WASHINGTON, Nov. 6, 2007

Congress Nears First Bush Veto Override

$23.2B Water Projects Bill Addresses Vital Infrastructure Needs Like Bridges, Levees And Dams

  • Floodwaters from Hurricane Katrina pour through a levee along Inner Harbor Navigational Canal, also known as the Industrial Canal, near downtown New Orleans, Louisiana, Aug. 30, 2005. Photo

    Floodwaters from Hurricane Katrina pour through a levee along Inner Harbor Navigational Canal, also known as the Industrial Canal, near downtown New Orleans, Louisiana, Aug. 30, 2005.  (AP (file))

(AP)  The House approved what could become the first override of a President Bush veto Tuesday, with Republicans joining Democrats in challenging the president over a $23.2 billion water resources bill that addresses pressing infrastructure needs while offering hundreds of home district projects.

"I must respectfully disagree with President Bush's veto of this important and long overdue water resources development act," said Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., the top Republican on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, in explaining the rare rebellion of the GOP faithful toward the president.

The vote was 361-54, well over the two-thirds majority needed to negate a presidential veto. The Senate, which approved the bill 81-12 in September, could cast its override vote as early as Wednesday.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said Bush's argument that the bill is fiscally irresponsible rings hollow when the White House is asking for an additional $200 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. "Fiscally responsible people maintain their infrastructure," he said. "Fiscally responsible people know that clean water and safe harbors aid our commerce and the health of our people."

Asked whether the veto override was essentially a crack in the dam - the first in perhaps a string of veto overrides as Bush's power wanes - White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said: "We'll see about that."

"One thing that the president would like to do is to make sure that he's on the right side of federal taxpayers," Perino said. "And that's what he's doing with this veto."

Bush did not veto a single bill during the first five years of his presidency, when Congress was mainly in GOP hands. He has since vetoed a stem cell research bill twice, an Iraq spending bill that set guidelines for troop withdrawal and a children's health insurance bill. He vetoed the Water Resources Development Act, or WRDA, on Nov. 2, saying it was too expensive.

Since Democrats gained control of Congress in January, Bush has issued dozens of veto threats, warning he will veto annual spending bills that go beyond his budget levels. As Congress winds down for the year, veto threats hang over a $288 billion farm bill the Senate is considering and new attempts to come up with a children's health insurance bill.

Quote

Fiscally responsible people maintain their infrastructure.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md.
The Water Resources Development Act includes hundreds of Army Corps of Engineers projects, although a large chunk of the proposed funding would go to the hurricane-hit Gulf Coast and the Florida Everglades.

Lawmakers from both parties representing those areas stressed that Bush was misguided in trying to kill the bill. "Without a Water Resources Development Act, which is seven years overdue, we are seeing our coastline disappear," said Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La.

The few critics pointed out that the Army Corps now has a backlog of $58 billion worth of projects and an annual budget of only about $2 billion to address them. "We simply can't continue to add to the backlog of projects that are already out there," said Rep. Jeff Flake., R-Ariz.

The bill, the first water system restoration and flood control authorization passed by Congress since 2000, would cost $11.2 billion over the next four years and $12 billion in the 10 years after that, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Flood protection projects along the Gulf Coast, including a 100-year levee protection in New Orleans, would cost about $7 billion if fully funded. The bill approves projects but does not fund them.

It would authorize the construction of navigation improvements for the Upper Mississippi River, at an estimated federal cost of $1.9 billion, and an ecosystem restoration project for the Upper Mississippi costing $1.7 billion.

The Indian River Lagoon project in the Florida Everglades would be funded at about $700 million.

Addressing the issue of wastefulness in past Army Corps projects, the bill calls for an independent peer review process of all Corps projects costing $45 million or more.

The Senate is expected to approve the veto override by a comfortable margin. Last month, some 20 Senate Republicans, including conservatives such as David Vitter, R-La., and Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., wrote Bush urging him to support the bill. "Hurricane Katrina and the Interstate 35 bridge collapse in Minnesota are two recent examples of the dangers in under-investing in our nation's key infrastructure," they wrote.

© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 27 Comments
by kansas1946 November 6, 2007 7:45 PM PST
About time that Repulicans acted like Americans and said no to this tin cowboy.
Reply to this comment
by condumism November 6, 2007 8:17 PM PST
Bob Dylan, 1964: The Winds They Are A Changing.

Interesting how music for the ages will always be eternal, univeral, understood by all intelligence forever.
Reply to this comment
by myidoncbs November 6, 2007 8:24 PM PST
"One thing that the president would like to do is to make sure that he''s on the right side of federal taxpayers"

HA! Is THAT what he''s been doing these last 7 years, BORROWING and SPENDING like there''s no tomorrow?

Doesn''t Bush know that being in debt is like running a race up a sand hill in flip flops, when all the other racers are on solid, flat ground, in running shoes?

We are all going to have to PAY and PAY and PAY for Bush''s rampant spending. And our children, and their children will still be paying for it! That is, IF there''s any world left after Cheney starts WW3!
Reply to this comment
by danstoned November 6, 2007 8:25 PM PST
"I must respectfully disagree with President Bush''s veto of this important and long overdue water resources development act," said Rep. John Mica, R-Fla.

Time for Florible to rid itself of anyone that insinuates respect for GW Bush. Florible Rep. John Mica (R) is part of the problem with America, not the solution. This loyal Florible fascist has got to go!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 November 6, 2007 8:33 PM PST
Absolutely!!!!
Reply to this comment
by myidoncbs November 6, 2007 8:34 PM PST
Condumism, don''t you mean, "The Times They Are A Changing"?
Reply to this comment
by my2centss November 6, 2007 8:35 PM PST
With a deficite closing in on $10 Trillion, where is all this money that they are proposing to spend coming from? I say don''t spend another penny until we pay something down.
Reply to this comment
by condumism November 6, 2007 8:38 PM PST
Posted by MyIDonCBS
Condumism, don''t you mean, "The Times They Are A Changing"?

But of course. There was a bush burnin in the neighborhood when I posted such, so I guess it made me a little woozy. Thanks for regrounding me.
Reply to this comment
by myidoncbs November 6, 2007 8:44 PM PST
my2cents suggests, "don''t spend another penny until we pay something down."

That''s a nice sentiment, but not practical. If the country''s infrastructure collapses, there will be no roads and waterways to travel, so no food, no junk at walmart, no jobs, etc. No jobs means no taxes, so no money. We can''t just shut the country down like that. Now, we could save a HEAP of money if we''d just pull our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, shut down Guantanamo and I don''t know how many secret torture camps around the world, but I doubt the Bushies will ever consider doing that.
Reply to this comment
by siete-pesos November 6, 2007 8:57 PM PST
not one southern state will vote for hillary.

the south prefers upstanding, christian , faith professing republicans

and top notch leadership like george bush, jr.

the south would like to find another prez like george bush. jr.

the southern states are considering drafting rush limbaugh to be the republican candidate.

he has all the qualifications...

fat, bigoted, republican, christian, drug user, demogogue.

oh well, that''s the south for you, folks!
Reply to this comment
by hsinco-2009 November 6, 2007 9:22 PM PST
I can''t wait to see his tantrum fit he will throw.

I will enjoy watching. Hopefully, more fun to come over the next 439 days!
Reply to this comment
by jonesforch November 6, 2007 9:25 PM PST
This city is way below sea levels. It will flood no matter what the veto does..Geesh I say give it too Hillary or any other President that wants it.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman November 6, 2007 9:53 PM PST
It''a probably just a game House republicans are playing to keep thier jobs ---- It''s the Senate repubs that are in goose step with the Fuhrer, it has yet to make it passed them.
Reply to this comment
by fairandbal November 6, 2007 10:10 PM PST
Bush only talks about protecting tax payers when vetoing things that benefit ordinary people. He''s approved hundreds of Billions of dollars to Kill Iraqi''s and to give away many more billions to his friends in the Oil Industry.

Wake up American, the GOP has no interest in you!
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman November 6, 2007 10:13 PM PST
jonesforch,,, I think it''s for alot more than protecting New Orleans from flooding, it also provides funding for starting to rebuild the entire Delta.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 November 6, 2007 10:52 PM PST
How dare these d*mn Republicans try to stick up for OUR infrastructure!!!

Obviously they need to have their GOP membership cards pulled for doing something as disgraceful as supporting American initiatives!!!
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 November 7, 2007 12:59 AM PST

Water projects are a huge boon-doggle in the U.S. I don''t know much about this particular legislation, but I might very well side with King Dipshit on this one.

Oh well. The Bush-puppet was complaining that Congress was not getting anything done. It appears that they are addressing his criticism.
Reply to this comment
by danstoned November 7, 2007 1:05 AM PST
"I must respectfully disagree with President Bush''''s veto of this important and long overdue water resources development act," said Rep. John Mica, R-Fla.

Time for Florible to rid itself of anyone that insinuates respect for GW Bush. Florible Rep. John Mica (R) is part of the problem with America, not the solution. This loyal Florible fascist has got to go!
Reply to this comment
by November 7, 2007 2:57 AM PST
Must not be any profit for Bush''s cronies.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica November 7, 2007 5:06 AM PST
You took the thoughts right out of my head, Baileycc.
Reply to this comment
by watcher269-2009 November 7, 2007 7:46 AM PST
I say that maybe its GOOD that bush didn''t try to maintain the US infrastructure - after all look at Iraq - with all the Billions of Dollars that was spent there by Bushit and Cheney to fix their infrastructure and the complete and total mess that is - I say we are better off that B&C didn''t focus on the US.

Just think how F***ed up we''d be then!!!!
Reply to this comment
by DaveGress November 7, 2007 8:00 AM PST
Take solice, the villiage of Crawford will soon have their idiot back.
Reply to this comment
by simonsez40 November 7, 2007 8:58 AM PST
Bush did not veto a single bill during the first five years of his presidency, when Congress was mainly in GOP hands. He has since vetoed a stem cell research bill twice, an Iraq spending bill that set guidelines for troop withdrawal and a children''s health insurance bill. He vetoed the Water Resources Development Act, or WRDA, on Nov. 2, saying it was too expensive.

I see Bush if it isn''t profitable or a REPUG bill then you Veto it? Moron! The Uniter WHATEVER........this bozo needs to be impeached!
Reply to this comment
by rokero69 November 7, 2007 9:15 AM PST
NOOOOooo.. we dont want him back in TEXAS!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 November 7, 2007 11:25 AM PST
rokero69,

Don''t worry, he won''t be coming back to Texas. Once his political career is over he won''t need the ranch and cowboy hat.

Besides, he can be extradited from Texas; he''ll be heading for his new ranch that Jenna bought for him in Paraguay(no extradition treaty with the U.S.or the Hague).
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 November 7, 2007 3:15 PM PST
now that china and russia and iran are freinds with cuba and are working very close to drill for oil and set up a arms deal with them...great job bush/rice/congress.

cant wait until bush and cheney come out with their own state of emergency in our country..and they will thats why cheney was the one behide black water..

its going to be his private army..because real troops will not protect them they will help us take our country back..but black water will kill anyone for money..and the 1 billion dollars that we the people gave them tax free, they make 200.000 thousand tax free dollars and are troops get payed 24000 tax dollars for doing more..

so great job americans keep closeing your eyes...
Reply to this comment
by diverdown555 November 8, 2007 5:30 PM PST
The problems in Iraq have been beyond Bush Chemey since very shortly after the Iraqi Army folded like a bunch of school girls. Then the situation was taken over by the Bureaucrat/Liberal candy a--es who are afraid to try working in the real world and prefer to take the welfare with dignity that is their paycheck from the gov. And they effed it up as usual with the give it all away mentality
Reply to this comment
See all 27 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs