WASHINGTON, Nov. 26, 2007

McCain Sees Progress, Problems In Iraq

GOP Presidential Candidate Notes Dramatic Improvement During Visit, But Worries Remain

  • Play CBS Video Video Sen. McCain On The Surge

    Sen. John McCain has just returned from his latest Iraq visit and is pleased with the results of the surge. He also remains confident about his presidential campaign. McCain talks with Harry Smith.

  • Video Thanksgiving In Iraq

    Harry Smith speaks with chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan live from Camp Liberty, Iraq, about how U.S. troops are celebrating Thanksgiving while stationed overseas.

  • Video Sunnis: U.S. Allies In Iraq?

    The U.S. has allied with former Sunni insurgents to defeat al Qaeda in Iraq. They are called "volunteers," and many say that they fear for their life supporting the U.S. Lara Logan reports.

  • Republican presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is seen at Esperanza Academy Charter High School in Philadelphia, Monday, Nov. 19, 2007. Photo

    Republican presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is seen at Esperanza Academy Charter High School in Philadelphia, Monday, Nov. 19, 2007.  (AP)

  • Interactive Campaign 2008

    Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.

  • Photo Essay John McCain

    Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?

Latest From Horserace

Campaign Blog
The latest news in CBSNews.com's politics blog.
(CBS/AP)  Senator John McCain, back from a Thanksgiving visit to Iraq, said Monday there are signs of progress though the country remains mired in corruption and U.S. commanders anticipate increased violence from a desperate al Qaeda.

The Republican presidential candidate said Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki “was more upbeat than I've seen him in the past.” Still, McCain said he and other members of a congressional delegation made it clear that al-Maliki needed to show political advances.

“So we'll see what the Iraqi government does,” McCain said at a lunch with reporters at his campaign headquarters in Arlington, Va.

He had been a vocal critic of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's strategy in Iraq and had called for the United States to increase the number of troops in Iraq. Earlier this year, following Rumsfeld's resignation, the Bush administration did boost its military presence, and violence has been reported to have decreased somewhat.

McCain has used his stance on the war to distance himself from Bush while at the same time making note of the gains under the current troop surge.

“There’s been dramatic improvement. Frankly, more improvement than I thought there’d be, even though as you know I strongly supported this change in strategy, and things are much better,” the candidate told Early Show co-anchor Harry Smith.

He said Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, in joining other Democrats critical of the troop increase early this year, had referred to the shift as the “McCain strategy, the McCain surge.”

“He doesn't anymore, but I wish he would,” he said, chuckling.

At another point, he said: “I'm the one that got criticized by Republicans because I had no confidence in Rumsfeld, that I thought the strategy was failing and that we ought to have a new strategy, None of the others who are running for the Republican nomination, much less the Democrat, pointed this out.”

On CBS News' The Early Show, McCain said “If we had done what the Democrats wanted to do six months ago and left then al Qaeda would be bragging all over the world that they defeated the United States.”

Despite improvements in Iraq, McCain said top U.S. commander Gen. David Petraeus was expecting a new round of violence because al Qaeda was being flushed out of its strongholds.

“He thinks they are not finished,” McCain said.

On CBS News' The Early Show, he added: “I worry a little bit about a spike in al Qaeda activity even though they’re on the run.”

The candidate was on his way to South Carolina, where military troops and veterans make up a sizable proportion of Republican voters. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, an ally of McCain who traveled with him to Iraq, sent out a fundraising appeal setting a goal of $380,000 by Friday.

McCain, an Arizona senator, offered reasons for both an optimistic and a pessimistic view of conditions in Iraq. He said local city councils were beginning to govern effectively and members of the Sunni minority were being integrated into the military and were obtaining jobs. But he said corruption was still rampant in the country, noting that oil destined to Iraq's northern regions was being illegally siphoned off.

“I still hold out a strong hope that they’ll declare elections in the provinces but it’s tough. Without the military’s secure environment, then it’s not going to happen,” he told CBS News’ The Early Show.

His cautious assessment contrasted with his remarks in March when he participated in a heavily guarded visit to a Baghdad market just days after saying it was safe to walk some city streets, drawing ridicule.

In his 45-minute talk with reporters, McCain tried to reproduce the tone of his campaign bus tours, where he promotes “straight talk” in conversations with journalists.

Among his points:

  • “I have to do very well in New Hampshire,” he said. He said independent voters, an important part of his support, would be more likely to participate in the Republican primary there on Jan. 8 if Hillary Rodham Clinton had won the Iowa caucuses five days earlier and thus made her Democratic nomination seem more inevitable.

  • The subject of immigration still dogs him, he said, particularly in South Carolina. And he said Iowa, a state he ignored in his 2000 presidential bid, is a challenge for him. “Iowa we have a great deal of work to do,” he said.

  • He said he respected Republican rivals Mike Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani, Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson. Asked whether he could say the same for Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, McCain said he simply did not know him well enough to make a judgment.

    © MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


    Video and Galleries from Politics

    Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
    by eastprophet November 27, 2007 12:36 AM EST
    GIULIANI GIVES AID TO AL QAEDA
    How much exactly would it cost to get Rudy Giuliani to holster his overdone 9/11 sanctimony? The government for the tiny Persian Gulf nation of Qatar might have a good idea. Following earlier reports that Giuliani was still getting paid by a consulting firm he created, Giuliani Partners LLC, Mary Jacoby of the Wall Street Journal sheds light on some potentially problematic sources of Giuliani''s private income. Chief among them is Qatar, the U.S. ally that paid Giuliani Partners for "security advice" regarding their petroleum facilities. The article uncovers a "potential political pitfall" for Giuliani''s candidacy and image given Qatar''s poor record in fighting Al Qaeda, and addresses aspects of the business arrangement that could dog Giuliani during his quest for the presidency. Specifically, the ostensible chief consumer of Giuliani''s security advice in this case would be Qatar''s Internal Security Ministry, currently headed by a known Al Qaeda associate. As reported earlier this year, Qatar Interior Minister Abdullah bin Khalid Al-Thani has long had ties to top Al Qaeda operatives including Osama Bin Laden, and is believed by many U.S. officials to have personally arranged the narrow escape of Al Qaeda big-wig Khalid Sheikh Mohammed from U.S. agents in 1996, thereby ensuring his freedom to mastermind the 9/11 attacks. Giuliani has refused to release specifics of the case, and to-date remains on the firm''s payroll.
    Reply to this comment
    by eastprophet November 27, 2007 12:46 AM EST
    WILL MCCAIN MAKE THIS A THOUGHT CRIME?
    While CBS was busy pretending all other news didn''t exist during the California wildfires, our Constitution was burning on the floors of Congress. On Oct 23, the House overwhelmingly passed HR 1955, the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act. This Bill is one of the most blatant attacks against our right to freedom of speech ever devised by Congress. The Bill actually defines different types of thought as "homegrown terrorism," and unlike previous anti-terror legislation, it specifically targets U.S. citizens. The Bill uses extremely vague language to define "terrorist propoganda" as any speech which promotes an agenda that the government considers an "extremist belief system." Since the bill doesn''t specifically define what an "extremist belief system" is, it will be entirely up to the interpretation of government officials. Isn''t that comforting? Considering how much the government has done to desecrate our Constitution lately, they would surely have to define this post as promoting an "extremist belief" system, since it promotes the restoration of civil liberties--something not en vogue these days. As disturbing as this Bill is, so to is the additional requirement that there be a seperate, "public version." In other words, the Bill we see is different from what Congress is seeing. Why''s that necessary? Whatever the reason, I predict this Bill will become Law soon while CBS focuses the country''s attention elsewhere
    Reply to this comment
    by westprophet November 27, 2007 12:46 AM EST
    CAMPING-OUT WITH MCCAIN
    The John Warner Defense Authorization Act, which was supported by Clinton, Obama and McCain, permits militarized police round-ups and detention of "protesters" and other "undesirables" for detention in facilities which are already contracted for and under construction by Kellog, Brown & Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton. This Law, which was sold to an emergency managed and willfully gullible public in the wake of the 9/11 attacks as a necessary measure needed by our President in order to fight his "global war on terrorism," permits the indefinite detention of American citizens who resist the foreign and domestic agenda of our President. The Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security International reported recently that global engineering and technical services powerhouse, Kellog, Brown & Root announced during January 2006 that its Government and Infrastructure division had been awarded a (no bid) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract to build these detainment camps with a maximum total value of $385 million over a five year term, and that this contract called for the company to build "temporary detention and processing capabilities" to augment existing U.S. government Detention and Removal Operations and to support "the rapid development of new programs." New Programs? Could it possibly get any worse? Why would the president be so concerned about Americans protesting? Aren''t we all happy campers?
    Reply to this comment
    by southprophet November 27, 2007 12:46 AM EST
    MCCAIN LETS BUSH PARDON HIMSELF
    Buried deep inside Military Commisions Act, which was FULLY SUPPORTED by Senators Clinton, Obama and McCain, is a provision which pre-pardons President Bush and all the members of his administration for any crimes which they may have committed all the way back to September 11, 2001. Why that far back? That kind of makes you wonder. Huh? I can''t help but recall what Nixon said during an interview following the Watergate scandal when he said, "If the President does it, by definition, it''s not illegal." History never repeats itself, folks. It only rhymes. At least Nixon had enough class to wait for another President to pardon him for his crimes against our country. Bush apparently doesn''t want to take that chance. He has to consider the risk that Ron Paul will become our next President.
    Reply to this comment
    by northprophet November 27, 2007 12:46 AM EST
    MCCAIN MAKES BUSH DICTATOR
    With the full support of Senators Clinton, Obama and McCain, President Bush recently signed into Law the John Warner Defense Authorization Act, which, according to Senator Leahy (VT), will actually "encourage the President to declare Martial Law." It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a Laws which limits the President''s ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act, helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic Law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush has now undone all of those prohibitions. The John Warner Defense Authorization Act, which was signed by the President in an unpublicized ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency," suspend Congress; The Constitution; and to take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of your Governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder." President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act. The two Laws compliment one another. One allows for torture and detention abroad of those who dissent and are stripped of their citizenship, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home by allowing the President to order the military onto our streets in a domestic Law enforcement role, which is already being done. Vote for Liberty. Vote for Ron Paul.
    Reply to this comment
    by eastprophet November 27, 2007 12:47 AM EST
    RON PAUL WINS BIG IN NATIONAL POLL
    The results of a nationwide telephone poll, announced by Zogby on November 19th, reveals that Americans want to vote for a candidate who protects liberty; who wants to shrink government; and who wants to immediately withdraw our troops from Iraq - positions of Congressman Ron Paul. As part of a blind-bio, spread poll, likely voters (from all parties) were provided with descriptions of four different Republican candidates and asked to choose who they would vote for based on each one''s resume and political platform. 33% of pollees chose Ron Paul, 19% chose Rudy Giuliani, 15% chose Mitt Romney and 13% chose Fred Thompson. The results clearly illustrate that the country is crying out for Ron Paul, which is why mainstream media has launched a public relations offensive to marginalize his accomplishments and suppress the Congressman''s name recognition. In a seperate question, over 49% of pollees said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who would begin an immediate withdrawal from Iraq. In fact, Ron Paul won in every demographic of this poll including, but not limited to, religious voters, NASCAR fans, military families, African-Americans, etc..
    Reply to this comment
    by westprophet November 27, 2007 12:47 AM EST
    ONLY RON PAUL CAN BEAT CLINTON
    Zogby''s Director of Communications Fritz Wenzel said on November 20 that Paul is the strongest of the GOP candidates to run against Clinton. "Among the larger universe of voters," which includes all parties, "yes, Paul would be a much stronger candidate than any of the other three [Romney, Giuliani, Thompson]," Wenzel said. Zogby recently announced that Paul was their winner in a nationwide blind-bio poll which included voters from all parties. "He is anti-war and the majority of Democrats are anti-war, he has some other ideas and policies and stances on issues more attractive to Democrats, particularly conservative Democrats," said Wenzel. "Even among Independents, he is far and away a more attractive candidate," he added. Paul is the only GOP candidate who is not threatening war with Iran, whereas Clinton vowed to keep that option "on the table." Paul also voted against the war in Iraq, which Clinton has supported. Because Democrats outnumber Republicans, none of the other GOP candidates can win against Clinton, because they simply won''t be able to reach across party lines and attract enough Democratic and Independent voters to beat Clinton. Only Paul can do that. "He''s right on schedule," Wenzel said. "He''s making all the right moves, going in the right direction...at a time when other candidates are not moving." Wenzel based his analysis on recent polls that show Paul could win in New Hampshire and that his support nationwide is intensifying.
    Reply to this comment
    by southprophet November 27, 2007 12:47 AM EST
    RON PAUL''S FOREIGN POLICY BOOK BECOMES BESTSELLER
    Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul''s new book, "A Foreign Policy of Freedom: Peace, Commerce, and Honest Friendship," broke into the best-seller''s list. On November 2, Congressman Paul''s collection of speeches on foreign policy from his 10-term career in the House of Representatives hovered at number 93 on the amazon.com top 100-selling books list, and continued to maintain its number one spot in the non-fiction government and economic policy genres. The book is a 30-year compilation of the Texas congressman and rising GOP presidential contender''s speeches from the congressional floor, and assorted foreign policy writings on constitutional republicanism and non-interventionism. "Dr. Paul''s message of freedom, prosperity and peace is a best-seller," said Paul campaign spokesman Jesse Benton. "The numbers don''t lie. Americans want a constitutional, humble foreign policy, which only Ron Paul can deliver in 2008." RonPaulLibrary.org
    Reply to this comment
    by northprophet November 27, 2007 12:47 AM EST
    MORE TROOPS AND VETERANS SUPPORT RON PAUL
    On Veteran''s Day, Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul today addressed a crowd of over 5,000 enthusiastic veterans and supporters in Philadelphia. The Veteran''s Day weekend rally took place at Independence Mall. Thousands of veterans and their friends and families heard country music superstar Rockie Lynne open the event for the Texas congressman. John Holland, the founder of a leading advocacy organization for troops, veterans, and POW/MIAs, delivered an enthusiastic endorsement of Congressman Paul, before the congressman addressed the crowd. The rally coincided with the launch of the Veterans for Paul Coalition, a group composed entirely of American war veterans. "Dr. Paul''s support among veterans is extremely high," said Paul campaign spokesman Joe Seehusen. "These great patriots who have fought for our country know that only Dr. Paul''s foreign policy of peace and secure borders can guarantee true national security, and they want him fighting for our country''s freedom." Congressman Paul was himself a Captain in the Air Force who served as a flight surgeon during the "totally unnecessary and illegal" Vietnam war. He receives more campaign contributions from former and active military and military affiliates than all of the other 2008 presidential candidates combined.
    Reply to this comment
    by eastprophet November 27, 2007 12:48 AM EST
    A FOREIGN POLICY OF FREEDOM
    All of the other presidential candidates want to continue our illegal police action in Iraq indefinitely, and they do not rule out a preemptive (nuclear) first strike against Iran. Conversely, Ron Paul voted against our (undeclared) war in Iraq, which was sold to us with lies. The area is more dangerous now than when we entered it. We destroyed a regime hated by our direct enemies--the jihadists, and created thousands of new recruits for them. The war in Iraq has cost more than 3,500 American lives and almost a trillion dollars. We need a leader in the White House who will ensure this never happens again. Both Jefferson and Washington warned us about entangling ourselves in the affairs of other nations. Today, we have 750 foreign bases and troops in 130 countries. We are spread so thin that we have too few troops defending America. And now, there are new calls for a draft. We can continue to fund and fight no-win police actions around the globe, or we can refocus on securing our borders against illegal aliens who are invading us from the South. No war should ever be fought without a Declaration of War voted upon by the Congress, as required by The Constitution. Under no circumstances should the U.S. again go to war as the result of a resolution that comes from an unelected, foreign body, such as the United Nations. Too often, we give foreign aid and intervene on behalf of governments that are despised. Then, we become despised.
    Reply to this comment
    by westprophet November 27, 2007 12:48 AM EST
    U.S. WAR WITH IRAN?
    When I consider the prospect of a War with Iran, I wonder whether or not another major power might be inclined to side with Iran and oppose us. 10% of China''s exports go to Iran and 12% of Germany''s. Also, many countries, including China, are heavily dependent on the 2,836,000 barrels of oil Iran exports everyday. Not a problem. I''m sure those folks won''t mind riding bikes until the war is over. As far as the Iranians are concerned, I''m sure they''re just dying (no pun intended) to be invaded, er, I mean "liberated" by Americans, considering the horrid 70% approval rating of Ahmadinejad and the terrible $8,700 gross domestic product per capita there (8.6% better than China). I''m sure we''ll be welcomed in the streets after we "shock and awe" their all important looking buildings to Jahannum and back. When I compare U.S. military numbers with Iran''s, what I find is truly alarming. The U.S. has 2.37 million soldiers ready for combat. Let''s compare that with little ol'' Iran, which has more soldiers available for combat than any country in the entire world. Actually, Iran has more combat-ready soldiers (11.7 million) than China and Russia combined. Talk about hell! The bottom line is that America can''t even handle Iraq. At one point, we thought we could rush in, smite some nubs with dirks and bubble on back home in time to catch the next season of American Idol, but it didn''t quite work-out that way. Did it? With Iran, reality is going to hurt a lot more.
    Reply to this comment
    by lastdance4 November 27, 2007 11:08 AM EST
    CBS News comments is for
    For Spammers only !

    Post or Read Serious Comments - Go over to ABC News

    Chronic ...Habitual...and Harassing - Spam
    Brought to you by :
    The Professional Qualities and Work Ethics of the
    Low-Life - CBS News Management Team

    Forever diligent in the Work Morals and Work Ethics of
    Creating Chronic - Habitual and Endless Spam

    Produced By : bigpecker4 - Prophet

    1) aka-GreatProphet ......2) aka-PeaceProphet
    3) aka-MegaProphet ......4) aka-KJVProphet
    5) aka-NextProphet.........6) aka-TrueProphet
    7) aka-LAProphet............8) aka-NHProphet
    9) aka-GoodProphet.......10) aka-EarlyProphet
    11) aka-SageProphet.......12 aka-TruthProphet
    13) aka-FairProphet.........13) aka-WestProphet
    14) aka-EastProphet ......14) aka-NorthProphet
    15) aka-WestProphet ......16) aka-SouthProphet
    17) aka-VestProphet

    CBS Professional News Management Team - Spam
    Throughout Each Day - Each Night - Every Day -

    All Week long within most of the topics on
    The CBS News Comments (Harassing Spam)

    Stop Complaining - Go over to - ABC News (Comments) - Post There ! !
    Leave this Low-Life - CBS News Management and Prophet
    To wallow alone in the Muck they created Together
    Both are deserving and Worthy of each Other ! !


    Lastdance
    Reply to this comment
    by lastdance4 November 27, 2007 11:09 AM EST
    Prophet is stomping that Low-Life
    CBS News Management - Straight into the ground

    With all of the - CBS News Management: Approved - Spam -
    Prophet - Seized the CBS News Site - Away From -
    CBS News Management

    Brought to you by : Professional Low-Life - CBS News Management

    This its a simple case of Extreme Poor Management Functions
    CBS News Management - Refuses to Execute or Fulfill their own -
    Job Descriptions

    To expose this Low-Life CBS News Management
    To the World and its Competitors

    Is just Priceless ! !
    ABC and NBC didn''t even have to pay for it ! !

    CBS News Management - Did it all by Themselves
    Simply by doing - Nothing ! !

    Prophet - bigpecker4
    Has made a - Laughing Fool out of this
    Low-Life - CBS News Management

    Lastdance
    Reply to this comment
    by venkata4--2008 November 27, 2007 11:38 AM EST
    "U.S. WAR WITH IRAN?
    When I consider the prospect of a War with Iran, I wonder whether or not another major power might be inclined to side with Iran and oppose us. 10% of China''''s exports go to Iran and 12% of Germany''''s. Also, many --- American Idol, but it didn''''t quite work-out that way. Did it? With Iran, reality is going to hurt a lot more.

    Posted by WestProphet at 09:48 PM : Nov 26, 2007"

    Well that is if US goes in the conventional war. According to leaked memo from VPs office is US will drop a semi nuclear weapon to neutralize those Iranian forces. 700,000 dead Iraqi''s did not matter, another million in Iran does matter to this VP, Nah.
    Reply to this comment
    by infidel_us November 27, 2007 3:40 PM EST
    Sen Liberman said it best. Speaking as a conservative, I would support Sen Lieberman OVER McCain.
    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 November 27, 2007 5:28 PM EST
    Baghdad john is at it again. You don''t have a snowball chance of wining John. You are a bush bot just like the rest of the neo cons so please give it a rest.

    Check the stats most of America wants out of Iraq and they don''t want to go to Iran. So the last thing WE THE PEOPLE need is another decider.

    WE THE PEOPLE are the deriders not the Republicans and you can best be sure that your kind have made the average American stop and think of who we want as a President. It won''t be a bush bot.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 16 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs