Huckabee's Holiday Inn Express Campaign
This column was written by the editors of National Review Online.
Mike Huckabee's extraordinary rise in the polls means he deserves to be taken seriously as a presidential candidate in a way he hasn't been all year long. Serious candidates have well-formulated views on foreign policy. What are Huckabee's?
He hasn't been asked about them much - reporters prefer to inquire after his views on evolution-but Don Imus, on his resurrected radio show, queried Huckabee the other day about his foreign-policy experience. Huckabee not so humbly invoked Ronald Reagan, who also, according to the former Arkansas governor, ascended to the presidency with no foreign-policy experience. As Powerline's Paul Mirengoff has pointed out, this is - to say the least - an inapt analogy. Ronald Reagan lived and breathed the global fight with the Soviet Union for decades, and had been an important voice on the right on foreign policy long before he was president.
Mike Huckabee, by contrast, cut his teeth on typical state-level fare in Arkansas and on weight-loss and wellness programs. This is probably why he felt compelled to quip to Imus, "And the ultimate thing is, I may not be the expert that some people are on foreign policy, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night." (Powerline also points out that he used the exact same line on Imus a year earlier when foreign policy came up.) This won't do.
Huckabee did give a long speech on foreign policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in September. It combined a superficial rendering of conventional foreign-policy wisdom - which of course included many unfair criticisms of President Bush - with Huckabee's inimitable folksy delivery. The former governor's bottom line was that we should be nicer to other countries.
It is true that, especially in the first term, the Bush administration undervalued diplomacy. And as the most powerful country in the world (or as Huckabee put it in a long childhood analogy, the kid who is "just good at everything"), we have to be careful to avoid stoking unnecessary feelings of envy. But Huckabee is off the mark in accusing the administration of having a "bunker mentality." We have maintained good relations - in a difficult balancing act - with both India and Pakistan, and with both China and Japan. Relations have warmed with "Old Europe" following the election of leaders in France and Germany who are less vested in anti-Americanism. For better or worse, we have cut a nuclear deal with North Korea, and have had an offer on the table with Iran to break with 30 years of U.S. policy and directly negotiate with them if they fulfill their international obligation and quit enriching uranium. This isn't the stuff of a "bunker mentality."
On Iran, Huckabee is at his most troubling. He accuses the administration of "proceeding down only one track with Iran: armed confrontation." This is false, and the kind of rhetoric you'd expect from DailyKos bloggers, not a Republican presidential candidate. Huckabee thinks it has been a lack of diplomatic engagement that has soured our relations with Iran: "We haven't had diplomatic relations with Iran in almost 30 years, my whole adult life and a lot of good it's done. Putting this in human terms, all of us know that when we stop talking to a parent or a sibling or a friend, it's impossible to accomplish anything, impossible to resolve differences and move the relationship forward. The same is true for countries."
This is the kernel of Huckabee's foreign policy. He wants to anthropomorphize international relations and bring a Christian commitment to the Golden Rule to our affairs with other nations. As he told the Des Moines Register the other day, "You treat others the way you'd like to be treated. That's to me the fundamental issue that has to be re-established in our dealings with other countries."
This is deeply na?ve. Countries aren't people, and the world is more dangerous than a Sunday church social. Threats, deception, and - as a last resort - violence must play a role in international relations. Differences cannot always be worked out through sweet persuasion. A U.S. president who doesn't realize this will repeat the experience of President Jimmy Carter at his most ineffectual.
Other than the general impulse to be nicer, Huckabee's views are the uneven grab bag to be expected from someone who hasn't thought much about foreign policy.
To his credit, he supported "the surge" in Iraq and has spoken forcefully about the threat of Islamic extremism.
He wants to wean us from our dependence on foreign oil, as do the other candidates. Huckabee is unique in his unrealistic estimate of how fast this will happen - by the end of his second term - and in his overestimate of the importance of oil in international relations. ("Why did Iraq and Iran fight?" he asked in his CSIS speech, referring to the war that started in 1980 and that he clearly knows little about. "Oil.")
He wants to boost our intelligence, but seems to think intelligence analysis from afar can be a substitute for combat power on the ground: "I'd rather have more people in Langley so we can have fewer in Baghdad."
He also has twisted priorities when it comes to maintaining warm relations with the rest of the world: He just came out for shutting down Guantanamo Bay to placate international critics of it, but rejects free trade, which not only helps us economically but is an important way to develop close ties with other countries.
In sum, conservatives should have worries about the depth and soundness of Mike Huckabee's foreign-policy views. And staying at a Holiday Inn Express is not going to be enough to allay them.
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online
National Review Online Mike Huckabee's extraordinary rise in the polls means he deserves to be taken seriously as a presidential candidate in a way he hasn't been all year long. Serious candidates have well-formulated views on foreign policy. What are Huckabee's?
He hasn't been asked about them much - reporters prefer to inquire after his views on evolution-but Don Imus, on his resurrected radio show, queried Huckabee the other day about his foreign-policy experience. Huckabee not so humbly invoked Ronald Reagan, who also, according to the former Arkansas governor, ascended to the presidency with no foreign-policy experience. As Powerline's Paul Mirengoff has pointed out, this is - to say the least - an inapt analogy. Ronald Reagan lived and breathed the global fight with the Soviet Union for decades, and had been an important voice on the right on foreign policy long before he was president.
