February 11, 2009 3:47 PM

15,000 More To Go To Iraq, Afghanistan

(CBS/AP)  The Pentagon announced Monday that five Army National Guard units have been alerted that they are going to serve in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The units include some 8,000 troops going to the Iraq war and 7,000 to Afghanistan, all as replacement units to deploy in the summer of 2009.

They are being alerted now to give them the most time possible to complete the training they'll need for their missions and to allow "a greater measure of predictability for family members and flexibility for" their civilian employers, the department said in a statement.

The units for Iraq will be assigned a security force mission including base defense and route security in Iraq and Kuwait. They are:

-The 32nd Brigade Combat Team from Wisconsin. Part of the unit had also been mobilized in 2005 for duty in Iraq.

-The 41st Brigade Combat Team from Oregon. About a third of the unit has already served in Afghanistan.

-The 155th Brigade Combat Team from Mississippi, which has already served in Iraq.

Those going to Afghanistan are:

-The 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team from Georgia, which already has served in Iraq. It will concentrate on training Afghan National Security Forces.

-The 53rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team from Florida, which left for its first tour in Afghanistan in mid-2006. It is to assume battle space in Afghanistan, where it will perform a full range of operations, the Pentagon said.

While active-duty soldiers and smaller Guard units and members have returned to Iraq for multiple tours, the Guard now is trying to send entire brigades back together to the battlefront on grounds they work more effectively as teams. Brigades generally have about 3,500 troops. Because people come and go from units, it's not possible to immediately determine how many of the people being sent will be going for repeat tours.

Right now Guard members account for roughly a fifth of the Army in Iraq and Afghanistan - dramatically lower than levels during part of 2005, when the Guard soldiers made up about 50 percent of the force in Iraq.

Under a Pentagon policy announced this year, Guard members will serve on active duty for a year.

The announcement affects about 15,000 soldiers, and is part of the regular rotation of forces, according to the Army Times.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 68 Comments
by samsel3 December 4, 2007 5:03 PM EST
The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is more of a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are in Cheney''''s energy policy. The Caspian oil pipeline will be cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran. This pipeline was the reason for the invasion of Afghanistan.The Caspian sea area holds a third of the worlds oil,and south asian markets are the target for their oil trade.Cheney''s energy policy is at the root of all these middleast wars, the court sealed all documents associated with it, and the national media are not allowed to discuss it. That''s the real deal and this should be a cause for the concern of both parties.
More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the Caspian sea pipeline. Iran is a target of Cheney, because it would be cheaper to pass through part of Iran with the pipeline than the current plan. Eventually the line goes through Pakistan,to India and Nepal. Remember China warned the US not to interfere with their direct oil buying contracts signed with Iran a few months ago. China said that their would be dire consequences if the US interfered. China is quietly building up there war machine and everyone should be concerned.

Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith December 4, 2007 4:25 PM EST
Thank you to the brave troops and their families. These outstanding young men and women have volunteered to sacrifice so that the rest of us may live in peace and security.
Reply to this comment
by erpcat December 4, 2007 3:27 PM EST
What was it before the Bush invasion ?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by IOWEIGN at 09:16 PM : Dec 03, 2007

NONE of the above, our troops was never there before this invasion, and as for as the iraqi civilians i am sure they was not dying because of the u.s. gov''t.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales December 4, 2007 3:21 PM EST
Soldiers of the Guard! Before you go on this mission, understand who was responsible for the ''attack on America'' of September 11, 2001...

The former president of Italy, Mr. Cossiga, states that the Mossad and the CIA ran the attacks on the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon. KNOW YOUR ENEMY!!

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/cossiga_ex_italian_pres_intel_agencies_know_911_inside_job.htm
Reply to this comment
by bareemperor December 4, 2007 3:19 PM EST
9/II = CIA false flag op?

Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act = Constitution Burned?

SB 1959 = Institutionalized hatred and fear?

C''mon, babyboomers - you stopped these same tyrants before, it''s time to act once more.

Remove the traitors before 9/III
Reply to this comment
by king77shaw December 4, 2007 3:17 PM EST
just in time for the holidays - how sad .. I''m sure none of them come from the families of the wealthy elite who profit from this so-called war ..
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 December 4, 2007 3:14 PM EST
The administrations interest in Iran & nukes is more of a smoke screen for their real agenda. Their true interests are in Cheney''''''''s energy policy. The Caspian oil pipeline will be cheaper to construct if they can go through Iran. This pipeline was the reason for the invasion of Afghanistan.The Caspian sea area holds a third of the worlds oil,and south asian markets are the target for their oil trade.Cheney''''s energy policy is at the root of all these middleast wars, the court sealed all documents associated with it, and the national media are not allowed to discuss it. That''''s the real deal and this should be a cause for the concern of both parties.
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 December 4, 2007 3:12 PM EST
More troops are needed in Afghanistan to protect the contractors building the Caspian sea pipeline. The Caspian sea area holds a third of the worlds oil and south asia is the target market. Iran is also a target of Cheney, because it would be cheaper to pass through part of Iran with the pipeline than the current plan. Eventually the line goes through Pakistan, India and Nepal. This is the real deal!!!!
Reply to this comment
by redbarron73 December 4, 2007 2:58 PM EST
http://911blogger.com/node/10025
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 December 4, 2007 2:57 PM EST
Are the Republicans listening to us we said out and they keep sending more troops to Iraq.

Well, GOP you had your chance and now I don''t think it will matter what you do. There will be a blood bath in 2008 for the GOP and I don''t want to hear any crying because if I do I think along with me many Americans are going to lose it.
Reply to this comment
See all 68 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook