By

Kevin Hechtkopf /

The Politico/ June 26, 2009, 5:19 PM

Huckabee Ramps Up Game In Early States

This story was written by David Paul Kuhn.


Determined to prove he's more than a political "one-night stand," Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee will make his largest ad buys in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina this week.

The former Arkansas governor also plans to send out his first mailing to voters in Iowa and is ramping up the numbers of paid staffers in a campaign that until recently relied almost exclusively on volunteers.

While declining to say exactly how much the campaign would spend on the ad buys in the three early-contest states, national campaign manager Chip Saltsman put the figure at around "at least" several hundred thousand dollars.

It's the cost of moving from long shot to front-runner. Yet despite a double-digit lead in Iowa and growing strength in South Carolina, Huckabee acknowledges skepticism still runs deep over whether he can translate a likely win in Iowa to victories here in the Granite State and in other critical early contests beyond.

"First it was, well nice guy but he doesn't have a chance of winning," Huckabee said in a brief interview in his campaign van between stops at a local eatery and a speech at the high school. "Nice guy, he doesn't have enough money. Nice guy, doesn't have enough organization. Then it got to be in the place of, well he's going to do OK in Iowa but that's as far as it can go. He'll be a one night stand."

Huckabee says voters are responding to his ideas. "Regardless of what happens, we've proven and I've said it since January, the message matters more than the money," Huckabee said.

Perhaps, but a top new campaign strategist isn't taking any chances.

"We need to basically put together the mechanisms that not only [last] for Iowa and New Hampshire but [go] all the way to the White House," said veteran Republican strategist Ed Rollins, who officially began Friday as the national campaign chairman.

It was only last week that Huckabee first aired ads on television in New Hampshire and South Carolina. His first ad in Iowa only aired a week before Thanksgiving, and he's spent approximately $800,000 on advertising there.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, in comparison, went up on television in February and has spent $7 million on advertising in Iowa alone.

Yet in a matter of weeks Huckabee has achieved what Romney could not in nearly a year.

Not only does Huckabee lead in Iowa, but polls show he is now ahead in the crucial state of South Carolina and contesting Rudy Giuliani both in Florida and nationally.

Winning the nomination remains an ambition with immense obstacles to overcome. He will only have five days to carry a possible victory from Iowa to New Hampshire. That leaves little time to capitalize on momentum but equally, little time to undercut it. But no obstacle haunts Huckabee more than his meager staff resources.

So Huckabee, due to urgent necessity, is now hiring. He added roughly 10 campaign staffers in the last three weeks. Yet his campaign still numbers at 42 paid staffers nationwide - only about half of what Romney has in Iowa alone.

At a recent campaign event, after one of Huckabee's aides acknowledged the small size of the, he quickly added, "But we have a ton of volunteers. And they aren't paid $1,000 a head." It was a veiled swipe at Romney's use of paid "super-volunteers."

"Christ," the Huckabee aide quipped. "That's a mid level staffer for us."

The humor masks a serious problem. He only has about 15 staffers in Iowa, six in New Hampshire, and six in South Carolina. And he still has no staff in Michigan or Florida, both of which have critical GOP contests in January.

Over the next two weeks, Rollins intends to beef up staffing on the ground in key states as well as canvass Republican circles tohire foreign, domestic, and national security experts.

Campaign Calendar
The latest information on the primary and caucus dates in 2008.
To date, the campaign has only two policy advisors - California attorney Janis Cherry, and J. French Hill, a veteran Republican bureaucrat from the Reagan era - as well as a young assistant. Unlike all other top-tier campaigns, Huckabee has yet to organize his staff into a plane and ground team, which allows a candidate to be apprised of the days' events while campaigning.

The shoestring operation explains why, in part, Huckabee was unaware when Politico asked earlier this month about a recent intelligence report on Iran's nuclear program, though it topped the news for more than a day.

"If I was running his campaign at that point in time, the moment something like that breaks you have someone traveling with him briefed," Rollins said. "In the course of the day you have an hourly contact with your candidate."

Now Rollins does run the campaign. Staffing up is imperative, he said, but "I think any resources we have at this point in time we will put him on television."

Huckabee's campaign may not be able to run a single internal poll before the Iowa caucuses, essentially relying on the media to know where they stand. It has been the media attention in recent weeks that has allowed Huckabee to spend relatively little but maintain a significant national presence.

And the newfound success is beginning to pay off. Last month Huckabee raised $2 million online, more than every month prior combined.

It was this past Saturday that the campaign faced a logistical nightmare. It was caught in northern New Hampshire in the early evening, the nearest commercial airports at least two hours away. The next morning a nor'easter was to hit New England.

Huckabee charted a private plane and flew out Saturday night, beat the storm, and made it to California by Sunday evening for a large fundraiser.

One month ago, said Saltsman, "it would have been almost impossible for us to do that."
The Politico
  • Kevin Hechtkopf On Twitter »

    Kevin Hechtkopf is CBSNews.com's politics editor.

35 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mudrose-2009 says:
These are only the ones we know of!
Posted by taotxzen

Gee and Clinton got impeached?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taotxzen says:
gslinger3

Bush Scandals

Abu Ghraib, Plamegate, Niger Forgeries, Manipulated Intelligence on Iraq, Pundits on the Payroll, Illegal warrant less NSA wiretapping, Walter Reed, Firing of US attorneys, illegally transferring resources to Iraq from Afghanistan, Halliburton and Cheney, Hurricane Katrina and reconstruction, Black prisons and extraordinary rendition, Homeland Security, Blackwater, involvement in Delays and Abramoffs K Street Lobbyists Project, Cheney''''''''s Energy Policy, tax cuts for the wealthiest, denial of Global warming, big budget deficits and vastly increased national debt, big pharmaceuticals write prescription drug plan, attempts to torpedo the 911 Commission, loss of US reputation internationally after massive post-911 world support, under funding of basic research, Alberto Gonzales, FDA and EPA, Porter Goss and the gutting of the CIA, Signing statements, Overuse and abuse of the National Guard and Reserves, US balance of trade deficit, Dubai Ports deal and manipulation of Iran intelligence.

(cont)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taotxzen says:
(cont)

The War on Science, Harriet Miers, stem cell research, Missile defense shield that doesn''''''''t work, defunding overseas AIDS programs, male prostitute Gannon/Guckert, Native American trust funds, false military reporting on Pat Tillman, Jessica Lynch, Guantanamo torture, Bush connections to Enron and Ken Lay, refusing to intervene in the California electricity crisis, lack of action on Darfur despite Congress declaring it genocide, White House involvement in election day phone jamming, attempted use of GSA to promote Republican candidates, Karl Rove and the culture of corruption, Voter suppression, voter ID laws, Swift boating of John Kerry, No Child Left Behind, based on flawed and false data, Rumsfields not enough boots on the ground war strategy, Paul Bremers wrong at every turn mismanagement of post war Iraq, a supreme lack of oversight by a rubberstamping Republican Congress for 5 years, stacking of the federal judiciary with unqualified rightwing hacks, Ralph "I need to start humping in corporate accounts" Reed led Christian Coalition, lax security at US nuclear facilities, Geneva Convention does not apply, FEMAs faux news conference, State Children''''''''s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP.)

These are only the ones we know of!



reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mudrose-2009 says:
Answer: Very, very good. More like AWSOME!
Posted by npborn

I haven''t decided, but I like his in-your-face attitude about religion. It''s rather refreshing. Rather unpolitically correct. Sounds my like Bishop Fulton J. Sheen. Wasn''t he terrific?.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
npborn says:
Mike Huckabee has a more conservative track record that Mitt Romney and Rudy. Romney was pro-choice and pro-civil unions until last year when he decided to run for president. Rudy is a Democrat running as a republican. The quicker republicans realize this the faster the party can rally behind a candidate. How does Huckabee/ McCain sound?

Answer: Very, very good. More like AWSOME!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taotxzen says:
Huckabee: The GOP''s Cynical Use of Religion Has Come Home to Roost

With Mike Huckabee''s continuing surge, the Republican Party now has an Iowa front-runner who, like George Bush, is anti-choice, born-again, against gay-marriage, and gets political advice directly from God. So why is the Republican establishment suddenly in a state of near-apoplexy? They''ve been cultivating evangelicals and fundamentalists for 30 years. Now they finally have a candidate who''s truly part of the movement. Which, it turns out, is precisely the problem. The evangelical crowd was fine when it was just a resource to be cynically exploited every few years in demagogic anti-gay get-out-the-vote campaigns. But now the holy-rolling monster the GOP''s Dr. Frankensteins have created has thrown off the shackles, fled the lab, and is currently leading in Iowa. And the party doesn''t know what to do.

Arianna Huffington

reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jon2012-2009 says:
C is for Cattlegate, Hillary Clinton''s mysterious ability to turn a $1,000 investment into a $100,000 profit on cattle futures, a feat experts say was virtually impossible in normal trading.
Posted by mudrose

I''ve heard of such investments, not one of mine unfortunately, and true it''s not in cattle futures either. I''ve also heard about baseless attacks and nothing in them is "virtually impossible."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mudrose-2009 says:
C is for Cattlegate, Hillary Clinton''''s mysterious ability to turn a $1,000 investment into a $100,000 profit on cattle futures, a feat experts say was virtually impossible in normal trading.

for d thru z go here

http://www.io.com/~cjburke/clint
on/clinatoz.html
Posted by gslinger3

Isn''t see absolutely amazoning, er amazon?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gslinger3 says:
Mike Huckabee does not hold a candle to Hilary Clinton, at least as far as scandals are concerned!



Just in case you''ve lost track of the scandals that have hit the Clintons here is the A to Z list!

A is for Arkansas, where Bill Clinton got his political start, where Hillary Rodham Clinton worked at Rose Law Firm, and where Whitewater began as a land deal between the Clintons and Jim and Susan McDougal.

B is for Billing-gate, Hillary Clinton''s missing law-billing records. Those records -- which raised questions about Mrs. Clinton''s role in the Castle Grande deal -- were subpoenaed in 1994. They were missing until early 1996, when they turned up in a White House room next to her office. She says she doesn''t know how they got there.

C is for Cattlegate, Hillary Clinton''s mysterious ability to turn a $1,000 investment into a $100,000 profit on cattle futures, a feat experts say was virtually impossible in normal trading.

for d thru z go here

http://www.io.com/~cjburke/clinton/clinatoz.html

reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jon2012-2009 says:
Hwy71So: The odds of an atheist taking the White House have never been much better than an outside chance since they constitute a miniscule portion of the population. But they certainly are qualified to lead, just as there are women and blacks who would make excellent leaders, groups with higher representation in the demographic makeup. Regardless, a candidate who professes belief in God is not expected to push that agenda and would be, in fact, constrained by the Constitution.

I always turn away from leaders coming heavy on religion. They are no better than their supporters who, generally speaking, have nothing positive to contribute to society beyond the raw labor of their hands and supplying part of the gene pool.
reply
See all 35 Comments