CBS/AP/ February 11, 2009, 3:52 PM

Airline Defends Flying Empty Planes

Jenna Bush, left, and her sister Barbara Bush, applaud their grandparents, former President George H.W. Bush, former first lady Barbara Bush, not seen, in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, May 31, 2012, during a ceremony to unveil their parents portraits. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)?

Jenna Bush, left, and her sister Barbara Bush, applaud their grandparents, former President George H.W. Bush, former first lady Barbara Bush, not seen, in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, May 31, 2012, during a ceremony to unveil their parents portraits. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)? / Carolyn Kaster

British Airways could advertise lots of extra legroom on some of its transatlantic flights, by virtue of the fact that there are no passengers.

The U.K. airline has been flying some planes from Britain to North America this month without a single passenger aboard because of a cabin crew shortage, the airline said Wednesday.

Since Nov. 1, about one BA flight a day from Britain to the U.S. or Canada has left Heathrow or Gatwick airport carrying only pilots and cargo.

"We have been flying empty planes between London and various cities in the United States," British Airways spokesman John Lampl confirmed to CBS News, though he said the number was few.

He insisted the planes are not flying simply to hold onto BA's valuable landing slots at London's airports or in the United States.

British Airways PLC controls 41 percent of the sought-after slots at Heathrow airport - more than any other airline - and like other flyers it must use them 80 percent of each year to retain them.

BA said it is working hard to resolve its staffing problem, caused by the difficulty it sometimes has coordinating the separate schedules of its 15,000 full- and part-time cabin crew members, 3,000 pilots and 240 planes operating around the world. This sometimes leads to a lack of cabin crew for a specific flight.

One environmental group sharply criticized the "phantom" BA flights, saying they indicate once again how indifferent the aviation sector can be to the world's battle against global warming.

A 747 flying from London to New York will burn almost 100,000 gallons of fuel, which produces a considerable amount of pollution and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

The practice of expending that much fuel for empty flights also comes at a time when BA has raised fuel surcharges to its customers, applying almost $200 to each long haul, round-trip ticket.

"At a time of climate crisis it's absolutely scandalous that BA should be flying empty planes across the Atlantic," said Ben Stewart, a spokesman for Greenpeace's London office.

"Global warming is the greatest threat we face, but by doing this, British Airways is flying in the face of the science and public opinion. The public wants companies to act responsibly these days."

BA's Web site heralds the airline's commitment to reducing its carbon footprint, indicating that the carrier has improved its fuel efficiency by 28 percent since 1990.

Earlier this year, British Mediterranean Airways, or BMed, a struggling carrier then operated as a BA franchise, was accused of using "ghost" flights between Heathrow and Cardiff to retain its slots at the London airport. In October, the airline stopped operating as a BA franchise, and it is now owned by BMI.
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
5 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
octavianfdlr says:
"Airline Defends Flying Empty Planes"

Since Nov. 1, about one BA flight a day from Britain to the U.S. or Canada has left Heathrow or Gatwick airport carrying only pilots and cargo.

------------------------------

I will ask again, because the only answer from CBS has been to repeat its accusation:

Why not complain about "empty" freight trains (which have no passenger cars), "empty" cargo-filled trucks (which are not passenger buses) and "empty" cargo containers (those which are full of freight, and not being used to smuggle illegal aliens).

If an airliner is full of cargo, it is not empty.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
amazedd says:
It%u2019s just that some peoples have a track record of using their flying machines as battering-rams, see?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
amazedd says:
Still, it makes me uncomfortable to think some Saudi crackpot is flying around, playing games, inside an A-380. What%u2019s wrong with private-jets?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eggy1620 says:
A previous CBS article said no passengers could leave the UK under those crew conditions, but passengers can leave the US under those same crew conditions. Inconstistent and arbitrary regulations are to blame here.

reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
amazedd says:
It%u2019s interesting that people are shredding their garments over global warming, while some prince chooses to fly an A-380 behemoth for some obscene fun.
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right