February 11, 2009 3:49 PM

U.N.: Tasers Are A Form Of Torture

 

(CBS/AP)  A United Nations committee said Friday that use of Taser weapons can be a form of torture, in violation of the U.N. Convention Against Torture.

Use of the electronic stun devices by police has been marked with a sudden rise in deaths - including four men in the United States and two in Canada within the last week.

Canadian authorities are taking a second look at them, and in the United States, there is a wave of demands to BAN them.

The U.N. Committee Against Torture referred Friday to the use of TaserX26 weapons which Portuguese police has acquired. An expert had testified to the committee that use of the weapons had "proven risks of harm or death."

"The use of TaserX26 weapons, provoking extreme pain, constituted a form of torture, and that in certain cases it could also cause death, as shown by several reliable studies and by certain cases that had happened after practical use," the committee said in a statement.

"Well, it means that it's a very serious thing," Amnesty International USA Executive Director Larry Cox told CBS Early Show co-anchor Julie Chen. "These are people that have seen torture around the world, all kinds of torture. So they don't use the word lightly."

Tasers have become increasingly controversial in the United States, particularly after several notorious cases where their use by police to disable suspects was questioned as being excessive. Especially disturbing is the fact that six adults died after being tased by police in the span of a week.

Last Sunday, in Frederick, Md., a sheriff's deputy trying to break up a late-night brawl tased 20-year-old Jarrel Grey. He died on the spot.

"I want to know what he did that was so bad," the victim's mother, Tanya James, said. "Did the deputy think that their life was in danger? Did he have a weapon?"

The death came just weeks after Frederick police used a Taser to subdue a high school student.

Black leaders held a rally Tuesday calling for the department to ban Tasers, at least until there is a clear policy on how they are used. The NAACP says it appears the sheriff's office is using Tasers routinely, rather than as a weapon of last resort.

Also this week, in Jacksonville, Fla., in two separate cases two men died after being stunned.

One suspect, who fled a car crash and tried to break into a nearby home, struggled with a policeman, prompting the officer to tase him three times. The man continued to fight, and tried to bite the officer, while he was being tased. He was later pronounced dead at a hospital.

Another man died Tuesday after a Jacksonville officer pulled over his car. When the officer approached it, the man took off running. When the officer caught up with him, during a struggle, authorities say the officer used his Taser to subdue the suspect.

After being placed in the back of the police car the suspect became unresponsive. He was taken to the hospital where he was pronounced dead.

Last Sunday, in New Mexico, 20-year-old Jesse Saenz died after Raton police used a Taser to subdue him. Police say Saenz was struggling and fighting with them as they attempted to take him into custody.

Saenz died after being transported to a county jail.

In Nova Scotia, a 45-year-old man who was jailed on assault charges jumped a counter and ran for the door as he was being booked. He died yesterday, about 30 hours after being shocked.

And in Vancouver, where Royal Candian Mounted Police have been criticized for their use of a Taser against an irate airline passenger at Vancouver Airport last month, 36-year-old Robert Knipstrom died in a hospital four days after police used a Taser, pepper spray and batons to subdue him.

Police earlier said Knipstrom was agitated, aggressive and combative with officers. The cause of death has yet to be determined.

More than a dozen people have died in Canada after being hit by Tasers in the last four years.

The reported incidents this week did not have cameras documenting the use of the Tasers, but in British Columbia, a tourist's video camera recorded the death of a man tased twice while in custody at the Vancouver Airport last month.

That horrifying video shows Robert Dziekanski, a Polish man who spoke no English, become increasingly agitated. He was shocked twice, and then died.

The stun guns were denounced at memorial rallies in Vancouver and Toronto for Dziekanski.

Among the 1,000 people at the Vancouver rally was Paul Pritchard, who shot the video of the confrontation at the city airport.

The crowd gave a hero's welcome to Pritchard, who said he "saw the life drain out of a man's face" and heard "blood-curdling screams."

A rally in front of the Ontario legislature in Toronto drew several hundred people, including Bob Rae, a Liberal candidate in the next federal election.

Rae said the events leading up to Dziekanski's death must "never, ever be allowed to happen again."

The prominent - and sensational - reports of deaths following the use of Tasers has increased attention to their legitimacy, and prompted a bold defense by their manufacturer.

Taser International, based in Scottsdale, Az., released a statement following the Vancouver Airport incident saying no deaths have ever been definitively connected to what the company describes as: "the low-energy electrical discharge of the Taser."

That's 50,000 volts.

"The video of the incident at the Vancouver airport indicates that the subject was continuing to fight well after the TASER application," Taser International said. "This continuing struggle could not be possible if the subject died as a result of the Taser device electrical current causing cardiac arrest. [Dziekanski's] continuing struggle is proof that the Taser device was not the cause of his death.

"Specifically in Canada, while previous incidents were widely reported in the media as 'Taser deaths,' the role of the Taser device has been cleared in every case to date," Taser said.

While the medical questions about causes of death are not resolved, Cox said this is precisely why more study is needed. "Nobody really knows exactly why these people are dying, we only know that people are dying after they're tasered," he said. "It's nearly 300 people who have died in the United States - they're tasered, and then they die.

"It may be because they have a heart condition. It may be because they're on drugs. It may be because of some other factor that we don't know about. The important thing is, they are dying after they are tasered. That cannot be denied, no matter how you spin the language."

The devices are used by about 12,000 police departments, often in chaotic situations.

Retired police officer Paul Mazzei told Chen, "Minus the Taser, they would have to use an impact weapon like a baton, possibly pepper spray or in some extreme cases of violent behavior they might even have to use deadly force to control that individual."

In fact, in New Mexico earlier this month, the parents of a suicidal woman who was shot to death by Bernalillo County deputies two years ago are suing, contending that the police should have used Tasers instead of firearms.

Brittany Wayne was killed in her bedroom 23 seconds after police arrived.

And in Utah, a patrol car's dashboard camera caught an officer tasing a driver who refused to sign a speeding ticket. The officer is now under investigation, accused of being too quick on the draw.

Amid a growing outcry, civil rights groups are urging police to put down their Tasers until more research is done.

"The danger of Tasers is that they seem safe, they seem easy and therefore I think it's natural that police will be inclined to use them much more quickly than they would ever use a gun," Cox told Chen.

"Most of the cases we've looked at, there's been no weapon involved at all [on the part of the suspect], let alone a deadly weapon," Cox said. "So these are not situations where necessarily the police officer sees a threat."

In the Utah highway arrest, the unarmed motorist talks back to the officer and walks away before being stunned.

"The penalty for resisting arrest should not be death," Cox said.

CBSNews.com producer David Morgan contributed to this report.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 518 Comments
by protectyourselfnow October 1, 2010 6:03 AM EDT
It's understandable why police would rather use a TASER than a gun, it is non-lethal in most cases. I agree with a comment made on how they are using TASER in situations that might not necessarily warrant it. I don't see why they felt the need to tase the person more than once. After the 1st Taser shot the police should have been able to control the individual. That's what this weapon is designed for. There is no reason why police should have to shoot someone more than once with a TASER gun.
http://personalprotectionandmore.com/cart.html
Reply to this comment
by DJC88 January 25, 2010 9:45 AM EST
A taser is just a cattle prod for humans, with the voltage lowered a bit. But it's still 50,000 volts, enough to create searing pain in every nerve in your body: in terms of pain level, it is unequivocally torture. The Taser company gets away with saying it's low energy because the current is much too low to kill a healthy person, but there's no predicting how each individual will respond to the physical and psychological trauma of intense pain caused by the voltage.

The point of Tasers was to be used as a humane alternative to guns, but it's pretty obvious that police use them in many situations where you would never think of shooting someone. They're used to enforce 'compliance', the fascist euphemism police use when they regard citizens as subjects.
Reply to this comment
by drbellamy July 21, 2009 8:38 PM EDT
The questions are:

WHY are so many MORE Americans incarcerated, compared to the same population vs. incarcerated in the EU?

WHY do we have body building centers in prisons, where the people going in come out meaner and tougher than they go in?

Those are the real crimes against the great people of this nation!!!

Tasers? BAN THEM NOW!!!
Re-educate our enforcement to use simple common sense, and teach our kids NOT to be aggressive!
Reply to this comment
by newsreader21 November 27, 2007 8:35 AM EST
It seems that in October, the U.N. wanted to *buy* Tasers; check out this document on the U.N.''s own web site:

http://www.un.org/Depts/ptd/pdf/eoi3495.pdf
Reply to this comment
by flreason November 27, 2007 1:17 AM EST
"If you know a person who quit school, pursuade them to go back and finish and get a more promising life. Our society reserves violent experiences for the most stubborn and under-educated souls." Pensacola88

I wish it were that simple. As today''s story about the Ivy League professor who bludgeoned his wife to death shows, education doesn''t insure rational behavior.

I do think that our violence-as-entertainment culture contributes to public violence. Also, the attack-dog political climate that equates compromise with weakness teaches that the end justifies the means--not an example that public officials who want to preserve respect for the rule of law should be setting. That''s reinforced when justice is for sale to the highest bidder, leading to two justice systems: a harsh, judgmental system for the have-nots, and pattern of leniency for those of means, including the professor. Add the diminished importance of religion in our society, and you''ve removed most of the factors that inhibit people''s aggressive behavior. We need, as a society and worldwide, more practice in humility and humanity.

Tazer''s allow police an quick, easy alternative to negotiation. That makes them a tool that is easily abused. With the mounting evidence that they represent lethal force, the rules for their use by law enforcement should be the same as for guns.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 November 27, 2007 12:15 AM EST
Tool I don''t think for a minute you can hold yer own as they think they need a gun.
Back to police..They may be trained to use that bloody taser But they have no medical know how when they use that thing what it will do to a person. The fact is torture is what they perfer to do. They love it.
Reply to this comment
by facts6 November 27, 2007 12:12 AM EST
I had a window peeper who would move the slide panel on the AC window unit to peep. Someone suggested I buy a taser and whop him in the eye. Wouldn''t that have been hysterical!!!!
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 26, 2007 10:04 PM EST
I wonder how the police would react if they were required to endure a tasing everytime they used one on somebody? Might slow down the incidents a bit.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 26, 2007 10:00 PM EST
Using a Taser is not torture, if it is then anything that causes pain is torture (handcuffs, Billy clubs, Karate, arm twisted behind the back, knee on neck) just what is left for criminal control? I can kill with anyone of those just as good as using a gun.
Reply to this comment
by bob0matic November 26, 2007 6:28 PM EST
How mant police have been shot tased or beaten this year. Wrecking your car does not count. That would fall into the catagory of your own fault.
Reply to this comment
See all 518 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook