BALI, Indonesia, Dec. 13, 2007

Gore: U.S. Blocking Progress On Climate

White House "Principally Responsible" For Obstruction; Europeans May Boycott U.S.-Led Talks

    • Nobel Peace Prize laureate Al Gore delivers a speech during the U.N. Climate Change Conference 2007 in Nusa Dua on Bali island, December 13, 2007. The former vice president called on delegates to push ahead on a global pact to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without the United States, which he accused of obstructing progress at the talks.

      Nobel Peace Prize laureate Al Gore delivers a speech during the U.N. Climate Change Conference 2007 in Nusa Dua on Bali island, December 13, 2007. The former vice president called on delegates to push ahead on a global pact to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without the United States, which he accused of obstructing progress at the talks.  (Getty Images/Jewel Samad)

    • New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg sits behind the steering wheel of a solar taxi at a hotel near the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Bali.

      New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg sits behind the steering wheel of a solar taxi at a hotel near the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Bali.  (Getty Images/Adek Berry)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Play CBS Video Video Bloomberg In Bali

    Harry Smith speaks with Michael Bloomberg about his attendance at the U.N. conference on climate change in Bali, Indonesia, and finds out what cities are doing to curb global warming.

  • Interactive Global Warming

    The greenhouse effect, a look at the Kyoto Protocol and a history of the Earth's climate.

(CBS/AP)  Pressure has come even from a one-time ally on climate, Australia, whose new prime minister urged Washington to "embrace" binding targets, and from former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, who won this year's Nobel Peace Prize for helping alert the world to the danger of climate change.

But U.S. Under Secretary of State Paula Dobriansky, the head of the American delegation, told reporters that the conference was simply the start of negotiations, not the end.

"We don't have to resolve all these issues ... here in Bali," she said.

That did not satisfy environmentalists, who accused Washington of standing in the way of a meaningful deal - and not just on the inclusion of emissions targets.

"We know that there is a wrecking crew in Bali led by the U.S. administration and its minions," said Jennifer Morgan, spokeswoman for environmental groups on Bali. "They are working hard to pull out the bits of text that matter to developing countries on finance and technology."

In the end, however, all parties agree it is vital that the U.S. is on board.

"Everyone wants the United States in so badly that they will be willing to accept some level of ambiguity in the negotiations," said Greenpeace energy expert John Coequyt. "Our worry is that we will end up with a deal that is unacceptable from an environmental perspective."

The Kyoto Protocol requires 37 industrial nations to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by a relatively modest average 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.

Mr. Bush has continually claimed that the pact would harm the U.S. economy.

He has also made opposing arguments against global agreements. While he criticized Kyoto for not forcing emissions cutbacks on developing economies, like China and India, Mr. Bush now says that such countries should not have mandatory targets imposed upon them in any new agreement, because their economies' ability to grow would be inhibited.

Cap-And-Trade Has Fans And Critics

Nations are not the only governments studying targets on reducing emissions. Many U.S. states and cities are taking their own actions paralleling the Kyoto Protocol.

Many are advocating a "cap-and-trade" program, whereby emissions of carbon dioxide by industries are traded on the market. Companies which reduce their emissions below certain targets can then sell their allotment of allowed emissions to those who are failing to meet their reductions targets.

This system creates a profit motive for companies to employ greener technologies, energy efficiencies and other measures to cut emissions. It is the basis of the America's Climate Security Act, sponsored by Sens. John Warner, R-Va., and Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn.

Current cap-and-trade programs in carbon have given rise to a multibillion-dollar global industry of brokers, analysts and project managers dealing in such carbon credits and "green" projects that produce them.

However, New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, appearing at Bali, said the growing carbon cap-and-trade industry is vulnerable to "special interests, corruption, inefficiencies," and should be replaced by straight carbon taxes.

Speaking of global warming, Bloomberg said, "Most experts would agree that the way to solve the problem is with a carbon tax."

Bloomberg, who addresses the conference Friday as a representative of the world's local governments, told a meeting with environmentalists Thursday that carbon trading "is attractive to many politicians because it doesn't have that three-letter word 'tax.'"

"But it's a very inefficient way to accomplish the same thing that a carbon tax accomplishes," he said. "It leaves itself open to special interests, corruption, inefficiencies."

Some environmentalists complain the process has been corrupted by projects in the developing world awarded more carbon credits than they deserve, and has become unduly influenced by financial companies that have jumped into the action in a big way.

Many environmentalists say a carbon tax - heavy government levies on coal, oil and other fossil fuels - is a better, more direct way to discourage global-warming emissions, and to finance environmentally friendly policies and technology.

"You really want to tax the coal producers in a way that coal producers could reduce that tax by investing in technology and in ways to make coal a cleaner-burning, less polluting fuel," Bloomberg said.

He said most experts would agree that carbon taxes are "a very difficult political lift," since they would probably boost costs for energy consumers.

"But that's what leadership is all about, and we need leaders around the world who get things done," the New York City mayor said.

At the conference Friday, Bloomberg is expected to tout his new plan to reduce global-warming emissions in New York City by 30 percent by 2030 by, among other measures, improving energy efficiency in buildings, requiring taxi fleets to convert to hybrid vehicles, and levying a fee on drivers entering Manhattan business districts.

©MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 56 Comments
by December 16, 2007 12:53 PM EST
un. uneducated.
Reply to this comment
by December 16, 2007 12:51 PM EST
I wish the deniers would wake up and smell the coffee. Doesn''t it tell you anything that every environmental science textbook on the planet says that anthropogenic warming is real? If there was really such a big debate going on - the textbooks would reflect that. They don''t. The universities are teaching the reality of global warming, so it appears those individuals who deny its existence are actually educated.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 December 14, 2007 9:06 AM EST
The Bush administration has rejected reduction of fossile fuel burning citing severe economic impacts.The Cheney energy policy expands US interests in The Caspian Sea region where one third of the world''s oil remains untapped. Big Oil does not want alternative energy because they are profit motivated. Big Oil & Corporate America dictate US policy not the people. We are just pawns in their game.

Reply to this comment
by co2max December 14, 2007 8:14 AM EST
If you are a disciple of Al Gore, then you accept the idea that the planet has a fever (cough, cough), which is absolutely absurd. But if you follow this reasoning, you cannot call carbon dioxide a pollutant (which it certainly is not). Instead, refer to carbon dioxide as an infection. This way, you can adhere to the line of logic that tries to support this ridiculous claim that humans cause climate to change and the rest of us intelligent, thinking members of the world will recognize the global warming zealots for what they are: uneducated, politically motivated control freaks.
Reply to this comment
by gordon.couger December 14, 2007 5:34 AM EST
If this is to work we need the whole of the world behind it. Not just govemntes passing treaties. You need every business and person in the world working on a way to use less energy and ways to use less them selves.

More important it needs to make a profit in the process. We can''t just stop what were doing we must find a way to keep our economy and your and my job bringing in a living wages.

Stopping co2 is easy. Reducing it and feeding a world hungry for food growing pollution and keeping an economy alive to pay the bills with out falling apart isn''t as simple as Al Gore.

I think the faction that is driving this believes in population control at any price. I believe They see the four horseman of Starvation, Famine, War and pestilence as their minions to carry out there dreams.

Gc
Reply to this comment
by harp1963 December 14, 2007 5:13 AM EST
When the earth is on fire, the lovers of money will be wishing for more than money and power.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 December 14, 2007 3:46 AM EST
"Have you lost your f*cking mind? We''''ve been a plague ever since we evolved into the a-holes we are today. Go take a swim the next time a tanker loses it''''s cargo. We''''re nothing more than a virus as we rape this planet for all we can get. " posted by matvei1107

See, here is a person that sees things for the way they are. This person isn''t living in lala land. When a person can stand back and take a good look at themselves and see things for the way they are, I believe they are then half way to solving the problem. Of course this is only one of the very few people in the U.S. that actually isn''t living in denial so I am afraid the U.S. has a long way to go before there is any hope of them fixing any problems they have.


How embarrassing for the American people to have such a loser as president. I don''t know how he can sleep at night knowing that he is going to go down in history as being the worst president of the United States that there ever was.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 December 14, 2007 3:36 AM EST
"Can''''t you Global Warming Sheep see how insane this is?????" posted by hawksprings

There is nothing insane about it. You can expect in the beginning that they are going to have to get together to form some kind of plan to get things going. Eventually once everyone knows what that plan is then they will not need to get together anymore. So in the beginning, sure they will be contributing to the problem, but that won''t be forever.
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings December 14, 2007 2:35 AM EST
OK, let me get this straight...

All these delegates and Algore flew from all over the world, spewing the CO2 of 20,000 freakin'' cars, to attend a conference in Bali where some of them had to watch Algore''s drivel ON VIDEO??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If Global Warming is sooo dire, sooo urgent, sooo deadly, soooo in need of immediate action RIGHT NOW, why in the H-E-Double-Hockey-Sticks didn''t they ALL STAY HOME AND DO THE WHOLE THING ON VIDEO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Instead they do a feel-good conference in a remote corner of the Earth where some of them have to watch it on video because the place couldn''t accomodate them all, so they can bash the US while they created more CO2 than 20,000 cars???????

Can''t you Global Warming Sheep see how insane this is?????
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 December 14, 2007 2:29 AM EST
jowand said: "ZERO factual evidence that C02 is causing global warming, its actually getting colder at the poles, check out the links: http://www.iceagenow.com/Growin"

Didn''t I kick your a*s on this the other night? So many deniers, so little time...

Read it (again) and weep, Bushie. Its from NASA, so if you don''t believe they took us to the moon, you may just get a laugh out of it:

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2006/greenland_slide.html
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 December 14, 2007 2:22 AM EST
arj4031 said: "several studies have indicated that [warming] can still be tackled relatively inexpensively compared to the costs and consequences of allowing it to accelerate further."
For example, just planting more trees in the tropics and dumping crop wastes into the oceans would do wonders. But you won''t hear the denyers crowd talking solutions. They''re more into whining about ''liberal conspiracies''.
Reply to this comment
by arj4031 December 14, 2007 1:27 AM EST
Correction - My previous comment is to MCVet, not Steve:
Reply to this comment
by arj4031 December 14, 2007 1:21 AM EST
Steve, you might want to at least learn the difference between the separate but related issues of global climate change and stratospheric ozone depletion. See #24 at Understandit.org

As for cost, several studies have indicated that this thing can still be tacked relatively inexpensively compared to the costs and consequences of allowing it to accelerate further.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet December 14, 2007 12:58 AM EST
More America bashing from a Democrat is expected. In the end, the hole in the earth''''s atmosphere is shrinking and that proves global warming is declining. Gore is an overblowing blowhard.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by denn034 at 04:49 PM : Dec 13, 2007
+ report abuse

ROFLMAO Well SURE folks.. Bush and the Fascist have been so right on this and so much for so long!! ROFLMAO It only took Sir Lies-A-Lot 7 YEARS to finally admit that Gobal Warming ACTUALLY existed and YOU want people to listen to you clowns?? ROFLMAO I hardly think a fascist is someone to be listening to about anything these days... Sieg Heil Bush!!
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 December 13, 2007 10:49 PM EST
How goes the spin tonite right wingers?

You know we''re going to raise your taxes a billion percent to cover these costs right? ha
Reply to this comment
by ibzjem December 13, 2007 8:35 PM EST
You two have got to be kidding us. Have you read the links you provide to the Daily Green? Of course ice is growing be cause it''s becoming winter! Duh!! But it is less this year than last. If you read the article you would have seen it say "but has yet to recover fully from a record summer melt"

The other site is questionable. Ice might be thickening in spots, but it has been shown that it is shrinking in overall size and it''s moving. I would not trust a fly-by-night site such as this. Not one reference to any other article or report.

Come back when you understand the global warming or climate change process.
Reply to this comment
by ibzjem December 13, 2007 8:34 PM EST
You two have got to be kidding us. Have you read the links you provide to the Daily Green? Of course ice is growing be cause it''s becoming winter! Duh!! But it is less this year than last. If you read the article you would have seen it say "but has yet to recover fully from a record summer melt"

The other site is questionable. Ice might be thickening in spots, but it has been shown that it is shrinking in overall size and it''s moving. I would not trust a fly-by-night site such as this. Not one reference to any other article or report.

Come back when you understand the global warming or climate change process.
Reply to this comment
by oscarez December 13, 2007 8:30 PM EST
You don''t have to worry about how high the sea levels rise if you live at or above 500 feet MSL, That is as long as the central part of the United States does not become a desert.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 December 13, 2007 8:27 PM EST
The Great Emperor Bush II is unconcerned about Al Gore''s claims that the government of the USSA is blocking attempts to clean up the air we all breathe.

The Great Emperor could care less about ice caps melting, polar bears and penguins drowning, and sea levels rising, just so long as those things do not affect the profit levels of big business companies and his own personal stock portfolio. After all, greed and profit are what drive the Fascist neocon agenda and those items must be protected at all times.

Besides, armed with the advice of such great "scientists" as Professor Micheal Savage, Doctor Bill O''Reilly, and Professor Rush Limbaugh, together with the "inspired" words of the Reverand Anne Coulter, the Great Emperor is convinced there is nothing to worry about, that the planet is in great shape, and is setting his sights on the Red Planet so he can screw Mars up!

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
Reply to this comment
by co2max December 13, 2007 8:05 PM EST
jowand - That''s quite interesting. The view of the lift crane and the power pole becoming engulfed in thickening ice over the past 20+ years is quite astonishing. Not bad for a frozen desert.
Reply to this comment
See all 56 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: