Saudi Rape Victim Gets 200 Lashes
Court Says 19-Year-Old Woman Improperly Used Media To Influence Case
-
Photo
Unidentified Saudi women walk along a suburban street in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in this Nov. 15, 2006 file photo (AP Photo/Hasan Jamali)
-
Fast Facts
Saudi Arabia
Learn about the people, economy and history.
The decision by the Qatif General Court came in a case that had sparked rare debate about the kingdom's justice system when it surfaced more than a year ago.
In its decision Wednesday, the court also roughly doubled prison sentences for the seven men convicted of raping the 19-year-old woman, the Arab News reported on its English-language Web site.
According to Arab News, the court said the woman's punishment was increased because of "her attempt to aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media."
The New York Times reported that her lawyer, Abdulrahman al-Lahem, is a well-known human rights activist who angered the court by publicly criticizing the verdict. He said the verdict was too lenient for the rapists and unjust for the victim.
The victim had initially been sentenced to 90 lashes after being convicting her of violating Saudi's rigid laws on segregation of the sexes.
Under Saudi Arabia's interpretation of Islamic Sharia law, women are not allowed in public in the company of men other than their male relatives.
The court also banned her lawyer from defending her, confiscated his license to practice law and summoned him to a disciplinary hearing later this month.
The initial sentences for the men convicted of the gang rape ranged from 10 months to five years in prison. Their new sentences range from two to nine years, the paper said.
The attack took place in 2006. The woman has said that it occurred as she tried to retrieve her picture from a male high school student she used to know. While in the car with the student, two men got into the vehicle and drove them to a secluded area. She said she was raped there by seven men, three of whom also attacked her friend.
Reports of the story triggered debate about Saudi Arabia's legal system, in which judges have wide discretion in punishing a criminal, rules of evidence are shaky and sometimes no defense lawyers are present. The result, critics say, are sentences left to the whim of judges.
The judges, appointed by the king, have a wide discretion in handing down sentences, often said to depend on their whim. A rapist, for instance, could receive anywhere from a light or no sentence, to death.
The woman was identified in the media only as the Girl from Qatif. The case was referred back to the General Court by an appeals court last summer, after her lawyer went public with his criticism of the verdict.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 13
- next
See all 616 CommentsWell, of course we did. We couldn''t be retaliating against a country run by George W. Bush''s good buddies, now could we?
Sickening.
Why can''t they see that the rape was punishment enough?
My God, this is beyond sickening.
" Just remember this...Saudi Arabia is bush''''s BEST friend and supporter. Two peas in a pod ...as the saying goes. Can any one in their right mind imagine having a terrorist nation like Saudi Arabia as a friend and ally? bush can! "
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I see a Saudi Prince has one up on Bush''s Air Force One plane. He is buying an especially modified new AirBus A380, which takes twice as many passengers as the 747. Bush would like one but he put the country trillions of $ in the hole.
JUST LIKE BUSH''S FAVORITE TRADE NATION, CHINA, THERE WILL BE NO COMMENT FROM THIS ADMINISTRATION, AND IT WILL TURN A BLIND EYE, DEATH EAR, TO THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
ALL HAIL THE KING............
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY
jQpFAGUrQ
Simple, cut & dried sort of life wouldn''t you say? You do that, you pay. And unlike our "civilized" society, they have the cajones to enforce it as opposed to tying up the legal system and spending thousands, if not millions, of our tax dollars trying to find a loop hole (a la OJ for instance).
Stop worrying about everyone else in the world (kinda like the advise you Demo''s give Bush) and start taking care of yourselves. Hey now, that would be a step in the right direction - even for a liberal!
It''s like one big happy a$$raping of America.
You have posted the same message several times! I have no desire to watch videos of beatings! Do you get some perverse pleasure from those videos?
Whatever... don''t give me that liberal ''everything is relative'' ***... by THAT definition anything & everything is defendable as fair game so long as it exists within the context of ''your culture'' - what''s funny is that my guess is that you''d probably go to all kinds of lengths to condemn whatever it is that America has done or does... but punishing a gang rape victim with 200 lashes & six months in jail is somehow their cultural birthright...
Posted by matvei1107 at 10:07 AM : Nov 16, 2007
Brilliant idea, NOT. This part of the world is considered the cradle of civilization, at least closer to Iraq. How is this civilized? Blaming the victim is not a cultural opinion, and this punishment of the victim is wrong.
If American politics requires us to financially support their cultural identity in this way, then we have learned nothing from supporting the Taliban, building a Soccer Stadium for them to use to stone women for their own sadistic cultural norms--all the men laughing and applauding. Even if any woman voluntarily commits adultery, Christian values do not support her death sentence. And if American money supports this, then we are partially to blame for this grave error of against humanity.
F/uck your liberal reference, what is wrong is wrong--Conservatives could learn alot from that if they could admit their mistakes.
If only we can give the same sentence to Cheney and Bush.
Posted by matvei1107 at 10:07 AM : Nov 16, 2007
Let me guess. You are male. Since most of the barbaric laws fall on women, only a man cannot see this as sexual discrimination and brutality. You put it down to "cultural differences." When in reality it is the systemactic and legal suppression and subjegation of women.
It''s hard to imagine just how warped a society of people would have to be to punish a women with jail and 200 lashes for being gang raped.
We should have seized the opportunity when we had the chance to attack the real source of terrorist attacks on America. The only problem is they would have fought us with all the military equipment we sell to them. The military industries in America that make billions off of equipment sales to cash cow Saudi Arabia would never let their puppet George do that.
By the way America, not one of the hijackers was from Iraq. Those lies were fueled by our President.
The whole thing turned out to be a win win situation for the military industries of America. They get to keep supplying Saudi Arabia with military hardware, and, then on top of that, they get to supply our troops in Iraq with unbid government contracts that channel trillions of taxpayer dollars to them.
Actually, it sounds nothing like the battle cry of the crusades my ignorant friend... I won''t bother detailing this as it''s too obvious... but I would suggest you read a little on the topic before publicizing your stupidity...
It''s crying because it''s leaders are still stuck in the 12th Century AD as Islam''s greatest period in hopes of bringing that era back where the West was a backwater mudhole and the world was ruled from Baghdad.
It''s crying because Islam cannot understand why non-Islamic people don''t look upon it as being a positive influence or a "good, progressive and forward" religion.
The worst thing for Islam''s public relations with other cultures was the 9/11 attacks. Islam''s actions on intolerance of religion and women''s rights doesn''t help this either.
There is hope, though: A select, intrepid few within Islam know their society''s concept of religion and their religious leaders must change in order to interract within a 21st century society.
Power to them, for like Christ... his revolution against the Roman establishment was a quiet one at first. So too will theirs that truly believe in all the good Islam -can- be.
"But, sir... Islam is crying. Don''t you see?" is what the interpreter told me.
I''ll never forget that as long as I live.
;)
Posted by gunownerdan at 10:01 AM : Nov 16, 2007
Or we refuse to survive without. This argument came up quite a bit in the late 1980s, as it pertained to Edward Deming''s succes in Japan--after being rejected by his American constituents. The theory of quality management was eschewed by Detroit and many other industires, and allowed overseas competitors to developed business practices that overshadowed American innovations. Today, we are living the repurcussions of this folly, in that we insist on not pursuing better, cleaner technologies, but instead fight any change for the better. California, I hear, is sueing the EPA to initiate clearer exhause standards. But to your point, we can survive without cheap products from China, and Oil from the Middle East, if we would accept our own American know-how for doing so.
Ah yes... then where ARE we going to buy our oil genius? Oh, I forgot... oil is bad - guess what moron - here in the real world... we have to factor those kinds of things...
liberals - it''s like they were raised in amusement parks....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYjQpFAGUrQ
Dear Nimrod:
What good is swift & strict enforcement of rules - when the rules are an outrage of injustice? That''s like giving a rapist credit for getting his pants off quickly...
Women are treated as lower class citizens in MANY middle eastern countries that met out these types of punishments.
Of course the US needs to stop supporting them but what can you do when everyone complains that drilling here will hurt the enviroment and then they still want to drive their vehicles all over town.( Should we even still continue to feed the N. Koreans that want to build bombs and blow us up? NO)
The US military is being used as the world police, we help everyone over every cause yet they continue to hate us, and the people that don''t want us in any type of war are the ones that whine the most about injustices in other places. They want out of Iraq, but they want to go into the Sudan? Whats the diff?
Sanction the Saudis, for sure, don''t buy their oil but then don''t whine about gas prices going up or about drilling for our own resources here so we as a country are not dependent on these idiots!
Posted by matvei1107 at 10:25 AM : Nov 16, 2007
I would think that herein lies the point of the crusades reference. For instance, Islamic fundamentalism claims superiority over other faiths and religions, but let''s examine this. Check through all of the Saints of the Christian Church, perhaps Catholic mostly, and you''ll find many many women. Check through Islam, and you won''t find hardly any women--because they are all men.
So if this is misogynic, that women cannot drive cars, are not to be treated in hospitals, must be in a separate part of their mosque, or simply cannot be looked at in public--it simply isn''t a human trait that I find to add to the quality of life.
Yes, we need to factor in the reality that we need to buy our oil somewhere. The question that liberals have for conservatives is, at what point do we factor in the realization that we also have to very quickly and forcefully make the transition to alternative forms of energy? Not only to free ourselves from the forign policy entanglements it entails but also for the good of our economy and environment.
Republicans love to bash Jimmy Carter for a variety of reasons(some legitimate, a different discussion) but if we had truly heeded his call 25 years ago to look upon the energy crisis as the moral equivalent of war we would not have the severity of these problems today.
One way or another we''re going to have to because the global supply is limited and the demand too great.
It''s ok to bash Carter and Gore but it''s not ok to deny the message and continue to ask, where do we get our energy when the oil runs out and where do we live when the planet is no longer habitable?
This was a great post... and absolutely true - especially the radical Muslims are taught & reinforced to obsess over a period in history when they went around literally raping and pillaging as much of the world as possible - of course, all in the name of Allah. Now conquest certainly wasn''t unique to Muslims although they were especially brutal about it. And whereas Eurpoeans can sort of study history & at least recognize many of the wrongs of conquest, colonialism, slavery etc... Muslims celibrate that period as their greatest hour & long for it to return... What''s funny is that while their entire existence is spent whining about, if not blowing themselves UP over, the crusades or how Israel stole their land (or at least stole it BACK from them) or how the West is meddling in their affairs etc... they desperately want to do 5 times that to everyone else - but you see... THEY''RE annointed, in fact commanded, by Allah to do so....
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 13
- next
See all 616 Comments