WASHINGTON, Nov. 8, 2007

Mukasey Confirmed As Attorney General

Wins Confirmation 53-40, Despite Waterboarding Controversy

  • Interactive The Bush Cabinet

    A look at departures, new nominees and long-standing members of the president's staff.

  • Interactive Abuse At Abu Ghraib

    Investigation timeline, the chain of command, POW rules, global mistreatment of prisoners and video reports.

(AP) 

Mukasey has called waterboarding personally “repugnant,” and in a letter to senators said he did not know enough about how it has been used to define it as torture. He also said he thought it would be irresponsible to discuss it since doing so could make interrogators and other government officials vulnerable to lawsuits.

“He felt that he could not make that pronouncement without placing people at risk to be sued or perhaps even criminally prosecuted,” said Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Mukasey, who received a strong endorsement from Schumer, was the White House's first choice to replace Gonzales. Gonzales announced his resignation on Aug. 27, and the White House interviewed Mukasey the same day. Three weeks later, Mr. Bush introduced the 66-year-old Mukasey as “a tough but fair judge” and asked the Senate to confirm him quickly.

Mukasey, the former chief U.S. district judge in the Manhattan courthouse just blocks from ground zero, was first appointed to the bench in 1987 by President Reagan. He also worked for four years as a trial prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office in New York's Southern District - one of the Justice Department's busiest and highest-profile offices in the country.

Mukasey oversaw some of the nation's most significant terror trials in the years before and after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

He sentenced Omar Abdel Rahman, known as the “blind sheik,” to life in prison for a plot to blow up New York City landmarks, and he signed in 2002 the material witness warrant that let the FBI arrest U.S. citizen Jose Padilla. That warrant marked the start of a case that wound its way through several federal courts as the government declared Padilla an enemy combatant and held him for 3˝ years before he was convicted last month on terrorism-related charges.

In an opinion article in The Wall Street Journal, Mukasey criticized U.S. national security law as too weak in some areas by noting that prosecutors are sometimes forced to reveal details of cases at the risk of tipping off terrorists. He is also a supporter of the government's anti-terror USA Patriot Act, wryly writing in 2004 that the “awkward name may very well be the worst thing about the statute.”

Mukasey, a partner at New York-based law firm Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, is also a close friend to former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Republican. He stepped down as an adviser to Giuliani's presidential campaign, on which he served as part of an advisory committee on judicial nominations.

Besides Schumer and Feinstein, Democrats voting to confirm Mukasey were: Sens. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Tom Carper of Delaware, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Of the Senate's two independents, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut voted for confirmation and Bernie Sanders of Vermont voted against.

Not voting were Democratic presidential candidates Joe Biden of Delaware, Hillary Clinton of New York, Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Barack Obama of Illinois. All four had said they opposed Mukasey's nomination.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain of Arizona also was absent, as were GOP Sens. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and John Cornyn of Texas.

© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 103 Comments
by trueprophet November 12, 2007 12:00 AM EST
RON PAUL TO CLOSE GUANTANAMO TORTURE PRISON
Ron Paul is the only Presidential candidate who does not support secret offshore prisons like the one in Guantanamo, wherein our government tortures prisoners, who have no right to redress of grievance, or to Writ of Habeus Corpus. Ron Paul promises he will close these "illegal prisons" down. He wouldn''t necessarily just release the prisoners either. He said he would simply bring them to detainment facilities on U.S. soil where they would be entitled to an attorney, and to their day in Court--"American Justice." Significant others agree with Paul. "Essentially, we have shaken the belief that the world had in America''s justice system by keeping a place like Guantanamo open and creating things like a Military Commission," former U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell recently said.
Reply to this comment
by name_verify November 11, 2007 12:08 AM EST
Even more conservative than Gonzo. "W" wins again.
Reply to this comment
by nofascists November 10, 2007 11:34 AM EST
Published on Thursday, November 8, 2007 by the Los Angeles Times

Torture: The New Abortion
by Rosa Brooks

Remember that golden, innocent time %u2014 the 1980s and %u201990s %u2014 when the phrase %u201Cpolitical litmus test%u201D was associated with the debate about abortion rights, and torture was associated with the Spanish Inquisition?

Those days are gone. And, as usual in life, there%u2019s good news and bad news.

The good news? Abortion isn%u2019t nearly as divisive an issue as it used to be. The bad news? For the GOP, torture is the new abortion.

Not too long ago, judicial nominees and political candidates could expect to be grilled on abortion. As the Republican leadership became dominated by right-wing evangelicals, staunch opposition to abortion became a precondition for those seeking support from GOP insiders. Soon, abortion was a litmus test for both parties. Just as Republicans would oppose any candidate or nominee who supported abortion rights, Democrats would oppose anyone who wanted Roe vs. Wade overturned.

Cont
Reply to this comment
by nofascists November 10, 2007 11:32 AM EST
Cont

Of course, the abortion debate was never just about abortion. It was also about the role of the judiciary, the role of individual freedom, the role of women and the role of religion. As a result, debates about abortion sparked pitched battles between the political parties.

Today, though, the GOP%u2019s interest in abortion appears greatly diminished. When President Bush nominated Michael B. Mukasey as attorney general, no one seemed clear about Mukasey%u2019s views on abortion %u2014 and no one in the GOP seemed to care very much either.

These days, you can forget that old-style GOP rhetoric about %u201Cvalues,%u201D %u201Chuman dignity%u201D and the %u201Cculture of life.%u201D Because the GOP has a new litmus test for its nominees: Will you or will you not protect U.S. officials who order the torture of prisoners?

Cont
Reply to this comment
by nofascists November 10, 2007 11:31 AM EST
Cont

As Scott Horton reports in his Harper%u2019s Magazine blog: %u201CSeveral days before his first meeting with the Senate Judiciary Committee, Michael Mukasey%u2019s Justice Department handlers arranged a private meeting for him with a number of %u2018movement conservatives.%u2019%u2026 They pushed aggressively on the torture question. They wanted Mukasey to pledge that he would toe the administration%u2019s line%u201D by not criticizing the administration%u2019s approval of waterboarding and similar interrogation techniques, and they wanted him to %u201Cprotect those who authored the [interrogation] program%u201D by issuing opinions that would keep those responsible for the program from facing criminal prosecution.

In his Senate testimony, Mukasey made it clear that he shared this agenda. He was conciliatory on a wide range of issues, but even when it looked as though his confirmation was at risk, he refused to give an opinion on whether waterboarding constitutes torture or is legally prohibited. That was his line in the sand.

Cont
Reply to this comment
by nofascists November 10, 2007 11:30 AM EST
Cont

For further evidence that torture is the new abortion %u2014 at least when it comes to the GOP %u2014 look at the Republican presidential hopefuls. This time around, rigorously antiabortion evangelicals such as Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee gained little traction, while Rudy Giuliani %u2014 who supports abortion rights %u2014 has a solid lead. On Wednesday, Giuliani gained the coveted endorsement of Pat Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition.
Giuliani%u2019s main selling point with GOP stalwarts is his toughness on terrorism, symbolized by his %u201Cgloves-off%u201D approach to interrogations. In the campaign%u2019s first GOP presidential debate, Giuliani told a cheering crowd that if the U.S. captured a suspect believed to be planning a terrorist attack, %u201CI would tell the people who had to do the interrogation to use every method they can think of.%u201D Pressed on whether that would include waterboarding, Giuliani repeated, %u201CEvery method they could think of, and I would support them in doing that.%u201D More recently, Giuliani claimed that whether or not waterboarding is torture %u201Cdepends on who does it.%u201D

But if the waterboarding debate has become a symbolic rallying point for Republicans %u2014 emblematic of a broader insistence on aggressive unilateralism in foreign affairs and on executive power unchecked by Congress or the judiciary here at home %u2014 it increasingly seems to be turning into a symbolic litmus test for Democrats too.

Cont
Reply to this comment
by nofascists November 10, 2007 11:28 AM EST
Cont
Significantly, every Democrat running for president opposed Mukasey%u2019s confirmation, specifically citing his refusal to call waterboarding torture. New York%u2019s Charles Schumer and California%u2019s Dianne Feinstein became the only Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee to vote for Mukasey, and both found themselves on the defensive.
They shouldn%u2019t have been so surprised by the rapid blowback. Far more than the abortion debate ever did, the debate about torture goes to the very heart of what (if anything) this country stands for. Do we want to be the nation imagined by the signers of the Declaration of Independence, a nation with %u201Ca decent respect to the opinions of mankind,%u201D committed to a vision of human dignity and unalienable rights, limited government and the rule of law?
Or would we rather bring back the methods of the Spanish Inquisition?
As litmus tests go, that%u2019s not such a bad one.
%u2013 rbrooks@latimescolumnists.com
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales November 10, 2007 11:22 AM EST
The Democratic treachery is complete...the cover-up artist of the first WTC attack is now the gangster in charge of the ''Justice'' Department.
Reply to this comment
by trueprophet November 10, 2007 7:15 AM EST
RON PAUL TO CLOSE GUANTANAMO TORTURE PRISON
Ron Paul is the only Presidential candidate who does not support secret offshore prisons like the one in Guantanamo, wherein our government tortures prisoners, who have no right to redress of grievance, or to Writ of Habeus Corpus. Ron Paul promises he will close these "illegal prisons" down. He wouldn''t necessarily just release the prisoners either. He said he would simply bring them to detainment facilities on U.S. soil where they would be entitled to an attorney, and to their day in Court--"American Justice." Significant others agree with Paul. "Essentially, we have shaken the belief that the world had in America''s justice system by keeping a place like Guantanamo open and creating things like a Military Commission," former U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell recently said.
Reply to this comment
by trueprophet November 10, 2007 7:13 AM EST
HOPE FOR AMERICA: PRESIDENT RON PAUL

-- No more meddling in other country''s political affairs
-- No more aggressive military actions overseas
-- No more torture prisons
-- No more pseudo-wars like the "War on Drugs"
-- No more IRS and unconstitutional income taxes
-- No more Federal Reserve (the group of private banks which owns our government)
-- No more U.N. (one world government) participation
-- No more NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO or GATT
-- No more North American Union
-- No more federal gun control laws
-- No more illegal aliens pouring-in over our country''s borders
-- No more illegal aliens allowed to roam freely in our streets
-- No more federal Laws which are not authorized by The Constitution
-- No more federal erosion of State sovereignty
-- No more all-powerful (Orwellian) federal government

They don''t call him "Dr. No" for no reason. The Doctor is in! Join us in this 21st Century political revolution at ronpaul2008.com

"Liberty, when it takes root, is a plant of rapid growth."
- George Washington

"Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must...undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
- Mahatma Gandhi
Reply to this comment
by searingtruth November 9, 2007 9:10 PM EST
"BE AFRAID,,, BE VERY AFRAID,,,

PICTURE FASCIST NAZI GERMANY WITH NUKES,,,

WAKE UP! The Crisis in Pakistan Is Much More Dangerous Than You Think
Musharraf''''s Emergency Crackdown Is Anathema to Everyone Who Cherishes Human Rights and Democracy. But His Grip on Power Is Slipping ..."


Oh my goodness.

Sometimes I really have to wonder.

Ummm ....

His grip on power is slipping because he is a brutal dictator, and has unjustly imprisoned, tortured, murdered, and oppressed his people for years.

And America, by supporting such brutal tyrannies, and abandoning the rule of law ourself, has given our enemies all the ammunition they need.

For free.

Well, actually, at the cost of 225 years of American freedom.

But yes, be afraid. Be very afraid.

