This Time Around, Edwards Is Talking Tough
Democrat's Second Presidential Run Includes Angrier Rhetoric, Often Directed At Clinton
-
Play CBS Video Video Can John Edwards Break Out? Will the recent bout of aggressiveness from former Sen. John Edwards eventually lead to the Democratic presidential nomination? Bob Schieffer spoke with Edwards about his recent campaign strategy.
-
Video Edwards On The Middle East In an interview with Bob Schieffer, presidential hopeful Sen. John Edwards explained his stances on the Middle East, and how his views differ from those of Sen. Clinton and President Bush.
-
Video Tense Exchange At Edwards Stop "Only On The Web": John Edwards has a heated exchange with a questioner on global warming at a Portsmouth, N.H., campaign event. He also gets an unusual interruption while giving his stump speech.
-
Interactive Campaign 2008 Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.
-
Photo Essay John Edwards In his second presidential campaign, Edwards ran as a populist, with a focus on poverty and health.
"Hell yeah I'm confrontational and I'm not ashamed of it," Edwards said. "We need a fighter in the White House."
In the Democratic debates, no one punches harder, especially when the target is front-runner Hillary Clinton, who accuses Edwards of throwing mud.
"She continues to defend a system that does not work, that is broken, that is rigged, and is corrupt," Edwards said.
Edwards quotes Harry Truman about giving 'em hell back in Washington, and recently even aggressively cut off a questioner who challenged his commitment on global warming. "No, you're through, you got a chance to talk," Edwards told the spectator. "I do not agree with you."
Critics say he's changed from four years ago when he was known for his smiling disposition and his refusal to go negative. "If you are looking for the candidate that'll do the best job of attacking the other candidates, I'm not your guy," Edwards said then.
Now, Democratic rival Chris Dodd says: "I am surprised at just how angry John has become. This is not the same John Edwards I once knew."
But Democratic strategist Steve McMahon says that with Clinton and Barack Obama running so strong, Edwards has no choice but to turn up the heat.
"The only way he's going to get any attention is if he pushes himself into the focus, into the frame, and that's what he's trying to do," McMahon said. "Call it confrontational - I call it effective campaigning."
In New Hampshire today, Edwards insisted his message is still positive. It's not anger, he says - it's passion.
"What voters want to see is that what you stand for, what you believe, comes from within here," he said, pointing to his heart, "that it doesn't come from just your head."
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- CBSNews.com on Digg

- ''This Time Around, Edwards Is Talking Tough''
''Hillary, if you take my extra hold hair spray again without asking me, I''m really gonna pitch a hissy!''
:) - Reply to this comment
Edwards has stayed too long at the party as in 04 he brings nothing to the table. After Iowa he is gone thats not tough by the way that is desperation and personal attacks from a position of weakness just like the win the south by exploiting their inadequacies Repugs Play book.- Reply to this comment
- Why all the posts on Ron Paul on a story about Edwards. I don''t see the appeal. Yes, Paul would lower taxes, or eliminate them. For that I could move to any third world country.
I want a better America - better social services, better regulation to keep me and my children safe. I actually want to pay more in taxes. I used to and I got far far more for the money than I get now in tax cuts. - Reply to this comment
- Prophet is stomping that Low-Life
CBS News Management - Straight into the ground
With all of the - CBS News Management: Approved - Spam -
Prophet - Seized the CBS News Site - Away From -
CBS News Management
Brought to you by : Professional Low-Life - CBS News Management
This its a simple case of Extreme Poor Management Functions
CBS News Management - Refuses to Execute or Fulfill their own -
Job Descriptions
To expose this Low-Life CBS News Management
To the World and its Competitors
Is just Priceless ! !
ABC and NBC didn''t even have to pay for it ! !
CBS News Management - Did it all by Themselves
Simply by doing - Nothing ! !
Prophet - bigpecker4
Has made a - Laughing Fool out of this
Low-Life - CBS News Management
Lastdance - Reply to this comment
- CBS News comments is for
For Spammers only !
Post or Read Serious Comments - Go over to ABC News
Chronic ...Habitual...and Harassing - Spam
Brought to you by :
The Professional Qualities and Work Ethics of the
Low-Life - CBS News Management Team
Forever diligent in the Work Morals and Work Ethics of
Creating Chronic - Habitual and Endless Spam
Produced By : bigpecker4 - Prophet
1) aka-GreatProphet ......2) aka-PeaceProphet
3) aka-MegaProphet ......4) aka-KJVProphet
5) aka-NextProphet.........6) aka-TrueProphet
7) aka-LAProphet............8) aka-NHProphet
9) aka-GoodProphet.......10) aka-EarlyProphet
11) aka-SageProphet.......12 aka-TruthProphet
13) aka-FairProphet.........13) aka-WestProphet
14) aka-EastProphet ......14) aka-NorthProphet
15) aka-WestProphet ......16) aka-SouthProphet
17) aka-VestProphet
CBS Professional News Management Team - Spam
Throughout Each Day - Each Night - Every Day -
All Week long within most of the topics on
The CBS News Comments (Harassing Spam)
Stop Complaining - Go over to - ABC News (Comments) - Post There ! !
Leave this Low-Life - CBS News Management and Prophet
To wallow alone in the Muck they created Together
Both are deserving and Worthy of each Other ! !
Lastdance - Reply to this comment
- HOPE FOR AMERICA: PRESIDENT RON PAUL
RonPaul2008.com
-- No more meddling in other country''s political affairs
-- No more aggressive military actions overseas
-- No more torture prisons
-- No more pseudo-wars like the "War on Drugs"
-- No more IRS and unconstitutional income taxes
-- No more Federal Reserve (the group of private banks which owns our government)
-- No more erosion of Social Security to pay for militarization
-- No more U.N. (one world government) participation
-- No more NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO or GATT (globalist trade cartels)
-- No more North American Union (loss of U.S. sovereignty)
-- No more federal gun control laws
-- No more illegal aliens pouring-in over our country''s borders
-- No more illegal aliens allowed to roam freely in our streets
-- No more national ID cards (Real ID Act)
-- No more government invasion of your privacy
-- No more federal Laws which force you to take unwanted injections
-- No more federal Laws which are not authorized by The Constitution
-- No more federal erosion of State sovereignty
-- No more unlimited federal government
"Wars are poor chisels for carving-out peaceful tomorrows."
- Martin Luther King Jr.
"The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home."
- James Madison
"When the people fear their government, you have tyranny. When the government fears the people, you have liberty."
- Thomas Jefferson - Reply to this comment
- RON PAUL IS THE NEW WAY
What we need is a President who will show us the way. Not the old way. Not the same way, but a NEW way. Think about this for a minute. What if we pulled all of our troops out of South Korea? They''ve been there for 50+ years. What if we quit worrying about Iran, but instead, realized that its having a nuclear weapon will not mean the end of the world? What if we pulled all of our troops out of the Middle-East, and brought them all home? What if we realistically addressed the National Debt, and paid attention to REALLY DOING SOMETHING about stopping illegal immigration? These are the ideas of Presidential candidate, Ron Paul. He''s a ten term Congressman and a physician who has delivered over 4,000 babies. He''s an intellectual who''s published four books, three of which are devoted entirely to sound economics and one to foreign policy. He was raised on a dairy farm in Pennsylvania as a pious Lutheran, but now he attends a Baptist church. Paul is given to mulling things over morally. Whenever he recollects the helicopter pilots he treated as an Air Force Flight Surgeon (Captain) during the Vietnam War, a war which he now says was "totally unnecessary and illegal," he laments, "They were gung-ho. I''ve often thought about how many of those people never came back." Candidates with the high level of personal integrity and proven track record of adherence to The Constitution, Congressman Paul has always demonstrated only come around once in a lifetime, if we''re lucky. - Reply to this comment
- COULDN''T VOTE FOR A REPUBLICAN? REALLY?
Everytime I hear Democrats say "I hate the Republican Party. Look at what Bush has done.," I can''t help but think about all of Bush''s Democratic enablers in the Congress like Clinton, Obama, Pelosi, et. al. who made all of his dastardly deeds possible. They handed him every bit of legislation with which he has used to make himself the dictator that he now is on a silver platter. The Democrats in Congress don''t even seem to express any interest in investigating Bush for the crimes he and Cheney have surely committed against our country even though a vast majority of Americans think they should. What cowards! In fact, Obama and Clinton even voted in favor of legislation which actually allows Bush to pre-pardon himself and his administration for crimes dating all the way back to 9/11. What''s up with that? Look. Do yourself and your country a favor. Focus on the candidate, and the ideas and positions he or she represents, and then study the candidate''s track record of performance with respect to those positions. That''s all that really matters in the end. Elections are not a contest of two teams. Ultimately, It''s the politician who will either serve your interests or betray them while in office--not their party. Finally, Democrats, I ask you this: Would you have voted for Steven Douglas (a Democrat), who was ardently pro-slavery, against Abraham Lincoln (a Republican) simply because Douglas was a Democrat? I think most of you would. - Reply to this comment
- ONLY RON PAUL CAN BEAT CLINTON
Zogby''s Director of Communications Fritz Wenzel said on November 20 that Paul is the strongest of the GOP candidates to run against Clinton. "Among the larger universe of voters," which includes all parties, "yes, Paul would be a much stronger candidate than any of the other three [Romney, Giuliani, Thompson]," Wenzel said. Zogby recently announced that Paul was their winner in a nationwide blind-bio poll which included voters from all parties. "He is anti-war and the majority of Democrats are anti-war, he has some other ideas and policies and stances on issues more attractive to Democrats, particularly conservative Democrats," said Wenzel. "Even among Independents, he is far and away a more attractive candidate," he added. Paul is the only GOP candidate who is not threatening war with Iran, whereas Clinton vowed to keep that option "on the table." Paul also voted against the war in Iraq, which Clinton has supported. Because Democrats outnumber Republicans, none of the other GOP candidates can win against Clinton, because they simply won''t be able to reach across party lines and attract enough Democratic and Independent voters to beat Clinton. Only Paul can do that. "He''s right on schedule," Wenzel said. "He''s making all the right moves, going in the right direction...at a time when other candidates are not moving." Wenzel based his analysis on recent polls that show Paul could win in New Hampshire and that his support nationwide is intensifying. - Reply to this comment
- RON PAUL WINS BIG IN NATIONAL POLL
The results of a nationwide telephone poll, announced by Zogby on November 19th, reveals that Americans want to vote for a candidate who protects liberty; who wants to shrink government; and who wants to immediately withdraw our troops from Iraq - positions of Congressman Ron Paul. As part of a blind-bio, spread poll, likely voters (from all parties) were provided with descriptions of four different Republican candidates and asked to choose who they would vote for based on each one''s resume and political platform. 33% of pollees chose Ron Paul, 19% chose Rudy Giuliani, 15% chose Mitt Romney and 13% chose Fred Thompson. The results clearly illustrate that the country is crying out for Ron Paul, which is why mainstream media has launched a public relations offensive to marginalize his accomplishments and suppress the Congressman''s name recognition. In a seperate question, over 49% of pollees said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who would begin an immediate withdrawal from Iraq. In fact, Ron Paul won in every demographic of this poll including, but not limited to, religious voters, NASCAR fans, military families, African-Americans, etc.. - Reply to this comment




