Flu Drugs Causing Bizarre Behavior?
FDA Wants Warnings For Tamiflu, Relenza For Young Kids As Studies Show Problems
-
Photo
A chemists takes out a package of Tamiflu at a pharmacy in Goeppingen, southern Germany. Now a panel is raising questions about the flu drug's safety for children. (AP)
-
Interactive
Fighting The Flu
Health and vaccine information, photos and outbreak history
-
Photo Essay
Pandemic Planning
Preps for the 2006/07 flu season are a nationwide readiness test for bigger things.
The Food and Drug Administration on Friday released its safety review of Roche's Tamiflu and Glaxo's Relenza. Next week, an outside group of pediatric experts is scheduled to review the safety of several such drugs when used in children.
FDA began reviewing Tamiflu's safety in 2005 after receiving reports of children experiencing neurological problems, including hallucinations and convulsions.
Twenty-five patients under age 21 have died while taking the drug, most of them in Japan. Five deaths resulted from children "falling from windows or balconies or running into traffic."
There have been no child deaths connected with Relenza, but regulators said children taking the drug have shown similar neurological problems.
While FDA said it isn't clear whether the problems are directly related to the drugs, it recommends adding language about the possible side effects to labeling for physicians who prescribe Tamiflu and Relenza.
Besides being a drug side effect, the agency said the behaviors alternately could result from an unusual strain of flu or a rare genetic reaction to the drug.
Company representatives were not immediately available for comment.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Heaven forbid "Free Adults" in the Free World and Physicians making correct choices, lest the dumbing of America.
----------------------------------------------------
denn034 SAID:
"Forget the "label precautions" and recall them. The FDA should''''ve never approved the drugs to begin with. "
One quote you''d hear at the pharmacy might be: How much antifreeze is in them there Chinese vitamins?
They don''t always get it right, but it is the federal government''s job to protect the people. So, they should be involved.
---
Bush and his stealth proxy, Ron Paul, share the policy of "lessez faire" (leave alone) for government administration of such important matters as the FDA-- and it shows in that agency''s almost brain-dead neglect of American health and safety on far too many food and drug consumer issues.
Bush considers the FDA-- like FEMA and DHS-- to be a rest home for political cronies and a servant of his political backers. At FDA, a major policy objective is to make the pharmaceutical industry feel confortable.
In effect, the FDA is permanently out-to-lunch-- a lunch paid for by the major pharmaceuticals. Not surprisingly, FDA policies on drug development strongly favor the major drug corporations, not innovative but underfunded approaches from smaller enterprises.
Few Americans realize the FDA does not independently verify pharmaceutical industry data. FDA does not do significant parallel validation studies of its own.
My grandmother was born in Idaho in 1900; a baby in the family died of polio, her father died of pneumonia in his early 40s, corrective lenses were like gold. Folks had lots of children, in part because one or more would certainly die.
Evil "big-medicine" and evil "big-pharm" have made the common killers (TB, cholera, polio,etc.) of 100 years ago practically unheard of, allowed premature babies to live, and have allowed victims of previously fatal diagnosis (various cancers, contraction of HIV)to not only survive, but live. For crying out loud - you can get examined, prescribed and pick up your glasses all at freakin'' Wal-Mart!
Is medical care too expensive? Probably. Are there problems with our regulatory practices concerning medications? Absolutely.
Are there a heck of a lot of folks around to complain today, that wouldn''t be without evil pharmaceutical companies and private medical research? For sure.
Unlike what most socialist and Democrats think...
They are not the Red Cross.
---
The pharmaceutical industry "sponsored" a study on echinacea which turned out not to favor the herb so strongly as other studies had suggested. Only later was it revealed the industry study failed to extract properly the phytochemical compounds under study.
In addition, the study''s statistical method still left echinacea "almost" significant-- meaning the study numbers easily could have gone the other way, had the plant compound been rendered at full strength. Apparently, Big Pharma still has much to learn from herbal medicine.
Herbs are the oldest drugs, and have the greatest mass of field trial data on record, with an increasing proportion of modern experimental findings. In a subtle bow to herbs'' preeminence in medicine through history, the major pharmaceuticals still scour the earth for promising leads to plant compounds to be synthesized, renamed and marketed.
This approach offers benefits when drug companies learn from nature. But the ultimate ambition of Big Pharma is to "improve" on nature. That direction involves both the lab and legions of paying guinea pigs, sometimes called patients, who use approved experimental compounds literally at their own risk. That is why the quality and integrity of FDA administration is so much at issue.
---
Study the complaints about pharmaceutics, and you quickly will surmise where the evil lies. Evil is not in the science pharmaceuticals exploit, but the entirely unnecessary human corruption attending any market monopoly where power incites greed.
"Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
For sure.
---
In recent years, it has become clear even the Red Cross is not the Red Cross.
But you are the government in a democracy. And this has nothing to do with whether you think, or do not think so.
Don''t listen to the doctors hype about all the BS. Go to the doctor when you are injured or are sick. Don''t go because he/she schedules you for a check up. There is no such thing as preventive medicine. The real term is revenue enhancement.
It was not uncommon for entire families to be wiped out by an epidemic of flu, or TB, or many other communicable diseases for which we now have some protection.
Another way to experience how fortunate we are in the West, in regards to preventive healthcare, is to visit a poor country in which vaccinations are a luxury and in which a good number of women and children die in childbirth.
The last time I took a flu shot, I ached for a month after. Doc said impossible! But he couldn''t explain why I was achy and felt terrible.
Why take something that is likely to make you sick anyway? This is pharmaceutical claptrap. They''re making millions.
If you get flu symptoms, that''s the time to go get treatment.
Eat right, exercise, get a good nights sleep, and go to the Church of whatever denomination you belong to every week. That will solve most of your health problems.
I agree with you 100% and I live in this manner. I hate doctors. They have the mistaken idea that they are our gods on earth.
I''d rather die from my own choices than to die under the influence of a doctor.
-
by tngreen
November 26, 2007 1:27 PM PST
- WELL IF THIS DRUG IS MAKING PEOPLE ACT STRANGE, THE ENTIRE WHITE HOUSE STAFF MUST BE TAKING IT !!!!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 20 CommentsPosted by JetRanger7 at 03:07 AM : Nov 25, 2007
_____________
It''s just too bad it''s not making them leap out of windows or run into traffic!