Romney: Give Parents More Say In Education
Republican Hopeful Downplays Endorsements Received By McCain, Giuliani
-
Photo
Republican Presidential hopeful, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, left, is introduced to a crowd gathered for a morning campaign stop at EdVenture Children's Museum, in Columbia, S.C., Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2007. (AP)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Gladhanding In Greenville
An enthusiastic Mitt Romney hits the streets in Greenville, S.C., where he's greeted with hugs and kisses, takes a photo with Hooters girls, and high-fives a giant apple.
-
Video
Romney On The GOP Race
"Only on the Web": Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney explains why he thinks the GOP race is still wide open and what distinguishes him from other candidates.
-
Video
Mitt Plays It Safe At Big Game
"CBS News Raw": Mitt Romney attends the pre-game festivities at the Michigan - Michigan State football game Saturday. "I've got enough rivalries of my own," said Romney, declining to pick a favorite.
-
Interactive
Campaign 2008
Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.
-
Interactive
Education In America
Backpack ready? Learn more about education in America through fun facts, national statistics and unusual schools.
"I also believe parents who are teaching their kids at home, homeschoolers, deserve a break, and I've asked for a tax credit to help parents in their homes with the cost of being an at-home teacher," he said.
Romney supports giving parents more educational options, through charter schools or vouchers, but he said legislation should be done on a state level.
"I really hesitate to have the federal government become too involved in local schools," he said.
Romney also said teachers are underpaid and better teachers should be rewarded with more money.
"I'd like to see there be a relationship between the pay of the teacher and their performance, their career track, their ability to mentor other students," Romney told more than 100 people at a children's museum in this early voting state. "We need to treat teachers like the professionals they are and not like people manufacturing widgets on an assembly line."
Romney downplayed the news that rival Rudy Giuliani had won the endorsement of televangelist Pat Robertson, touting his own endorsement from Bob Jones University chancellor Bob Jones III instead. The Christian fundamentalist school is located in conservative northwest South Carolina.
"I can't get all the social conservatives to endorse my candidacy," Romney told reporters. "I'm really pleased with the support I've got. The people who have the ultimate say are the voters."
Romney also said he was not surprised that former rival Sam Brownback threw his support behind colleague John McCain on Wednesday.
They "have worked together in the Senate for a long time and that's probably to be expected," he said.
On teacher pay, Romney said each state should decide the compensation. He said as governor, he pushed for a $15,000 bonus package for the best teachers in Massachusetts, including $5,000 bonuses for math and science teachers and $5,000 bonuses for teachers deemed in the top third of a school.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.




Nice idea Mitt, but the NEA will never allow this.
Parents are too stupid to be having more influence and control over the education of their children.
The NEA believes parents should have less involvement with their children''s education, not more. That gives them more time to teach kids how to use condomss and such.
And why should my tax dollars go to support making some kids stupid and ignorant with fairy stories about the "leaves of gold" and magic salamanders?
Parents have a say in their child''s education already. What a bunch of ***! There is a wonderful education to be had in our public schools. Many children are just not taught the value of it and to take advantage of it. It''s not the school''s fault...it''s bad parents!
Home schooling children is a choice you make...it should not get you out of the obligation of supporting your local schools. I don''t have ANY children at home, yet I pay my taxes. That''s like saying I have no fires so I shouldn''t have to support the fire department, I should get a tax credit for that.
With a tax credit you will have ever high school drop out mother keeping their kids from school to get the tax credit. WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? Home schooling is great if you''re dedicated to it, and use the programs that help you get the curriculum you need. But after the basics your children need advanced education.
I was a teacher for many years. I was held to performance and if my students weren''t up to par I had to answer for it. I was well rewarded for it. Plus I had summer''s off to be with my children.
The republicans will mouth off any anything that looks like a tax reducation and call themselves conservative. It NEVER is. I have NEVER seen taxes lowered, be it a democrat or a republican in the administration. ANY time a politician says I will lower taxes, they might put in your front pocket a dime or two, but then they hike it back out of the back one.
I''d have preferred a good low-cost flexible curriculum with help from the school system instead.
If you DON''T OWE taxes what good is a "credit" to "lower" them??
Wealthier parents can afford Private school and use vehicles like "education accounts" to wrangle tax benefits.
So, with that in mind, PLEASE rethink your idea and MAYBE as some states are doing, make more resources available for alternative/homeschool options which makes MUCH MORE sense.
Hybridizing education to meet the individual needs of a child is both more efficient and cost effective in the long run.
Colorado, Missouri and several other states have realized that and have begun offering "distance learning" programs for home-schoolers but COST keeps coming up as it''s considered an "additional expense" not part of an overall continuum.
Cookie cutter factory style teaching isn''t for everyone and this nation has lost a lot of exceptional potential leaders trying to force those "square pegs" into the "round hole" of standardization.
Encouraging and FUNDING innovation sounds better to me.
I didn''t mind the sacrifice I made. My children (Public, Private and home-schooled) have become people I''m very proud of. Each child was educated differently but it fit their needs and that''s what counts.
I like Paul''s platform but a huge unreadable block if stuff that''s NOT relevant to this topic is a waste of your efforts.
Try shorter more relevant posts and advertising in Other mediums.
I like counting candidate bumper-stickers to measure interest.
My property taxes have increased to a level that I can barely afford them but to you and your rich buddies an extra 1,000 dollars a year in property taxes is offset by the 1,000,000 tax savings you get. Most Americans saved less the 300 per year. Please tell me where our taxes have decreased.
GOP = greed over principle
-
by klingon69
November 9, 2007 1:09 PM PST
- And why should my tax dollars go to support making some kids stupid and ignorant with fairy stories about the "leaves of gold" and magic salamanders?
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 16 CommentsPosted by gkc99 at 06:44 PM : Nov 07, 2007
Probably the same reason my property tax and income tax dollars go to educate you brats in public school. Homeschoolers not only have to pay for ALL their materials out of pocket, they also have to pay taxes to support the public school system.
Not only that, but since schools get thousands of dollars per student per year, they fight against homeschoolers. Don''t try to enroll a homeschooled child into public school, they don''t want them, becasue a homeschooled child was taught sans politically correct materials. Public school students learn just what is needed to pass the standardized tests, homeschooled students get a more rounded education, it has NOTHING to do with leave of gold or holy salamanders.