Mike Huckabee, by contrast, cut his teeth on typical state-level fare in Arkansas and on weight-loss and wellness programs. This is probably why he felt compelled to quip to Imus, "And the ultimate thing is, I may not be the expert that some people are on foreign policy, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night." (Powerline also points out that he used the exact same line on Imus a year earlier when foreign policy came up.) This won't do.
Huckabee did give a long speech on foreign policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in September. It combined a superficial rendering of conventional foreign-policy wisdom - which of course included many unfair criticisms of President Bush - with Huckabee's inimitable folksy delivery. The former governor's bottom line was that we should be nicer to other countries.
It is true that, especially in the first term, the Bush administration undervalued diplomacy. And as the most powerful country in the world (or as Huckabee put it in a long childhood analogy, the kid who is "just good at everything"), we have to be careful to avoid stoking unnecessary feelings of envy. But Huckabee is off the mark in accusing the administration of having a "bunker mentality." We have maintained good relations - in a difficult balancing act - with both India and Pakistan, and with both China and Japan. Relations have warmed with "Old Europe" following the election of leaders in France and Germany who are less vested in anti-Americanism. For better or worse, we have cut a nuclear deal with North Korea, and have had an offer on the table with Iran to break with 30 years of U.S. policy and directly negotiate with them if they fulfill their international obligation and quit enriching uranium. This isn't the stuff of a "bunker mentality."
On Iran, Huckabee is at his most troubling. He accuses the administration of "proceeding down only one track with Iran: armed confrontation." This is false, and the kind of rhetoric you'd expect from DailyKos bloggers, not a Republican presidential candidate. Huckabee thinks it has been a lack of diplomatic engagement that has soured our relations with Iran: "We haven't had diplomatic relations with Iran in almost 30 years, my whole adult life and a lot of good it's done. Putting this in human terms, all of us know that when we stop talking to a parent or a sibling or a friend, it's impossible to accomplish anything, impossible to resolve differences and move the relationship forward. The same is true for countries."
This is the kernel of Huckabee's foreign policy. He wants to anthropomorphize international relations and bring a Christian commitment to the Golden Rule to our affairs with other nations. As he told the Des Moines Register the other day, "You treat others the way you'd like to be treated. That's to me the fundamental issue that has to be re-established in our dealings with other countries."
This is deeply na?ve. Countries aren't people, and the world is more dangerous than a Sunday church social. Threats, deception, and - as a last resort - violence must play a role in international relations. Differences cannot always be worked out through sweet persuasion. A U.S. president who doesn't realize this will repeat the experience of President Jimmy Carter at his most ineffectual.
Other than the general impulse to be nicer, Huckabee's views are the uneven grab bag to be expected from someone who hasn't thought much about foreign policy.
In sum, conservatives should have worries about the depth and soundness of Mike Huckabee's foreign-policy views. And staying at a Holiday Inn Express is not going to be enough to allay them.
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online
No wonder the war-loving chickenhawks hate this man. He might actually have the courage and diplomatic skills to avoid wars, rather than create and cause them
How you gruesome lunatics at the NRO live with yourselves is a mystery. I honestly wish you were as smart as you believe yourself to be. You aren''t.
1. He will Eliminate the IRS:
This means you will receive 100% of your paycheck.
2. He will drastically reduce Gas prices:
Switch to alternative fuels, changing supply/demand.
3. He will reduce global warming.
Switch to alternative fuels, no carbon dioxides.
4. He will reduce threat of terrorism.
New fuels cause middle east gov. crack down on them.
5. He will reduce rising Health care costs.
New programs that prevent diseases, not just fix them.
6. He will lead up not just hard right or hard left.
Excellent communicator, will bring parties together.
7. He will lead with principles rather than money.
He cares everybody not just those on Wall Street.
8. He will give Hope to America and enthusiasm.
He plays bass guitar in a band, dynamic personality.
9. He will carry out his goals, not talk about them.
Lost 110 pounds, kept it off, ran 4 Marathons-26.2m
10. He knows the American people is the real boss.
As Governor, his picture frame only shows citizens.
Vote for Mike Huckabee, otherwise you will not be able to enjoy these benefits
Since the other candidates don''''t have anything to say on what they can do for America, they take the easy road and resort to taking cheap shots at Mike. Don%u2019t fall into their trap any longer with negative attacks, let''''s show the critics and the naysayers that Americans have pride and we are ready to elect an honest, humble, trustworthy man for US President.
The fools at the NRO are wrong again. They will only support an idiot who beleives in violence and who will repeat the experience of George Bush as his most ineffectual.
I would never vote for Huckabee. At a minimum any canadidate I vote for would have to be grounded enough in reality to beleive in evolution. Still, I consider a rebuke by the NRO on foreign policy, given our current state, a resounding endorsement for any candidate.
Huck is from the same town and state, Hope Arkansas, as Slick Willie and Mike Huckabee is justed as smooth talking and slick.
Where am I wrong?
http://goupstate.us/index.php/lanefiller/2007/11/02/title_14