Get ready for harvest. The final reaping of the neocons whirlwind of evil.
ST


"Moments before our destruction we discovered that weapons were not reason."
SearingTruth

A Future of the Brave - www.searingtruth.com
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam5 November 9, 2007 8:28 PM EST
BE AFRAID,,, BE VERY AFRAID,,,

PICTURE FASCIST NAZI GERMANY WITH NUKES,,,

WAKE UP! The Crisis in Pakistan Is Much More Dangerous Than You Think
Musharraf''s Emergency Crackdown Is Anathema to Everyone Who Cherishes Human Rights and Democracy. But His Grip on Power Is Slipping Just as Islamic Extremists Are Escalating Their Bloody Insurgency. If They Succeed in Overthrowing Musharraf and Seizing Power, al-Qaida Will Gain Access to Pakistan''s Nuclear Weapons.
http://www.skeeterbitesreport.com/2007/11/wake-up-crisis-in-pakistan-is-much-more.html

Iran could have nukes by 2009
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380749027&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan November 9, 2007 6:24 PM EST
As president, Dr. Ron Paul will NEVER allow torture in America.
Why?
Because he''s not a fascist neocon!
Ron Paul is #1 on the internet.
Youtube viewers can choose to subscribe to their favorite candidate''s youtube page for updates on their latest videos.
Dr. Ron Paul has more subscribers in Youtube than Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Joe Biden, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, and John McCain COMBINED.
Candidate / Number of Subscribers as of Nov. 8, 2007:
Obama = 12,384
Clinton = 6,661
Edwards = 4,437
Biden = 1,483
Romney = 3,231
Giuliani = 2,645
McCain = 1,740
Thompson = 760

TOTAL = 33,341

Dr. Ron Paul = 35,855

This is no accident or typo, Dr. Ron Paul really is #1 on the internet! Why? Because the internet is not controlled by a small handfull of huge corporations, it''''s controlled by WE THE PEOPLE.
You won''t hear this from the mainstream media, but peace and liberty are very popular!
ronpaul2008.com

Reply to this comment
by j-whitman November 9, 2007 5:51 PM EST
simonsez40,,,, You are absoulty right... If Bush droped a nuclear bomb on Miami or fiddled while America burned they would think Bush is right.
Reply to this comment
by simonsez40 November 9, 2007 5:47 PM EST
nexgen99,,,, Here we go again,, KSM whould have admitted to raping the Virgin Mary, giving Elvis drugs & sinking the Titanic


Posted by j-whitman

j-whitman you are arguing with the cult members - they are gullable and believe anything the Bush Administration does - why do you think he stole the election twice? Keep up the good fight!
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman November 9, 2007 5:45 PM EST
nexgen99,,,, Here we go again,, KSM whould have admitted to raping the Virgin Mary, giving Elvis drugs & sinking the Titanic
Reply to this comment
by nexgen99 November 9, 2007 5:33 PM EST
nexgen99 --- Waterbording does cause death

Posted by j-whitman
=========================

And is ahas recently been proved to be effective with Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and others
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman November 9, 2007 5:23 PM EST
nexgen99 --- Waterbording does cause death
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman November 9, 2007 5:19 PM EST
nexgen99 --- Waterbording puts water in your lungs, America has prosecuted others for doing it since the end of the Spanish American War ---- In 1983 Ronald Reagans administration found Texas lawmen guilty of torture in Waterbording during interegations, the lawmen were found guily & the sheriff got 10 years in federal prison.
Reply to this comment
by nexgen99 November 9, 2007 5:14 PM EST
"Prepare to be waterboarded!!!
HEIL Bush! Posted by jh6379

With an attitude such as this - waterboarding might as well be done.
Posted by speakinup


====================================


Yeah waterboarding, its almost as bad as that gurgling and choking on your own blood as you''re being beheaded, but at least you don''t die with waterboarding. Stop whining and waterboard
Reply to this comment
See all 103 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (490 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: