WASHINGTON, Dec. 18, 2007

Congress Widens Freedom Of Information Act

Legislation That Would Allow Access To More Government Records Could Be Vetoed

  • Former U.S. Marine Maj. Tom Townsend, returning a folder to its place in his over 20 feet of FOIA files on chemical contamination at Camp Lejeune, N.C., which he believes caused the birth defects that killed his baby son and the cirrhosis that killed his wife of 52 years. Photo

    Former U.S. Marine Maj. Tom Townsend, returning a folder to its place in his over 20 feet of FOIA files on chemical contamination at Camp Lejeune, N.C., which he believes caused the birth defects that killed his baby son and the cirrhosis that killed his wife of 52 years.  (AP)

  • Interactive 110th Congress

    The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.

(AP)  Congress on Tuesday struck back at the Bush administration's trend toward secrecy since the 2001 terrorist attacks, passing legislation to toughen the Freedom of Information Act and increasing penalties on agencies that don't comply.

The White House would not say whether President Bush will sign the legislation, which unanimously passed the House by voice vote Tuesday a few days after it sailed through the Senate. Without Bush's signature, the bill would become law during the congressional recess that begins next week.

It would be the first makeover of the FOIA in a decade, among other things bringing nonproprietary information held by government contractors under the law. The legislation also is aimed at reversing an order by former Attorney General John Ashcroft in the wake of the attacks, in which he instructed agencies to lean against releasing information when there was uncertainty about how doing so would affect national security.

"No matter who is the next president, he will have to run a government that is more open than in the past," if the bill becomes law, Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt, said on the Senate floor.

A previously passed version was rewritten this month to meet House concerns about how government agencies would pay for attorneys' fees when they lose or settle a FOIA lawsuit. That money will now have to come from other programs within each agency.

Supporting changes in the law were dozens of media outlets, including The Associated Press.

The bill restores a presumption of disclosure standard committing government agencies to releasing requested information unless there is a finding that such disclosure could do harm.

Agencies would be required to meet a 20-day deadline for responding to FOIA requests. Their FOIA offices would have to forward requests for information to the appropriate agency office within 10 days of receiving them.

It they fail to meet the 20-day deadline, agencies would have to refund search and duplication fees for noncommercial requesters. They also would have to explain any redaction by citing the specific exemption under which the blacked-out information qualifies. Nonproprietary information held by government contractors also would be subject to the law.

The legislation also creates a system for the media and public to track the status of their FOIA requests. It establishes a hotline service for all federal agencies to deal with problems and an ombudsman to provide an alternative to litigation in disclosure disputes.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has been working with the Justice Department on the legislation and has said he expects the president to sign it.

But the White House wasn't committing the president to any such action.

Asked whether Bush would sign, veto or ignore the bill, White House spokesman Tony Fratto responded only that the legislation "is certainly an improvement" over previous versions.

There may be a key reason for the non-commitment: Congress is about to recess - but not adjourn - for the year. Under the Constitution, legislation passed by a Congress technically in session that is not signed by the president within 10 days automatically becomes law.

This pocket-veto-in-reverse would give Bush some political cover, allowing the FOIA bill to become law without taking the affirmative step of endorsing it.

The White House, however, wouldn't say if that is Bush's plan.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is planning to keep the Senate officially in session by holding a brief - often only seconds long - "pro forma" session every four business days over the winter break to prevent Bush from making recess appointments not subject to Senate confirmation.

©MMVII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 37 Comments
by culturechang December 18, 2007 9:41 PM EST
As long as govt regulates itself, they still wont comply. I''ll bet if you requested something (according to thier procedures), you will never get anything. If you do, it would be a gobbled up bag of *** that did not help.
Reply to this comment
by bareemperor December 18, 2007 9:50 PM EST
A real dictator would veto this plan.
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl December 18, 2007 10:03 PM EST
lps out my wallet and makes me feel safer. Can''t them lamebrains do anything worthwhile to help out the public?
Reply to this comment
by mcv57 December 18, 2007 10:03 PM EST
Hey Drew Peterson, EX-COP who beat and kills wifes is being sued (other than a member of his family). Drew is a racist too, it turns out.

Why aren''t you folks at CBS covering the developing story. This low-down dog has stashed away $250,000 and is advertising donations for legal fees. This is the dirt that people want to read about Chicago''s finest police officer.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 December 18, 2007 10:10 PM EST

The Freedom of Information Act is one of many institutions for which we can thank Ralph Nader.

www.nndb.com/people/788/000023719/

Don''t miss a good documentary on Nader, entitled "An Unreasonable Man", TONIGHT, on your local public broadcast station:

www.pbs.org/independentlens/unreasonableman/
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 December 18, 2007 10:11 PM EST
What the hell else did they tag onto it? Did anybody read it?

If the bill is worth a *** for the people, he won''t sign it, just to thumb his nose at it.

If he signs it, it must mean there''s some *** tagged on it for his benefit. It sure passed the Senate too fast not to be suspicious...
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl December 18, 2007 10:24 PM EST
mcv57...interesting thanks for the info. How does a cop come up with a quarter of a million if he''s not on the take????
Reply to this comment
by mcvet December 18, 2007 10:36 PM EST
We as a nation are starting to heal... starting to come together again. We must understand that a Dictator like George Bush is NOT in our best interest. Living in a Democracy has always been dangerous, it comes with the territory. What we must do is find a reasonable situation where we can feel fairly safe without giving the Terrorist what they most want, taking away our freedoms in fear.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 December 18, 2007 10:38 PM EST
The Great Emperor Bush is totally upset with both the evil, cowardly Whimp-ocrats and even more so with his stupidly loyal Fascist Republican Congressmen who have all sided against the Great Emnperor to widen the Freedom of Information Act.

The Emperor reasons that he cannot fight his wars on "terrrrorism" if he cannot keep secrets from everyone about everything. It also brings into question his role as the "Great Decider" and brings to the forefront the old slogan "Inquiring Minds Want To Know!!!". The Emperor has always felt that knowledge is dangerous (after all, look how smart the Emperor is!) and is power which the citizens of the USSA do not have to have. It could cause those who support him to suddenly think for once!

Provided the legislation does become law, despite the Great Emperor''s anticipated normal veto, the only recourse the Emperor has is to continue to extensively "censure" every document issued (those documents that can be "found", that is!) making whatever is provided totally meaningless by being "blacked out".

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
Reply to this comment
by jimc52 December 18, 2007 11:19 PM EST
Loose Lips Sink Ships.
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 December 18, 2007 11:23 PM EST
A real dictator would veto this plan.

Posted by BareEmperor

Yeah, and it would be a whole lot easier for him if he were the dictator...it''s not too late for martial law.

G.W. Bush in his own words:



"You don''t get everything you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier." - Governing Magazine, July, 1998

"If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier; just so long as I''m the dictator." - Washington D.C. December 18, 2000

"A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there''s no question about it." - Business Week, July 30, 2001
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 December 18, 2007 11:26 PM EST
If the internet had not come along, this country might have been sacked by now.

The corporations are fighting to control the internet by controlling the content and flow of information.

We the people payed for the internet, the arrogant elite wish to take charge and control what gets shared.
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 December 18, 2007 11:28 PM EST
http://www.trueamericanpatriots.com/bushquotes.html

Amazing, utterly amazing. The Twilight Zone.

Proof the Supreme Court should never appoint a leader.
Reply to this comment
by lorinkundert December 19, 2007 12:04 AM EST
Georgie can declare a state of emergency suspending the Constitution all without the support of congress because of that POS Patriot Act that our representatives didn''t bother reading. That is a question we should be asking our Presidential candidates, Why did you surrender our liberties without reading the act?
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 December 19, 2007 12:31 AM EST
(AP) Congress on Tuesday struck back at the Bush administration''s trend toward secrecy since the 2001 terrorist attacks, passing legislation to toughen the Freedom of Information Act and increasing penalties on agencies that don''t comply.
**************************************

Maybe some fresh air and sunlight will blow the stink of the Bush administration into the Joe McCarthy rotten doings trash bin. It always amazes me when these type of sleezes have so little regard for the Constitution and the spirit that our country was built on.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 December 19, 2007 12:36 AM EST
Georgie can declare a state of emergency suspending the Constitution all without the support of congress because of that POS Patriot Act that our representatives didn''''t bother reading. That is a question we should be asking our Presidential candidates, Why did you surrender our liberties without reading the act?
*******************************
I think the first thing that should be demanded of the new president and new congress in 2009 is the immediate redrafting and repeal of most of the Patriot Act. I think the congress was badgered (by fear) to pass it shortly after 9/11, thinking is was a time of emergency and that we should err on the side of caution.
Now it is time to redo it and go back to pre-King George edicts.
Reply to this comment
by sbb2211 December 19, 2007 1:11 AM EST
Does this mean that we''ll finally get Hillary''s records from the Clinton Library?

Probably not.
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs December 19, 2007 1:17 AM EST
The last time the liberal media got some information..the TERRORISTS GOT SMARTER...Al Queda does not need any intelligence agency as long as they have the NY Times.
Reply to this comment
by kaelinda December 19, 2007 1:27 AM EST
By the time this bill gets passed into law, it will have so many amendments attached to it that it probably won''t mean anything at all, like the so-called "budget" this same congress recently passed. Nothing this congress has done has been really useful to the citizens of this fine, democratic republic.
Reply to this comment
by mcv57 December 19, 2007 1:45 AM EST
I DON''T NEED MORE INFORMATION, I KNOW THAT GEORGE BUSH IS A TREASONIST DOG. HANG EM, HANG EM, HANG EM HIGH EM HIGHER THAN A MURDERER AND GET HIS U.S. SUPREME COURT TOO.
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 December 19, 2007 2:48 AM EST
By the time this bill gets passed into law, it will have so many amendments attached to it that it probably won''''t mean anything at all, like the so-called "budget" this same congress recently passed. Nothing this congress has done has been really useful to the citizens of this fine, democratic republic.

Posted by Kaelinda

You must have a problem with reading comprehension, or you didn''t read the entire article. The bill has PASSED both houses of Congress!
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 December 19, 2007 3:08 AM EST
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c110:3:./temp/~c1106pmRZ2::
Reply to this comment
by ontheleft December 19, 2007 3:50 AM EST
I like the Joe McCarthy analogy. That''s exactly how the Bush administration will be viewed a generation from now.
Reply to this comment
by watcher269-2009 December 19, 2007 5:22 AM EST
Democrats may be inept, and often spineless, but there is something ethically rotten deep in the core of the Republican party. It is not PC to say this, but it is true, and it dates back at least to Nixon. Watergate, Iran-Contra, the Iraq War, just to cite a few major trophes from a much longer piece of work. All are Republican scandals. Against this we have what on the Democratic side, cash in a freezer, and Bill Clinton lying about a *******. One is an assault on the fundamental structure of our government, the other is just pathetic human frailty.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 December 19, 2007 10:01 AM EST
The last time the liberal media got some information..the TERRORISTS GOT SMARTER...Al Queda does not need any intelligence agency as long as they have the NY Times.

Posted by libsluvsuvs at 10:17 PM : Dec 18, 2007
+ report abuse

Are there ANY American''s outside the "party" that you do not hate? I''ve never heard you say ONE, not ONE single word that could even be concidered civilized about any of your neighbors and fellow citizens that do not agree with you. You are truly a scary human and I''m afraid a practicing FASCIST! As Sarge would say! Sieg Heil!!
Reply to this comment
by gunnerv1 December 19, 2007 10:17 AM EST
watcher269 You hit the nail on the head "Pathetic Human"s.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet December 19, 2007 10:31 AM EST
watcher269 You hit the nail on the head "Pathetic Human"s.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by gunnerv1 at 07:17 AM : Dec 19, 2007
+ report abuse

Ummm?? Now I know you Nazi''s are taught this almost from birth but MOST intelligent people have caught on to your bigotry LONG ago. You never quoted him right but instead misquoted for your own fascist reasons. Not nice! Sieg Heil Bush!!
Reply to this comment
by neoconrcrazy December 19, 2007 10:50 AM EST
"Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is planning to keep the Senate officially in session by holding a brief - often only seconds long - "pro forma" session every four business days over the winter break to prevent Bush from making recess appointments not subject to Senate confirmation."


it''s that bad! this bush fellow is a real "uniter" and "trust" does not belong anymore to the American political vocabulary - sadly.

Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 December 19, 2007 11:42 AM EST
Oh boy, how are Republicans going to revise history and build dubyas legacy when bits of truth about his incompetence and criminality periodically leak in to the public eye? This is a bad day indeed for Hillary08, poopus, lars and the rest.
Reply to this comment
by cyberus-2009 December 19, 2007 12:19 PM EST
Big whoop ... if the King W doesn''t want to release something he just refuse .. long enough to destroy it and theres nothing anyone can do about it.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 December 19, 2007 2:10 PM EST
And did I not say that they will give away every last shred of our national security. There ya go. Congress and the FIA. Yup. Giving it all away for posterity.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 December 19, 2007 2:52 PM EST
The fire this morning at Cheney''s office building destroyed many historical documents and who knows what else. Now they have an excuse if they can''t turn up certain documents being sought. Was the fire planned ?????????????
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 December 19, 2007 2:54 PM EST
The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are Cheney''s energy policy.Condi Rice is a former board member of Chevron Oil and mouthpiece for the administrations energy policy. Part of that policy is the The Caspian Sea pipeline which will go through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan,Pakistan, to the gulf of Oman and possibly on to India & Nepal.It will be cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran, but regime change is necessary first. The Caspian sea area holds one third of the world''s oil and south asian oil markets are their target market. This pipeline was also the reason for the Afghanistan invasion. Cheney''s energy policy is the root of all these middle east wars, a federal court judge sealed all documents associated with it for the administration, and the national media are not allowed to discuss or comment on it. More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the pipeline. Iran stands in the way of total control of global oil now with sales of oil to China''s Sinopec Oil, deal signed Dec.10,2007. Months ago China said there would be dire consequences if the US interfered with there direct oil contracts with Iran. Both parties in the Congress should be very concerned with China''s growing war machine and need for oil. They are the real threat & the administration doesn''t care they are in control!!! All that matters to them is BIG OIL and their corporate stock portfolios
Reply to this comment
by fornicario December 19, 2007 3:01 PM EST
Won''t happen. Bush and Co will get it blocked, and mudrose and the like can keep on goosestepping.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 December 19, 2007 3:48 PM EST
Won''''t happen. Bush and Co will get it blocked, and mudrose and the like can keep on goosestepping.
Posted by Fornicario

We don''t know how to goosestep. But you all do. Soros playbook *********. My but the indoctrination was quite good! Not an authentic thinking among you.
Reply to this comment
by simonsez40 December 19, 2007 7:46 PM EST
Hey new concept if you are being investigated just start a fire in your office and your off the hook! Why is it the FBI can pretty much ferret any criminal out but we can bring Cheney/BushCo to justice?

Amazing.......
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 December 19, 2007 8:53 PM EST
Bushy_baby will have covered his rear or set up a ''scapegoat'' so he doesn''t have to ''dance to the music''.
Reply to this comment
See all 37 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs