February 11, 2009 3:50 PM

The Presidential Secondary

By
Dick Meyer
(CBS)  This commentary was written by CBSNews.com's Dick Meyer.




The primary campaign will be over in less than 45 days and the candidates are bloody and their prospects deeply uncertain. The 2008 race remains a tough one to handicap, even this far along.

Whoa, you say, the primaries haven't begun. Wrong. The primaries began last winter when candidates began announcing the pre-announcement and then announced their announcements and then announced. The candidates have debated more times than Lincoln and Douglass ever shook hands. They have been on the Sunday shows for a year, they have cut on each other and they have aired ads.

Nope, the primary campaign is over.

On January 3 in Iowa the Presidential Secondary opens. Thanks to the nearly kaput primary campaign, candidates who had stature nine months ago now look like Lilliputians. Imagine how puny they'll seem by November 2008. Americans will resoundingly vote for relief, sending out a national cry of "Uncle! We give up."

The Democrats at least have a front-runner in the form of Hillary Clinton. Many Democrats believe she is unelectable, of course, but she is the front-runner. And she seems especially unelectable in theory. That is, the concept of "Hillary" does not work as a victorious American president. But the reality of Hillary versus Barack, John E., Rudy, Fred, Mitt, Mike H. or John McC. works better than any other equation. Hence, she is the front-runner.

Many, especially Obama fans, are saddened to see the Democratic primary campaign turning so snarky. Campaigns have simply become very skilled at tearing down opponents and very bad at building public admiration. The great hope was that Barack Obama might change that skill set. Not going to happen and that is a bummer.

John McCain's fans suffered similarly. McCain was to straight talk as Obama was to positive talk. McCain, like Obama, was the charisma leader in their posse. Such factors matter little in 24-month campaigns where every voter is a pundit, every sound bite is YouTube fodder and every utterance is repeated ad nauseum.

So McCain is behind the pack, sometimes trailing Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson.

Rudy Giuliani is the front-runner in his gang. But there's a problem. Mitt Romney is leading in Iowa and New Hampshire. Most handicappers don't believe that Rudy can lose the first two big Secondary races and still be the front-runner. And most-experienced Rudy watchers don't believe the Mayor will handle electoral adversity with grace and aplomb.

So in the Secondary campaign there is tremendous opportunity to further diminish the candidates' stature, the legitimacy of the presidential selection process and the credibility of the American press corps.

Of course, things really won't turn sour until the general election. And if history is a guide, the next president will have an awfully hard time actually governing.




E-mail questions, comments, complaints, arguments and ideas to Against the Grain. We will publish some of the interesting (and civil) ones, sometimes in edited form.
By Dick Meyer

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
by quatrops November 24, 2007 4:25 PM EST
Absolutely amazing! I''m 73, and from the mindset mistered9 reveals @ 12:10, he''s at least 50 years older than me!

Someone should tell him that women can now vote, and, prohibition has been repealed!
Reply to this comment
by sparks224 November 24, 2007 4:15 PM EST
"Can you imagine Obam''''s generation leading this Country?? Teenagers using drugs, shooting up schools and killing their own parents...."
Posted by mistered9

Ah, Yea, Obama will probably fill his cabnet with teenage drug addicts who kill their parents.

By the way, what drugs are YOU on?
Reply to this comment
by mistered9 November 24, 2007 3:10 PM EST
Can you imagine Obam''s generation leading this Country?? Teenagers using drugs, shooting up schools and killing their own parents. Just what we need, the old west style living. Everyone carry a gun and shoot anyone you don''t like. Think a gain Obama, it''s not what we needd.
Reply to this comment
by quatrops November 24, 2007 1:39 PM EST
Figure this! Robisch asserts " . .I will not . . treat differently any homosexual". This follows the sentence in which he asserts a homosexual should be denied "any church job".

What part of "blatent contradiction" don''t you understand, Alan? It is no wonder you are so comfortable with the concept of inerrancy.
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch November 24, 2007 12:22 PM EST
BTW keep using Clinton as neocon excuse #1 for the last 8 years of total failure. I think if the choice had to be between Bill and the chimp in 08, the ol philanderer would get 90 percent of the vote. At least he kept his penetration to his personal partner as opposed to the entire country.


Posted by ainttaken at 08:50 PM : Nov 23, 2007

I am not a defender of GWB''s record. this is difficult if not near impossible. I can say that your memory lapses that we did wage war in the balkans during his period in office and we did a few preemptive strikes during his time in office to try and stop international terrorism
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch November 24, 2007 12:18 PM EST
Quattrops quite clear quite wrong when it comes to stating that active homosexuals should be allowed into the priesthood or any other church office. this is not homophobic. I do not have not and will not hate or detest or even treat differently a homosexual .but unlike you I do believe that the bible is the source of moral teachings and that homosexuality is a sin and no more than having extramarital *** is acceptable to God.

Unfortunately people who use the word homophobic are judging others in the manner that the bible tells us specifically not to do.
Reply to this comment
by quatrops November 24, 2007 1:51 AM EST
Re robisch''s 8:08 query: I know you are not looking for a dictionary definition, so let''s dispense with that. We can also dispense with proof-texting Scripture, since we know already we disagree about inerrancy and whether or not Christ''s overall message of love and tolerance supercedes any words of judgement, intolerance, and supposed prohibitions of behavior that were of his age, whether they appear in Leviticus, Numbers, or Chronicles.

That being said, my basic concern about homophobia is how it manifests itself in so many areas of life that have nothing to do with a person''s sexuality. If a man or woman meets all the qualifications for a particular job, to deny that person employment just because of their sexual preference is homophobic, whether the job is as a sales clerk, priest, bishop, pope, or soldier.

The same would hold for public office or membership in public organizations or religious groups, again where they meet all other qualifications.

I believe it is homophobic to preach that homosexuality is a sin, is evil, is immoral, or decadent.

Clear enough?
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch November 23, 2007 11:10 PM EST
The sad fact is probably 80% of voters choose their candidate based on entirely irrational reasons. U.S. voters have become strongly irrational: ergo, George W. Bush Jr.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Something like voting for bill clinton
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch November 23, 2007 11:08 PM EST
found your caveat about sounding "anti-religious" interesting. As a life-long Christian in a denomination that has led the fight for equality of women and against homophobia, I have never had any quarrel with those of other faiths or those with no institutional "faith" at all. My anger is directed towards the "religious right" who, with their self-rightous, pompous pronouncements on any number of issues gets the great majority of more tolerant and loving Christians painted with the same negative broad brush.


Posted by Quatrops at 03:05 PM : Nov 23, 2007

I agree that people like Jerry falwell and Pat robertson blinds people to the caring that christians bring to what they do in parts of life from food banks to helping the homeless etecetera but I would be interested in knowing what you mean by homophobia.
Reply to this comment
by geezer62 November 23, 2007 8:57 PM EST
Quatrops
Thank you for your kind reply to my post. Your points are well taken and also informative. That is what these sites are meant to do. To exchange ideas and provide food for thought. So many who post here seem to think that the only way to communicate is by insult and sarcasm. If I appear to lump all Christians together I do appologize. It seems that the radical right are the ones we hear to the exclusion of folks like yourself who have the ability to actually understand what Jesus tried to teach us. I sometimes feel left out and have been unable to find a church that is right for me. But it is good to know that there are Christians out there who don''t think I am evil because of my stand on certain issues. Thanks again for your post and I hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving Day.
Reply to this comment
See all 43 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook