Home Foreclosure Rates Spiking
Stockton, Calif., Worst Off In 3rd Quarter Look At 100 Metropolitan Areas
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Mortgage Crisis Hurts Retirees
Levitt and Sons, the company that invented the American suburb, is crumbling and many of their clients have invested their retirement funds into homes that are not finished. Kelly Cobiella reports.
-
Photo
A home under foreclosure in Stockton, Calif., Nov. 11, 2007 . (AP/Stockton Record)
-
Special Report
Money Matters
Get words to the wise, from the wise, on handling, making and saving money.
An analysis of foreclosure activity in the nation's largest 100 metropolitan areas during the three months ended Sept. 30 shows seven cities in California and five each in Florida and Ohio were among the top 25 metro areas with the highest foreclosure rates, according to the study being released Wednesday by RealtyTrac Inc.
The Irvine-based company calculates its foreclosure rate ranking by comparing the number of households in a metro area with the number of foreclosure filings, which include notices of default, auction sale notices or bank repossessions.
Stockton, about 83 miles east of San Francisco, had the highest foreclosure rate in the third quarter among the top 100 metro areas, with one foreclosure filing for every 31 households, RealtyTrac said.
Detroit was second, with one foreclosure filing for every 33 households. The Riverside-San Bernardino metro area, located about 60 miles east of Los Angeles, was third, with one filing for every 43 households.
Riverside-San Bernardino also accounted for the most foreclosure filings in the U.S. during the quarter, RealtyTrac said.
The housing market slump has made it harder for financially strapped homebuyers to sell their homes and avoid missing payments or losing their homes in foreclosure. Increasingly, many borrowers who took out adjustable-rate mortgages and other loans that potentially adjust to higher monthly payments after an initial period are also finding they can't afford their payments.
Once-booming areas, such as California's Central Valley, where Stockton is located, and the neighboring counties that are home to Riverside and San Bernardino, are also mired now with a glut of new and resale homes.
"What happens there is you have your basic economic imbalance between supply and demand," said Rick Sharga, vice president of marketing for RealtyTrac. "It exacerbates the problem for people who are on the verge of default."
Stockton had 7,116 foreclosure filings on 4,409 properties during the quarter, an increase of more than 465 percent from the same quarter a year ago, the company said.
The Detroit metro area, which includes Livonia and Dearborn, reported 25,708 filings on 16,079 homes, up more than 93 percent from the same quarter last year. It had the third-highest number of filings during the quarter.
Riverside-San Bernardino, meanwhile, had 31,661 filings on 20,664 properties, a jump of more than 267 percent from the year-ago quarter.
Fort Lauderdale, Fla., was ranked fourth, followed by the Las Vegas-Paradise metro area.
In Fort Lauderdale, one in every 48 households was in foreclosure, up 127 percent, reports CBS News correspondent Kelly Cobiella.
The foreclosure spikes are even affecting Levitt and Sons, the company that founded Levittown and helped popularize the American suburb. The company is facing bankruptcy and blames its troubles on a housing glut, the mortgage crisis and skittish buyers.
Retirees Angelo and Paula Palermo were supposed to be closing on their Levitt home in Port St. Lucie, Fla., this winter, reports Cobiella. Instead they're living in a one bedroom apartment, waiting to see if their builder can survive.
"This was our last move, I swear,” said Angelo Palermo. “I said to my wife, this is where we will die.”
But the Palermo's development and more than 30 others across the southeast are on hold, and some 600 customers, many of them retirees, with $18 million in deposits are in limbo, reports Cobiella.
The California metro areas of Sacramento, Bakersfield and Oakland were also among the top 10 metro areas with the highest foreclosure rates, garnering the sixth, ninth and 10th spots, respectively.
A metro area in Ohio composed of Cleveland, Lorain, Elyria and Mentor was ranked seventh. Miami was ranked eighth.
Los Angeles had the second-highest number of foreclosure filings during the quarter with 29,501 on 18,043 homes. The city's foreclosure rate was one filing for every 113 households, or 26th overall.
Some metro areas, including Baton Rouge, La., McCallen-Edinburg-Pharr, Texas, and Greenville, S.C., saw foreclosure filings drop during the quarter.
Borrowers in Detroit and other metro areas in the Midwest that have been hard-hit by job losses generally were receiving late-stage foreclosure filings, such as notices of auction or bank repossession, Sharga said.
"That just speaks to the underlying weakness in those areas," he said.
