NEW YORK, Dec. 13, 2007

Wounded Vets Shortchanged By Charities

The Skinny: Study Says Less Than 1/3 Of Money Collected By 8 Charities Went To Vets

  •  (CBS/iStockPhoto)

  • Interactive American Heroes

    Profiles of U.S. soldiers who've died in Iraq, a look at the war's toll and pictures of mourning.

  • Interactive Military 101

    Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.

(CBS)  The Skinny is Keach Hagey's take on the top news of the day and the best of the Internet.

Talk about adding insult to injury.

Many of the charities set up to help troops wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan have spent relatively little of their donations on the wounded, the Washington Post reports.

Eight veterans' charities, including some of the nation's largest, gave less than a third of the money raised to the causes they champion, far below the recommended standard, according to a repot by the American Institute of Philanthropy. One group paid its founder and his wife a combined $540,000 in compensation and benefits last year, according to a Washington Post analysis of tax filings.

This isn't against the law - but it is giving lawmakers an always-welcome opportunity to express outrage.

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform was scheduled to hold its first hearing on veterans' charities this morning. One of those scheduled to testify is Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of the Chicago-based institute that authored the study.

"They oversolicit," he said of the charities. "They love to send out a lot of trinkets and stickers and greeting cards and flags and things that waste a lot of money that they get little return on."

Twelve of the 29 charities reviewed got Fs, including Military Order of the Purple Heart Service Foundation, the AMVETS National Service Foundation and the Freedom Alliance. Eight got Ds.

Taxpayers are paying for the tax exemption that many of these groups are allegedly squandering, one congressman noted angrily.

Of course, taxpayers are also supposed to be funding the veterans' services that might make some of these charities' work less necessary, but there's the problem. You just don't get that warm, fuzzy, supporting-the-troops feeling from paying your taxes.

Now we know you shouldn't necessarily be getting from donating to any old veterans' charity either.

Army Suicide Rate This Year The Highest On Record

Fewer American troops may be dying at the hands of Iraqi insurgents lately, but more Army soldiers died at their own hands than at any other time since officials have been keeping track, USA Today reports.

A record number of soldiers - 109 - have killed themselves this year, according to Army statistics. The deaths come as soldiers serve longer combat deployments and the Army spends $100 million on support programs.

The highest number of Army suicides recorded since 1990 was 102 in 1992 - a period when the service was 20 percent larger than it is today. This year's suicide rate would equal 18.4 per 100,000, the highest since the Army started counting in 1980.

The civilian suicide rate was 11 per 100,000 in 2004, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Research released by the Army in August shows that almost 70 percent of suicides in 2006 were spurred by failed relationships.

Since Sept. 11, 2001, records show that 127 soldiers have killed themselves while serving in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The article doesn't offer any particularly compelling explanation - besides a general one about the ongoing stigma surrounding seeking mental health treatment - for why the overwhelming majority of suicides in these conflicts have happened in the last year.

Hospital Says No Thanks To Religious Kidney Donor

While Congress is grilling veterans' charities today on not being generous enough, the Wall Street Journal reports on the controversy surrounding a religious group accused of being a little too generous.

Ashwyn Falkingham, 23, is a member of a 30-member religious group called the Jesus Christians that, true to normal cult form, expects members to turn over their savings to the group and forsake family, friends and possessions. It also advocates donating kidneys to strangers.

Half of the group's members have done it. Falkingham wanted to do it too. He said it was a "simple thing that can help someone." And he's got a point. Nearly 75,000 people in the U.S. are waiting for kidney transplants.

But many hospitals aren't interested in donors who don't have established, personal relationships with the recipient, partly because they fear strangers might be secretly (and illegally) paid for their organs. They also worry these people might be psychologically disturbed or likely to back out.

After finding a recipient online through the website set up by the Jesus Christians' leader, David McKay, Falkingham flew to Toronto in March to meet with doctors and psychologists at a hospital there. They asked if he was coerced into this decision, and he said no.

But his parents disagreed. They were freaked out by the fact that Falkingham refused to attend a family Christmas gathering without at least one other group member, or that he wouldn't discuss his kidney donation plans without the 67-year-old McKay present. They wrote to transplant programs across the country and to the health minister's office in Ontario laying out their concerns.

The Toronto hospital cancelled his surgery and ruled out Falkingham as a donor. It wrote him explaining that he was motivated by the desire for publicity, it concluded, not altruism.

The recipient, who now needs kidney dialysis, was devastated. "I'm not saying that it was easy for the hospital," he said. "But they were more concerned about their reputation and everything else than worried about someone's life."

A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is available via e-mail. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.


©MMVII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by plainjean December 14, 2007 7:59 PM EST
What is needed here is federal intervention by the Justice Department, but that will never happen while George Bush is President. Is it any wonder a substantial number of America''s military have committed suicide? WITH A COMMANDER-AND-CHIEF LIKE GEORGE W. BUSH I''D BE TEMPTED TO COMMIT SUICIDE TOO! Just ask Kevin Tillman, Pat''s brother, about the way this administration has managed the military during this war on terror. I''ll bet he''d give you an ear-full.
Reply to this comment
by safedave-2009 December 14, 2007 2:50 AM EST
I am glad to see the charity I donate to, The Fisher House, got an A+.
Reply to this comment
by redbarron73 December 14, 2007 1:54 AM EST
I''ve had personal experience with one of these sleazeballs, as my girlfriend worked for a "non-profit" organization for 2 years. The woman who owned this "business" claimed that she provided "sanctuary" for disabled vets.

She would appeal to the religious and compassionate people who really wanted to be a part of such a wonderful cause.

Unfortunately, she was a con artist.

I watched in disbelief as she spent every dime of the well meaning philanthropists'' money on her own lavish lifestyle, all tax free.

Two things. Research any organization before making a donation, and report, expose, and call for legislation to punish these crooks.

I won''t even waste my time addressing all the idiots writing checks to the televangelists. If you''re that stupid, you deserve to lose your money. But hey, you do at least get some "miracle water."...lol
Reply to this comment
by swwils December 14, 2007 1:49 AM EST
People talk about Bush haters,I don''t hate him but those soldiers deserve what is theirs not some dude who has never seen combat but on CNN.
Reply to this comment
by swwils December 14, 2007 1:44 AM EST
That shows you the crooks that are in charge of the distribution,we need to check out their records before they are allowed to be in charge of so much money.
Reply to this comment
by ninerman168 December 13, 2007 10:28 PM EST
It''s funny as H*ell how it didn''t take long for all these Bush haters to blame it on him. You guys crack me up.Keep em coming.
Reply to this comment
by edward1975-2009 December 13, 2007 7:35 PM EST
You can''t lump all charities into this. Just as a consumer, it''s your responsibility to make sure of who your dealing with. And the one''s that are above board, will have no problem giving you whatever info you want. With all the information at a persons disposal, not hard to weed out the bad ones.
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 December 13, 2007 6:40 PM EST
This is classic Bush-

The faithless/souless church backed charity

All brought to you by the FAITH BASED BRIBES of the white house

and the MINDLESS CHRISTIAN VOTE
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman December 13, 2007 6:39 PM EST
libsluvsuvs,,, You''re just now noticing it ?? Guess what ??? Your GOP does the same thing with charities, and more than one.. Many of them have religous & patriotic names --- It was part of Bush 43''s fund raising.
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs December 13, 2007 5:52 PM EST
this is rediculious..borderline criminal..these organization needs to be audited, assets confiscated and members punished. THIS IS HIGHWAY ROBBERY!
Reply to this comment
by meboard December 13, 2007 5:46 PM EST
I run a charity called %u201CDimes for Afghanistan%u201D and I%u2019m proud of the fact that for every one dime my organization raises, 1.345298 cents is sent directly to a needy Afghan family. That%u2019s 1.345298 cents they wouldn%u2019t have received if not for my organization working a fever pitch to get them those badly needed funds! (It%u2019s none of your business where the rest of the money goes%u2026you can pound sand buddy!) If you%u2019re interested in contributing to %u201CDimes for Afghanistan%u201D please follow the link off the RNC web-page.
Reply to this comment
by kattyclayz December 13, 2007 5:20 PM EST
Now I really wonder if ANY of the donations I''ve given that were supposed to help the injured vets or go to "Care Packages" for the troops were actually sent/used for their purposes, or just pocketed.

This makes it really really hard on the associations that are actually trying to help the veterans.
Reply to this comment
by johnshaft4 December 13, 2007 5:08 PM EST
No doubt, that our troops are also getting the shaft from the so called Christian "Faith Based" churches swine Bush paid off.
Hey, where''s Pastor Ted? I''ve been working all night and would like to score some crystal meth to get my report done.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 December 13, 2007 4:51 PM EST
I wondered why AMVETS suddenly stopped picking up clothing and appliances in the neighborhood which they were doing on a near monthly basis for the past year.

Guess they got the wind that the heat was on and they better lay low until things cool down.

Now you know why no one gives to charities anymore. You are lucky if 10 cents of your $5 really goes to the charity its supposed to. Remember how the big shots at United Way were "greasing their palms" a few years back? Anybody who doesn''t think that still isn''t happening now with ALL supposed non-profit charities needs to take REALITY 101!

There is no such animal as a "non-profit" charity!

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
Reply to this comment
by edward1975-2009 December 13, 2007 4:43 PM EST
This will put a taint on charities that do good work, a good question to ask when donating, is how much out of every dollar actually goes to the people your trying to help. You will be surprised at some of the responses. Donate wisely.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman December 13, 2007 4:30 PM EST
Didn''t Bush say doing charity work was just as good as joining the military ???
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 December 13, 2007 4:25 PM EST
Why didn''t they list ALL the orgainizations that literally swindled donors. Why can''t we know the names of the individuals leading these organizations. They need to be revealed and held up to public scrutiny.
Reply to this comment
by fornicario December 13, 2007 4:13 PM EST
Won''t happen. They can afford (with the donation money they stole) to hire enough attorneys to make sure they get to keep all the money. After all, justice now comes with a price tag, and morals do not come with a profit margin, so who cares about a few poor soldiers, except for those of us who think people are more than meat sheep to be bled, blown up, and robbed from.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 December 13, 2007 3:53 PM EST
This is a misappropriation of funds and if they didn''t report it on their 990 they are subject to pprosection for tax fraud even though they are tax-exempt.

The organizations should have their 501(c) status revoked and the CEO, CFO, & Board of Directors should be prosecuted.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 December 13, 2007 3:28 PM EST
Americans are notoriously generous when it comes to giving to charitable causes. Abuses like these are going to curtail the giving instinct replacing it with cynical suspicion.

"It isn''t against the law...", I''m so tired of that line - like that makes it OK.
Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: