TRENT, Texas, Dec. 2, 2007

Winds Of Change Blow In Texas

Once Known For Its Oil And Gas, West Texas Is At The Center Of The Wind Energy Boom

  • Signs of a new energy revolution in West Texas: Wind turbines sprouting up as fast as wildflowers. But windmills are also setting neighbor against neighbor.

    Signs of a new energy revolution in West Texas: Wind turbines sprouting up as fast as wildflowers. But windmills are also setting neighbor against neighbor.  (CBS)

  • Interactive Alternative Energy

    Learn about the types of renewable energy that are used in the U.S. and the regions of the country considered to be most suitable for each kind.

  • Interactive Energy Savers

    Stay warm, save money this winter

(CBS)  West Texas is cowboy country. Here, scratching out a living is often dictated by what a cow can fetch, or what a barrel of oil brings.

Dry, dusty towns are dotted with reminders of hard times: vacant motels; rusted cars parked at drive-in theaters that have long stood silent - theaters where crowds once flocked to see films that reflected their lives, like "Giant."

Set in West Texas, "Giant" told the real-life story of cattle barons refusing to change with the times.

That resistance to change and the desire to preserve a way of life, still remains. But today, the cause of concern is different - with rusted and retired pump jacks standing as witnesses of booms and busts gone by, a new "giant" looms on the horizon: wind turbines. They're sprouting as fast as Texas wildflowers.

They say everything is bigger in Texas, and windmills are no exception. One windmill is taller than the Statue of Liberty. Its huge turbine is longer than an 18-wheeler, and each one can generate enough power for more than 500 homes.

From the air you can see them on almost every mesa, stretching for miles.

"You can look back over here, and keep seein' 'em, another run and another run and another run," rancher Raymond McDaniel, who has more than 50 wind turbines on his land, told CBS News correspondent Hari Sreenivasan.

For most ranchers in these parts, McDaniel says it was a struggle just to break even in the cattle business.

"There was no water, there was no grass, there was no market," he said. "So everything went downhill pretty good."

But the money they receive from leasing land to power companies and their turbines, he says, has given ranchers some breathing room - money to better tend to their land and their cattle.

But not everyone is happy about the use of wind. In some cases, it is setting neighbor against neighbor.

"I'm offended that my neighbor would sell himself for money and not care what it did to me," Dale Rankin said. "I'm all for people making money. I'm all for people making a profit, having an income, but I think you need to be considerate of your neighbors when you're in that pursuit."

Greg Wortham is one of a new breed of prospectors pursuing wind-energy riches. He cashed in his retirement savings to start the West Texas Wind Energy Consortium and is trying to rally local support for renewable energy. He says the turbines are multiplying.

"West Texas is the 4th largest nation in wind energy today," Wortham said. "There's Germany, Spain, India, and West Texas."

And he's no carpet-bagger: Wortham grew up in Sweetwater, Texas and walked its streets back when it was an oil and gas town. "You could always tell you were home even if you were sleepin' in the car on the way home because you begin to smell oil, which was a beautiful smell," he said.

After high school he headed off to college and the big city where he worked as an energy attorney in New York and Washington, D.C. Now he's back, living in a renovated house just off Main Street, and he was recently elected mayor.

"I didn't come back here to be mayor, that wasn't the plan, but part of it is having been in N.Y. on Sept. 11th and realizing that you have one country, one hometown, and one lifetime to do something," he said.

For him, that something is helping to spark a wind energy gold rush - so far more than $6 billion has been invested in 120 West Texas counties.

"We hear nationally that people are being laid off by tens of thousands. Well, they need to come here. We hear nationally that housing starts are down. Well, West Texas needs hundreds of new, very high quality homes," he said.

To meet hiring demands, the community college has added courses in wind technology. Students are shifting gears to train for careers in wind-farming because the pay is two to three times above the local average.

The industry has given the entire region a second wind - generating new businesses and new construction. Schools are scoring as well. Tiny Trent, Texas has only 60 students in its high school, what used to be one of the poorest schools in the state. It is now state of the art.

"We've got two computer labs - one for the elementary and one for high school," Trent school superintendent Greg Priddy said. "We're getting projectors for every class room."

Priddy says none of this would have been possible without a healthy new tax base fueled by the turbines on the mesa behind the school.

But opponents like Dale Rankin worry all that income may be short-lived. He wonders what might happen if tax subsidies the companies rely on, come to an end.

"They'll shut 'em off and walk away, and we'll be left with thousands and thousands of these monsters littering the landscape," he said.

But that's not the way ranchers like Raymond McDaniel see it. When he looks at all the windmills he has one simple thought:

"A changing world," he said. "Changing world."

© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 66 Comments
by chubbyhubby9 June 23, 2008 11:00 PM EDT
I understand that change can be hard if it''s not for the better. How much "better" can a person expect? Wind is as free as the sun in West Texas and a wind mill is a far sight "better" than a solar panel would be. Mr. Rankin is too short sighted in his worries about subsidies over the long term independence of this cheap energy. Even if the life of a wind mill is 25 years (at the rate of five hundred homes per wind mill) proper distribution of that energy would far exceed even a 10 year subsidies. As far as the unsightly poles, in six months Mr. Rankin, like city folk, won''t even know they''re there.
Reply to this comment
by cez4me June 22, 2008 3:58 PM EDT
I am interested in other websites that have renewable energy. I''ve spent a lot of time researching it but come up with a lot of dead ends. The Wind resources in Texas saves a LOT of tax Dollars. Most of those Ranchers WERE subsidized with Gov''t money. I''ve been through Texas 5 times this last year and I don''t think they are as ugly as some think.
Reply to this comment
by decondo June 22, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
Does anybody notice what this does to the beauty of the landscape? It''s a hideous sight to some of us. I hope it''s not a flash in the pan. There are more aesthetic approaches to wind harvesting, and, I think there are better newer technologies for capturing wind energy than standard propellers.
Reply to this comment
by emanresu123 December 4, 2007 1:01 PM EST
Nameverify, you are bright and passionate. Don''t let foul language and insults discredit your message.
Reply to this comment
by emanresu123 December 4, 2007 12:07 PM EST
I am very encouraged by the direction and content of this blog! I have felt all along Americans would figure this out before the countrysides are covered with spinners. I have devoted much of 2007 to understanding wind energy''s uniqueness - pros and cons. In the end it is the methods used by the industry to gain approval for siting that bothers me most. That''s not to say the power they produce is reliable or meaningful in the big picture or that the idea isn''t an inefficient use of public funds, just that the industry''s lack of moral fiber is the standout feature in my mind. We have a web site in WESTERN OHIO that discussed WIND ENERGY CONCERNS. If you are interested, please Google to it.
Thank you!
Reply to this comment
by ukjake12 December 3, 2007 11:21 AM EST
Unfortunately, ''windfarms'' don''t work.

There selling point: they ''reduce CO2'' emissions. However, in order to do so they would need to allow somer percentage of either baseload (the constantly running generation, generally coal or nuclear) or spinning reserve (the adjustable output, generally gas-fired) to be taken offline in proportion to the amount of ''wind-generated'' electricity added in.

That has never happened; no country, anywhere, has been able to cut back its conventional production and, in fact, C02 emissions from conventional have increased, since they must ramp up and down (inefficiently burning coal and gas) to compensate for wind variability.

Wind does NOT replace coal or gas; not even a little bit.

I wonder what it''s called when folk are forced to purchase a useless--totally useless--product at a high price, gaining no benefit?

There''s a word for that, I believe.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 December 3, 2007 10:43 AM EST
Thanks to everyone for the links and the consideration given.
Reply to this comment
by jowand December 3, 2007 9:16 AM EST
radiob you can purchase everything at this web site, dozens of others like this around the country

http://www.affordable-solar.com/renewable.energy.wind.htm
Reply to this comment
by jowand December 3, 2007 8:53 AM EST
Windmills have been shut down in N California because someone says they are dangerous to some bird species.
They only work when there is a constant wind speed over about the 10 mph minimum for start up; this rules out huge parts of the US. For personal use you need battery storage; with solar electric panels also if you want a reasonably balanced power supply; plus a backup generator,. Cost for a system, 10 kWhrs per day, to supply a smaller home about 30k to 40k depending how much work you want to do, and it will still require a major lifestyle modification.
Reply to this comment
by itgranny December 3, 2007 8:34 AM EST
http://www.awea.org/faq/wwt_smallwind.html

This site has a ton of info.

Reply to this comment
by edward1975-2009 December 3, 2007 3:28 AM EST
radiob: Did a quick search under power generating windmills, without the spaces of course, and there is a whole truckload of sites. So I will leave it to your discrestion as to which to choose, have fun and enjoy.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 December 3, 2007 2:11 AM EST
This post finally turned inquistive and intelligent, thanks to the posters who have given this some thought.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 December 3, 2007 2:08 AM EST
People are putting up smaller version of these windmills for their homes and from what I''''ve read they like them. Plus the fact that most of these folks enjoy electric bills of under $ 10.00. And some have said that if they have a surplus of juice the power companies are obligated to buy it. And when we speak of start up cost, I don''''t know about your state, but here in Illinois, we subsidize the power company with tax dollars and they are given breaks on taxes for years. So it looks to me that the only ones whoever suffer from start up cost are us the people. But the thing is this is a renewable resource and as of yet no one has found any fallout from the use of them. Sounds to me like a win-win situation.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Edward1975


Can you provide any links with associated cost to put one up for a home? Links that might give a structural design also would be nice.
Reply to this comment
by runningralph December 3, 2007 2:05 AM EST
There is a company called Solardyne that has a generator rated at 225kw listed at $168,350. The cost of a kwh in the US averages 8.83cents according to one chart I looked up. Assuming there is enought wind to bring this machine up to capacity 1/2 the time that works out to $87,000/yr worth of electricity. Of course there are installation and maintenance costs. I don''t have a way to estimate that. Also there would have to be some equipment to keep this generator in phase with whatever grid it tied into. I can''t figure that either. But it seems to me if I had some land in a place like West Texas I would buy one of these things and go into business. Where I live power companies are regulated by the state. If the power company doesn''t allow independants to go on their grid I would try to work out a deal to sell power to them cheaper than they generate it. Seems to me if the wind farmers in West Texas are just collecting rent for the space they are missing the boat.
Could someone show me the numbers to prove I am wrong?
Reply to this comment
by edward1975-2009 December 3, 2007 1:54 AM EST
People are putting up smaller version of these windmills for their homes and from what I''ve read they like them. Plus the fact that most of these folks enjoy electric bills of under $ 10.00. And some have said that if they have a surplus of juice the power companies are obligated to buy it. And when we speak of start up cost, I don''t know about your state, but here in Illinois, we subsidize the power company with tax dollars and they are given breaks on taxes for years. So it looks to me that the only ones whoever suffer from start up cost are us the people. But the thing is this is a renewable resource and as of yet no one has found any fallout from the use of them. Sounds to me like a win-win situation.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 December 3, 2007 1:21 AM EST
Posted by nameverify at 07:56 PM : Dec 02, 2007

You calling me stupid when you voted for Bush? Excuse me, but...ummmmmm when you get your head out of your behind and if you find a brain cell take it an go live in Iraq where the surge is working. :)
Reply to this comment
by itgranny December 3, 2007 12:38 AM EST
http://green.jiminypeak.com/page.php?PageID=302
Here''s a link that I found that answers a few questions.

They''re saying ~4million to build a 1.5megawatt windmill. This is a little one by the standards in my community. Most of the new ones going up now are 3megawatt and a 3 megawatt one will serve 700 to 800 homes (this is another figure that''s kind of hard to pin down).

This article was saying 30 to 50 years useful life. That''s a lot longer than what they''re saying around here. They tell me 8-10 years. But that may be the guts of the thing rather than the whole structure. I would imagine maintenance can be pretty costly for something like this, especially since you put them out where the elements are windy and rough.

WE need to look at this industry and figure out how it''s going to be run. Right now it''s looking like the medical industry. Inflated costs everywhere you look and it''s going to kill the industry in it''s infancy. Competition and inovation will save it. WE really have to figure out the storage issues.

Again, i believe wind can be used, but we need to work out the bugs.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 December 3, 2007 12:21 AM EST
Posted by donbl1 at 08:39 PM : Dec 02, 2007



If you deal with it as an eternal cost per unit it is prohibitive. But it isn''t the initial cost might be 1 billion USD to start, but after the initial start the cost per unit drops to near zero (Minus maintainence). I mean you dont have to make the wind blow, you don''t have to do anything to generate all the kilowats a generator is capable of (not even dam the river. where is the giant cost now, (Please, I am not being mean and bear no ill-will to you or any of the posters) this is a No Brainer, get rid of the crooks and drop foreign oil use our shale oil and coal until we get the Hydrogen motor working properly.
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 December 2, 2007 11:39 PM EST
Tools, I think you missed my point.

The amortorized investment required to get (1) KWH is more than the operating costs for existing plants.

Should government subsidize? If the "community" goal is improved air quality and reduced reliance on foriegn oil, then subidization is understandable.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 December 2, 2007 11:24 PM EST
Posted by donbl1 at 07:47 PM : Dec 02, 2007



I understand initial investment and the things entailed in it, the technology is here now and doesn''t have to be developed, the only cost is that of the generators and towers plus the land. the powerlines exist already so they are moot. My question is why do they require subsidation. the product is a no-brainer and there ''should'' be investors coming out of the woodwork, but no, somebody is causing problems because they do not want the competition from free stuff (wind) to interfere with the price of Oil or whatever.
Reply to this comment
See all 66 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • The Berlin Wall The Berlin Wall

    Photographer Peter Turnley Captures the Fall

  • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

    Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

  • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

    Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

    Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

  • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

    The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: