawford Texaz. Who says Bush doesn''t care? Everytime he flies over N.O. he prays.
Just think how much money is being spent for this president to fly home almost every weekend. Bush has taken almost 1 1/2 years of vacation time in the last 6 years of office at $400,000 a year, not to mention the cost of flying Air Force One with all the Ground Crew costs and just the magnatude of the costs in volved is Secret!
If you want to point your anger at anyone - the VOTE! Don''t sit back and cry, VOTE - half of those people don''t. And that is being generous with the percentages.
It''s time to take to the streets and be tasered!
That said, I do believe it would be better to keep the crime breeding in a area isolated from taxpayers. In fact It would be better to build a fence around it, and have guards monitor firearm and drug traffic. HUD has been building public housing in residential neighborhoods ad trying to encourage the project denizens to go live in single family dwellings. This may seem like a good idea to the do-gooders at HUD but it will be like spreading a staph infection to other parts of a body.
The fact that they - gosh - turned violent at the prospect of not getting paid in housing for their votes is not all together surprising... it''s really just part of the package. And for all you liberals who think Bush can somehow summon hurricanes... this is a local matter in New Orleans... or as their local leadership calls it, ''The Chocolate City'' - and them not taking responsibility for themSELVES pretty much spells out what''s wrong with the black community at large.
Black people - WHEN are you finally going to get it thru your skulls... stop letting these liberals run your lives for you - and right into the ground - vote Republican & learn what it means to stand tall on your own two feet - respect yourselves & eachother - and tell these liberals to shove their handouts, housing projects, & pity up their collective *sses already...
Black people... when are you going to WAKE UP
This from a "white" person.
In the mean time HUD has several thousand vouchers available for former project residence to use to pay rent elsewhere. There are also HUD apartments going begging. The fact is many families who left New Orleans have not come back, many becuase they have settled elsewhere, got new jobs, and enrolled their kids in schools outside the New Orleans area. There is not the same level of demand as before.
As to the comment about ''back people getting violent'', it should be noted many of the protesters who tried to break into city hall are white, and many are not from New Orleans!
This from a "white" person. "
Oh gee... you must be SO enlightened - to ACTUALLY be white & say those things... gosh... you''re my hero...
you''re a nimrod
typical liberal - would blame bush if a meteor hit
Posted by dogsoul
And where did I invoke Bush''s name? Katrina was a Republican team effort.
Congress has passed, with the help of the NRA, a gun control law that puts the 2nd Amendment at naught...It is unconstitutional. Keep your guns-- that is the only thing this Regime fears...an armed populance...or give up your guns for a Stalin, a Hitler...give them up for a Bush.
When there is a shortage of affordable housing (such as there is in N.O. now), tearing down the "slums" is not a solution unless new housing replaces it immediately. That won''t happen, so what do you expect the newly homeless to do? It''s not surprising that people are upset. The surprising thing is that the "greatest country in the world" couldn''t protect one of its largest cities from a natural disaster they had been warned about, had no plans to deal with the disaster when it struck, waited way too long after the disaster to do anything about it, and STILL has not acted to significantly restore the city.
1st, the majority of the protesters are not project residents and many are not even Louisiana residents and have not even seen the festering projects that they are fighting to keep.
2nd, there is not a shortage of public housing in New Orleans. There are literally hundreds of public housing units sitting vacant awaiting occupants, plus the hundreds of "Section 8" subsidized rental units available.
3rd, the projects as they exist now are miserable failures and do a great disservice to the residents that they are supposed to serve. If any of the protesters bothered to look at any of the myriad urban planning or sociological studies that have been undertaken since the 60''s that all show that high density public housing is a complete failure. The density offers no sense of personal identity or "defensible space" to the residence and futhermore the boundaries of these developments reinforce the sense of hopelessness rather than integrate the residents into productive society.
4th, the mixed income developments that are proposed have succeeded in other cities where they have been implemented and in the River Garden Development in New Orleans. Just ask the former St. Thomas housing project residents that now reside in River Garden where they would rather live.
I would expect the media to at least do a little research before chasing headlines without scratching the surface of the facts involved.
1st, the majority of the protesters are not project residents and many are not even Louisiana residents and have not even seen the festering projects that they are fighting to keep.
2nd, there is not a shortage of public housing in New Orleans. There are literally hundreds of public housing units sitting vacant awaiting occupants, plus the hundreds of "Section 8" subsidized rental units available.
3rd, the projects as they exist now are miserable failures and do a great disservice to the residents that they are supposed to serve. If any of the protesters bothered to look at any of the myriad urban planning or sociological studies that have been undertaken since the 60''s that all show that high density public housing is a complete failure. The density offers no sense of personal identity or "defensible space" to the residence and futhermore the boundaries of these developments reinforce the sense of hopelessness rather than integrate the residents into productive society.
4th, the mixed income developments that are proposed have succeeded in other cities where they have been implemented and in the River Garden Development in New Orleans. Just ask the former St. Thomas housing project residents that now reside in River Garden where they would rather live.
I would expect the media to at least do a little research before chasing headlines without scratching the surface of the facts involved.
1st, the majority of the protesters are not project residents and many are not even Louisiana residents and have not even seen the festering projects that they are fighting to keep.
2nd, there is not a shortage of public housing in New Orleans. There are literally hundreds of public housing units sitting vacant awaiting occupants, plus the hundreds of "Section 8" subsidized rental units available.
3rd, the projects as they exist now are miserable failures and do a great disservice to the residents that they are supposed to serve. If any of the protesters bothered to look at any of the myriad urban planning or sociological studies that have been undertaken since the 60''s that all show that high density public housing is a complete failure. The density offers no sense of personal identity or "defensible space" to the residence and futhermore the boundaries of these developments reinforce the sense of hopelessness rather than integrate the residents into productive society.
4th, the mixed income developments that are proposed have succeeded in other cities where they have been implemented and in the River Garden Development in New Orleans. Just ask the former St. Thomas housing project residents that now reside in River Garden where they would rather live.
I would expect the media to at least do a little research before chasing headlines without scratching the surface of the facts involved.
1st, the majority of the protesters are not project residents and many are not even Louisiana residents and have not even seen the festering projects that they are fighting to keep.
2nd, there is not a shortage of public housing in New Orleans. There are literally hundreds of public housing units sitting vacant awaiting occupants, plus the hundreds of "Section 8" subsidized rental units available.
3rd, the projects as they exist now are miserable failures and do a great disservice to the residents that they are supposed to serve. If any of the protesters bothered to look at any of the myriad urban planning or sociological studies that have been undertaken since the 60''s that all show that high density public housing is a complete failure. The density offers no sense of personal identity or "defensible space" to the residence and futhermore the boundaries of these developments reinforce the sense of hopelessness rather than integrate the residents into productive society.
4th, the mixed income developments that are proposed have succeeded in other cities where they have been implemented and in the River Garden Development in New Orleans. Just ask the former St. Thomas housing project residents that now reside in River Garden where they would rather live.
Lastly, this is not about donkeys or elephants or Hillary or Dubya, it''s about common sense and people.
A fascist government supportive of corporate interest against down-trodden homeless impoverished citizens, now who do you think will win?
I have mixed feelings about this situation.
The black residents of this area should have stormed the Mayor''s office, city council, state capital, etc. a long time ago in protest of their failing housing units, but most of all, for their failing public schools.
My question is, why does it always have to get to this point before a community reacts?
Affordable and decent housing isn''t the only dilemma facing poor blacks in this region and across the country, adequate education and self-determinism are paramount and neglected by a majority of inner-city down-trodden blacks.
We all know who the government supports, particularly Republicans, the corporation, mega-corporations and not the people, the middle-class and certainly not the poor.
The poor have a voice, notwithstanding elitist members of society''s perspective of them as deviant, they need to take charge of their own destiny and stop depending upon a greater society to "bail them out" and take the initiative to demand better schools for their children, seek entrepreneurship within their communities, and make a conscious effort to finish school and seek higher-education.
1st, the majority of the protesters are not project residents and many are not even Louisiana residents and have not even seen the festering projects that they are fighting to keep.
2nd, there is not a shortage of public housing in New Orleans. There are literally hundreds of public housing units sitting vacant awaiting occupants, plus the hundreds of "Section 8" subsidized rental units available.
3rd, the projects as they exist now are miserable failures and do a great disservice to the residents that they are supposed to serve. If any of the protesters bothered to look at any of the myriad urban planning or sociological studies that have been undertaken since the 60''s that all show that high density public housing is a complete failure. The density offers no sense of personal identity or "defensible space" to the residence and futhermore the boundaries of these developments reinforce the sense of hopelessness rather than integrate the residents into productive society.
4th, the mixed income developments that are proposed have succeeded in other cities where they have been implemented and in the River Garden Development in New Orleans. Just ask the former St. Thomas housing project residents that now reside in River Garden where they would rather live.
Lastly, this is not about donkeys or elephants or Hillary or Dubya, it''s about common sense and people.
1st, the majority of the protesters are not project residents and many are not even Louisiana residents and have not even seen the festering projects that they are fighting to keep.
2nd, there is not a shortage of public housing in New Orleans. There are literally hundreds of public housing units sitting vacant awaiting occupants, plus the hundreds of "Section 8" subsidized rental units available.
3rd, the projects as they exist now are miserable failures and do a great disservice to the residents that they are supposed to serve. If any of the protesters bothered to look at any of the myriad urban planning or sociological studies that have been undertaken since the 60''s that all show that high density public housing is a complete failure. The density offers no sense of personal identity or "defensible space" to the residence and futhermore the boundaries of these developments reinforce the sense of hopelessness rather than integrate the residents into productive society.
4th, the mixed income developments that are proposed have succeeded in other cities where they have been implemented and in the River Garden Development in New Orleans. Just ask the former St. Thomas housing project residents that now reside in River Garden where they would rather live.
Lastly, this is not about donkeys or elephants or Hillary or Dubya, it''s about common sense and people.
Thanks for the sanity.
1st, the majority of the protesters are not project residents and many are not even Louisiana residents and have not even seen the festering projects that they are fighting to keep.
2nd, there is not a shortage of public housing in New Orleans. There are literally hundreds of public housing units sitting vacant awaiting occupants, plus the hundreds of "Section 8" subsidized rental units available.
3rd, the projects as they exist now are miserable failures and do a great disservice to the residents that they are supposed to serve. If any of the protesters bothered to look at any of the myriad urban planning or sociological studies that have been undertaken since the 60''s that all show that high density public housing is a complete failure. The density offers no sense of personal identity or "defensible space" to the residence and futhermore the boundaries of these developments reinforce the sense of hopelessness rather than integrate the residents into productive society.
4th, the mixed income developments that are proposed have succeeded in other cities where they have been implemented and in the River Garden Development in New Orleans. Just ask the former St. Thomas housing project residents that now reside in River Garden where they would rather live.
Lastly, this is not about donkeys or elephants or Hillary or Dubya, it''s about common sense and people.
1st, the majority of the protesters are not project residents and many are not even Louisiana residents and have not even seen the festering projects that they are fighting to keep.
2nd, there is not a shortage of public housing in New Orleans. There are literally hundreds of public housing units sitting vacant awaiting occupants, plus the hundreds of "Section 8" subsidized rental units available.
3rd, the projects as they exist now are miserable failures and do a great disservice to the residents that they are supposed to serve. If any of the protesters bothered to look at any of the myriad urban planning or sociological studies that have been undertaken since the 60''s that all show that high density public housing is a complete failure. The density offers no sense of personal identity or "defensible space" to the residence and futhermore the boundaries of these developments reinforce the sense of hopelessness rather than integrate the residents into productive society.
4th, the mixed income developments that are proposed have succeeded in other cities where they have been implemented and in the River Garden Development in New Orleans. Just ask the former St. Thomas housing project residents that now reside in River Garden where they would rather live.
Lastly, this is not about donkeys or elephants or Hillary or Dubya, it''s about common sense and people.
I don''t see where the racism comes into play. Nobody''s identifying a particular RACE. They should be GRATEFUL they''re getting better quality housing in the area. This low rent housing is only supposed to be there to help people get on their feet. Then they can move into something better. If I was only paying $100-200 a month I could really stack up a nice savings.
Besides they are certianly going to open up a LOT of construction jobs. Those pay pretty good. The people ought to be cheering.
Posted by nlm2383
~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So, if you have a home to go to, you''re greedy?
First, it is always a political agenda, don''t be so blind.
Second: has it ever occurred to you that, if these are not residents of New Orleans, then they''re there to protest against the "mixed neighborhood developments", because they don''t want to live in common with those poor down-trodden black residents.
Third: there is such a program in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and yes it works, it re-socializes or re-civilizes down-trodden individuals into mainstream society through modeling, however it''s dependent upon middle-class masses to participate. And maybe these individuals don''t care to participate in a "pilot program", which reintegrates so-called undesirables back into mainstream society.
Fourth: if you think mega-corporations aren''t benefiting from this deal, then I have some swamp land to sale you.
"We all know who the government supports, particularly Republicans, the corporation, mega-corporations and not the people, the middle-class and certainly not the poor."
These Republican, corporations and mega-corporations are the same people that you will come crying to to BUILD the housing for these people, AND you also expect them to do it at a LOSS and be HAPPY about it.
If you want to point the finger, point it at the Liberals and Democrats that created this situation of "entitlement mentality" decades ago.
These people were brought up to have to rely on whatever the Liberals deemed fit to toss their way. And it was only enough to keep them reliant and loyal to the Liberals.
THAT is the truth about New Orleans!
lets see, hmmm, what happens when a group of people who have been repeatedly disenfranchised but highly taxed do not perceive they benefited as their government against their will spends revenues corruptly elsewhere and then issues edicts involving their homes....
I don''t know what the deal is with these people. I guess welfare took their brains and capacity to work from them. I don''t know. But construction jobs are paying 12 bucks an hour these days. Even if you know NOTHING, you can go to work as a framer. EASY work: CONSTANT work: EASY money.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 261 Comments