Police Crack Down On Newspaper's Sex Ads

Orlando Weekly Say Vice Sting Is In Retaliation For Stories Critical Of Local Officers

(CBS)  For years, the back pages of the Orlando Weekly were filled with ads for naughty nurses, sultry coeds and girls with come-hither names like "Rush" and "Roxie."

But the saucy escort-service advertising came to a halt last month.

Vice squad officers arrested three of the paper's advertising sales reps in a sting operation and secured an extraordinary racketeering indictment against the Weekly, accusing it of knowingly profiting from prostitution.

The free alternative paper, owned by Scranton, Pa.-based Times-Shamrock Communications, is calling the arrests an assault on the First Amendment - an argument that might not fly in court, given that investigators say they videotaped Weekly employees selling ad space to undercover officers who openly claimed to be prostitutes.

"We couldn't believe how easy it was to say, `We're a prostitute. I want to put out an ad,"' said Paul Zambouros, commander of the vice and organized crime section at the Metropolitan Bureau of Investigation, a task force made up of Orlando-area police and sheriff's departments. "That has to stop."

Escort-service ads are common in the nation's alternative newspapers and bring in big money. But Richard Karpel, executive director of the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies, said he has heard of only one other similar case, and it involved only one employee and no charges against the newspaper.

"There's hundreds of ads every week, and it's not a place of newspapers to vet all their ads," Karpel said. "I think the responsibility of the newspaper is to make sure that they're not advertising anything that's explicitly illegal."

The Weekly has decried the arrests as retaliation for running stories critical of the MBI. The paper has extensively chronicled allegations that during investigations of strip-club prostitution and drug sales, MBI officers groped dancers, mishandled evidence and spent a lot of time in nightspots with little results.

The MBI denied the bust had anything to do with the Weekly's stories. Zambouros said the agency couldn't ignore the newspaper because MBI officers kept arresting prostitutes who advertised there.

"Believe me, we've got a lot of other things we want to do," Zambouros said. But "they forced our hand."

The employees were arrested Oct. 19 and charged with aiding and abetting prostitution and profiting from it. The charges could bring as much as five years behind bars. The employees and their lawyer would not comment on the case.

As for the charges that the Weekly operated as a third-party pimp, the paper could be fined $15,000, and it would be up to a judge to decide whether anyone representing the publication goes to jail, according to the MBI.

The MBI spent two years investigating the paper, accumulating hours of audio and video surveillance. Investigators said the Weekly sold ad space to undercover agents posing as prostitutes, even though the officers made it clear they were selling sex.

The ad reps even tried to help the "prostitutes" by passing on a tip the MBI planted about a fictitious sex sting, authorities said.

Publisher Rick Schreiber said in an Oct. 22 statement: "These charges are outrageous and we are confident they will be dismissed in due course. The arrests are a blatant attempt to infringe upon the First Amendment rights of this newspaper and its advertisers."

The newspaper also responded with a 5,000-word story condemning the agency. And in place of the Adult Services section, it ran the text of the First Amendment.

Publishers are usually protected by the First Amendment if ads don't explicitly promote crime, said Jane Kirtley, an authority on media law at the University of Minnesota. But "if there's evidence that they were collaborating with these people, that might be different."

The MBI ran a similar sting against the Weekly in 1996, and the newspaper agreed to eliminate its Adult Services category, though it kept the massage section. In the past few years, though, the escort ads resurfaced.

The MBI said it has seen a corresponding rise in prostitution arrests - 80 connected to the paper since 2003. The Weekly has made $2.5 million on illicit ads over five years, according to the task force's calculations.

The Weekly's coverage of the MBI focused on its handling of two huge strip-club investigations. In both, undercover agents frequented clubs for several months, trying to earn dancers' trust, and then raided the places.

The raids yielded mostly indecent exposure and minor drug charges that brought little prison time for any of the dozens arrested.

Zambouros, in the MBI's defense, said members of the public "don't like the idea of cops having to go up to a topless club and getting a lap dance." But he added: "Well, you're not going to find charges of prostitution unless you pretend like you're a willing customer."

[adasher1]

I have often wondered how papers get away with this. They KNOW there is no escorting going on and that its all about selling ***. While I do not care if consenting adults hook up, they need to use a paper or web site dedicated for it and not a paper that my 9 year old is exposed to. What is the difference between putting ads selling prostitution and ads selling hit man services or crack?

[keithle1]

No one cares about your 9-year-old but you. You gonna lock him up in a closet until he''s 18? What do you think kids at school talk about? Bunny rabbits & Santa Claus?

You think boys aren''t looking at porn on the Web?
I love parents who expect the world to care about protecting their precious child from reality.

"Don''t use four-letter words around Timmy, everyone.
And put away that Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition.
Timmy might see it. Tell that woman walking down the street to cover up. Timmy & I will be walking around downtown tomorrow night. It''s Timmy''s birthday & we''re going to the circus. Tell the prostitutes to stay home."

[brianbwb-2009]

If you are going to sell "it", there is a legal way, get married.

Then after the divorce, you can get paid "residuals" without even giving "it" up.

[wilmer425]

It''s true! Kids are going to find out, and chances are you won''t know about it until years later. I''ve seen it happen. It would be better to tell your kids about this stuff, teach them about it, teach them why it is bad, and what to do to avoid it.

[standlee5]

It''s about time. Every publication you pick up looks like Hooker Gazette. It''s like the whole country has become Las Vegas. Really ugly when your not in the mood.

[jetranger7]

Well next it would of been Drugs, run an ad to sell Drugs in your neighborhood, all for the sake of PROFIT to the newspaper,,bout what it boils down to !!! Anything for a buck, the almighty dollar ! Drugs-hookers-guns-Hit Men, Stolen Cars,Body Parts, who knows whats next this day and age ???

[tuscansun-2009]

Oldest profession in history! Low overhead and endless supply.

[jowand]

If you are going to sell "it", there is a legal way, get married.

Then after the divorce, you can get paid "residuals" without even giving "it" up.
Posted by brianbwb at 09:01 AM : Nov 17, 2007

You can''t legislate morality, just doesn''t work.

[adasher1]

Keithle1, I raised 6 children from 26 to 2. Based on this, I have a pretty good understanding of what they learn and when they learn it. I do not need you or some public paper to teach my kids when I know when the best time to teach them is, and its not when they are 9. I have children in the military, children in med school, and children on the honor lists at their schools, so I have a pretty good track record. A newspaper that is available to the general public is not where I want them to learn that some women sell their bodies to some men. Let them sell and buy, I do not care so long as they consent. Let them open *** houses up, I do not care. And its not a religious thing - as most people here that have read my posts will agree, I do not subscribe to any god. I got my morals from my parents, and I would like to think that I can teach my children on my own. Is that too hard to understand?

[duffyn]

Instead of "you can''t legislate morality" I think we should say "you shouldn''t have to legislate morality". I consider myself a complete freedom loving open minded person. Yet when we see some of the results of too much freedom, I start to think, yes, we need these laws. And, the fact is, prostitution laws tend to come and go, as does the enforcement. I''m just finding out there were all kinds of *****houses before I was born. I never even saw them. And I''m sure it was because it simply got out of control, marriages being wrecked, disease rampant, etc. Probably we are reaching a point where the *** for sale is, once again, getting out of control.

[fibonacci_]

Legalize prostitution. Some people cannot get laid any other way and they need it.

[standlee5]

How much *** and sleaz do we have to be draped in before it''s too much.

[antoniof123]

I lived in Orlando, Florida most of my life and the violent crime in the area is very high and they have time and money to chase hookes, but can''t chase real criminals.

Oh wait I forgot its safer that way.

[logicanada]

likeablunch...when did they hook up the internet at the asylum?

[vlgallas]

adasher1 stated: "They KNOW there is no escorting going on and that its all about selling ***."

That is an outright lie, promoted by Orlando''s morality police - the MBI. I have never placed an ad in the Orlando Weekly''s "adult services" section but have placed one in their "adult help wanted" for social escorts. FYI - Orlando is a convention city and not everyone is interested in Disney! Additionally, the MBI are a gang of thug cop creeps that love to fondle dancers and escorts - and I can prove that statement.

[adasher1]

vlgallas, I stand corrected. The ads with the round butts showing whilst posing on all fours and the tiny panties, and the bright red lip stick and the bright red lips that are a few feet from the face, and the salivating vixens with the wanton looks, and the urgency to CALL NOW do not always catch someone looking to get his crank wet, they sometimes do catch the million dollar exec that is simply looking for a hood ornament. Well put. I stand corrected. My bad dear. I do not want to take away your source of income. But that still does not change my mind that there are places for those ads that do not include the press that is PUBLICLY available.

Look, if you do not want to read fifth grade material, you can avoid it. I do not want my fifth grader to read adult material which I cannot avoid when its printed in normally public pubs..%u2026is that too hard to understand? Do I really need to spell this out?

[stephengosson]

The staffers screaming "First Amendment" over this thinly-disguised prostitution guide are like televangelist, Richard Roberts screaming "God''s will" over his gluttony.

[adasher1]

steveyg5, well said........

[billpl-2009]

well said didntinhale

just watch, the good god loving citizens of Orlando will be soon proclaiming their police force as "heroes"

...while the ****** will be laughing their way off to the next customer

[closethippy1]

I live in Orlando and I have to say the police here are wasting their time chasing prostitutes. Be they on the streets or advertised in the papers.
There''s a strip in town that''s 10 freaking miles long called OBT with prostitutes walking from one end of it to the other.
There''s the 8 mile section where regular prostitutes work, then a one mile section for TV''s and the last mile belongs in the gay section.
What a meat market that place is. You want teenage runaways? Big black dudes? The prettiest TV''s? Tall blondes? The most classy looking girls? The cheapest ho''s? You got it at OBT, baby.
It''s amazing how police cars go up and down the strip and it doesn''t stop anyone from doing business.
I once was looking for a BJ when I spotted this girl up the street. Well, I had a police car behind me and another police car in front of me. The car behind me made a right turn and disappeared from sight. I still had to deal with the police car in front of me so I just waited until he made a left turn and right away I picked up the girl.
See how easy it is even if you''re surrounded by the police? And this girl was dressed for the part. It was no secret what she was looking for and yet her and I were able to coordinate our movements just in time to do business.
The MBI and its cohorts are a joke.

[hypnotoad72]

People, do NOT say "ho". The Santa Squad will come and beat you up with their toy-filled sacks.

But in more earnest seriousness: prostitution, as it stands, is an expensive and dangerous affair. Littered with disease and self-loathing. Not a good thing.

[keithle1]

The tyranny of parents with kids. "We must protect the kids! The world must not do anything that might disturb my child."

Might as well get rid of your TV then. Your kid might be switching channels & see something he shouldn''t see. Get rid of your radio. Wouldn''t want him listening to Howard Stern or Don Imus.

What if someone at school uses a four-letter word or shows your kid a dirty magazine?

[oeangus]

A newspaper that is available to the general public is not where I want them to learn that some women sell their bodies to some men - Posted by adasher1

---

Exactly. Who cares what consenting adults do; just keep the sleazy ads in the sleazy mags.

[adasher1]

oeangus, exactly. However, there are aparently some peeps here that this its O.K. to put sleeze ads in any paper. Why not place ads for gay *** in Sports Illustrated? Why not put ads for fishing in Womens World? How about ads for chain saws in a boating mag? How about ads about diapers in Men''s Health? How about ads for hunting supplies in Cosmo? None of that makes sense, nor do ads with half naked babes selling the elements that they had on when they were born in a paper that is available to anyone. Do I police what my younger children read? Of course I do, and I am not ignorant to the FACT they they will learn stuff when I am not around, duh.

As far as my radio and TV choices, I control those for my younger kids as well. Obviously there will be a time and place for them to learn more, I would simply like to be the one that brings that opportunity about, and not some greedy newspaper that enables people to buy what they otherwise cannot get with good looks and brains.

[glb1969]

Yet another reason to get rid of the police once and for all. The time has come to end the fascist police state we live in once and for all.

[keithle1]

You want to live in a country where there are no police? That makes a lot of sense.

[jetranger7]

Well "Shucks Wally", They shipped our Jobs overseas,outsourced thr rest, now they''re forcing everybody out of their Homes,lettin Illegals take them over, our US Dollar is down, The Prez, Stole a Bunch of US Cash and sent it to those Ragheads, You can''t Smoke in public anymore, can''t get a drivers license anymore bacause they say theirs a shortage, because of all the ILLEGALS who needed them, and now we can''t even sell our bodies any more for ***, Zamn, whats a person to do, Wally ??? Geeee "Beaver" I dunno, maybe we should move to another country like Amsterdamn where we can smoke pot and have *** legally like the good ol'' USA used to be like, before that group of Rednecks from Texas took over and lied to everybody and stole all the money out of the US Treasury,, Ya, Wally when we leavin, soon as I figure out how to sneak on board Air Force 1 Beaver, we have no money ! Humm !!!

[republic1776]

This is ludicrous, the police wasting resource on stupid stuff like this. Paying for *** is a crime, However, I can have a late term abortion at 8 months.
It''s legal for a doctor to drill a hole in a infants head and suck it''s brains out prior to aborting.
What heck is wrong with our Government?

[republic1776]

yep,
OBT "Orange Blossom Trail"

[jetranger7]

OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH,,,,, Wait a minute, I thought the article was saying, the Police are DOING CRACK, and calling the Newspapers *** ADS,, Well, thats what I thought I read anyway,,but it wouldn''t surprise me tho !!

[onsteroids1]

Pornos are America''s entrepreneurial spirit! What the hey? Some fat cat politician can make money declaring war based on noth''n, and constituents can''t have sexxxx ads?

[onsteroids1]

You know how many perverts there are out there?

You know how many perverts there are out there with money?