RENO, Nev., Nov. 26, 2007

Nevada Brothel Owner Backs Ron Paul

BunnyRanch Proprietor Is Asking Customers To Donate Cash To Long-Shot GOP Hopeful

  • Republican presidential hopeful, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, talks to The Associated Press during an interview at Nashua High School South, in Nashua N.H. Wednesday Nov. 7, 2007.

    Republican presidential hopeful, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, talks to The Associated Press during an interview at Nashua High School South, in Nashua N.H. Wednesday Nov. 7, 2007.  (AP)

  • Play CBS Video Video Paul On Funding Campaign

    Bob Schieffer talks with Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul about how he became a serious contender for the presidency by raising $4 million in one day via the Internet.

  • Video Paul: American Empire

    Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul talks with Bob Schieffer about how he believes the U.S. has built an empire overseas that is weakening the nation's security and economy.

  • Interactive The Money Race

    See the latest campaign finance tallies from Obama and McCain.

(AP)  It's not exactly your average Republican fundraiser.

A Nevada brothel owner is giving Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul his stamp of approval and plans to start raising money for the Texas congressman.

Dennis Hof, owner of the Moonlite BunnyRanch near Carson City, says he'll leave collection boxes outside the door so people can drop in their political contributions.

A spokesman for Paul says the politician with a libertarian streak doesn't condone prostitution on a personal level. But, he says, "it's not the role of federal government and it's not in the constitution for federal government to regulate these things."

TV host Tucker Carlson, who was trailing Paul for an article, says he's a good friend of Hof and -- in his words -- "decided to call him up and see if he wanted to come check this guy out."

© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 82 Comments
by petemackin November 27, 2007 9:20 PM EST
I guess I could always do your reporting for you. Here''s what USA Today said about it:

Barry Goldwater Jr. endorses Ron Paul

Former congressman Barry Goldwater Jr. -- son of conservative icon and 1964 GOP presidential candidate Sen. Barry Goldwater -- has endorsed Republican Rep. Ron Paul''s presidential bid.

"America is at a crossroads," Goldwater says in a statement released by the Paul campaign. "We have begun to stray from our traditions and must get back to what has made us the greatest nation on earth or we will lose much of the freedom we hold dear. Ron Paul stands above all of the other candidates in his commitment to liberty and to America. Leading America is difficult, and I know Ron Paul is the man for the job."

Goldwater Jr. represented Los Angeles County in Congress from 1969-83. His father, who represented Arizona, died in 1998.
Reply to this comment
by petemackin November 27, 2007 9:15 PM EST
I wonder why a Ron Paul endorsement by an obscure pimp and not the one by fmr. Rep. Barry Goldwater Jr. (R) Arizona found its way onto CBS.

Especially given the fact that Mr. Goldwater''''s father was known as "Mr. Republican" and was the inspiration for the Reagan Revolution. His endorsement proves that mainstream, conservative Republicans support and work hard for the Paul campaign - such as myself, a 2006 Republican senate candidate from Michigan.

But I don''''t own a "brothel" so I guess I won''''t be mentioned on CBS anytime soon or Mr. Goldwater.

I guess this proves ol'''' Mr. Goldberg was right about his former boss in his book "Bias".
Reply to this comment
by collegerepub November 27, 2007 7:32 PM EST
As I recall, Jenna Jameson, porn star said she supported Hillary (Clinton) for President.

That articles was on pr.com:

Quote:

"May 21, 2007. New York, NY, --(PR.com)-- PR.com%u2019s Senior Editor, Allison Kugel, asks Jenna Jameson about her political views, including which candidate she supports for the 2008 presidential election, spawning national headlines and making political history. In this in-depth interview, Jenna Jameson reveals that she is a liberal, and expresses her support for Hillary Clinton to get the Democratic Presidential Nomination....."

FULL STORY HERE:

http://www.pr.com/press-release/39676

WATCH THE YOUTUBE VIDEO ABOUT JENNA''s SUPPORT FOR HILLARY.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne22IBZ3Ets

Please be sure that if you are covering the Ron Paul "brothel owner endorsement"to please REMIND everyone that Hillary too got sucked in (no pun intended) to a very similar situation. But then that would make the smear against Ron Paul less effective wouldn''t it?
Reply to this comment
by culturechang November 27, 2007 7:30 PM EST
Well I have more respect for money from prostitutes and patrons because they are concerned American citizens than campaign money from oil and pharmacutical companies who want to keep owning this country. They aren''t the citizens. they just want to buy govt so they can exploit the citizens some more. The citizens should own this country...not the corporations.
Reply to this comment
by westprophet November 27, 2007 6:33 PM EST
TRUST ONLY THE WISDOM THAT IS YOUR OWN
CBS can paint the pictures they want to paint, and people will open their minds to the pictures they want to see. That said. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can recognize sold-out, mainstream media propoganda when they see it, and the fact that this is one of the most lazily-drawn "hit pieces" ever published by CBS about Ron Paul. My eighth-grader could have done a better job writing this story. Thank God there''s still millions of intelligent Americans who can see right through CBS'' attempts to marganilize Dr. Paul, and our numbers and anger is growing in magnitude. It''s hard to demonize a man who has served his God, his family, his country and The Constitution the way Ron Paul has during his lifetime, and make it believable to anyone with even a modicum of intelligence. It''s like selling cyanide, and calling it "mother''s milk." Nobody''s buying it. In the few times CBS News has covered Ron Paul, I''m suprised they didn''t go the extra mile and have one of their graphic artists paint some devil horns on top of his head in order to further degrade those worst ever photographs they always seem to use of him. CBS obviously thinks that if they marginalize Ron Paul and continue pretending he isn''t a top-tier GOP candidate, then their readers eventually will too. However, it''s not working. Face it CBS. Your "negative slant" here is WAY too obvious, and the reason why is that your reporters suck as bad as the employees do at the BunnyRanch.
Reply to this comment
by eastprophet November 27, 2007 6:33 PM EST
RON PAUL IS THE NEW WAY
What we need is a President who will show us the way. Not the old way. Not the same way, but a NEW way. Think about this for a minute. What if we pulled all of our troops out of South Korea? They''ve been there for 50+ years. What if we quit worrying about Iran, but instead, realized that its having a nuclear weapon will not mean the end of the world? What if we pulled all of our troops out of the Middle-East, and brought them all home? What if we realistically addressed the National Debt, and paid attention to REALLY DOING SOMETHING about stopping illegal immigration? These are the ideas of Presidential candidate, Ron Paul. He''s a ten term Congressman and a physician who has delivered over 4,000 babies. He''s an intellectual who''s published four books, three of which are devoted entirely to sound economics and one to foreign policy. He was raised on a dairy farm in Pennsylvania as a pious Lutheran, but now he attends a Baptist church. Paul is given to mulling things over morally. Whenever he recollects the helicopter pilots he treated as an Air Force Flight Surgeon (Captain) during the Vietnam War, a war which he now says was "totally unnecessary and illegal," he laments, "They were gung-ho. I''ve often thought about how many of those people never came back." Candidates with the high level of personal integrity and proven track record of adherence to The Constitution, Congressman Paul has always demonstrated only come around once in a lifetime, if we''re lucky.
Reply to this comment
by northprophet November 27, 2007 6:32 PM EST
COULDN''T VOTE FOR A REPUBLICAN? REALLY?
Everytime I hear Democrats say "I hate the Republican Party. Look at what Bush has done.," I can''t help but think about all of Bush''s Democratic enablers in the Congress like Clinton, Obama, Pelosi, et. al. who made all of his dastardly deeds possible. They handed him every bit of legislation with which he has used to make himself the dictator that he now is on a silver platter. The Democrats in Congress don''t even seem to express any interest in investigating Bush for the crimes he and Cheney have surely committed against our country even though a vast majority of Americans think they should. What cowards! In fact, Obama and Clinton even voted in favor of legislation which actually allows Bush to pre-pardon himself and his administration for crimes dating all the way back to 9/11. What''s up with that? Look. Do yourself and your country a favor. Focus on the candidate, and the ideas and positions he or she represents, and then study the candidate''s track record of performance with respect to those positions. That''s all that really matters in the end. Elections are not a contest of two teams. Ultimately, It''s the politician who will either serve your interests or betray them while in office--not their party. Finally, Democrats, I ask you this: Would you have voted for Steven Douglas (a Democrat), who was ardently pro-slavery, against Abraham Lincoln (a Republican) simply because Douglas was a Democrat? I think most of you would.
Reply to this comment
by southprophet November 27, 2007 6:32 PM EST
ONLY RON PAUL CAN BEAT CLINTON
Zogby''s Director of Communications Fritz Wenzel said on November 20 that Paul is the strongest of the GOP candidates to run against Clinton. "Among the larger universe of voters," which includes all parties, "yes, Paul would be a much stronger candidate than any of the other three [Romney, Giuliani, Thompson]," Wenzel said. Zogby recently announced that Paul was their winner in a nationwide blind-bio poll which included voters from all parties. "He is anti-war and the majority of Democrats are anti-war, he has some other ideas and policies and stances on issues more attractive to Democrats, particularly conservative Democrats," said Wenzel. "Even among Independents, he is far and away a more attractive candidate," he added. Paul is the only GOP candidate who is not threatening war with Iran, whereas Clinton vowed to keep that option "on the table." Paul also voted against the war in Iraq, which Clinton has supported. Because Democrats outnumber Republicans, none of the other GOP candidates can win against Clinton, because they simply won''t be able to reach across party lines and attract enough Democratic and Independent voters to beat Clinton. Only Paul can do that. "He''s right on schedule," Wenzel said. "He''s making all the right moves, going in the right direction...at a time when other candidates are not moving." Wenzel based his analysis on recent polls that show Paul could win in New Hampshire and that his support nationwide is intensifying.
Reply to this comment
by westprophet November 27, 2007 6:32 PM EST
RON PAUL WINS BIG IN NATIONAL POLL
The results of a nationwide telephone poll, announced by Zogby on November 19th, reveals that Americans want to vote for a candidate who protects liberty; who wants to shrink government; and who wants to immediately withdraw our troops from Iraq - positions of Congressman Ron Paul. As part of a blind-bio, spread poll, likely voters (from all parties) were provided with descriptions of four different Republican candidates and asked to choose who they would vote for based on each one''s resume and political platform. 33% of pollees chose Ron Paul, 19% chose Rudy Giuliani, 15% chose Mitt Romney and 13% chose Fred Thompson. The results clearly illustrate that the country is crying out for Ron Paul, which is why mainstream media has launched a public relations offensive to marginalize his accomplishments and suppress the Congressman''s name recognition. In a seperate question, over 49% of pollees said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who would begin an immediate withdrawal from Iraq. In fact, Ron Paul won in every demographic of this poll including, but not limited to, religious voters, NASCAR fans, military families, African-Americans, etc..
Reply to this comment
by eastprophet November 27, 2007 6:32 PM EST
RON PAUL WILL RESTORE U.S. SOVEREIGNTY
All of the trade deals and world government organizations, which all of the presidential candidates support (except Ron Paul), such as the ICC, NAFTA, GATT, WTO, and CAFTA, are all a major threat to our nation''s sovereignty. They transfer power from our government to unelected foreign elites. The ICC wants to try our soldiers as war criminals. Both the WTO and CAFTA could force Americans to get a prescription to take herbs and vitamins. The WTO has forced Congress to change our laws to meet their needs, and not our own. If anything, the WTO makes trade relations worse by giving foreign competitors a new way to attack U.S. jobs. The NAFTA superhighway, being built by a Spanish company, is just one part of a plan to erase our borders and create the North American Union, a single nation State like the EU, out of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, with a new, unelected bureaucracy and money system. Forget about controlling immigration under the NAU scheme. There won''t be any borders anymore, or a free America. Our limited, constitutional government will be gone forever. Let''s not forget the UN either. It wants to impose a direct Carbon Tax on us. Ron Paul successfully fought this move in Congress last year, but if we are going to stop ongoing attempts of this world government body to rule over us, we need someone in the White House who knows how to say "No." We must withdraw from any organizations or treaty that infringes upon our nation''s sovereignty.
Reply to this comment
by northprophet November 27, 2007 6:31 PM EST
A FOREIGN POLICY OF FREEDOM
All of the other presidential candidates want to continue our illegal police action in Iraq indefinitely, and they do not rule out a preemptive (nuclear) first strike against Iran. Conversely, Ron Paul voted against our (undeclared) war in Iraq, which was sold to us with lies. The area is more dangerous now than when we entered it. We destroyed a regime hated by our direct enemies--the jihadists, and created thousands of new recruits for them. The war in Iraq has cost more than 3,500 American lives and almost a trillion dollars. We need a leader in the White House who will ensure this never happens again. Both Jefferson and Washington warned us about entangling ourselves in the affairs of other nations. Today, we have 750 foreign bases and troops in 130 countries. We are spread so thin that we have too few troops defending America. And now, there are new calls for a draft. We can continue to fund and fight no-win police actions around the globe, or we can refocus on securing our borders against illegal aliens who are invading us from the South. No war should ever be fought without a Declaration of War voted upon by the Congress, as required by The Constitution. Under no circumstances should the U.S. again go to war as the result of a resolution that comes from an unelected, foreign body, such as the United Nations. Too often, we give foreign aid and intervene on behalf of governments that are despised. Then, we become despised.
Reply to this comment
by southprophet November 27, 2007 6:31 PM EST
RON PAUL IS THE TAXPAYER''S BEST FRIEND
If he is elected President, Ron Paul will work to abolish the Federal Reserve System as well as the IRS, returning our country to the Gold Standard. He believes, as I do, that our current Income Tax System is unconstitutional, because it is a direct tax that is not equally apportioned as The Constitution requires. Whenever taxes are raised by the federal government, it should be done as The Constitution does require--in an indirect way, which is equally apportioned. This system would benefit all of us, creating more individual wealth, and allowing us to make more decisions for ourselves about our lives. As President, Ron Paul will also work to abolish the Federal Reserve, a group of private banks, run by unelected officials, which loans our government unbacked money which they are allowed to essentially print out of thin air, making each dollar in your pocket worth less all the time, and increasing our national debt to these banks. Worse still. Most of our debt is owned by China (25%) and Saudi Arabia who finance our runaway military spending overseas. This is a threat to our nation. We need to bring our troops home from overseas, and use the trillions we would save thereby to reduce our debt, and to re-invigorate our currency. We can use this money to ensure that Social Security and other essential programs will still be solvent in the future. Vote for Ron Paul. He''s published three books on the topic of sound economics. RonPaulLibrary.org
Reply to this comment
by westprophet November 27, 2007 6:31 PM EST
RON PAUL KNOWS HOW TO STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
The talk must stop. We must secure our borders now. A nation without secure borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad when our own front door is left unlocked. Ron Paul has a plan: (1.) Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated immigration reform proposals. (2.) Enforce Visa rules. Immigration officials must track Visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their Visa or otherwise violates U.S. Law. This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11 terrorists had expired Visas. (3.) No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in our country illegally. That''s a lot of people to reward for breaking our Laws. (4.) No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules, but taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services. (5.) End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S. illegally will remain strong. (6.) Pass true immigration reform. The current system, and those proposed by ALL other candidates, is incoherent and unfair, and would allow up to 60 million more immigrants into our country.
Reply to this comment
by eastprophet November 27, 2007 6:31 PM EST
RON PAUL WILL PRESERVE SOCIAL SECURITY
Our nation''s promise to its seniors, once considered a sacred trust, has become little more than a tool for politicians to scare retirees while robbing them of their promised benefits to pay for militarization. Today, the Social Security system is both broke and broken. Those in the system are seeing their benefits dwindle due to higher taxes, increasing inflation, and irresponsible military spending. The proposed solutions, ranging from lower benefits to higher taxes to increasing the age of eligibility, are NOT solutions; they are betrayals. Imposing any tax on Social Security benefits is unfair and illogical. In Congress, Dr. Paul introduced the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act, which repeals ALL taxes on Social Security benefits, to eliminate political theft of our seniors'' income and raise their standard of living. Solvency is the key to keeping our promise to our seniors, and he introduced the Social Security Preservation Act (H.R. 219) to ensure that money paid into the system is ONLY used for Social Security. Also, it is fundamentally unfair to give benefits to anyone who has not paid into the system. The Social Security for Americans Only Act, which Ron Paul supported, ends the drain on Social Security caused by illegal aliens seeking the fruits of your labor. In short, if we stop our runaway military spending overseas, there will be plenty of money available to keep Social Security solvent for decades to come.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan November 27, 2007 5:44 PM EST
Candidates who are the best prostitutes for big money and corporate interests will get the most positive media attention.
That''s why all CBS can do is attack Dr. Ron Paul, because he actually supports peace and our constitution.
ronpaul2008.com
Reply to this comment
by merlgrey November 27, 2007 12:57 PM EST
they totally forgot to mention that ron killed the prostitutes and ate thier babies.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales November 27, 2007 12:48 PM EST
Tucker Carlson of MSNBC solicited Hof and accompanied him to Ron Paul HQ according to reports. Look at the picture of Dr. Paul...the shadowed face..the sinister implications...text book negatives...I''ll never subscribe to any DISH or cable that carries CBSABCNBCFOXCNN or buy a paper that uses Associated Press...These companies can just disappear from the earth as far as I''m concerned--and the banks that control them as well.
Reply to this comment
by abramcookson November 27, 2007 11:39 AM EST
MSM is shaking in their boots and this is the only way they know how to deal with it. This is why I get my news on my own, read every article, every Blog. Shame on this.
Reply to this comment
by pkeyrich November 27, 2007 9:44 AM EST
The AP "Paul Endorsed by Nevada Brothel Owner" story is simply the latest in a growing number of mainstream news articles that attack Ron Paul by attacking his supporters. But that, of course, could be viewed as an admission on the part of the anti-Paul media that Ron Paul does not have the skeletons in his closet that so many other politicians do. Otherwise the anti-Paul media would be targeting those skeletons.

Finally, the AP noted that the two prostitutes who accompanied Hof and Carlson to the news conference have not yet decided who they support for president. But if they come out for (say) Hillary, don%u2019t hold your breath waiting for AP to rush out a story under the gripping headline, %u201CHillary Endorsed by Nevada Prostitutes%u201D!
Reply to this comment
by pkeyrich November 27, 2007 9:42 AM EST
The Associated Press carried a story about how a Nevada brothel owner had "endorsed" Ron Paul, downplaying the fact that the "endorsement" was actually arranged by the media. The AP story began: "Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, an underdog Texas congressman with a libertarian streak, has picked up an endorsement from a Nevada brothel owner," Dennis Hof.

"Picked up," however, is the wrong phrase, since it implies, incorrectly, that Ron Paul had solicited Hof%u2019s endorsement. In actuality, it was a member of the media, MSNBC%u2019s Tucker Carlson, who had done the soliciting. Carlson not only contacted Hof to ask him to check out Ron Paul while Paul was in Nevada, but he even arrived at Ron Paul%u2019s Reno news conference in the company of Hof and two of Hof%u2019s prostitutes. Hof%u2019s presence, which surprised the Ron Paul campaign, then gave Hof the opportunity to be interviewed by the media.
Reply to this comment
See all 82 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (295 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: