Deadly Ice Storm Glazes Midsection Of U.S.
Storm Snaps Power Lines, Closes Schools In Midwest; 23 Deaths Blamed On Weather
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Ice Storm Ravages Midwest
The Midwest ice storm has left the region frozen, leaving more than a dozen dead and causing Oklahoma's worst power outage on record. The Weather Channel's Mike Seidel reports.
-
Video
Ice And Snow Cripple Midwest
Winter storms have caused destruction and delays in many parts of the Midwest. Now, analysts are predicting that these ice and snow conditions are heading for the Northeast. Byron Pitts reports.
-
Video
Ice Storm Wreaks Havoc
Missouri is in a state of emergency from an ice storm that stretched from Texas to the Northeast. Over 100,000 are without power and 6 people have died in traffic accidents. Russ Mitchell reports.
-
-
Photo
A row of American flags is coated with ice and icicles Monday Dec. 10, 2007 along I-72 in rural Winchester, Ill. (AP Photo/Al Maglio)
-
Photo
A mailbox sits covered in ice Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2007 in Kirksville, Mo., after an overnight ice storm. (AP Photo/Al Maglio)
-
Photo
Fallen tree limbs cover Britton Road after an ice storm in eastern Oklahoma County, Monday, Dec. 10, 2007. (AP/The Oklahoman, Jim Beckel)
-
Photo
A statue is covered in ice in Spencer, Okla., Monday, Dec. 10, 2007. (AP)
-
Photo
Utility wires are coated in ice in Jones, Okla, Monday, Dec. 10, 2007. (AP)
-
-
Photo Essay
Deadly Ice Storm
Ice, freezing rain, snow linked to dozens of deaths from the southern Plains to the Northeast.
-
Interactive
Winter Watch
See photos of wet and snowy days across the country, and check out snow accumulations and airport delays.
At least 23 deaths had been blamed on the storm system since the waves of sleet and freezing rain started during the weekend. Hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses had no electricity.
The ice storm is marching north, leaving behind states of emergency in Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma, where more than 500,000 homes and businesses lost power -- the largest outage in state history, reports CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes.
President Bush declared an emergency in Oklahoma on Tuesday, ordering federal aid to supplement state and local response efforts.
Food and drinking water are on the way to Oklahoma, says the Federal Emergency Management Agency, along with blankets, cots and generators, adds Cordes.
Iowa's largest school district closed for the day in Des Moines, telling its nearly 31,000 students to stay home, and kids across most of Oklahoma and in the Kansas City, Mo., area stayed home for a second day.
Schools also were closed in parts of Wisconsin, including Milwaukee Public Schools with 85,000 students. "We thought about our kids on foot," said Milwaukee schools spokeswoman Roseann St. Aubin. Some drivers couldn't even get to their buses, she said.
About an inch of ice was expected Tuesday over parts of Iowa, followed by up to 5 inches of sleet and snow. "It's a pretty good ice-maker," said Frank Boksa, a National Weather Service forecaster.
Ice as much as an inch thick had accumulated on trees, power lines, streets and car windshields Monday in parts of Oklahoma and Missouri, with thinner layers elsewhere.
Utilities in Missouri reported more than 100,000 homes and business without power and Kansas utilities said probably more than 70,000 were blacked out Tuesday, with some in the dark since Sunday.
Public Service of Oklahoma spokesman Stan Whiteford told CBS News it's going to take a long time to restore everyone's electricity because the tree and power line damage is so severe and widespread. So, what are families left in the cold to do?
"We're encouraging people to go to a shelter rather than to do something risky in their home and try to stay there, especially if they have health problems," Whiteford said. "But a lot of people are just hunkering down and using their fireplaces to keep warm.
Iowa's two major utilities reported over 17,000 customers without power Tuesday.
This rain keeps refreezing. We put chemicals down, it melts and then freezes again. We can't stay ahead of it. This is not fun.
Des Moines International Airport spokesman Roy CrissDes Moines International Airport closed because of ice late Monday and could be closed most of Tuesday, said spokesman Roy Criss. The airport, which also was shut down by winter weather two weeks ago, has 138 arrivals and departures per day, he said.
"This rain keeps refreezing. We put chemicals down, it melts and then freezes again. We can't stay ahead of it," Criss said. "This is not fun."
Many travelers also were grounded at Chicago, where about 250 flights were canceled Tuesday morning at O'Hare International Airport and departure delays averaging 15 to 30 minutes, said Karen Pride of the city's Department of Aviation.
Weather Channel meteorologist Mike Seidel said on CBS News' The Early Show Tuesday he expects hundreds of more flights to be canceled as the ice storm spreads to the Chicago area.
However, the storm "is not heading to the East Coast and you do not have to worry about it in Philadelphia, D.C., and Baltimore," Seidel said.
Kansas City International Airport in Missouri canceled more than 90 flights Tuesday morning, but spokesman Joe McBride said that was probably due to problems at other airports.
Southeastern Nebraska also had power outages Tuesday and some flights in and out of Omaha's Eppley Airfield were canceled.
FEMA and the Army Corps of Engineers sent 50 generators and three truckloads of bottled water from Texas to distribute to blacked-out areas of Oklahoma.
At least 22 deaths - most of them in traffic accidents - had been blamed on the ice and cold since the weekend, including 15 in Oklahoma, four in Kansas, and three in Missouri.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 71 CommentsWe need global warming to reduce the number of deaths from the cold.
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=c9554887-802a-23ad-4303-68f67ebd151c
All we''ve heard about from the Church of Global Warming is doom and gloom, we''re going to heat up so many degrees, the sea is going to rise 20 feet, terrible drought, blah blah blah.
But when it''s colder than ''normal'', you say that''s Global Warming too. When it''s wetter than ''normal'', you say that''s Global Warming too.
You all act like the Climate has always been a beautiful 72 degrees and sunny.
The Inconvenient Truth is that the Climate has ALWAYS varied wildly.
There have ALWAYS been wicked killer storms, killer droughts, killer floods, killer heat, killer cold.
But now, thanks to the CHurch of Global Warming, and it''s High PRiest Algore, any of these events are now blamed on humans.
YOu people are so gullible, you deserve the taxes and controls that are going to be forced on you in the name of saving the planet.
Pathetic.
This is typical winter weather. In December 79, all the midwest states were under a blizzard and were closed down-was that global warming too? Or was it just winter!!!!
Pathetic.
Posted by hawksprings at 09:25 AM : Dec 11, 2007
Yup,,, I agree,,,,and also I can''t believe that they gave Big Al The Nobel Peace Prize, with all those lies he''s been telling.
With their selection, they have diminished the value of the peace prize.
So what was the cause of big ice storms and blizzards before Algore and Human-Caused Global Warming?
Can anyone tell us?
Can anyone tell us?
Posted by hawksprings at 11:07 AM : Dec 11, 2007
You know, if you closed your mouth, that would cut some serious CO2 emissions right there. :)
Posted by hawksprings
Weather systems cause storms. Always have, always will. The problem is some areas may experience less or more of them thanks to events such as El Nino and La Nina. I''m guessing global warming may affect or cause these weather phenomenons. I''m no expert so I can''t say. But either way, we still need to recycle resources and reduce our addiction to oil, for obvious reasons.
So, what are you boys credentials, your education, your field work, and publications in the evironmental sciences? Do fill us all in, since you are so in-the-know about all things global.
Don''t have any creditials to speak on global warming? Didn''t think so. Naa. You are just a bunch of unintelligent lazy scaredy-cats totally afraid that you might have to give up your chrome plated wide-rimmed V-6 substitutes for authentic manhood.
You are probably the kind of people who won''t give up their beer and cigarette habits to put money away so your kids can go to college, so it isn''t surprising that you fight NOT to do anything to even remotely ensure that your kids will still have a planet to live on.
Just as well, given that they are your spawn, only headed for prison anyway.
Have a great Bush day.
My mouth is closed when I''m typing. :)
Posted by Displeased at 11:35 AM : Dec 11, 2007
Ther obvious reason would be saving money. But would not stop global warming.
The earth is always going to warm up/cool down no matter what we do.
And AaaBee, I think I felt the earth warm up 10 degrees on your rant. LOL
The favorite tactic seems to build a straw man out of non-truths and tear it apart and act like you killed a dragon.
For example, if you don''t understand how climate shifts can change the number, location, and severity of ice storms and hurricanes, then you look like a fool commenting.
Not that I care, fools arguing ignorantly against climate change in public help get people to hear what the science really says and tune out the wackos.
My mouth is closed when I''''m typing. :)
Posted by hawksprings at 11:52 AM : Dec 11, 2007
LOL. May Santa put an extra something good in your stocking this year, preferably a non-evironmentally related item such as coal.
Seriously though, there are far too many theories on what''s causing the warming. How are we to actively do something about it when we can''t even be sure what the cause is?
We know the cause. It is good you want to do something. Watch "An Inconvenient Truth." It is a good, easily accessible starting point for understanding and has some ideas to help.
The poor suckers are being taken for a ride by Al Gore.
Al got out into the big wide world and looked at the evidence. He has traveled from the Arctic to the Antarctic.
His facts come not from imagination, but from the field workers who are drilling the ice-core samples, who are collecting, as scientists have done for years, data from the earth itself. He went to NASA, he went to the military, he went and stood on what''s left of the glaciers.
How easy is it for posters to refute his work, when they themselves have been nowhere, read nothing, haven''t taken a semester of anything environmental.
They get their information from someone else, someone equally as ignorant of evironmental issues as themselves, refusing to listen to those who work in the field and have collected data, published, earned degrees in evironmental studies, and want people to know so we can reverse the damage while there is still time.
Global warming aside, any measures we take will help the overall pollution issue in general. Taking any action at all would benefit this planet and we who live on it.
Al Gore''s life work is trying to reduce pollution impacts to this planet. Nothing in what he is trying to do is out to "Get" people or hurt people, what he is working for would help the human race, and allow them to live better and longer. And people are skinning him for it.
The poor suckers are being taken for a ride by Al Gore.
Posted by tiddsanbeer at 12:27 PM : Dec 11, 2007
What were you doing on NPR? Why weren''t you supporting your local Talk Radio station? Are you a closet liberal!
Respectable conservatives listen to Talk Radio. Limbaugh and Hannity will tell you exactly what you want to hear, so your morning wouldn''t get upset by unpalatable realities.
Makes you sick to know you''ve been had, doesn''t it?
Global warming is nothing to flip out over, unless you want to convince people the world is coming to an end. How did Gore explain the little ice age in Europe during the 16th Century? It surprises me that people who claim to be such devout followers of evolution simply find it impossible to accept that evolution is at work now. Doesn''t hurt to cut back on carbon emissions or to recycle...ideas that have been around since the 60s...Gore didn''t invent the idea of conservation any more than he invented the internet. Go ahead and believe the weather now is directly related to global warming if it gives you something to live for, but the Native Americans were taking note of weird weather patterns long before Gore decided to make it is his own invention;
Thunder in February...expect frost in May. In other words...c.rap happens but don''t plant anything that bears fruit on top of the soil until after the last frost...in May. Seldom were they wrong. Ooops...there went another tree limb downed by ice...guess who will be more vigilant in pruning next summer?
Yes this is what happens when people make comments without bothering to understand what the subject--just comes across as foolish.
Al Gore is not the source of information on human-caused climate change. That comes from a consensus of scientists and decades of research. Mr. Gore has tried to spread the information, educate, and more importantly, step up and show courage and leadership when it is badly needed.
His critics are poster children for lazy, ignorant people who stick their heads in the sand and hope their mommy will save them. So much of their argument boils down to "it''s hard. I''m lazy and scared of change. Science confuses me so I pretend. And I hate real leaders and moral courage causes it makes me look bad."
Posted by One_American at 12:49 PM : Dec 11, 2007
May I see your link or where you got this? I want to read the whole thing.
Another one--it just looks foolish to post a comment without some basic understanding of the topic.
Why would Al Gore explain this? He is not a scientist and doesn''t claim to be. He is a Nobel winner but not in science. He is a leader and visionary.
However the scientists who work in the field have explained this very well and it is in the literature. Look into it and you see that it does nothing to take away from the theory of human-caused climate change.
-----------
Posted by andor3
And then there are those who choose to actually research ''facts provided from a consensus of scientists'' because they know just adding the title scientist to one''s name doesn''t make it valid. Equal numbers of ''scientists'' disagree with the ''scientists'' who provided the data that confirms global warming...so many in fact that they created an ''error'' list. Check it out, unless you''re too lazy or too scared, or maybe it would just confuse you to have alternate views of something to have to look into for yourself.
Posted by One_American at 12:49 PM : Dec 11, 2007
I would rather be taken by Al Gore, who is trying to save the planet, than be in your shoes. You are being taken by George Bush, who is busy destroying the planet so he and Cheney can put a few more dollars in their already-bulging pockets.
I buy the pollution-is-changing-our-planet story with the same loyalty as you bought the bringing-democracy-to-Iraq story. That makes us both suckers. LOL
----------
Posted by andor
The sky is falling...you are correct...how stupid of us not to all be out there with you stopping all this. Have fun spending your hours on line chastising ''ignorance''...everyone has to have something that gives them reasons to breath. Tah tah...
No, they don''t. Those scientists could well be bought experts, most of whom have not come forward to let the public examine their evironmental credentials nor have they allowed investigation into their ties to non-envirnmental corporations. What is allowed is the publishing of their "expert" opinion in the news.
You have only been told that there is an "error" list without even knowing who is on it. Try to find out who the participants are and see if there is disclosure about the careers and ambitions of those so-called anti-GW "experts". If you can find reasonable accreditation for even a small percentage of them, I will give you this point, but you can''t. I have researched the french trial and their errors and little is being let out about it, which lends NO credibility to claims of errors if the claiments don''t show themselves and the record of their own expertice.
Cemented world views, encapsulated by fear and greed, are not a American-only danger.
What are any of these candidates doing for anyone?
Simply not true. I checked it out. You got any facts? There is consensus in the scientific community on human activity as a primary cause in climate change. It is not being debated in any serious forum. A few people are claiming scientific credentials and opposition just because it gets attention because their view is considered wacky, and also because there is big money pushing to get ANYONE to speak up and oppose the science.
Geeze,
This has to terrible news for all you Global warmed enviromentalist nuts cases in here!
FREEDOM FOR THE IRAQIS!!!!
The pattern seems to be--a vague assertion of "scientists" and "research" that cast doubt on the accepted theories. Several people respond asking for facts, names, references, qualifications--anything to back up the story.
Then, as likeitis5050 says: "Tah tah..."
Probably suddenly remembered she left her SUV double-parked with the engine running.
Oh yeah and name calling. When you are REALLY backed in a corner and got no facts on your side, you can always call someone a name like liberal-- has zero relevance to the science or the discussion, but an ad hominem attack is the classic way to admit defeat in a debate without waving a white flag.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp
Check it out.
Don''t get it, sorry. Mine was just kidding around anyway.
http://www.snopes.com/politics
/bush/house.asp
Check it out.
Posted by trey2166 at 02:57 PM : Dec 11, 2007
And while you are there, read the one on Bush. It is far better and has more green dots than Al''s red dots. :)
liberals deal with emotions. Posted by skykk at 02:04 PM : Dec 11, 2007
Wow, this was a clearly unemotional fact-driven post itself.
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Evans-CO2DoesNotCauseGW.pdf
Here''s an article stating: Climate Warming Is Naturally Caused And Shows No Human Influence.
http://science-sepp.blogspot.com/2007/12/press-release-dec-10-2007.html
Here''s an article about a prominent scientist reversing his views on Global Warming after looking at the latest research:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12
Here''s an article by scientists calling for a review of the UN''s IPCC''s and it''s procedures:
http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=155&Itemid=1
If all you Human-Caused Global Warming Sheep dare to read these articles, there''s plenty more where they came from.
Your Consensus is Melting, Melting, MELTING!!!!!
I did. Don''t think you really wanted anyone to since the URLs are fractured and not usable without some work. Didn''t find anything convincing or even eyebrow raising. We got a scientist with no affiliation or credentials listed, a paper with author funding ties to Exxon, a random blogpost where the blog clearly has an agenda...
Is is just supply and demand. A demand has been created for scientists who will oppose the consensus and research on global warming. The demand is paired with funding. Not surprisingly a supply of these critters arises. It does not change the majority consensus or the truth.
There is also a demand for the truth, and that has produced quite a different supply.
Just for the sake of argument, assume all of the scientists - the vast majority of the world''s scientists - who believe that humans are causing or increasing global warming are wrong.
What is it going to hurt to play it safe for the sake of our descendants?
Your profits?
They are more important than the world''s children?
You drive your kids around without a car seat because you KNOW you''ll never cause an accident?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 71 Comments