SEATTLE, Nov. 30, 2007

Boy Who Refused Blood Transfusion Dies

Jehovah's Witness, 14, Dies Hours After Judge Upholds His Right To Refuse Medical Treatment

  • Dennis Lindberg attends an after-school function Dec. 14, 2005, as a sixth-grader at Lincoln Elementary School in Mount Vernon, Wash.

    Dennis Lindberg attends an after-school function Dec. 14, 2005, as a sixth-grader at Lincoln Elementary School in Mount Vernon, Wash.  (AP/Skagit Valley Herald/Frank Varga)

  • Interactive Eye on Religion

    Find out more about the beliefs, practices and history of some of the world's major religions.

  • Interactive Cancer

    Learn about the most common cancers, who gets them and how they are treated.

(AP)  A few hours after a judge ruled that a 14-year-old Jehovah's Witness sick with leukemia had the right to refuse a blood transfusion that might have helped him, the boy died, a newspaper reported.

Dennis Lindberg died Wednesday night at Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, his father, Dennis Lindberg Sr., told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

Hospital spokeswoman Teri Thomas said she could not confirm or deny anything about the case at the request of the boy's legal guardian, his aunt Dianna Mincin.

Earlier Wednesday, Skagit County Superior Court Judge John Meyer had denied a motion by the state to force the boy to have a blood transfusion. The judge said the eighth-grader knew "he's basically giving himself a death sentence."

"I don't believe Dennis' decision is the result of any coercion. He is mature and understands the consequences of his decision," the judge said during the hearing. "I don't think Dennis is trying to commit suicide. This isn't something Dennis just came upon, and he believes with the transfusion he would be unclean and unworthy."

Doctors had given Dennis a 70 percent chance of surviving the next five years with the transfusions and other treatment, the judge added.

Doctors diagnosed the boy's leukemia in early November. They began chemotherapy at Children's Hospital, but stopped a week ago because his blood count was too low, the Skagit Valley Herald reported. The boy refused the transfusion on religious grounds.

However, his birth parents, Lindberg and Rachel Wherry, who do not have custody and flew from Boise, Idaho, to be at the hearing, believed their son should have had the transfusion and suggested he had been unduly influenced by his aunt, who is also a Jehovah's Witness.

The aunt has declined to talk about the case.

The boy's father told the Post-Intelligencer the ruling shocked him but after visiting his son later Wednesday, he decided not to appeal. He said doctors told him that the boy, unconscious since Tuesday, had likely suffered brain damage.


© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 124 Comments
by timeisrunningout August 12, 2009 11:10 PM EDT
in reality the boy believed blood is sacred just as the bible teaches. He had faith and showed acts of faith. Calling ones that try their best to live by bible principles "religious nuts" is so insulting and shows no love for neighbor.
Reply to this comment
by chad16437 December 2, 2007 9:52 PM EST
The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version (published 1971) Gen 9:4, 16 "Only you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood... remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature." Lev 17:14 "For the life of every creature is the blood of it... You shall not eat the blood of any creature, for the life of every creature is its blood; whoever eats it shall be cut off." Lev 7:26,27 "Moreover you shall eat no blood whatever... Whoever eats any blood, that person shall be cut off from his people." Acts 15:28, 29 "For it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things: that you abstain from... blood. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well. Farewell." Acts 21:25 "But as for the Gentiles who have believed... they should abstain from... blood." 1 Sam 15:22 "... to obey is better than sacrifice." Mark 8:35,36 "For whoever would save his life will lose it; and whoever loses his life for my sake and the gospel''s will save it. For what does it profit a man, to gain the whole world and forfeit his life?" John 11:25 "Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live" John 5:28,29 "the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life..." Titus 1:2 "in hope of eternal life which God, who never lies, promised ages ago"
Reply to this comment
by my2centss December 2, 2007 12:21 PM EST
This boy sounds like he was a very strong and brave child. Who else when faced with unbearable pain and certain death could hold their principles? At 14 even.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 December 2, 2007 2:12 AM EST
Gramma , If the boy is ward of the State as a minor as he had foster parents,the Judge is wrong. Yer has to be a emancipated and that make ye an adult even at his age. But if not he was a child. I only met one teen that was emancipated. That is was when We lived in MO we knew Tim. Gram, I like ye. Yer think abortion is entered to lightly..It is not. If there is a health reason then yer rather the female who is too sick to carry the unborn. I think not.
Now back to this boy. I don''t think a religion should deny medial care. I have met persons of that church and they are cold to outsiders. We have sep of church and atate.
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs December 1, 2007 5:25 PM EST
Posted by Nancy_Naive at 01:48 PM : Dec 01, 2007
+ report abuse

************

so what do you want??for GOD to miracle you a quality of life??hate the religion but dont hate GOD as the saying goes..SUCKA!
Reply to this comment
by grammawhamma December 1, 2007 7:43 AM EST
This kid was 14 years old...he had cancer. You people are all bent out of shape because "religion". The kid had cancer...a bad form of cancer. A blood transfusion would not have saved his life...only maybe prolonged it for a while so he could get more chemo and be miserably ill for a longer time. No one knows for sure...but he was 14 and made his choice. Respect his decision!! and may he rest in peace.
Reply to this comment
by grammawhamma December 1, 2007 7:07 AM EST
I wonder why and how the parents lost custody of their son, and which judge decided the boy was better off with a jehovah witness. Also, when did minors get the right to decide to refuse medical teatments to save their life? At what age would this judge allow a minor to make such an important decision? 12,10,8?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by kaviz at 11:58 AM : Nov 30, 2007

Why are minors allowed to have abortions without notification to their parents at this age and even younger since this is also a life and death decision!!??
Reply to this comment
by grammawhamma December 1, 2007 7:01 AM EST
a 14 old is not allowed to smoke and drink alcohol and have ***..... but he is allowed to die???????


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by GURUknows at 12:42 PM : Nov 30, 2007

Yeah I guess so...just like a 14 year old girl can have an abortion and kill her unborn child.

Reply to this comment
by hereticzero-2009 December 1, 2007 5:26 AM EST
Then there is the case of the little girl, and I''m sorry I can''t remember the state this was in, but she had cancer and the doctors warned that taking radiation along with chemo could bring her cancer out of remission. So her parents did not want her to go through with the radiation. The state took her daughter away and forced her parents to subject her to the other therapy and when the cancer came back as incurable, the state returned the girl to her family. Praise God... the do-gooders of the state got their way and a girl is now dying from what was once in remission. Every person has the right to refuse any care they so choose to refuse.

If the court wanted me to poison my children with the *** they call medication, the court can hand it to the kids on their own cuz I will go to jail before I force that stuff down the throat of my kids.

You have no idea the agony children and adults go through with cancer. Any choice they make is the correct choice. Take the treatment and indure years of continued agony or not and let god decide what happens. It is up to the patient, yes or no. Either choice is the right choice.
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 December 1, 2007 4:43 AM EST
PS. Newster is right.. the doctors said the kid''s blood count (meaning the cell count) was too low. The kid needed the red blood cells which are not available except through real blood or packed RBC''s derived from real blood.
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 December 1, 2007 4:33 AM EST
If they had used artificial blood substitute HE WOULD LIKELY BE ALIVE TODAY!!!
BIG PHARMA KILLS AGAIN!!!

Posted by DestroyGreed

Just curious.... where do you think the artificial blood products will come from? Real blood doesn''t come from ''Big Pharma'', it comes from real people. Artificial blood will come from BIG PHARMA!!
Reply to this comment
by robertkjjj December 1, 2007 2:41 AM EST
newster1, is that the BEST you come up with? You have to go back SEVEN HUNDRED years????? You go back 700 years, when the entire world was nothing but lawless primitives, and THEN you find Christians killing? Are you insane? Do you not see that Islam is killing thousands NOW? Every week? Every month? Why do you people do this? Why compare modern-day Islam slaughter to 700-year-old Christian crime? Is that the way the game is played, just drag up the "Crusades" each time you get your a*ss handed to you in a debate about Islam?
Reply to this comment
by robertkjjj December 1, 2007 2:37 AM EST

http://www.terrorismawareness.org/
Cdfoxtrot, you%u2019re an ignorant idiot. Over 10 million people slaughtered by Muslims since 1970. This is documented all over the Internet. This is an AVERAGE of 22,000 murders a MONTH for 37 years. In over 40 countries.
It is indisputable and doesn%u2019t go away. Ever. Go get a brain before you try to compete with the big boys.
http://www.terrorismawareness.org/
and
www.thereligionofpeace.com
and
www.jihadwatch.org
and
http://prophetofdoom.net/

Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 December 1, 2007 1:51 AM EST
I am 53.libsluvsuvs..Yer telling a daughter of a military vet to shut up. Yer wrong. I SAID WHAT WAS THE MATTER WITH THE JUDGE. HE ALLOWED THIS. I did not say the child has rights to have done this. That is why he had foster parents WHO were his caretakers.
To allow a boy to do this is wrong. They won''t serve in the armed forces.
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs November 30, 2007 11:26 PM EST
Posted by MichelleM99 at 08:14 PM : Nov 30, 2007
+ report abuse


***************

so do you agree now that parents should more power over thier children than the courts?????????

so the next time you are compelled to say that usual liberal line "children has the right to......." you best shut your bleeding heart liberal mouth..
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 November 30, 2007 11:14 PM EST
I live in Seattle and saw this on the local news. He was 14. He was a minor..you know a child even tho 14. I was 15 in 70 and told by my then soical worker I had to attend mormon meetings as I was a minor. It was against my will but I had to go. Sorry here but what was the matter with the judge. He allowed a child to do this. Poor kid.
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs November 30, 2007 11:00 PM EST
Percentage wise, the percentage of muslims who kill are far less than the numbers of CHRISTIANS who slaughtered entire villages in the crusades- men women AND children. We have a nut case right wing president who claims god talks to him and he killed tens of thousands.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by newster1 at 07:45 PM : Nov 30, 2007
+ report abuse


******

so with your logic..its okay for muslims to kill to even out the %??
would a muslim still kill me if i am not a christian??
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall November 30, 2007 11:00 PM EST
I dont read religious propaganda. It doesnt MATTER if it was his parents or his aunt who was ACTING in the capacity of parent- he was BRAINWASHED by his aunt then,- he''s STILL dead because of religious
fanaticism.

"there are several verses that states not to partake of blood. "

PARTAKE does not mean life-saving transfussion, you tell me how 2,000 years ago anyone then could figure an IV line and transfussions were even possible or thought of, back then they still believed women were incubators for a mans baby, and that the seed he had was a fully formed baby in miniature,and that the woman made the gender of the baby and got the blame if she didnt produce a BOY. People back then were as stupid about basic biology as sheep, they even bled people half to death to try to "cure" diseases.

Blood substitutes are not substitutes when you have MAJOR blood loss, your body needs those LIVING blood cells and in a certain number or percentage- they carry nutrients and oxygen to every cell in the body- they can''t simply be replaced with FILLERS- this isnt your CAR''s oil level here down a quart of four so you dump in some other oil- try substituting the 4 qts of oil in your car with salad oil and see what happens.



Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall November 30, 2007 10:45 PM EST
A 14 year old doesn''t have the maturity to decide such things, that''s why you have to be 18 to drive, drink, smoke, vote etc.
He was BRAINWASHED by his right wing parents, put the same kid in Iran and he would have been brainwashed to same way into islamic extremism and dying as a martyr.


".Muslims kill thousands and THOUSANDS of people each and every month, worldwide. ....How dare you even TRY to compare Islam--a religion of pure unrelenting death--with ANY other religion? How dare you!

Posted by robertkjjj"

Oh? and you think your precious CHRISTIAN''s history is ANY better? try the reformation, the crusades, the inquisition, the Salem witch trials, the heresy trials, the jailings and torture for blasphemy, the Sunday blue laws, the christians slaughtering the native Americans, subverting/trying to convert other people in other countries.
Percentage wise, the percentage of muslims who kill are far less than the numbers of CHRISTIANS who slaughtered entire villages in the crusades- men women AND children. We have a nut case right wing president who claims god talks to him and he killed tens of thousands.

Reply to this comment
by keithle1 November 30, 2007 10:43 PM EST
Uh oh. Jehovah is in really deep doo doo now. I wouldn''t wanna be him.
Reply to this comment
See all 124 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (478 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: