CBS/AP/ February 11, 2009, 3:45 PM

Afghan Forces Retake Town From Taliban

Hundreds of Taliban fighters retreated in trucks and motorbikes Monday from a southern Afghan town they overran last February - the only important territory the militants controlled - as Afghan and international troops closed in on the town's center.

Visiting British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said the victory in Musa Qala will have positive long-term results for the Afghan campaign. It also gives NATO a symbolic triumph in the deadliest year of fighting in Afghanistan since 2001 and boosts hopes the Afghan government can expand into a poppy rich area where it now wields little influence.

But Musa Qala has bounced back and forth between government and Taliban control, falling into militant hands in February despite the presence of British troops nearby, and the question remained whether overstretched Afghan and NATO troops can hold the town in the long-term.

Some 7,000 British troops have faced fierce battles throughout northern Helmand this year - in Kajaki, Sangin, Gereshk and Musa Qala - the world's largest opium poppy growing region, from which the Taliban derive tens of millions of dollars.

CBS News' Fazul Rahim, reporting from Kabul, said winning back Musa Qala was a highly symbolic blow to the country's Islamic militants. "It was the only big town where the Taliban had put in place their own way of government and courts," said Rahim, adding that the extremists had even set up their own radio station in the town, broadcasting Taliban leadership messages and Jihadi songs.

President Hamid Karzai said the decision to enter Musa Qala followed reports of brutality there by the Taliban, al Qaeda and foreign fighters. But Karzai also said local Taliban commanders had committed to switch their allegiance to the Afghan government.

Defense Ministry spokesman Gen. Mohammad Zahir Azimi said Afghan, British and U.S. forces had "completely captured" Musa Qala, a town in the opium poppy growing belt of northern Helmand province, and a Taliban spokesman said its forces had retreated.

Azimi told Rahim that "several dozen" militants had been killed fighting for the town, including some "foreigners", an likely reference to Taliban from across the border in Pakistan, or al Qaeda militants from other countries. Azimi said a more exact death toll would only be possible once the town had been secured.

NATO's International Security Assistance Force said ISAF and Afghan troops had entered the outskirts of the main part of Musa Qala but would now proceed cautiously into the town center because of improvised explosive devices.

An Afghan army commander, Brig. Gen. Gul Agha Naebi, said Musa Qala was surrounded and that troops were 500 yards from the town center.

"The bombing continues. The area is big. (Tuesday) we will carefully clear the streets from the mines," he said. "Both sides are still exchanging fire. There is still resistance from the Taliban. I think these are foreign fighters, al Qaeda members that we are facing. They are trying to create ways for retreat."

A Taliban spokesman, Qari Yousef Ahmadi, said militant fighters left Musa Qala as a strategic decision to avoid Taliban and civilian casualties.

A resident of Musa Qala, Haji Mohammad Rauf, said he saw Taliban fighters leave the town in trucks and motorbikes around noon. Two hours later, hundreds of Afghan soldiers streamed into town and established security checkpoints, he said.

"I was standing on my roof and saw hundreds of Afghan soldiers drive into town," Rauf said. "All the shops are closed and families are staying inside their homes."

Speaking at a news conference in the capital alongside Brown, Karzai recalled a story of a 15 year-old boy accused of spying that Taliban militants hanged from a ceiling. The militants lit two gas cylinders on fire underneath him, roasting the teenager to death. The next morning the militants told the boy's mother she could pick up her son.

"When she entered the room she found the charcoaled dead body of her son," Karzai said. "Some of the Afghan Taliban who also witnessed atrocities like that, they came and they met with me and they asked me to intervene and (said) that they will switch sides and that is what's happened," Karzai said

Taliban militants overran Musa Qala in February, four months after British troops left the town following a contentious peace agreement that gave security responsibilities to Afghan elders. That deal was criticized by U.S. officials behind the scenes as surrendering to the Taliban.

NATO commanders had long said they would take back Musa Qala at a time of the Afghan government's choosing, but NATO and Afghan forces will now have to work to hold the town in a region - Helmand province - that has seen the fiercest fighting in Afghanistan this year.

Lt. Col. Richard Eaton, a British military spokesman, said the military wasn't going to take Musa Qala without a plant to hold it. He said a unit of predominantly Afghan soldiers would be stationed in town.

(AP Photo/Stefan Rousseau/Pool)
Brown, seen at left visiting British troops in Helmand province, said he had "no doubt" the Musa Qala operation would be successful and that social and economic progress would follow military action.

"In Musa Qala the action has been taken, and I think we will see in the next few days in Musa Qala that the action will be effective, that it will work and it will bring long-term and lasting results," Brown said.

During a stop at Camp Bastion in Helmand province, Brown thanked about 150 British troops for their "patriotic service."

"It is one of the most difficult of tasks. It is the most testing of times and it is one of the most important of missions because to win here and to defeat the Taliban and make sure we can give strength to the new democracy of Afghanistan is important to defeating terrorism all around the world," he said.

Brown's visit to Iraq on Sunday signaled the start of what Britain hopes will be the transition from a military mission there to one aimed at aiding Iraq's economy and providing jobs. His speech was met with enthusiastic applause and cheers by British troops stationed there.

His speech in southern Afghanistan, by contrast, was more subdued, as was the resulting applause, perhaps reflecting the serious fight that British soldiers find themselves in.

"We have an operation ongoing in Musa Qala, we've just had people die, so it's a different tempo," said Lt. Andy McLachlan, from Exeter in southwest England.

At least 40 British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan this year and 86 have died in the country since 2001.

This year has been the deadliest since the U.S.-led invasion in 2001. More than 6,200 people have been killed in insurgency-related violence, according to an AP tally of figures from Western and Afghan officials.

Elsewhere, an Afghan army helicopter crashed in central Afghanistan Monday because of bad weather, killing four people, the Defense Ministry said. The Mi-17 helicopter went down in Salar district of Wardak province.

In neighboring Sangin district, Afghan police clashed Monday with a group of Taliban militants, killing 15 militants, said district police chief Mohammad Ali.
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
25 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Con Mohrat says:
This news article contains
"Both sides are still exchanging fire. There is still resistance from the Taliban. I think these are foreign fighters, al Qaeda members that we are facing."

And both sides have foreign fighters too. It is like WWI Battle of the Somme, where a tract of land is taken by one set of invaders, retaken by the opposition, ad nauseam.

We had similar taken-and-retaken occurrences in Korea and look where we are now--still in a state of war for 50 years.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Con Mohrat says:
speakinup wrote:

"there are 20 Trillion barrels in Colorado and Utah (yes that is a ''''T'''') More than 5 TIMES the amount of Saudi Arabian known reserves. Furthermore, it can be extracted at $30 a barrel, and environmentally friendly."

We have all read about the problems of extracting oil from shale, and, sad to say, it is NOT easy as you think, otherwise we would be heading in that direction.

When someone estimated $30/BBL, it may have been an old, optimistic estimate, and they may have omitted the cost of environmental factors afterward.

Boasting about a quadrillion barrels of "cheap" oil does not phase oil-rich OPEC nations like the Kingdom, or Kuwait, or Venezuela. Saudi''s once sold it for $2/BBL, and now it is over $90. They can live with any price.

How long can we?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samsel3 says:
The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are Cheney''s energy policy.Condi Rice is a former board member of Chevron Oil and mouthpiece for the administrations energy policy. Part of that policy is the The Caspian Sea pipeline which will go through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan,Pakistan, to the gulf of Oman or on to India & Nepal.It''s cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran, but regime change is necessary first. The Caspian sea area holds one third of the world''s oil and south asian oil markets are their target market. This pipeline was the reason for the Afghanistan invasion. Cheney''''s energy policy is the root of all these middle east wars, a federal court judge sealed all documents associated with it for the administration, and the national media are not allowed to discuss or comment on it. More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the pipeline. Iran stands in the way of total control of global oil now with sales of oil to China''''s Sinopec Oil,deal signed Dec.10,2007. Months ago China said there would be dire consequences if the US interfered with there direct oil contracts with Iran. Both parties in the Congress should be very concerned with China''''s growing war machine and need for oil. They are the real threat & the administration doesn''t care they are in control! All that matters to them is BIG OIL and their corporate stock portfolios

reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samsel3 says:
On September 14,2002 Rep. James McDermott at a Capitol Hill Briefing said that politics and oil, not fear that Iraq will use WMD are driving factors behind the presidents call for regime change. McDermott said there was an organized effort to squelch such discussions. "The political operatives in the white house have been very careful to spin it away from oil. Anytime anybody sees a connection they spin it the other way."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bizzzz-2009 says:
In five years since 9 11, I have NOT seen ONE organized demonstration by Muslim Americans condemning radical Islam or even terrorists, NOT ONE. Surely Muslims know how to demonstrate. You see them gather by the thousands and thousands for the return of Bhutto in Pakistan. You see them gather by the thousands in Gaza to protest Israeli oppression, and you see them gather by the thousands at parades for Hezzbollah in Tehran.But in a free society like the US, where demonstrations are both lawful and encouraged, NOT ONE Muslim demonstration condemning terrorists. Instead organizations like CAIR STATE THEY DENOUNCE TERRORIST ACTS AND RADICAL ISLAM BY DONATING MONEY TO THIS OR THAT ORGANIZATION.THE SAD THING IS, THEIR MONEY SILENCES US. THE DAY AMERICANS STOP TAKING MONEY FROM MUSLIMS, THE DAY WE AMERICANS TELL MUSLIMS " YOUR MONEY ISN''T GOOD HERE, WE WANT ACTION" WILL BE THE DAY I START BELIEVING THAT NOT ALL MUSLIMS ARE JIHADISTS WANTING TO TURN AMERICA INTO A ISLAMIC STATE. WHATS CONVENIENT ABOUT GIVING MONEY IS THAT YOU CAN DO IT WITH LOW OR NO PROFILE WHATSOEVER. IT%u2019S PERFECT SITUATION FOR A GROUP THAT WANTS TO APPEASE THEIR DETRACTORS AND NOT ACTIVELY OR VISIBLY TAKE A POSITION ON AN ISSUE. THE WHOLE TIME, THEY LAUGH AT OUR INSATIABLE GREED.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samsel3 says:
On September 14,2002 Rep. James McDermott at a Capitol Hill Briefing said that politics and oil, not fear that Iraq will use WMD are driving factors behind the presidents call for regime change. McDermott said there was an organized effort to squelch such discussions. "The political operatives in the white house have been very careful to spin it away from oil. Anytime anybody sees a connection they spin it the other way."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
speakinup says:
oh yeah, it''s big oil alright. samsel3, that is so lame as to be laughable.

Educate yourself on shale oil insitu reclaimation, will you. At conservative (note - this is not a political ''conservative'' term) estimates, there are 20 Trillion barrels in Colorado and Utah (yes that is a ''T'') More than 5 TIMES the amount of Saudi Arabian known reserves.

Furthermore, it can be extracted at $30 a barrel, and environmentally friendly.

So jam your oil theory where the sun doesn''t shine, cry baby.

reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
speakinup says:
samsel3 WAH WAH WAH...

Hear the far left crybaby.

He can''t live with reality, so he spins his own world.

Hillary''s chances are spinning in the bowl. She now has to flip flop AGAIN, or run on her merits (we all know she ain''t gonna do THAT).

Even SeeBS is starting to admit the public likes how things are changing in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Oh - this must be sooooo delicious! Enjoy, your just desserts, far left! You backed the wrong horse.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samsel3 says:
The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are Cheney''s energy policy.Condi Rice is a former board member of Chevron Oil and mouthpiece for the administrations energy policy. Part of that policy is the The Caspian Sea pipeline which will go through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan,Pakistan, to the gulf of Oman or on to India & Nepal.It''s cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran, but regime change is necessary first. The Caspian sea area holds one third of the world''s oil and south asian oil markets are their target market. This pipeline was the reason for the Afghanistan invasion. Cheney''s energy policy is the root of all these middle east wars, a federal court judge sealed all documents associated with it for the administration, and the national media are not allowed to discuss or comment on it. More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the pipeline. Iran stands in the way of total control of global oil now with sales of oil to China''s Sinopec Oil,deal signed Dec.10,2007. Months ago China said there would be dire consequences if the US interfered with there direct oil contracts with Iran. Both parties in the Congress should be very concerned with China''s growing war machine and need for oil. They are the real threat & the administration doesn''t care they are in control! All that matters to them is BIG OIL and their corporate stock portfolios
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Con Mohrat says:
Forgot one place where Bush did the Bonaparte''s Retreat. It was in Saudi Arabia.
I used to visit the Dhahran Air Base, home of the 2nd Air Division, where military aircraft from our East coast bases and West coast bases met. They even built a $2mil passenger terminal there around 1960, I believe with US funds, as oil was cheap.

Sheikh Osama Ben Laden, an American ally in the insurgency against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980''s, repeated warned the US against kafrs (infidels) staying in their holy land(Saudi Arabia.) He was ignored. After the first Gulf War, the US continued to station their troops in the kingdom, as they had for decades.
The comeuppance was the NYC world tower bombing, mostly by Saudi jihadis.
The US packed up and left, and are now in Doha, Qatar.
Not that we are out of the woods. Read "The Day of Islam" by Dr. Paul Williams.
reply
See all 25 Comments