Dave Webb, co-owner of Hudson & Marshall, a foreclosure auction firm based in Dallas, said most of the properties being auctioned by his firm in inland areas of California are investment properties that ended up being repossessed by lenders after the market tanked.
"What I'm selling this week - 700 homes in the Stockton-Oakland area - these properties were probably foreclosed a good year-and-a-half ago," Webb said.
The properties that end up in foreclosure now, however, will likely be homes bought by first-time buyers and others with adjustable rate mortgages due to reset to higher monthly payments, he said.
"You'll see when we come back late next year," Webb said. "It will be mostly owner-occupied homes."
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 83 CommentsAre the mortgage brokers/agents to blame?.... Yes, (partially).
So there is a lot of blame to go around, but no single entity is completely at fault for the housing market slump. It is comprised of multiple factors.
So if anyone is going to "point a finger", they''d better use more than one finger to point in multiple directions.
I agree with you. I am am a soon to be young home owner and my wife already thinks we hae to have the best and nicest of everything. It''s going to be an up hill battle trying to convince her to do it slow and steady instead of diving right in trying to live like we are either well off or well established in a home. I grew up learning the value of a dollar the hard way and am accustomed to hand me down furniture and things when getting started.
I don''t have a mortgage, I paid MY 10 year mortgage off in 5 years by making extra principal payments every month, as a result I own my house and land outright free and clear.
You play, you pay....
That''s easy for YOU to say Doug - because you and a lot of older folks had the appreciation of your homes skyrocket in many markets plumping up your equity something fierce - heck, even folks who aren''t necessarily ''older'' but got INto the game during the 90s had the value of their homes jump incredibly...
So you still think young & new home buyers are over extending themselves on top notch counter tops & the latest refridgerators? No my friend, even older outdated homes are infinitely more expensive these days as a % of one''s income - and when you DON''T have the benefit of sitting on your own pile of equity from the sale of your current home - well, basically you''re on your own to make up the difference... and THAT''S why in most cases it takes two incomes minimum to even stay afloat...
so you have this population that has now lost a home and has a huge credit blemish on a record that either was clean before, or was not so good and is now worse.
So on top of that you now have mortgage companies tightening loan standards with some cutting off all subprime loans. --- which makes it near impossible for many of the people to get a mortgage that had one before. So... now you have thousands and thousands of empty homes with a population of potential home buyers that now cannot get a mortgage to buy one.
So what concept does this bring to the Lenders and Real Estate agancies regarding selling these homes again? Wait for years for first time buyers with great credit to buy them all? more speculators? conglomerate rental agencies? what effect does this have on the house rental and apartment industry?
Secondly, the Lenders are making their claims on the PMI, that so many affected had been paying in their escrow, and the article yesterday stated that the Mortgage insurance industry is doing fine right now.
So lenders are making their money back not on your taxes.
Third, FHA insured mortgages dont mean your taxes go to a bailout either since FHA operates entirely from self-generated income and costs the taxpayers nothing.
You people always need to insult others, and categorize yourselves as the "great people" the ones that never make mistakes and are totally smarter than 90% of the rest of hte population... you Savants you.
what a bunch of whiners.
Anyone who bought a house without the income to afford it, should suffer for their poor decision. I''m tired of listening to the claim about home values. The value of a home is not nearly as important as the benfit of owning a home to live in. Who cares if it goes up or down in price? It''s where you live. It''s no investment. Those who invest in homes are mostly responsible for this bubble and they deserve what they get and I would hope for financial disaster.
All your acquaintances may feel like their home is an investment because it requires so much capital. It is an investment in quality of life, lifestyle, piece of mind, and family. If considered an investment at all, it is a stretch in the normal understanding of the term. It is not an investment in the sense that one considers other investments, like stocks and other forms of real estate.
When a financial questionaire is required to evaluate one''s net worth, the "not including your primary residence" statement makes my point. This is because true investments are more readily sold off to take profits or losses. One doesn''t so easily sell their home to do this. It has much more value than just the price at any given time..
Assume a house is 300K 5 years ago. Normal appreciation rates are below 4%, so lets say its "normal" price today would be 300K x (1+.04)^5th power, which is 300K x 1.217=365K.
Now lets do the math again with that same 300K house from 5 years ago, with 20% appreciation for 3 years, flat for two, how much would it have to drop to get back to the "fair value" price?
300K x (1 .2)^3 power = 300k*1.728=518K. So, to get to "fair value", 365K, that is a change of (518-365)=153K.
And 153K divided by 518K=29.5% DROP.
Now, in many areas the housing went up EVEN MORE! So until there is a 30% or more drop in prices, we have NOT seen bottom.
Jon Boy
my blog: www.curiousread.com
************************
LIVING WITHIN YOUR MEANS
************************
Perhaps people should give it a try, sometime...
ITS CALL THE MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT 2006, AND HIDDEN IN FINE PRINT CONGRESS HAS GIVEN THEMSELFS AND ANYONE WORKING IN THE GOVERNEMNT IMMUNEITY ON ANY THING THAT HAS HAPPEN IN THE WAKE OF THE WAR,OR ANYTHING ELSE THEY CAN FIND.
THIS IS THE BEST PART, THEY BACK DATED IT TO ( 1997) why?????
why would they need to back date this all the way before 2001????
because they have been ease dropping on america way back then...think about it america, and you better think about this, cheney/bush/rumsfeld/rove/rice started this war on all lies on top of lies, and remember 18 out of 19 involved in 2001 was saudi araibans you know the king and bush hold hands walking in the woods??? and this is why bush said he doesn''t care about finding bin laddan because bin is part of the royal family that bush loves..
so if you look at the hole law, hillary help get it into law, why why why sounds funning because her husband bill was president at that time in 1997..so what are they all hideing in washington???????????????
david a belanger,veteran,us army, 978-618-3105,for-america@hotmail.com
It''s not so much that the dollar is worth less. It''s more an issue of home prices compared to earned incomes. While the value of a dollar may only be half of what is was in 2001, the wages and earnings have not kept pace. It''s not in any kind of balance and I agree with ozilot that the scam artists are mostly responsible for the synthetic jump in prices.
You are correct in what you say. There is considerable value in homeownership for the reasons stated plus many more. I agree with you about the unscrupulous methods and people involved in the creation of the bubble. It is a tough time for first-time buyers.
Amen to that... those who have really lost out ARE those young and/or new home owners... We''ve seen many comments talking about how they''re simply stupid for buying the latest & best while you folks settled for hand-me-downs etc... Perhaps a few, but in most instances - these young/new homeowners have to pay a massively higher price as a % of income for the same home YOU bought back when YOU were young/new to the home buying market. Most of the people I see getting these huge houses & all the latest awesome frills are NOT young/new buyers; rather, they''re mostly people who DID buy way back when & are now sitting on goldmines because their homes appreciated so much in value - that they''ve re-invested in the same real estate market that got them so much equity in the first place - driving prices thru the roof... Basically, there''s 2 groups of people here - those who face very high home prices, yet also benefitted from their OWN home''s value doubling tripling... and those who face very high home prices who did NOT own a home, or own one for long...
Both myself & my wife are professionals who make decent salaries - we''ve only got 1 new baby and could only afford to buy a small vintage condo in Chicago that''s got some shady elements in the neighborhood
It seems to me that viewing human labor as a commodity is the most short-sided and self-destructive management policy one could think of. It does not provide any incentive to invest in human capital and boost skill levels in the workforce. The ''labor as a commodity'' thinking is a trap that keeps us all down.
Choose your favorite candidate -- change anytime --
www.netvote2008.com
As far as sub-prime mortgages--need I say more? If it is too good to be true, it usually is too good to be true. The same is true with ARMs. Some people want the government to bail these people out. The job of the government is not to bail people out of every poor decision they make. They agreed to the terms of the loan; then they have to live with the consequences.
If the lender defrauded people, that is a different story and needs to be dealt with in criminal and civil court.
Simple reasoning could have prevented this, but greed gets in the way. Think about it - If I send US jobs overseas and render many people here unemployed, who will buy my products/services? Wow! What insight! You mean if jobs keep floating out of this Country, people won''t be able to make a living???
Real Rocket Science, but here we are........
I hope I''m wrong........
Simple reasoning could have prevented this, but greed gets in the way. Think about it - If I send US jobs overseas and render many people here unemployed, who will buy my products/services? Wow! What insight! You mean if jobs keep floating out of this Country, people won''''t be able to make a living???
Real Rocket Science, but here we are........
Posted by pilgrimsprog at 04:27 PM : Nov 14, 2007
Worse than that. They also pay-off politicians to pass laws so they can monopolize industries and prevent a US made product from getting in the market.
We should be looking at proper solutions and not blaming everyone else, *** it.
Posted by ivymw2002 at 04:45 PM : Nov 14, 2007
Maybe if they stop lying they''ll cure their obesity problem too?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 83 Comments