April 17, 2009 4:01 PM
- Text
Adult Film Company Sues X-Rated "PornTube"
(CBS/AP)
A major adult entertainment company has sued an X-rated knockoff of YouTube, accusing the Web site of profiting from piracy by allowing its users to post videos that can include copyrighted material.
Vivid Entertainment Group filed the federal lawsuit Monday against PornoTube and its parent, Data Conversions Inc., which does business in Charlotte, N.C. as Adult Entertainment Broadcast Network.
Like YouTube, users submit short video clips on PornoTube for free viewing, but the adult fare on that Web site are undercutting porn producers who earn most of their money from long-form videos.
"We've decided to take a stand and say 'no more,"' Vivid co-chairman Steven Hirsch said. "We will go after all the free sites."
Vivid said it's required by law to record the ages and birth names of its performers, but PornoTube has an unfair competitive advantage because it doesn't always have to do that, according to the lawsuit.
An AEBN executive didn't respond to a request for comment.
The suit seeks damages of $150,000 per infringed work.
Other porn companies also are upset by the explosion in Web video sites, many of which rely on user submissions that borrow heavily from copyrighted material, reports the Los Angeles Times.
Vivid Entertainment Group filed the federal lawsuit Monday against PornoTube and its parent, Data Conversions Inc., which does business in Charlotte, N.C. as Adult Entertainment Broadcast Network.
Like YouTube, users submit short video clips on PornoTube for free viewing, but the adult fare on that Web site are undercutting porn producers who earn most of their money from long-form videos.
"We've decided to take a stand and say 'no more,"' Vivid co-chairman Steven Hirsch said. "We will go after all the free sites."
Vivid said it's required by law to record the ages and birth names of its performers, but PornoTube has an unfair competitive advantage because it doesn't always have to do that, according to the lawsuit.
An AEBN executive didn't respond to a request for comment.
The suit seeks damages of $150,000 per infringed work.
Other porn companies also are upset by the explosion in Web video sites, many of which rely on user submissions that borrow heavily from copyrighted material, reports the Los Angeles Times.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Thousands rally to support disbarred Spanish judge
- Injured boomers beware: Know when to see doctor
- 5 bankers arrested in UK tax inquiry
- UK gov't: Press must face tougher penalties
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






