Dec. 10, 2007

Huckabee's Holiday Inn Express Campaign

National Review Online: Surging GOP Hopeful's Foreign Policy Views Don't Stand Up To Scrutiny

  • Play CBS Video Video Huckabee Under Fire

    Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee's success in the polls has opened the door for intense scrutiny. Bianca Solorzano reports on the issues that have raised questions about his leadership.

  • Video Analysis: Mike Huckabee

    "Only On The Web": CBS News' Jeff Greefield and Nicole Wallace talk about what might make presidential candidate Mike Huckabee's campaign deflate after enjoying some of the limelight.

  • Video The Rise Of Mike Huckabee

    A year ago, he was considered a long-shot candidate. Now Mike Huckabee leads the polls in Iowa and South Carolina. How did he go from the fringe to the forefront? Jeff Greenfield reports.

  • Photo Essay Mike Huckabee

    A look at the life and times of Mike Huckabee.

  • Interactive Campaign 2008

    Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.

(National Review Online)  This column was written by the editors of National Review Online.

Mike Huckabee’s extraordinary rise in the polls means he deserves to be taken seriously as a presidential candidate in a way he hasn’t been all year long. Serious candidates have well-formulated views on foreign policy. What are Huckabee’s?

He hasn’t been asked about them much - reporters prefer to inquire after his views on evolution-but Don Imus, on his resurrected radio show, queried Huckabee the other day about his foreign-policy experience. Huckabee not so humbly invoked Ronald Reagan, who also, according to the former Arkansas governor, ascended to the presidency with no foreign-policy experience. As Powerline’s Paul Mirengoff has pointed out, this is - to say the least - an inapt analogy. Ronald Reagan lived and breathed the global fight with the Soviet Union for decades, and had been an important voice on the right on foreign policy long before he was president.

Mike Huckabee, by contrast, cut his teeth on typical state-level fare in Arkansas and on weight-loss and wellness programs. This is probably why he felt compelled to quip to Imus, “And the ultimate thing is, I may not be the expert that some people are on foreign policy, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night.” (Powerline also points out that he used the exact same line on Imus a year earlier when foreign policy came up.) This won’t do.

Huckabee did give a long speech on foreign policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in September. It combined a superficial rendering of conventional foreign-policy wisdom - which of course included many unfair criticisms of President Bush - with Huckabee’s inimitable folksy delivery. The former governor’s bottom line was that we should be nicer to other countries.

It is true that, especially in the first term, the Bush administration undervalued diplomacy. And as the most powerful country in the world (or as Huckabee put it in a long childhood analogy, the kid who is “just good at everything”), we have to be careful to avoid stoking unnecessary feelings of envy. But Huckabee is off the mark in accusing the administration of having a “bunker mentality.” We have maintained good relations - in a difficult balancing act - with both India and Pakistan, and with both China and Japan. Relations have warmed with “Old Europe” following the election of leaders in France and Germany who are less vested in anti-Americanism. For better or worse, we have cut a nuclear deal with North Korea, and have had an offer on the table with Iran to break with 30 years of U.S. policy and directly negotiate with them if they fulfill their international obligation and quit enriching uranium. This isn’t the stuff of a “bunker mentality.”

On Iran, Huckabee is at his most troubling. He accuses the administration of “proceeding down only one track with Iran: armed confrontation.” This is false, and the kind of rhetoric you’d expect from DailyKos bloggers, not a Republican presidential candidate. Huckabee thinks it has been a lack of diplomatic engagement that has soured our relations with Iran: “We haven’t had diplomatic relations with Iran in almost 30 years, my whole adult life and a lot of good it’s done. Putting this in human terms, all of us know that when we stop talking to a parent or a sibling or a friend, it’s impossible to accomplish anything, impossible to resolve differences and move the relationship forward. The same is true for countries.”

This is the kernel of Huckabee’s foreign policy. He wants to anthropomorphize international relations and bring a Christian commitment to the Golden Rule to our affairs with other nations. As he told the Des Moines Register the other day, “You treat others the way you’d like to be treated. That’s to me the fundamental issue that has to be re-established in our dealings with other countries.”

This is deeply naïve. Countries aren’t people, and the world is more dangerous than a Sunday church social. Threats, deception, and - as a last resort - violence must play a role in international relations. Differences cannot always be worked out through sweet persuasion. A U.S. president who doesn’t realize this will repeat the experience of President Jimmy Carter at his most ineffectual.

Other than the general impulse to be nicer, Huckabee’s views are the uneven grab bag to be expected from someone who hasn’t thought much about foreign policy.

  • To his credit, he supported “the surge” in Iraq and has spoken forcefully about the threat of Islamic extremism.

  • He wants to wean us from our dependence on foreign oil, as do the other candidates. Huckabee is unique in his unrealistic estimate of how fast this will happen - by the end of his second term - and in his overestimate of the importance of oil in international relations. (“Why did Iraq and Iran fight?” he asked in his CSIS speech, referring to the war that started in 1980 and that he clearly knows little about. “Oil.”)

  • He wants to boost our intelligence, but seems to think intelligence analysis from afar can be a substitute for combat power on the ground: “I’d rather have more people in Langley so we can have fewer in Baghdad.”

  • He also has twisted priorities when it comes to maintaining warm relations with the rest of the world: He just came out for shutting down Guantanamo Bay to placate international critics of it, but rejects free trade, which not only helps us economically but is an important way to develop close ties with other countries.

    In sum, conservatives should have worries about the depth and soundness of Mike Huckabee’s foreign-policy views. And staying at a Holiday Inn Express is not going to be enough to allay them.

    Reprinted with permission from National Review Online.



    America's Premier Site for Conservative News, Analysis, and Opinion.

    Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
    by roger3815 December 11, 2007 3:50 AM EST
    Huck is just another theocratic nut job.
    Reply to this comment
    by roger_inkart December 11, 2007 3:14 AM EST
    He accuses the administration of %u201Cproceeding down only one track with Iran: armed confrontation.%u201D

    No wonder the war-loving chickenhawks hate this man. He might actually have the courage and diplomatic skills to avoid wars, rather than create and cause them

    How you gruesome lunatics at the NRO live with yourselves is a mystery. I honestly wish you were as smart as you believe yourself to be. You aren''t.
    Reply to this comment
    by roger_inkart December 11, 2007 3:10 AM EST
    Anyone who can frighten the sleazy neocon maggots at the NRO into doing a hatchet job such as this can''t be all bad.
    Reply to this comment
    by giantrobot2 December 11, 2007 1:22 AM EST
    Mike Huckabee facts:

    1. He will Eliminate the IRS:
    This means you will receive 100% of your paycheck.

    2. He will drastically reduce Gas prices:
    Switch to alternative fuels, changing supply/demand.

    3. He will reduce global warming.
    Switch to alternative fuels, no carbon dioxides.

    4. He will reduce threat of terrorism.
    New fuels cause middle east gov. crack down on them.

    5. He will reduce rising Health care costs.
    New programs that prevent diseases, not just fix them.

    6. He will lead up not just hard right or hard left.
    Excellent communicator, will bring parties together.

    7. He will lead with principles rather than money.
    He cares everybody not just those on Wall Street.

    8. He will give Hope to America and enthusiasm.
    He plays bass guitar in a band, dynamic personality.

    9. He will carry out his goals, not talk about them.
    Lost 110 pounds, kept it off, ran 4 Marathons-26.2m

    10. He knows the American people is the real boss.
    As Governor, his picture frame only shows citizens.

    Vote for Mike Huckabee, otherwise you will not be able to enjoy these benefits

    Since the other candidates don''''t have anything to say on what they can do for America, they take the easy road and resort to taking cheap shots at Mike. Don%u2019t fall into their trap any longer with negative attacks, let''''s show the critics and the naysayers that Americans have pride and we are ready to elect an honest, humble, trustworthy man for US President.

    Reply to this comment
    by imnho December 10, 2007 11:00 PM EST
    I don''t think that he has a chance of winning the presidentcy. Still he may provide a little comic relief. A person who does not belive in evolution and will try to quarntine everyone wirh AIDS is a person with too much politcal baggage.
    Reply to this comment
    by elz523 December 10, 2007 9:40 PM EST
    Countries aren%u2019t people, and the world is more dangerous than a Sunday church social. Threats, deception, and - as a last resort - violence must play a role in international relations. Differences cannot always be worked out through sweet persuasion. A U.S. president who doesn%u2019t realize this will repeat the experience of President Jimmy Carter at his most ineffectual.

    The fools at the NRO are wrong again. They will only support an idiot who beleives in violence and who will repeat the experience of George Bush as his most ineffectual.

    I would never vote for Huckabee. At a minimum any canadidate I vote for would have to be grounded enough in reality to beleive in evolution. Still, I consider a rebuke by the NRO on foreign policy, given our current state, a resounding endorsement for any candidate.
    Reply to this comment
    by perception5 December 10, 2007 8:43 PM EST
    A vote for olde Huck will be a vote to put an end to the GOP.

    Huck is from the same town and state, Hope Arkansas, as Slick Willie and Mike Huckabee is justed as smooth talking and slick.

    Where am I wrong?
    Reply to this comment
    by davek455 December 10, 2007 8:01 PM EST
    Huckabee is indeed ignorant. Case in point is his 1992 statements on AIDS/HIV. He now claims there was confusion at the time. WRONG. Any confusion out there was cleared up by 1987/1988. He is either lying or was severely, completely ignorant and in the dark on a subject of national and profound importance.
    Reply to this comment
    by edw987 December 10, 2007 7:52 PM EST
    Pastor Huckabee is a tax and spender who is pro illegal immigration and pro Iraqi war. He has advocated college tuition breaks for illegal aliens. He has pardoned or commuted the sentences of violent criminals at the behest of other Evangelical pastors in Arkansas. These criminals then went on to rape and kill again. He took every gift in office that he could find. He wants to continue spending $1 trillion a year on foreign adventurism. He has asked for isolation of all AIDs patients and does not recant it. He thinks that homosexuality is a disease. Some of those who know him said he lost the 100 pounds by having gastric bypass surgery. Yet he says you can lose 100 pounds fast through good living. Not sure this is the best candidate. The thing is the Evangelicals have anointed him so he will get their vote come H--l or high water, so to speak.
    Reply to this comment
    by lanefiller1 December 10, 2007 6:47 PM EST
    Anyone interested in what Huckabee is really like face to face should try this funny (but it actually happened) column:
    http://goupstate.us/index.php/lanefiller/2007/11/02/title_14
    Reply to this comment
    by fairmark December 10, 2007 6:42 PM EST
    Dear NRO and ultra-smart bloggers,
    It must SUCK to have all your precious wisdom falling on millions of deaf or dumb ears! Ha Ha! GO HUCK!
    Reply to this comment
    by sweetness230 December 10, 2007 6:20 PM EST
    Typical Repub hick southern Baptist Bible thumper, judgmental as all get out, and about as backwoods and inept for presidential material as it could possibly get.

    I say to Repubs, for God''s sake get the religion out of politics and do it now for all of our good. You are doing "faith" no good by trying to forced it down other''s throats. You will only manage to turn them farther away from whatever it is you are trying to sell. Got it? If not, please do for it''s way past time.

    Huckabee, what a joke. Can''t you R''s do any better than that? If not, you''re in for a very rude awakening.
    Reply to this comment
    by anzianomike December 10, 2007 3:59 PM EST
    The problem isn''t just that Huckabee has no experience, it might be nice to have a new perspective on foreign policy; it''s that he has no clue. Simplifying International Relations through an analogy involving family spats shows how ignorant he is. We do need change with our diplomacy, but what Huckabee promotes is too rosey to be credible. A president needs to be willing to leverage everything at his disposal to encourage democratic growth. Bush has relied too much on the sword, but Huckabee swings the pendulum too far in replacing that sword with teddy bears and chocolates for our enemies. A president''s primary job is to protect American interests. Huckabee is too steeped in the "One World" view of international relations to perform that job well. He''s everything that''s bad about Wilson combined with everything that''s bad about Carter - unbridled idealism plus weakness inspired by evangelism. He would be a disaster.
    Reply to this comment
    by kwbagwel December 10, 2007 3:51 PM EST
    You are wrong in suggesting that Mike Huckabee does not support free trade. Actually, he very strongly agrees with free trade.
    Reply to this comment
    by Razzl December 10, 2007 3:30 PM EST
    Actually, all of Huckabee''s criticisms are on the mark. Ask the public this question--whom do you trust, Huckabee or Bush? Bushe''s mistakes have been so monumental and catastrophic that virtually any citizen of good character without any foreign policy experience would have done better. NRO is truly the propaganda vehicle for *** Cheney''s ongoing dictatorship and not a vehicle for discussing conservative political thought in public discourse. It''s really time for CBS to print some opinion from other parts of the conservative movement (and a more balanced share of space for liberal thought, too) and not continue to grant NRO unlimited space to propagandize just because they claim to be the most influential journal in a White House where nobody reads or cares what anybody else thinks anyway...
    Reply to this comment
    by clestes-2009 December 10, 2007 3:23 PM EST
    Another NRO article way off the truth. Huckabee is right about the lack of serious diplomatic effort on the part of the Bush admin.

    They are only joking about talking with Iran. Their policy has always been one of aggression and still is. If they thought the Pentagon and American people would stand for it, they would attack Iran tomorrow.

    But in fact, at all levels except Air Force, the top brass are united against attacking Iran. Not to mention the majority of American people.

    Everyone except Bush/Cheney and co, neocrazies and the rep candidates except Ron Paul has long since realized that diplomacy is the only route to take with Iran at the time.

    Their idiocy on Iran is only one of the reasons they will lose next year. I have never seen a group of politicians so off the pulse of the American people as the current group of rep candidates, except Ron Paul.

    And really there is no excuse for it. Polls tell the story. And everyone of them says the same thing. We are on the wrong track. Iraq is not worth it. No attacking Iran. The American economy can''t take it.

    How much more plain can it be said??
    Reply to this comment
    See all 16 Comments
  • 60 Minutes

    The secrets of tennis legend Andre Agassi; the growing threat of cyber wars; and more.
    Read More

    Latest News
    News in Pictures
    Scroll Left Scroll Right
    • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

      Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

    • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

      Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

    • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

      A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

    • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

      Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

    • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

      The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

    • Orlando Office Shooting Orlando Office Shooting

      A Gunman Opens Fire at the Offices of an Engineering Firm Where He Once Worked

    Connect with CBS News

    Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: